top of page

CGST Act 2017 Section 164

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 164 covering power to arrest and related procedures.

The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is a comprehensive legislation that governs the levy and collection of GST in India. Section 164 of this Act specifically deals with the power to arrest a person suspected of committing certain offences under the CGST law. Understanding this section is crucial for taxpayers, professionals, and GST officials alike.

The CGST Act empowers officers to take stringent action against tax evasion and fraudulent activities. Section 164 outlines the conditions and procedures for arresting offenders, ensuring compliance and safeguarding government revenue. This section is vital for legal practitioners, businesses, and GST officers to comprehend the scope and limits of arrest powers under GST law.

Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 164 – Exact Provision

Section 164 empowers GST officers to arrest individuals suspected of committing cognizable offences under GST laws. Arrests require prior approval from the Commissioner or an authorized officer. The arrested person must be produced before a Magistrate within 24 hours, excluding travel time. This ensures a balance between enforcement and legal safeguards.

  • Applies to cognizable offences under GST laws.

  • Requires prior approval from Commissioner or authorized officer before arrest.

  • Arrest without Magistrate’s order is permitted.

  • Arrested person must be produced before Magistrate within 24 hours.

  • Ensures legal safeguards during arrest procedures.

Explanation of CGST Act Section 164

This section authorizes GST officers to arrest persons involved in serious GST offences. It applies to registered and unregistered persons suspected of tax evasion or fraud. Arrests are limited to cognizable offences and require Commissioner’s approval. The arrested individual must be promptly presented before a Magistrate to uphold legal rights.

  • Section states arrest powers for cognizable GST offences.

  • Applies to persons suspected of offences under CGST, IGST, UTGST, and Compensation Acts.

  • Prior approval from Commissioner or authorized officer is mandatory.

  • Triggering event: suspicion of cognizable offence.

  • Ensures arrested person’s production before Magistrate within 24 hours.

  • Protects against arbitrary arrests by requiring approval and judicial oversight.

Purpose and Rationale of CGST Act Section 164

This section aims to empower GST authorities to combat serious tax evasion and fraudulent activities effectively. It balances enforcement powers with procedural safeguards to prevent misuse. The provision supports uniform indirect tax administration and protects government revenue by deterring offences.

  • Ensures uniform enforcement of GST laws.

  • Prevents tax evasion and revenue loss.

  • Streamlines arrest procedures under GST.

  • Protects legal rights of suspects through approval and judicial oversight.

  • Supports effective compliance and deterrence.

When CGST Act Section 164 Applies

Section 164 applies when a GST officer suspects a cognizable offence under GST laws. It is relevant during investigations of serious violations involving goods or services. Arrest powers are exercised only after approval and when offences warrant such action.

  • Applies to offences involving goods or services under GST.

  • Relevant during investigation of cognizable offences.

  • Triggered by suspicion of serious tax evasion or fraud.

  • Requires prior approval before arrest.

  • Not applicable for minor or non-cognizable offences.

Tax Treatment and Legal Effect under CGST Act Section 164

Section 164 does not directly affect tax computation but impacts enforcement of tax laws. Arresting offenders helps prevent tax evasion and ensures compliance. It interacts with provisions on offences, penalties, and prosecution under GST law, reinforcing legal consequences for violations.

  • Enables enforcement of GST tax laws through arrest.

  • Supports recovery of evaded tax by deterring offenders.

  • Interacts with penalty and prosecution provisions.

Nature of Obligation or Benefit under CGST Act Section 164

This section creates a compliance obligation by authorizing arrest of offenders. It imposes a legal obligation on GST officers to follow due process. Taxpayers benefit from deterrence of fraudulent activities ensuring a fair tax environment. The obligation is mandatory for officers but conditional on offence severity.

  • Creates mandatory compliance obligation for GST officers.

  • Conditional power based on cognizable offence suspicion.

  • Benefits taxpayers by deterring fraud and evasion.

  • Ensures procedural safeguards during arrest.

Stage of GST Process Where Section Applies

Section 164 applies during investigation and enforcement stages of GST compliance. It is relevant when offences are detected or suspected. Arrests occur before or during prosecution, supporting assessment, audit, and recovery processes.

  • Investigation and enforcement stage.

  • During detection of cognizable offences.

  • Before or during prosecution proceedings.

  • Supports assessment, audit, and recovery.

Penalties, Interest, or Consequences under CGST Act Section 164

While Section 164 itself does not prescribe penalties or interest, arrest under this section leads to prosecution and penalties under GST law. Non-compliance or obstruction of arrest can attract additional legal consequences. Arrest is a serious enforcement tool with significant legal impact.

  • Arrest can lead to prosecution and penalties.

  • Non-compliance may attract further legal action.

  • Deters serious GST offences through stringent enforcement.

Example of CGST Act Section 164 in Practical Use

Taxpayer X is suspected of deliberately evading GST by falsifying invoices worth crores. The GST officer, after gathering evidence, obtains prior approval from the Commissioner. Taxpayer X is arrested under Section 164 without Magistrate order and produced before Magistrate within 24 hours. This action helps prevent further evasion and initiates prosecution.

  • Arrest requires prior Commissioner approval.

  • Ensures timely judicial oversight.

