top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 287

Companies Act 2013 Section 287 governs the appointment and qualifications of auditors in Indian companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 287 deals with the appointment and qualifications of auditors for companies in India. It ensures that auditors appointed are competent and meet prescribed standards to maintain the integrity of financial reporting.

This section is crucial for corporate governance and compliance, as auditors play a key role in verifying company accounts. Directors, shareholders, and professionals must understand these provisions to ensure lawful and transparent audit processes.

Companies Act Section 287 – Exact Provision

This section mandates that only qualified individuals or firms can be appointed as auditors. It safeguards the audit process by restricting appointments to those who meet legal and professional criteria.

  • Ensures auditors meet qualification criteria.

  • Prevents unqualified persons from auditing companies.

  • Supports transparency in financial reporting.

  • Aligns with rules prescribed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 287

This section states that only qualified auditors can be appointed for companies.

  • Applies to all companies required to have an auditor.

  • Directors and shareholders involved in auditor appointment must ensure qualifications.

  • Mandatory compliance with qualification criteria under the Act and MCA rules.

  • Triggers at the time of auditor appointment or reappointment.

  • Permits appointment only if qualifications are met; prohibits appointment of disqualified persons.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 287

The section aims to uphold audit quality by ensuring only qualified auditors are appointed. This strengthens corporate governance and protects stakeholders.

  • Strengthens corporate governance by ensuring competent audits.

  • Protects shareholders and stakeholders from inaccurate financial reports.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability in financial disclosures.

  • Prevents misuse of audit function by unqualified persons.

When Companies Act Section 287 Applies

This section applies whenever a company appoints or reappoints an auditor, regardless of company size or type.

  • Applicable to all companies with statutory audit requirements.

  • Directors and shareholders must comply during auditor appointment.

  • Triggers at incorporation and annual general meetings.

  • No exemptions for private or small companies where audit is mandatory.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 287

This provision creates a mandatory qualification duty for auditors. It restricts appointment to qualified individuals, impacting corporate audit actions. Non-compliance can invalidate auditor appointments and invite penalties.

The section interacts with MCA rules detailing auditor qualifications and disqualifications, ensuring consistent enforcement.

  • Creates duty to appoint only qualified auditors.

  • Restricts appointment of disqualified persons.

  • Non-compliance may lead to penalties and audit invalidation.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 287

Compliance is mandatory and ongoing for every auditor appointment. Responsibility lies primarily with directors and shareholders to verify qualifications before appointment.

This obligation affects internal governance by ensuring audit integrity and legal adherence.

  • Mandatory compliance for each auditor appointment.

  • Ongoing obligation at every reappointment.

  • Directors and shareholders responsible for compliance.

  • Enhances internal governance and audit quality.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section applies mainly at the auditor appointment stage, including initial appointment and reappointment during AGMs. It also impacts filing and disclosure of auditor details.

  • Incorporation stage – initial auditor appointment.

  • Board decision stage – recommending auditor appointment.

  • Shareholder approval stage – confirming appointment at AGM.

  • Filing stage – submitting auditor appointment details to MCA.

  • Ongoing compliance at each reappointment.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 287

Failure to comply can lead to monetary fines and other consequences. Appointment of unqualified auditors may be declared invalid, affecting company compliance status.

Additional penalties may include remedial directions from regulatory authorities.

  • Monetary penalties for non-compliance.

  • Invalidation of auditor appointment.

  • Possible remedial directions by MCA or courts.

Example of Companies Act Section 287 in Practical Use

Company X appointed an auditor who did not meet qualification criteria under the Act. Upon discovery, the appointment was challenged by shareholders. The company had to revoke the appointment and reappoint a qualified auditor to comply with Section 287.

This ensured the audit was legally valid and maintained stakeholder confidence.

  • Ensures auditor qualifications are verified before appointment.

  • Protects company from legal and compliance risks.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 287

Section 287 replaced earlier provisions from the Companies Act, 1956, to strengthen auditor qualification norms. It was introduced in the 2013 Act to align with modern audit standards and corporate governance reforms.

  • Replaced similar provisions in the 1956 Act.

  • Introduced to enhance auditor qualification standards.

  • Supports reforms in corporate governance and audit transparency.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 287

In 2026, this section remains vital due to digital filings and e-governance via MCA portals. It supports compliance with evolving audit standards and governance reforms.

  • Supports digital compliance and MCA e-filing.

