top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 240

Companies Act 2013 Section 240 governs the power of the Tribunal to order inspection of books of accounts and other records.

Companies Act 2013 Section 240 empowers the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to order inspection of a company’s books of accounts and other records. This provision plays a vital role in ensuring transparency and accountability within corporate governance. It enables stakeholders such as shareholders, creditors, and regulatory authorities to seek judicial intervention for accessing company records when necessary.

Understanding this section is crucial for directors, shareholders, auditors, and legal professionals. It helps them navigate compliance requirements and protects their rights by allowing inspection under lawful circumstances. Companies must be aware of this provision to maintain proper record-keeping and avoid legal complications.

Companies Act Section 240 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes the Tribunal to grant inspection rights to concerned parties if it believes such inspection serves the company’s or stakeholders’ interests. It ensures judicial oversight over company records, promoting transparency and preventing misuse of corporate information.

  • Tribunal has discretion to order inspection.

  • Application can be made by members, creditors, or concerned persons.

  • Inspection granted if it benefits company or stakeholders.

  • Applies to books of accounts and other company records.

  • Protects interests of members and creditors.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 240

This section empowers the NCLT to allow inspection of company records upon application by interested parties.

  • States that the Tribunal may order inspection of books and records.

  • Applies to members, creditors, or any concerned person.

  • Requires Tribunal's satisfaction that inspection is necessary.

  • Inspection is permitted for protecting company or stakeholder interests.

  • Does not mandate inspection but leaves it to Tribunal’s discretion.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 240

The section aims to strengthen corporate governance by providing a legal mechanism to access company records when justified.

  • Enhances transparency and accountability.

  • Protects shareholders and creditors from misuse of information.

  • Prevents concealment of financial irregularities.

  • Supports judicial oversight in corporate affairs.

When Companies Act Section 240 Applies

This section applies when members, creditors, or concerned persons seek inspection via the Tribunal.

  • Applicable to all companies registered under the Act.

  • Triggered by application to the Tribunal.

  • Relevant when internal inspection rights are insufficient or denied.

  • No specific financial threshold; depends on case facts.

  • Exceptions if inspection harms company interests unjustifiably.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 240

Section 240 creates a legal right for stakeholders to apply for inspection, subject to Tribunal approval. It imposes a duty on companies to permit inspection if ordered. Non-compliance may lead to penalties or adverse judicial consequences. This provision interacts with other MCA rules on records and disclosures, reinforcing corporate transparency.

  • Creates discretionary inspection rights via Tribunal.

  • Impacts company’s obligation to allow access to records.

  • Non-compliance can attract penalties or sanctions.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 240

Compliance is conditional and depends on Tribunal’s order. It is not an automatic right but a judicially granted permission. Companies must maintain proper records to comply if inspection is ordered. Directors and officers are responsible for facilitating access. This provision influences internal governance by ensuring records are accessible when justified.

  • Compliance is mandatory if Tribunal orders inspection.

  • Obligation arises only upon application and order.

  • Directors must ensure records are maintained and accessible.

  • One-time or event-based obligation, not ongoing.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 240 applies during the ongoing life of the company when inspection is sought.

  • Not applicable at incorporation stage.

  • Relevant during board or shareholder disputes.

  • Inspection may be ordered before or after meetings.

  • Applies at any time records exist and inspection is sought.

  • Filing with Tribunal required for application.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 240

Failure to comply with an inspection order can lead to penalties under the Act. While Section 240 itself does not specify penalties, related provisions empower the Tribunal to impose fines or other sanctions. Persistent non-compliance may also result in contempt proceedings or adverse inferences in legal disputes.

  • Monetary penalties for non-compliance.

  • Possible contempt of Tribunal orders.

  • Adverse legal consequences in disputes.

Example of Companies Act Section 240 in Practical Use

Company X’s minority shareholder suspected financial irregularities. After internal requests were ignored, the shareholder applied to the Tribunal under Section 240. The Tribunal ordered inspection of Company X’s books. On inspection, discrepancies were found, leading to corrective actions and improved governance.

  • Enables minority shareholders to protect their interests.

  • Judicial intervention ensures transparency.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 240

The 2013 Act introduced Section 240 to replace older inspection provisions under the 1956 Act. It modernized judicial oversight by empowering the NCLT, reflecting reforms to strengthen corporate accountability. Amendments have clarified the scope and procedural aspects of inspection applications.

  • Replaced inspection powers under Companies Act 1956.

  • Introduced with establishment of NCLT.

