top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 260

Companies Act 2013 Section 260 governs the procedure for removal of directors before expiry of their term.

Companies Act 2013 Section 260 deals with the removal of directors before the expiry of their term by the company’s members. This provision is crucial for maintaining effective corporate governance by allowing shareholders to hold directors accountable.

Understanding this section is essential for directors, shareholders, company secretaries, and legal professionals to ensure compliance and proper management of company affairs. It balances the powers between the board and shareholders, promoting transparency and accountability.

Companies Act Section 260 – Exact Provision

This section empowers shareholders to remove a director through an ordinary resolution passed at a general meeting. The director must be given a fair chance to present their case before removal. This ensures procedural fairness and protects directors from arbitrary dismissal.

  • Removal requires a general meeting and ordinary resolution.

  • Director must be given reasonable opportunity to be heard.

  • Applies to all directors except those appointed by the Tribunal or under special provisions.

  • Ensures shareholder control over board composition.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 260

This section sets out the process for removing directors before their term ends.

  • States that shareholders can remove directors by ordinary resolution.

  • Applies to directors of all types of companies except where otherwise provided.

  • Mandates giving the director a chance to be heard.

  • Triggered by shareholder dissatisfaction or governance concerns.

  • Permits removal without assigning cause, but procedural fairness is required.

  • Prohibits removal without a proper meeting and notice.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 260

This section strengthens corporate governance by empowering shareholders to remove directors who are not performing or acting against company interests.

  • Enhances accountability of directors to shareholders.

  • Protects shareholders’ rights to influence management.

  • Promotes transparency in director removal process.

  • Prevents misuse of directorship and protects company interests.

When Companies Act Section 260 Applies

The section applies whenever shareholders decide to remove a director before term expiry.

  • Applicable to all companies with directors appointed by members.

  • Must be invoked through a general meeting with proper notice.

  • Applies irrespective of company size or capital.

  • Exceptions include directors appointed by Tribunal or special provisions.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 260

This provision creates a statutory right for shareholders to remove directors early, imposing a duty to follow due process. It restricts directors from holding office against shareholder wishes once removed legally. Non-compliance can invalidate removal and lead to disputes.

The section interacts with MCA rules on notice and meeting procedures, ensuring transparency and fairness.

  • Creates duty to hold a proper meeting for removal.

  • Requires reasonable opportunity for director to be heard.

  • Non-compliance may result in legal challenges.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 260

Compliance is mandatory when shareholders seek to remove a director. The company must follow prescribed procedures, including notice and hearing. This is a one-time obligation per removal event but may recur if multiple removals occur.

Directors and officers must cooperate with the process to maintain governance standards.

  • Mandatory compliance with meeting and notice rules.

  • One-time obligation per removal.

  • Responsibility lies with company secretaries and board.

  • Ensures internal governance integrity.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section applies primarily at the shareholder decision-making stage during a general meeting convened for removal.

  • Board may propose or respond to removal.

  • Shareholder approval required at general meeting.

  • Filing with Registrar of Companies after removal.

  • Ongoing compliance with disclosure and governance post-removal.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 260

Failure to comply with Section 260 procedures can lead to invalid removal, legal disputes, and reputational damage. There are no direct penalties for improper removal, but consequences include restoration of director and possible compensation claims.

  • Invalid removal if due process not followed.

  • Possible court intervention to reinstate director.

  • Reputational and governance risks.

Example of Companies Act Section 260 in Practical Use

Company X held an annual general meeting where shareholders passed an ordinary resolution to remove Director Y for non-performance. Director Y was given notice and an opportunity to be heard before the vote. The removal complied with Section 260, and the company filed necessary forms with MCA.

  • Shows importance of procedural fairness.

  • Demonstrates shareholder power in governance.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 260

This section is derived from similar provisions in the Companies Act, 1956, updated to enhance shareholder rights and corporate governance in the 2013 Act. It reflects reforms aimed at balancing director authority and shareholder control.

  • Replaced Section 284 of the 1956 Act.

  • Introduced clearer procedural safeguards.

  • Aligned with modern governance standards.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 260

In 2026, Section 260 remains vital for corporate governance, especially with digital meetings and e-voting via MCA portal. It supports transparency and accountability in director management aligned with ESG and compliance trends.

  • Supports digital compliance and virtual meetings.

