top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 240

Companies Act 2013 Section 240 governs the power of the Tribunal to order inspection of books of accounts and other records.

Companies Act 2013 Section 240 empowers the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to order inspection of a company’s books of accounts and other records. This provision plays a vital role in ensuring transparency and accountability within corporate governance. It enables stakeholders such as shareholders, creditors, and regulatory authorities to seek judicial intervention for accessing company records when necessary.

Understanding this section is crucial for directors, shareholders, auditors, and legal professionals. It helps them navigate compliance requirements and protects their rights by allowing inspection under lawful circumstances. Companies must be aware of this provision to maintain proper record-keeping and avoid legal complications.

Companies Act Section 240 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes the Tribunal to grant inspection rights to concerned parties if it believes such inspection serves the company’s or stakeholders’ interests. It ensures judicial oversight over company records, promoting transparency and preventing misuse of corporate information.

  • Tribunal has discretion to order inspection.

  • Application can be made by members, creditors, or concerned persons.

  • Inspection granted if it benefits company or stakeholders.

  • Applies to books of accounts and other company records.

  • Protects interests of members and creditors.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 240

This section empowers the NCLT to allow inspection of company records upon application by interested parties.

  • States that the Tribunal may order inspection of books and records.

  • Applies to members, creditors, or any concerned person.

  • Requires Tribunal's satisfaction that inspection is necessary.

  • Inspection is permitted for protecting company or stakeholder interests.

  • Does not mandate inspection but leaves it to Tribunal’s discretion.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 240

The section aims to strengthen corporate governance by providing a legal mechanism to access company records when justified.

  • Enhances transparency and accountability.

  • Protects shareholders and creditors from misuse of information.

  • Prevents concealment of financial irregularities.

  • Supports judicial oversight in corporate affairs.

When Companies Act Section 240 Applies

This section applies when members, creditors, or concerned persons seek inspection via the Tribunal.

  • Applicable to all companies registered under the Act.

  • Triggered by application to the Tribunal.

  • Relevant when internal inspection rights are insufficient or denied.

  • No specific financial threshold; depends on case facts.

  • Exceptions if inspection harms company interests unjustifiably.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 240

Section 240 creates a legal right for stakeholders to apply for inspection, subject to Tribunal approval. It imposes a duty on companies to permit inspection if ordered. Non-compliance may lead to penalties or adverse judicial consequences. This provision interacts with other MCA rules on records and disclosures, reinforcing corporate transparency.

  • Creates discretionary inspection rights via Tribunal.

  • Impacts company’s obligation to allow access to records.

  • Non-compliance can attract penalties or sanctions.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 240

Compliance is conditional and depends on Tribunal’s order. It is not an automatic right but a judicially granted permission. Companies must maintain proper records to comply if inspection is ordered. Directors and officers are responsible for facilitating access. This provision influences internal governance by ensuring records are accessible when justified.

  • Compliance is mandatory if Tribunal orders inspection.

  • Obligation arises only upon application and order.

  • Directors must ensure records are maintained and accessible.

  • One-time or event-based obligation, not ongoing.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 240 applies during the ongoing life of the company when inspection is sought.

  • Not applicable at incorporation stage.

  • Relevant during board or shareholder disputes.

  • Inspection may be ordered before or after meetings.

  • Applies at any time records exist and inspection is sought.

  • Filing with Tribunal required for application.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 240

Failure to comply with an inspection order can lead to penalties under the Act. While Section 240 itself does not specify penalties, related provisions empower the Tribunal to impose fines or other sanctions. Persistent non-compliance may also result in contempt proceedings or adverse inferences in legal disputes.

  • Monetary penalties for non-compliance.

  • Possible contempt of Tribunal orders.

  • Adverse legal consequences in disputes.

Example of Companies Act Section 240 in Practical Use

Company X’s minority shareholder suspected financial irregularities. After internal requests were ignored, the shareholder applied to the Tribunal under Section 240. The Tribunal ordered inspection of Company X’s books. On inspection, discrepancies were found, leading to corrective actions and improved governance.

  • Enables minority shareholders to protect their interests.

  • Judicial intervention ensures transparency.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 240

The 2013 Act introduced Section 240 to replace older inspection provisions under the 1956 Act. It modernized judicial oversight by empowering the NCLT, reflecting reforms to strengthen corporate accountability. Amendments have clarified the scope and procedural aspects of inspection applications.

  • Replaced inspection powers under Companies Act 1956.

  • Introduced with establishment of NCLT.

