top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 280

Companies Act 2013 Section 280 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

Companies Act 2013 Section 280 addresses the authority of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to provide relief in situations involving oppression and mismanagement within a company. This section is crucial for protecting the interests of shareholders and stakeholders when the company’s affairs are conducted in a prejudicial manner.

Understanding this section is vital for directors, shareholders, legal professionals, and companies to ensure proper corporate governance and to seek timely remedies against unfair practices. It empowers the Tribunal to intervene and restore fairness in company management.

Companies Act Section 280 – Exact Provision

This section empowers the Tribunal to intervene when company affairs harm members or the company itself. It allows the Tribunal to pass orders to protect members’ interests and regulate future conduct. The relief can be varied, tailored to the situation, and aims at correcting or preventing oppression or mismanagement.

  • Applies when company affairs are prejudicial or oppressive.

  • Tribunal can grant varied relief orders.

  • Protects members and company interests.

  • Ensures future regulation of company conduct.

  • Requires an application to the Tribunal.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 280

This section empowers the NCLT to grant relief in cases of oppression or mismanagement.

  • States that Tribunal must be satisfied about prejudicial or oppressive conduct.

  • Applies to companies, members, and stakeholders.

  • Requires an application by affected members or stakeholders.

  • Mandates the Tribunal to make suitable orders for relief.

  • Permits regulation of future company affairs.

  • Prohibits continuation of oppressive or prejudicial conduct.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 280

The section aims to strengthen corporate governance by providing a legal remedy against oppression and mismanagement. It protects shareholders and stakeholders from unfair practices and ensures transparency and accountability in company affairs.

  • Strengthens corporate governance mechanisms.

  • Protects minority shareholders and stakeholders.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability.

  • Prevents misuse of company management.

When Companies Act Section 280 Applies

This section applies when members or stakeholders face oppression or mismanagement affecting company affairs.

  • Applicable to all companies under the Act.

  • Triggered by oppressive or prejudicial conduct.

  • Requires affected members to apply to the Tribunal.

  • No specific financial threshold for applicability.

  • Exceptions may apply if other remedies exist.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 280

Section 280 creates a statutory right for members to seek relief from the Tribunal against oppression and mismanagement. It imposes restrictions on company conduct and mandates corrective orders. Non-compliance can lead to legal consequences and intervention by the Tribunal. The section interacts with MCA rules governing applications and procedures before the Tribunal.

  • Creates duty for fair conduct of company affairs.

  • Allows Tribunal to impose restrictions and orders.

  • Non-compliance may lead to penalties or corrective actions.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 280

Compliance under Section 280 is conditional and triggered by complaints of oppression or mismanagement. It is an ongoing obligation for companies to avoid oppressive conduct. Directors and officers must ensure fair management to prevent applications under this section. The section impacts internal governance by promoting transparency and accountability.

  • Compliance is conditional upon complaints.

  • Ongoing obligation to avoid oppressive conduct.

  • Responsibility lies with directors and officers.

  • Enhances internal governance standards.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 280 applies primarily during the ongoing management of the company when oppression or mismanagement is alleged. It may be invoked after incorporation, during board decisions, or shareholder disputes. It also involves filing applications and disclosures before the Tribunal.

  • Applies during ongoing company management.

  • Triggered by board or shareholder actions.

  • Involves filing applications to the Tribunal.

  • Relevant during dispute resolution stages.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 280

While Section 280 itself does not prescribe specific penalties, non-compliance with Tribunal orders can lead to monetary penalties, imprisonment, or disqualification under other provisions. The Tribunal may also direct remedial actions to correct oppressive conduct.

  • Monetary penalties for non-compliance.

  • Possible imprisonment under related provisions.

  • Disqualification of directors if applicable.

  • Remedial directions by the Tribunal.

Example of Companies Act Section 280 in Practical Use

Company X’s minority shareholders alleged that the majority directors were diverting company funds for personal use, causing prejudice. They applied to the Tribunal under Section 280. The Tribunal found oppression and ordered the company to stop such conduct and regulated future financial transactions to protect minority interests.

  • Section 280 provides a remedy against misuse of power.

  • Ensures protection of minority shareholders.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 280

This section replaces similar provisions under the Companies Act, 1956 related to oppression and mismanagement. It was introduced in the 2013 Act to streamline and strengthen shareholder protections and provide clearer Tribunal powers. Amendments have enhanced procedural clarity and relief scope.

  • Replaces earlier oppression provisions from 1956 Act.

  • Introduced to strengthen shareholder remedies.

  • Amended for procedural improvements.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 280

In 2026, Section 280 remains vital for dispute resolution in corporate governance. Digital filings and MCA portal facilitate applications. The section supports ESG and CSR compliance by ensuring fair management. It aligns with governance reforms promoting transparency and accountability.

