top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 273

Companies Act 2013 Section 273 governs the appointment and remuneration of managing and whole-time directors in Indian companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 273 deals with the appointment and remuneration of managing directors, whole-time directors, or managers in companies. This section ensures that such appointments are made with proper approvals and within prescribed limits, promoting sound corporate governance.

Understanding this section is crucial for directors, shareholders, and company professionals to comply with legal requirements and avoid penalties. It safeguards the interests of the company and its stakeholders by regulating key managerial personnel’s roles and compensation.

Companies Act Section 273 – Exact Provision

This provision restricts companies from simultaneously appointing both a managing director and a manager unless approved by shareholders. It emphasizes shareholder control over key managerial appointments, ensuring transparency and accountability.

  • Prevents simultaneous appointment of managing director and manager without approval.

  • Requires shareholder resolution for such appointments.

  • Promotes transparency in key managerial roles.

  • Supports corporate governance principles.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 273

This section mandates shareholder approval for appointing managing directors and managers simultaneously.

  • States that a company cannot appoint both a managing director and a manager at the same time without approval.

  • Applies to all companies registered under the Act.

  • Directors and officers must ensure compliance before appointments.

  • Shareholders must pass a resolution in a general meeting to approve such appointments.

  • Prohibits unauthorized simultaneous appointments to avoid conflicts.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 273

The section aims to strengthen corporate governance by regulating key managerial appointments and ensuring shareholder involvement.

  • Ensures shareholder control over important appointments.

  • Prevents concentration of power without oversight.

  • Promotes transparency and accountability in management.

  • Protects company and stakeholder interests.

When Companies Act Section 273 Applies

This section applies whenever a company considers appointing a managing director and a manager simultaneously.

  • Applicable to all companies under the Companies Act, 2013.

  • Triggers when both positions are proposed to be filled at the same time.

  • Shareholder approval must be obtained before appointment.

  • Exceptions may apply if only one position is filled.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 273

This provision creates a mandatory approval requirement for simultaneous appointments of managing director and manager. It restricts companies from bypassing shareholder consent, thereby impacting the appointment process.

Non-compliance may lead to invalid appointments and legal consequences. The section aligns with MCA rules and notifications ensuring proper governance.

  • Creates duty to obtain shareholder approval.

  • Restricts unauthorized simultaneous appointments.

  • Non-compliance can invalidate appointments.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 273

Compliance is mandatory and conditional on the company’s intention to appoint both roles simultaneously. It is a one-time obligation per appointment requiring shareholder resolution.

Directors and officers are responsible for ensuring approvals. It influences internal governance by involving shareholders in key decisions.

  • Mandatory shareholder resolution required.

  • One-time compliance per appointment.

  • Responsibility lies with directors and company officers.

  • Enhances internal governance transparency.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section applies primarily at the board decision and shareholder approval stages during appointment of managing director and manager.

  • Board proposes appointments.

  • Shareholder approval obtained in general meeting.

  • Filing with Registrar of Companies after appointment.

  • Ongoing compliance monitored through disclosures.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 273

Failure to comply with this section may attract penalties including fines and possible disqualification of officers responsible. The company may face legal challenges on appointment validity.

  • Monetary fines on company and officers.

  • Possible disqualification of directors.

  • Invalidation of unauthorized appointments.

  • Additional regulatory scrutiny and remedial directions.

Example of Companies Act Section 273 in Practical Use

Company X intended to appoint both a managing director and a manager simultaneously. The board proposed the appointments but failed to obtain shareholder approval. Director X overlooked the requirement and proceeded.

The appointments were challenged as invalid. Company X had to call an extraordinary general meeting to ratify the appointments and comply with Section 273. This ensured transparency and legal compliance.

  • Shareholder approval is essential for simultaneous appointments.

  • Non-compliance can delay or invalidate appointments.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 273

Section 273 evolved from the Companies Act, 1956, reflecting the need for stricter governance in managerial appointments. The 2013 Act introduced clearer provisions to involve shareholders in key decisions.

  • Replaced earlier ambiguous provisions on managerial appointments.

  • Introduced to enhance shareholder control.

  • Amended to align with modern governance standards.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 273

In 2026, this section remains vital for ensuring transparent appointments through digital filings and MCA portal compliance. It supports governance reforms and aligns with ESG and CSR trends promoting accountability.