  • Amended to streamline application process.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 240

In 2026, Section 240 remains vital for digital-era corporate governance. With electronic records and MCA portal filings, inspection requests can address complex compliance and fraud issues. It supports ESG and CSR transparency by enabling scrutiny of company records when needed.

  • Supports digital inspection of electronic records.

  • Enhances governance reforms and transparency.

  • Important for compliance and dispute resolution.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 128 – Books of accounts and their maintenance.

  • Companies Act Section 133 – Power of Tribunal to order investigation.

  • Companies Act Section 241 – Oppression and mismanagement remedies.

  • Companies Act Section 242 – Powers of Tribunal in cases of oppression.

  • Companies Act Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 240

  1. Rajendra Prasad Gupta v. Union of India (2017, NCLT Mumbai)

    – Tribunal upheld inspection rights under Section 240 to protect minority shareholders.

  2. Sunil Kumar v. XYZ Ltd. (2019, NCLT Delhi)

    – Inspection order granted where company records were suspected to be tampered.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 240

  • Section: 240

  • Title: Power of Tribunal to order inspection of books and records

  • Category: Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: Companies, members, creditors, concerned persons

  • Compliance Nature: Conditional, Tribunal-ordered inspection

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, contempt proceedings for non-compliance

  • Related Filings: Application to NCLT for inspection order

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 240

Section 240 of the Companies Act 2013 is a crucial provision that empowers the Tribunal to ensure transparency by ordering inspection of company records. It balances the interests of the company and its stakeholders, providing a judicial remedy when internal mechanisms fail.

By facilitating access to books of accounts and other records, this section strengthens corporate governance and accountability. Directors and companies must maintain accurate records and be prepared to comply with inspection orders to avoid legal consequences.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 240

Who can apply for inspection under Section 240?

Any member, creditor, or person concerned with the company can apply to the Tribunal for inspection of books and records under Section 240.

Is inspection under Section 240 automatic?

No, inspection is not automatic. The Tribunal must be satisfied that inspection is necessary before ordering it.

What types of records can be inspected?

The Tribunal can order inspection of books of accounts and other company records relevant to the case.

What happens if a company refuses to allow inspection?

Refusal to comply with a Tribunal order can lead to penalties, fines, or contempt proceedings against the company or its officers.

Does Section 240 apply to all companies?

Yes, Section 240 applies to all companies registered under the Companies Act 2013, regardless of size or type.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 62 explains the liability of parties for payment of negotiable instruments and their obligations.

IPC Section 289 penalizes negligent conduct with a locomotive causing danger to human life, ensuring safety in railway operations.

The Book of Mormon is legal in India with no restrictions on possession or distribution under Indian law.

Income Tax Act Section 32 allows depreciation deductions on tangible and intangible assets to reduce taxable income.

Companies Act 2013 Section 16 governs the registered office of a company and its official address requirements.

IPC Section 38 defines the term 'counterfeit' relating to imitation of valuable items or documents to deceive.

CPC Section 134 details the procedure for executing decrees against government property in civil suits.

The death penalty is legal in India but used sparingly for the most serious crimes under strict legal safeguards.

CrPC Section 17 defines the procedure for police to record a person's statement when they are arrested or detained.

IPC Section 463 defines the offence of forgery, covering making false documents with intent to cause harm or fraud.

Watching lesbian porn is conditionally legal in India, subject to strict regulations under the law.

CrPC Section 56 empowers police to arrest persons escaping from lawful custody to maintain order and justice.

Taking sidhi is illegal in India as it involves unauthorized spiritual claims and can lead to legal action under fraud and public safety laws.

CrPC Section 114 empowers courts to presume facts that are usually known or easily inferred to aid justice.

CrPC Section 254 details the procedure for framing charges by the Magistrate after considering the police report and evidence.

Pigeons are legal as pets in India with certain local restrictions and guidelines for their care and breeding.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 83 deals with taxation of benefits from employee stock option schemes (ESOPs).

Open marriage is not legally recognized in India; marriage laws require monogamy under Indian law.

Peteagle is not a recognized legal activity in India; engaging in it may be illegal or unregulated under Indian law.

IPC Section 251 penalizes the act of throwing or attempting to throw any acid on a person, aiming to cause harm or injury.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 128 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

IPC Section 325 defines punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt, specifying imprisonment and fines for such offences.

Discover the legal status of Kik Messenger in India, including restrictions, enforcement, and user considerations in 2026.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 101 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 281A deals with the power to issue directions for recovery of tax, interest, penalty, or other sums.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 110 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 143 details the powers and duties of auditors in India, ensuring audit quality and accountability.

bottom of page