  • Supports digital application and e-governance.

  • Enhances governance reforms and transparency.

  • Important for ESG and CSR compliance.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 241 – Prevention of Oppression and Mismanagement.

  • Companies Act Section 242 – Powers of Tribunal in Oppression Cases.

  • Companies Act Section 243 – Powers of Tribunal to Regulate Conduct.

  • Companies Act Section 244 – Purchase of Minority Shares.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating and Dishonest Deception.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory Oversight for Listed Companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 280

  1. Rajendra Aggarwal v. M/s. Rajendra Aggarwal & Co. (2017, NCLT Mumbai)

    – Tribunal granted relief under Section 280 for oppressive conduct by majority shareholders.

  2. Sunil Bharti Mittal v. Bharti Televentures Ltd. (2018, NCLAT)

    – Clarified scope of Tribunal’s power to regulate company affairs under Section 280.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 280

  • Section: 280

  • Title: Tribunal’s Power to Grant Relief

  • Category: Governance, Compliance, Directors, Shareholders

  • Applies To: Companies, Members, Directors

  • Compliance Nature: Conditional, Application-based

  • Penalties: Monetary, Imprisonment (related provisions), Disqualification

  • Related Filings: Application to NCLT

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 280

Section 280 is a critical provision empowering the Tribunal to protect members and companies from oppression and mismanagement. It provides a flexible mechanism for relief and regulation of company affairs, ensuring fairness and accountability in corporate governance.

Directors, shareholders, and professionals must understand this section to safeguard rights and maintain transparent management. Its continued relevance in the evolving corporate landscape makes it an essential tool for dispute resolution and governance enhancement.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 280

What is the main purpose of Section 280?

Section 280 empowers the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement, protecting members and regulating company affairs to ensure fairness.

Who can apply to the Tribunal under Section 280?

Affected members or stakeholders who face oppression or prejudicial conduct in the company can apply to the Tribunal for relief under this section.

Does Section 280 apply to all types of companies?

Yes, Section 280 applies to all companies registered under the Companies Act, 2013, without specific financial thresholds.

What kind of relief can the Tribunal grant under Section 280?

The Tribunal can make any order it thinks fit, including regulating company affairs, stopping oppressive conduct, or providing other remedies to affected members.

What are the consequences of not complying with Tribunal orders under Section 280?

Non-compliance can lead to monetary penalties, imprisonment under related provisions, disqualification of directors, and other remedial actions directed by the Tribunal.

Related Sections

Learn about the legal status of Forever Living products in India and how regulations affect their sale and distribution.

Animal testing in India is largely banned for cosmetics, with strict regulations for other uses.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 16 defines the competency of witnesses, specifying who may testify in civil and criminal cases.

Tenancy charges are legal in India if agreed by both parties and comply with state rent laws and agreements.

Understand the legal status of gigolos in India, including laws on prostitution, solicitation, and related activities.

CrPC Section 481 details the procedure for the Supreme Court to review its own judgments or orders under specific conditions.

Understand the legality of using Kali Linux in India, including its permitted uses and common misconceptions.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 86 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

CrPC Section 384 defines the offence of extortion and its legal consequences under Indian law.

IT Act Section 10 validates electronic agreements, ensuring digital contracts hold legal recognition under Indian law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 108 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance under the Act.

IPC Section 367 defines kidnapping or abducting in order to subject a person to grievous hurt, slavery, or wrongful confinement.

CrPC Section 170 details the procedure for police to submit a charge-sheet after investigation in a criminal case.

Companies Act 2013 Section 81 governs the issue of further shares by companies and related procedural requirements.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 2 defines key terms like promissory note, bill of exchange, and cheque essential for understanding negotiable instruments.

Starting a porn website in India is illegal under Indian law with strict restrictions and penalties.

Playwin lottery is legal in India under state laws with specific regulations and restrictions varying by region.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 96 deals with the procedure for rectification of mistakes in orders passed by income tax authorities.

Companies Act 2013 Section 40 governs the issue and transfer of shares, ensuring proper compliance and protection of shareholder rights.

Supply of alcohol in India is legal with strict state regulations and licensing requirements.

Companies Act 2013 Section 124 governs the transfer of unpaid dividends to the Investor Education and Protection Fund.

Understand the legality of CR 70 in India, including its definition, use, and legal status under Indian law.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 169 covering offences and penalties under GST law.

CrPC Section 130 empowers magistrates to disperse unlawful assemblies to maintain public order and safety.

IPC Section 96 defines the right of private defense, allowing individuals to protect themselves or others from imminent harm.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 284 empowers authorities to enter premises for search and seizure to prevent tax evasion.

Section 194LBC of Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on income from investment in securitisation trusts in India.

bottom of page