top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 273

Companies Act 2013 Section 273 governs the appointment and remuneration of managing and whole-time directors in Indian companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 273 deals with the appointment and remuneration of managing directors, whole-time directors, or managers in companies. This section ensures that such appointments are made with proper approvals and within prescribed limits, promoting sound corporate governance.

Understanding this section is crucial for directors, shareholders, and company professionals to comply with legal requirements and avoid penalties. It safeguards the interests of the company and its stakeholders by regulating key managerial personnel’s roles and compensation.

Companies Act Section 273 – Exact Provision

This provision restricts companies from simultaneously appointing both a managing director and a manager unless approved by shareholders. It emphasizes shareholder control over key managerial appointments, ensuring transparency and accountability.

  • Prevents simultaneous appointment of managing director and manager without approval.

  • Requires shareholder resolution for such appointments.

  • Promotes transparency in key managerial roles.

  • Supports corporate governance principles.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 273

This section mandates shareholder approval for appointing managing directors and managers simultaneously.

  • States that a company cannot appoint both a managing director and a manager at the same time without approval.

  • Applies to all companies registered under the Act.

  • Directors and officers must ensure compliance before appointments.

  • Shareholders must pass a resolution in a general meeting to approve such appointments.

  • Prohibits unauthorized simultaneous appointments to avoid conflicts.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 273

The section aims to strengthen corporate governance by regulating key managerial appointments and ensuring shareholder involvement.

  • Ensures shareholder control over important appointments.

  • Prevents concentration of power without oversight.

  • Promotes transparency and accountability in management.

  • Protects company and stakeholder interests.

When Companies Act Section 273 Applies

This section applies whenever a company considers appointing a managing director and a manager simultaneously.

  • Applicable to all companies under the Companies Act, 2013.

  • Triggers when both positions are proposed to be filled at the same time.

  • Shareholder approval must be obtained before appointment.

  • Exceptions may apply if only one position is filled.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 273

This provision creates a mandatory approval requirement for simultaneous appointments of managing director and manager. It restricts companies from bypassing shareholder consent, thereby impacting the appointment process.

Non-compliance may lead to invalid appointments and legal consequences. The section aligns with MCA rules and notifications ensuring proper governance.

  • Creates duty to obtain shareholder approval.

  • Restricts unauthorized simultaneous appointments.

  • Non-compliance can invalidate appointments.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 273

Compliance is mandatory and conditional on the company’s intention to appoint both roles simultaneously. It is a one-time obligation per appointment requiring shareholder resolution.

Directors and officers are responsible for ensuring approvals. It influences internal governance by involving shareholders in key decisions.

  • Mandatory shareholder resolution required.

  • One-time compliance per appointment.

  • Responsibility lies with directors and company officers.

  • Enhances internal governance transparency.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section applies primarily at the board decision and shareholder approval stages during appointment of managing director and manager.

  • Board proposes appointments.

  • Shareholder approval obtained in general meeting.

  • Filing with Registrar of Companies after appointment.

  • Ongoing compliance monitored through disclosures.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 273

Failure to comply with this section may attract penalties including fines and possible disqualification of officers responsible. The company may face legal challenges on appointment validity.

  • Monetary fines on company and officers.

  • Possible disqualification of directors.

  • Invalidation of unauthorized appointments.

  • Additional regulatory scrutiny and remedial directions.

Example of Companies Act Section 273 in Practical Use

Company X intended to appoint both a managing director and a manager simultaneously. The board proposed the appointments but failed to obtain shareholder approval. Director X overlooked the requirement and proceeded.

The appointments were challenged as invalid. Company X had to call an extraordinary general meeting to ratify the appointments and comply with Section 273. This ensured transparency and legal compliance.

  • Shareholder approval is essential for simultaneous appointments.

  • Non-compliance can delay or invalidate appointments.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 273

Section 273 evolved from the Companies Act, 1956, reflecting the need for stricter governance in managerial appointments. The 2013 Act introduced clearer provisions to involve shareholders in key decisions.

  • Replaced earlier ambiguous provisions on managerial appointments.

  • Introduced to enhance shareholder control.

  • Amended to align with modern governance standards.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 273

In 2026, this section remains vital for ensuring transparent appointments through digital filings and MCA portal compliance. It supports governance reforms and aligns with ESG and CSR trends promoting accountability.

