top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 144

Companies Act 2013 Section 144 governs the power of the Central Government to remove names of companies from the register of companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 144 empowers the Central Government to remove the name of a company from the register of companies. This provision plays a crucial role in maintaining an updated and accurate registry by removing defunct or non-compliant companies.

Understanding Section 144 is essential for directors, shareholders, and professionals to ensure compliance and avoid penalties. It also helps companies manage their corporate status and legal obligations effectively.

Companies Act Section 144 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes the Central Government to remove a company's name from the official register if it has been inactive for two consecutive financial years and has not applied to be declared dormant. This helps clear the register of inactive companies, promoting transparency and preventing misuse.

  • Applies when a company is inactive for two consecutive financial years.

  • Requires no application for dormant status under Section 455.

  • Central Government can initiate removal on its own or on application.

  • Removal results in company ceasing to exist legally.

  • Ensures the register reflects active companies only.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 144

Section 144 deals with the removal of a company's name from the register due to inactivity.

  • The section states that the Central Government may remove a company’s name if it has not carried on business for two financial years.

  • It applies to all companies registered under the Act.

  • The company must not have applied for dormant status under Section 455.

  • Removal can be initiated by any person or by the government itself.

  • The company is prohibited from continuing business after removal.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 144

This section aims to maintain an accurate and reliable register of companies by removing inactive entities.

  • Strengthens corporate governance by ensuring only active companies remain registered.

  • Protects stakeholders by preventing misuse of inactive companies.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability in corporate records.

  • Prevents clutter and outdated information in the register.

When Companies Act Section 144 Applies

Section 144 applies when a company has been inactive for two consecutive financial years without applying for dormant status.

  • Applicable to all companies registered under the Companies Act.

  • Triggered after two years of inactivity.

  • Applies if no dormant company application is made under Section 455.

  • Any person or government can initiate the removal process.

  • Exceptions include companies with ongoing operations or dormant status.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 144

Section 144 creates a legal mechanism for removing inactive companies from the register, effectively dissolving them.

This provision imposes a restriction on companies to maintain active business or apply for dormant status. Non-compliance leads to removal and cessation of legal existence.

The Central Government’s order under this section is final and binding, impacting the company’s ability to operate or enter contracts.

It interacts with MCA rules on company status and filing requirements.

  • Creates duty to maintain active status or apply for dormant status.

  • Removal leads to legal dissolution of the company.

  • Non-compliance results in loss of corporate identity.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 144

Compliance under Section 144 is conditional and triggered by inactivity.

Companies must either carry on business or apply for dormant status to avoid removal.

Responsibility lies primarily with directors to ensure timely filings and status updates.

This impacts internal governance by requiring monitoring of company activity and compliance status.

  • Compliance is conditional based on company activity.

  • Ongoing obligation to maintain business or dormant status.

  • Directors must ensure proper filings and disclosures.

  • Failure to comply risks removal and dissolution.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 144 applies during the ongoing compliance stage of a company’s lifecycle.

  • Not applicable at incorporation or initial board decisions.

  • Triggered after two years of inactivity during ongoing compliance.

  • Filing and disclosure stage involves monitoring company activity.

  • Applies before any final action of removal by the government.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 144

The primary consequence under Section 144 is the removal of the company’s name from the register, leading to legal dissolution.

There are no direct monetary penalties or imprisonment under this section.

However, directors may face consequences if non-compliance relates to other provisions.

Additional fees or remedial actions may be required for reinstatement if allowed.

  • Removal from register results in company ceasing to exist.

  • No direct fines or imprisonment under this section.

  • Possible indirect consequences for directors under other laws.

  • Reinstatement may require compliance and fees.

Example of Companies Act Section 144 in Practical Use

Company X has not conducted any business or filed financial statements for two consecutive years. It also did not apply for dormant status under Section 455. The Central Government, upon receiving a complaint, issued an order under Section 144 removing Company X’s name from the register. As a result, Company X ceased to exist legally, and its directors could no longer act on its behalf.

  • Demonstrates government’s power to remove inactive companies.

  • Highlights importance of compliance or dormant status application.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 144

Section 144 was introduced in the Companies Act 2013 to replace similar provisions under the Companies Act 1956.

The reform aimed to streamline the removal process and address the increasing number of inactive companies.