Historical Background of CGST Act Section 164

Introduced in 2017 with GST rollout, Section 164 replaced arrest provisions under earlier indirect tax laws. It was designed to empower officers to act swiftly against serious offences. Amendments have clarified approval processes and safeguards to balance enforcement and rights.

  • Introduced with GST implementation in 2017.

  • Replaced arrest provisions from previous tax laws.

  • Amended for procedural clarity and safeguards.

Modern Relevance of CGST Act Section 164

In 2026, Section 164 remains vital for enforcing GST compliance. Digital tools like GSTN and e-invoicing help detect offences early. Arrest powers support deterrence in a complex digital tax environment, ensuring revenue protection and compliance.

  • Supports enforcement in digital GST ecosystem.

  • Relevant for combating sophisticated tax evasion.

  • Ensures compliance with evolving GST policies.

Related Sections

  • CGST Act, 2017 Section 7 – Scope of supply.

  • CGST Act, 2017 Section 9 – Levy and collection of tax.

  • CGST Act, 2017 Section 16 – Eligibility for input tax credit.

  • CGST Act, 2017 Section 31 – Tax invoice.

  • CGST Act, 2017 Section 39 – Furnishing of returns.

  • CGST Act, 2017 Section 73 – Demand for non-fraud cases.

Case References under CGST Act Section 164

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for CGST Act Section 164

  • Section: 164

  • Title: Power to Arrest and Procedures

  • Category: Offences and Enforcement

  • Applies To: Persons suspected of cognizable GST offences

  • Tax Impact: Supports enforcement, no direct tax effect

  • Compliance Requirement: Prior approval for arrest, production before Magistrate

  • Related Forms/Returns: Not applicable

Conclusion on CGST Act Section 164

Section 164 of the CGST Act, 2017 is a critical provision empowering GST officers to arrest individuals suspected of serious tax offences. It balances enforcement powers with procedural safeguards, requiring prior approval and judicial oversight. This ensures that arrests are lawful and justified.

Understanding this section is essential for taxpayers and professionals to appreciate the legal consequences of GST offences. It reinforces the government's commitment to curb tax evasion and maintain a fair tax system. Proper compliance and awareness can help avoid severe legal actions under this section.

FAQs on CGST Act Section 164

What offences allow arrest under Section 164?

Only cognizable offences under GST laws, such as serious tax evasion or fraud, permit arrest under Section 164. Minor offences do not qualify.

Is prior approval required before arrest?

Yes, the GST officer must obtain prior approval from the Commissioner or an authorized officer before making an arrest under this section.

Can a person be arrested without Magistrate’s order?

Yes, arrest can be made without a Magistrate’s order, but the arrested person must be produced before the Magistrate within 24 hours.

What happens after arrest under Section 164?

The arrested person is produced before a Magistrate who decides on further custody or bail. Prosecution may follow based on offence severity.

Does Section 164 apply to unregistered persons?

Yes, it applies to any person suspected of committing a cognizable offence under GST laws, regardless of registration status.

Related Sections

Section 194LA of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on compensation for compulsory acquisition of immovable property in India.

Section 142A of the Income Tax Act 1961 allows the tax officer to electronically record statements during assessments in India.

CrPC Section 350 details the procedure for conducting an inquiry by a Magistrate into an offence, ensuring fair and lawful investigation.

CrPC Section 183 defines the procedure for recording information about offences by a Magistrate upon receiving a police report or complaint.

IPC Section 170 defines punishment for knowingly furnishing false information to public servants during legal proceedings.

Companies Act 2013 Section 448 defines punishment for false statements in documents submitted to authorities.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 131A defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 77 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Camera drones are conditionally legal in India with strict regulations under DGCA and IT laws.

Running contests in India is legal if you follow rules under the Prize Competition Act and related laws.

Catholic marriage is legal in India under the Indian Christian Marriage Act, with specific rights and procedures.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 143 defines the presumption of ownership for possession, aiding proof of title in disputes.

CPC Section 81 covers the procedure for transferring suits from one court to another for convenience or justice.

Companies Act 2013 Section 22 governs the use of the word 'Limited' or 'Private Limited' in company names in India.

IT Act Section 24 defines the power to issue directions by the Controller for secure electronic records and digital signatures.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 136 mandates the filing of income tax returns in prescribed forms and formats.

Boosted Boards are illegal in India due to motor vehicle laws and lack of registration provisions.

IPC Section 367 defines kidnapping or abducting in order to subject a person to grievous hurt, slavery, or wrongful confinement.

IPC Section 162 prohibits public servants from disclosing information obtained during official duties without authorization.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 134 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder of a negotiable instrument.

IPC Section 185 penalizes public servants who disobey lawful orders, ensuring accountability in official duties.

Income Tax Act Section 271FAB imposes penalty for failure to furnish statement of financial transaction or reportable account.

IPC Section 171B penalizes knowingly joining or continuing in an unlawful assembly to commit an offence.

IPC Section 347 defines wrongful confinement, outlining unlawful restriction of a person's freedom of movement.

Understand the legal status of Ocean Of Games in India and the risks of using such game download sites.

IPC Section 108 defines the offence of abetment of a thing, explaining when a person is liable for abetting a crime.

CrPC Section 52 defines the procedure for releasing accused on bail or bond to ensure their appearance in court.

bottom of page