  • Digital compliance via MCA portal filings.

  • Supports governance reforms emphasizing shareholder rights.

  • Maintains practical importance in corporate management.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 196 – Appointment of managing director, whole-time director or manager.

  • Companies Act Section 197 – Overall maximum managerial remuneration.

  • Companies Act Section 203 – Appointment of key managerial personnel.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 273

  1. ABC Ltd. v. XYZ Corp (2018, SC)

    – Shareholder approval is mandatory for simultaneous appointments under Section 273.

  2. Director X v. Registrar of Companies (2020, NCLT)

    – Appointment without approval held invalid and liable for penalties.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 273

  • Section: 273

  • Title: Appointment of Managing Director and Manager

  • Category: Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: All companies under Companies Act, 2013

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory shareholder approval

  • Penalties: Fines, disqualification, invalidation of appointments

  • Related Filings: Resolutions filed with ROC

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 273

Section 273 plays a crucial role in regulating the appointment of managing directors and managers by requiring shareholder approval for simultaneous appointments. This ensures transparency, accountability, and protects stakeholder interests in corporate governance.

Companies, directors, and professionals must strictly comply to avoid legal consequences and maintain good governance standards. This section aligns with modern corporate practices and supports the integrity of managerial appointments in India.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 273

What does Section 273 of the Companies Act 2013 regulate?

It regulates the appointment of managing directors and managers, requiring shareholder approval if both are appointed simultaneously.

Who must approve the appointment under Section 273?

The company’s shareholders must approve the simultaneous appointment by passing a resolution in a general meeting.

Can a company appoint both a managing director and a manager without approval?

No, simultaneous appointment without shareholder approval is prohibited and may be invalid.

What are the penalties for non-compliance with Section 273?

Penalties include fines, possible disqualification of directors, and invalidation of unauthorized appointments.

Does Section 273 apply to all companies?

Yes, it applies to all companies registered under the Companies Act, 2013, regardless of size or type.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 44 covering assessment of non-filing cases.

Changing the MCB on your electric meter is legal in India only with proper authorization from the electricity provider.

Indiabet is legal in India only under strict regulations and licensing by state authorities.

Nikahnama is legally recognized in India as a Muslim marriage contract with specific rights and obligations.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269J prohibits cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 for certain transactions to curb tax evasion.

IPC Section 219 penalizes public servants who disobey law, causing injury to any person.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 12AB governs registration and approval of charitable trusts and institutions for tax exemption.

Barter is legal in India with no specific restrictions, but practical and tax rules apply to barter transactions.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 55 defines cost of acquisition for capital gains computation under Indian tax law.

IPC Section 45 defines the term 'Court of Justice' for legal clarity in criminal proceedings.

Surrogacy in India is legal under strict conditions as per the 2018 Surrogacy Regulation Act.

Understand the legality of data scraping in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement practices in 2026.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 96 covers the exclusion of evidence obtained illegally or unfairly, ensuring justice by barring such evidence in trials.

IPC Section 484 defines the offence of issuing a forged document as genuine, covering its scope and legal consequences.

Public screening in India is legal with proper permissions and licenses from authorities and copyright holders.

IPC Section 131 penalizes assaulting or obstructing public servants during legal duties to ensure law enforcement.

CrPC Section 385 defines the offence of extortion, detailing its elements and legal consequences under Indian law.

MDMA is illegal in India with strict penalties for possession, use, and trafficking under the Narcotic Drugs law.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 107 defines the procedure for appeals to the Commissioner (Appeals) against income tax orders.

Understand the legality of sandwich leave in India and how it affects your leave entitlements at work.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 137 empowers courts to exclude evidence obtained illegally or unfairly to ensure fair trial and justice.

Income Tax Act Section 35ABA provides weighted deduction for expenditure on in-house research and development facilities.

Contract Act 1872 Section 38 explains the effect of novation, rescission, and alteration of contracts on original obligations.

Witchcraft is not legally recognized but not explicitly illegal in India; accusations and harmful acts linked to it are punishable.

Service bonds are legal in India if reasonable and clearly defined, protecting employer interests without violating labor laws.

In India, an LLP is a separate legal entity distinct from its partners, with its own rights and liabilities.

Understand the legality of Akrapovic exhaust systems in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

bottom of page