It reflects a modern approach to corporate regulation and registry management.

  • Replaced older provisions from the 1956 Act.

  • Introduced to improve registry accuracy.

  • Part of broader reforms in the 2013 Act.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 144

In 2026, Section 144 remains vital for maintaining clean and updated corporate records.

Digital filings and MCA portal facilitate monitoring company activity and triggering removal.

It supports governance reforms and compliance trends emphasizing transparency.

  • Enables digital compliance and monitoring.

  • Supports governance reforms by removing defunct companies.

  • Ensures practical importance in corporate regulation today.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 455 – Dormant companies.

  • Companies Act Section 248 – Power of Registrar to remove name of company.

  • Companies Act Section 252 – Effect of removal of name.

  • IPC Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 144

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 144

  • Section: 144

  • Title: Power to Remove Name of Company

  • Category: Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: All companies registered under the Act

  • Compliance Nature: Conditional, ongoing obligation to maintain activity or dormant status

  • Penalties: Removal from register, legal dissolution

  • Related Filings: Dormant company application under Section 455

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 144

Section 144 is a key provision empowering the Central Government to maintain an accurate register of companies by removing those inactive for two consecutive years. This ensures that only active or properly dormant companies remain on record, promoting transparency and good corporate governance.

For directors and shareholders, understanding this section is critical to avoid unintended dissolution. Timely compliance, including applying for dormant status if inactive, can prevent removal. Overall, Section 144 supports a clean corporate environment and protects stakeholders’ interests.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 144

What triggers the removal of a company’s name under Section 144?

A company’s name can be removed if it has not carried on business for two consecutive financial years and has not applied for dormant status under Section 455.

Who can initiate the removal process under Section 144?

The Central Government can initiate removal on its own or upon an application made by any person.

What happens to a company after its name is removed under Section 144?

The company ceases to exist legally and cannot carry on any business or operations.

Is there any penalty besides removal under Section 144?

Section 144 does not impose monetary penalties or imprisonment, but removal results in legal dissolution of the company.

Can a removed company be reinstated?

Reinstatement is possible but requires compliance with conditions, payment of fees, and approval from the appropriate authority.

Related Sections

IPC Section 204 covers the procedure for Magistrate to issue process for appearance or production of documents in a criminal case.

Companies Act 2013 Section 87 governs the power of the Tribunal to order rectification of the register of members.

CrPC Section 121 defines the offence of waging war against the Government of India and its legal consequences.

IPC Section 349 defines force used against a person without consent, covering its scope and legal implications.

CrPC Section 383 defines the offence of extortion and its legal implications under Indian criminal law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 159 governs the appointment and term of office of auditors in Indian companies.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(11) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

CrPC Section 253 empowers the High Court to transfer cases for fair trial and proper administration of justice.

Companies Act 2013 Section 15 governs the formation of companies with charitable objects and their registration requirements.

CrPC Section 366 details the procedure for sending a person accused of an offence to another jurisdiction for trial or investigation.

Companies Act 2013 Section 55 governs the issue and regulation of preference shares in Indian companies.

IPC Section 34 addresses acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention, ensuring joint liability.

CPC Section 109 details the procedure for transferring suits from one civil court to another for convenience or justice.

CrPC Section 222 details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in criminal cases.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 98 details the power of the Central Government to make rules for effective implementation of the Act.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 107 details the power of the Central Government to make rules for effective consumer protection.

Companies Act 2013 Section 60 governs the rectification of the register of members and related corporate compliance.

Contract Act 1872 Section 74 explains compensation for breach of contract when no specific sum is agreed.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 47A governs the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts.

CrPC Section 152 mandates police officers to register an FIR upon receiving information about a cognizable offence.

IPC Section 354C criminalizes voyeurism, protecting individuals from unauthorized spying or capturing private acts.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(2) defines 'goods' and their scope under the Act for consumer rights and protection.

CrPC Section 134 details the procedure for trial of summons cases by Magistrates in India.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(3) defines 'goods' including movable property and their importance in consumer rights.

CrPC Section 437A details the procedure for granting bail to accused during trial for offences punishable with imprisonment up to seven years.

IPC Section 279 addresses rash and negligent driving or riding on public roads, penalizing acts endangering human life or safety.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 60 defines oral evidence as statements made by witnesses verbally, crucial for proving facts in court.

bottom of page