  • Amended to streamline application process.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 240

In 2026, Section 240 remains vital for digital-era corporate governance. With electronic records and MCA portal filings, inspection requests can address complex compliance and fraud issues. It supports ESG and CSR transparency by enabling scrutiny of company records when needed.

  • Supports digital inspection of electronic records.

  • Enhances governance reforms and transparency.

  • Important for compliance and dispute resolution.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 128 – Books of accounts and their maintenance.

  • Companies Act Section 133 – Power of Tribunal to order investigation.

  • Companies Act Section 241 – Oppression and mismanagement remedies.

  • Companies Act Section 242 – Powers of Tribunal in cases of oppression.

  • Companies Act Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 240

  1. Rajendra Prasad Gupta v. Union of India (2017, NCLT Mumbai)

    – Tribunal upheld inspection rights under Section 240 to protect minority shareholders.

  2. Sunil Kumar v. XYZ Ltd. (2019, NCLT Delhi)

    – Inspection order granted where company records were suspected to be tampered.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 240

  • Section: 240

  • Title: Power of Tribunal to order inspection of books and records

  • Category: Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: Companies, members, creditors, concerned persons

  • Compliance Nature: Conditional, Tribunal-ordered inspection

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, contempt proceedings for non-compliance

  • Related Filings: Application to NCLT for inspection order

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 240

Section 240 of the Companies Act 2013 is a crucial provision that empowers the Tribunal to ensure transparency by ordering inspection of company records. It balances the interests of the company and its stakeholders, providing a judicial remedy when internal mechanisms fail.

By facilitating access to books of accounts and other records, this section strengthens corporate governance and accountability. Directors and companies must maintain accurate records and be prepared to comply with inspection orders to avoid legal consequences.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 240

Who can apply for inspection under Section 240?

Any member, creditor, or person concerned with the company can apply to the Tribunal for inspection of books and records under Section 240.

Is inspection under Section 240 automatic?

No, inspection is not automatic. The Tribunal must be satisfied that inspection is necessary before ordering it.

What types of records can be inspected?

The Tribunal can order inspection of books of accounts and other company records relevant to the case.

What happens if a company refuses to allow inspection?

Refusal to comply with a Tribunal order can lead to penalties, fines, or contempt proceedings against the company or its officers.

Does Section 240 apply to all companies?

Yes, Section 240 applies to all companies registered under the Companies Act 2013, regardless of size or type.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Kino betting is illegal in India with strict enforcement under gambling laws and no legal exceptions.

CPC Section 149 defines the power of the court to order the arrest of a judgment-debtor for willful disobedience of its decree.

Smoking marijuana is illegal in India except for limited medical or scientific use under strict laws.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 276 deals with prosecution for failure to comply with tax obligations.

IPC Section 399 defines the offence of dacoity, involving robbery by five or more persons acting together.

CrPC Section 403 defines the offence of dishonest misappropriation of property entrusted to a person.

Understand the legal status and authenticity of Online Legal India as a company in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 359 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint a receiver or manager for company property.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 269US prohibits cash transactions above specified limits to curb tax evasion.

Companies Act 2013 Section 84 governs the procedure for redemption of preference shares by companies in India.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 87 covering appeals to Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

IPC Section 376B addresses sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife during her pregnancy, defining it as an offence to protect maternal health.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 161 covers the examination of witnesses by police during investigation, crucial for admissibility and proof in trials.

Quail farming is legal in India with regulations on animal welfare and business licensing.

Contract Act 1872 Section 33 covers the legality of agreements made without free consent, impacting contract enforceability.

Automatic rifles are illegal in India except under strict licenses for defense and law enforcement.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 6 covering interstate supply and its GST implications.

CrPC Section 198A mandates police to register FIR for offences under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, ensuring prompt legal action.

IPC Section 220 defines the offence of wrongful confinement by a public servant, detailing its scope and punishment.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 31 defines the liability of the drawee of a bill of exchange upon acceptance.

Understand the legality of assignment of tenancy rights in India, including rules, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

Companies Act 2013 Section 135 mandates corporate social responsibility obligations for qualifying companies in India.

Ixil exhausts are generally illegal in India due to strict noise and emission regulations.

CrPC Section 360 deals with the power of the court to release offenders on probation of good conduct instead of sentencing them.

Companies Act 2013 Section 466 details the procedure for winding up under the Companies Act, 1956, as repealed and saved.

IPC Section 34 addresses acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention, ensuring joint liability.

In India, mature consensual sex without marriage is legal if both partners are adults aged 18 or above, with strict laws protecting consent and age.

bottom of page