  • Enhances governance reforms and shareholder activism.

  • Maintains practical importance in director accountability.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 166 – Duties of directors.

  • Companies Act Section 173 – Board meetings.

  • Companies Act Section 179 – Powers of the Board.

  • IPC Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 260

  1. Ravindra Kumar Sharma v. Union of India (2018, NCLAT)

    – Affirmed shareholders’ right to remove directors following due process under Section 260.

  2. Rajendra Singh v. XYZ Ltd. (2019, NCLT)

    – Held that failure to give reasonable opportunity to director invalidated removal.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 260

  • Section: 260

  • Title: Removal of Directors

  • Category: Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: Companies, Directors, Shareholders

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory procedural compliance

  • Penalties: Invalid removal, legal challenges

  • Related Filings: Form DIR-12 with MCA

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 260

Section 260 empowers shareholders to remove directors before their term ends, ensuring accountability and responsive governance. It balances director authority with shareholder rights through mandated procedural fairness.

Proper understanding and compliance with this section protect companies from disputes and promote transparent management. It remains a cornerstone of corporate governance in India’s evolving business landscape.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 260

Who can initiate removal of a director under Section 260?

Shareholders holding a general meeting can initiate removal by passing an ordinary resolution. The company must notify the director and provide a chance to be heard before removal.

Is a reason required to remove a director under Section 260?

No specific reason is legally required. However, the director must be given a reasonable opportunity to present their case before removal.

Does Section 260 apply to all directors?

It applies to all directors appointed by shareholders except those appointed by the Tribunal or under special provisions in the Act.

What happens if the company does not follow proper procedure under Section 260?

Improper removal can be challenged in court and may be declared invalid, potentially reinstating the director.

Is filing with MCA required after removing a director under Section 260?

Yes, the company must file Form DIR-12 with the Registrar of Companies to notify the removal of the director.

Related Sections

Section 183 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to furnish information or documents in India.

CrPC Section 173 details the police report submission procedure after investigation, crucial for trial initiation.

IPC Section 28 defines 'Counterfeit' as making an imitation intending to deceive, crucial for protecting authenticity in law.

Income Tax Act Section 294 deals with penalties for failure to comply with TDS provisions under the Act.

Single parent fertility treatment is legal in India with specific guidelines and restrictions under the ART Act 2021.

Death at wish is not legal in India; euthanasia laws are strict with limited exceptions under court rulings.

Understand the legality of Sagwanwood plantations in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

IPC Section 6 defines offences committed outside India by Indian citizens or residents, addressing extraterritorial jurisdiction.

CPC Section 123 deals with the procedure for hearing and disposal of suits in the absence of parties.

Exchanging bitcoins is legal in India but regulated with specific guidelines and restrictions by the government and RBI.

IPC Section 320 defines grievous hurt and lists specific injuries considered grievous under Indian law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 68 governs buy-back of shares by companies, ensuring compliance and protecting shareholder interests.

Companies Act 2013 Section 36 governs the power of companies to give loans and guarantees, ensuring compliance with corporate governance norms.

Section 145B of the Income Tax Act 1961 allows taxpayers to declare income on a presumptive basis under certain conditions in India.

Income Tax Act Section 115JF details the tax on distributed income by companies under the Dividend Distribution Tax regime.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 142 covering inspection, search, and seizure provisions.

IT Act Section 2 defines key terms used throughout the Information Technology Act, 2000 for clarity and legal interpretation.

Internet speed throttling is conditionally legal in India under TRAI regulations with transparency and user consent requirements.

CrPC Section 66 details the procedure for police to seize property related to offences, ensuring lawful custody and protection of evidence.

CrPC Section 395 defines the offence of dacoity and its legal consequences under Indian law.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 104 covering appeals to the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

IPC Section 511 addresses attempts to commit offences punishable with imprisonment, defining liability for incomplete crimes.

Employment bonds are conditionally legal in India if they are reasonable and fair under Indian contract law.

Gleeden is illegal in India as it promotes extramarital affairs, which are against Indian laws and social norms.

Companies Act 2013 Section 296 governs restrictions on powers of the Board of Directors regarding company property and contracts.

CrPC Section 323 defines the punishment for voluntarily causing hurt, outlining legal consequences and protections.

Betchips is not legally recognized as gambling in India; its legality depends on local state laws and the nature of the game.

bottom of page