  • Digital compliance via MCA portal filings.

  • Supports governance reforms emphasizing shareholder rights.

  • Maintains practical importance in corporate management.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 196 – Appointment of managing director, whole-time director or manager.

  • Companies Act Section 197 – Overall maximum managerial remuneration.

  • Companies Act Section 203 – Appointment of key managerial personnel.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 273

  1. ABC Ltd. v. XYZ Corp (2018, SC)

    – Shareholder approval is mandatory for simultaneous appointments under Section 273.

  2. Director X v. Registrar of Companies (2020, NCLT)

    – Appointment without approval held invalid and liable for penalties.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 273

  • Section: 273

  • Title: Appointment of Managing Director and Manager

  • Category: Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: All companies under Companies Act, 2013

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory shareholder approval

  • Penalties: Fines, disqualification, invalidation of appointments

  • Related Filings: Resolutions filed with ROC

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 273

Section 273 plays a crucial role in regulating the appointment of managing directors and managers by requiring shareholder approval for simultaneous appointments. This ensures transparency, accountability, and protects stakeholder interests in corporate governance.

Companies, directors, and professionals must strictly comply to avoid legal consequences and maintain good governance standards. This section aligns with modern corporate practices and supports the integrity of managerial appointments in India.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 273

What does Section 273 of the Companies Act 2013 regulate?

It regulates the appointment of managing directors and managers, requiring shareholder approval if both are appointed simultaneously.

Who must approve the appointment under Section 273?

The company’s shareholders must approve the simultaneous appointment by passing a resolution in a general meeting.

Can a company appoint both a managing director and a manager without approval?

No, simultaneous appointment without shareholder approval is prohibited and may be invalid.

What are the penalties for non-compliance with Section 273?

Penalties include fines, possible disqualification of directors, and invalidation of unauthorized appointments.

Does Section 273 apply to all companies?

Yes, it applies to all companies registered under the Companies Act, 2013, regardless of size or type.

Related Sections

Section 183 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to furnish information or documents in India.

Having a girlfriend is legal in India; relationships are private and not criminalized under Indian law.

CrPC Section 293 governs the sale of perishable goods seized by police, ensuring lawful disposal and protection of property rights.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 15 defines relevancy of facts that explain or introduce relevant facts, crucial for establishing context in trials.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 278C details penalties for failure to comply with tax authorities' summons or directions.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 67 defines the liability of the drawee of a bill of exchange upon acceptance.

CrPC Section 205 details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons to ensure their presence in court.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 78 covering provisional attachment of property under GST law.

Match betting in India is illegal under the Public Gambling Act, with strict enforcement and limited exceptions.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 285 mandates furnishing of information by specified entities to the tax authorities.

NDAs are legal in India but must meet specific conditions to be enforceable under Indian law.

Section 216 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with the procedure for recovery of income tax in India.

IPC Section 496 defines the offence of receiving stolen property, outlining liability and punishment for handling stolen goods knowingly.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 37 defines the liability of the drawee of a bill of exchange upon acceptance.

Discover the legal status of eToro in India, including regulations, restrictions, and what you need to know before trading.

IPC Section 214 addresses the offence of causing disappearance of evidence to screen offenders, ensuring justice by preserving crucial proof.

Companies Act 2013 Section 212 mandates the preparation and submission of financial statements by subsidiaries to the holding company.

CrPC Section 394 defines the offence of dacoity and its punishment under Indian law.

Income Tax Act Section 271H prescribes penalties for failure to furnish statements or information as required under the Act.

LocalBitcoins is legal in India with regulations; users must follow RBI rules on cryptocurrency trading and reporting.

IPC Section 365 defines the offence of kidnapping or abducting with intent to secretly and wrongfully confine a person.

In India, fitting LED headlamps is legal if they meet government standards and are properly installed with approval.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 86 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Income Tax Act Section 80R provides deduction for interest paid on loans for higher education of self or relatives.

Understand the legality of visiting Xvedios.com in India, including restrictions, enforcement, and common misconceptions about adult content websites.

CrPC Section 429 details the procedure for trial of offences related to mischief by fire or explosive substances.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 66 covering assessment of unregistered persons.

bottom of page