  • Aligns with governance reforms emphasizing audit quality.

  • Ensures practical importance in today’s corporate environment.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 139 – Appointment of Auditors.

  • Companies Act Section 141 – Qualifications and Disqualifications of Auditors.

  • Companies Act Section 143 – Powers and Duties of Auditors.

  • Companies Act Section 147 – Removal, Resignation of Auditors.

  • IPC Section 447 – Punishment for Fraud.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory Oversight for Listed Companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 287

  1. Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. Shaunak H. Satya (2017, SC)

    – Emphasized auditor qualifications and professional standards under the Act.

  2. XYZ Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies (2019, NCLT)

    – Invalidated auditor appointment due to non-qualification under Section 287.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 287

  • Section: 287

  • Title: Appointment and Qualifications of Auditors

  • Category: Audit, Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: All companies required to appoint auditors

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, ongoing at each appointment

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, invalidation of appointment

  • Related Filings: Auditor appointment forms with MCA

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 287

Section 287 of the Companies Act 2013 is fundamental in ensuring that only qualified auditors are appointed to companies. This provision safeguards the audit process, thereby enhancing the reliability of financial statements and protecting stakeholder interests.

Understanding and complying with this section is essential for directors, shareholders, and professionals involved in corporate governance. It supports transparency, accountability, and the overall integrity of corporate financial reporting in India.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 287

Who can be appointed as an auditor under Section 287?

Only individuals or firms qualified under the Companies Act and related MCA rules can be appointed as auditors. This ensures they meet professional and legal standards.

Does Section 287 apply to all types of companies?

Yes, it applies to all companies that are required by law to appoint auditors, including private and public companies.

What happens if a company appoints an unqualified auditor?

The appointment can be declared invalid, and the company may face penalties. The company must reappoint a qualified auditor to comply with the law.

Who is responsible for ensuring auditor qualifications?

Directors and shareholders involved in the appointment process must verify that the auditor meets all qualification criteria under the Act.

Is compliance with Section 287 a one-time or ongoing obligation?

It is an ongoing obligation that applies at every auditor appointment or reappointment to ensure continuous compliance.

Related Sections

Income Tax Act Section 115BBE imposes a special tax rate on undisclosed income and certain specified incomes.

CPC Section 66 covers the procedure for arrest and detention of a judgment-debtor in civil suits.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 104 defines the liability of a drawee who accepts a bill of exchange, outlining their obligations and rights.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 35 regarding electronic records maintenance and audit requirements.

Live-in relationships are conditionally legal in India with specific rights and limitations under Indian law.

Yukon Gold Casino is not legally accessible in India; online gambling laws restrict such foreign platforms.

CPC Section 83 details the procedure for executing decrees against property under the control of the judgment-debtor.

Understand if a letterhead is a legal document in India and its role in official communications and legal matters.

3-semester MSc courses are generally not recognized under Indian education laws, making them legally questionable in India.

IPC Section 384 defines extortion, covering unlawful threats to obtain property or valuable security.

IPC Section 69 empowers the government to intercept messages in the interest of public safety and sovereignty.

Option trading is legal in India with regulations by SEBI and specific rules for investors and brokers.

IPC Section 17 defines 'Public Servant' and specifies who qualifies as a public servant under Indian law.

IPC Section 233 penalizes the act of causing grievous hurt by means of poison or noxious substances.

Section 184 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to furnish return of income in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 30 governs the appointment of directors to fill casual vacancies on the board.

CrPC Section 260 details the procedure for the disposal of property seized during investigation or trial.

Section 143 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the assessment process of income tax returns in India.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 126 protects communications between legal advisers and clients, ensuring confidentiality in legal proceedings.

Companies Act 2013 Section 56 governs the transfer and transmission of shares in Indian companies.

IPC Section 237 penalizes causing danger to life or health of a person by negligent act in a public way or public servant's duty.

Mace is illegal in India except for authorized security forces; civilians cannot legally possess or use it.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 90 addresses admissions by persons whose position or relationship makes their statements relevant in legal proceedings.

IPC Section 302 defines punishment for murder, outlining legal consequences and scope of this grave offence.

IPC Section 80 provides legal protection for acts done by accident or misfortune without criminal intent.

Companies Act 2013 Section 96 governs the Annual General Meeting requirements for Indian companies.

CrPC Section 227 details the procedure for a Magistrate to discharge an accused if evidence is insufficient to proceed to trial.

bottom of page