top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 320

Companies Act 2013 Section 320 governs the appointment and powers of the Tribunal in company law matters.

Companies Act 2013 Section 320 deals with the appointment of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and outlines its powers. The Tribunal plays a crucial role in adjudicating disputes related to company law, including insolvency, mergers, and oppression cases. Understanding this section is vital for directors, shareholders, legal professionals, and companies to navigate corporate legal processes effectively.

This section ensures that company-related disputes are resolved by a specialized authority with adequate powers. It strengthens corporate governance by providing a dedicated forum for speedy and expert resolution of company matters. Professionals and companies must be aware of the Tribunal’s jurisdiction and authority under this provision to comply with procedural requirements and safeguard their interests.

Companies Act Section 320 – Exact Provision

This section establishes the National Company Law Tribunal as a specialized judicial body. It empowers the Central Government to appoint members with judicial and technical expertise. The Tribunal’s jurisdiction covers a wide range of company law matters, ensuring expert adjudication. This provision is foundational for the functioning of the NCLT, enabling it to exercise powers necessary for resolving corporate disputes efficiently.

  • Constitutes the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).

  • Authorizes appointment of judicial and technical members.

  • Defines the Tribunal’s jurisdiction and powers.

  • Empowers the Tribunal to adjudicate company law matters.

  • Supports efficient dispute resolution in corporate governance.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 320

This section mandates the formation of the NCLT and defines its authority.

  • The section states the Central Government will establish the NCLT.

  • Applies to judicial and technical members appointed to the Tribunal.

  • Mandates the Tribunal’s jurisdiction over company law disputes.

  • Triggers when company law matters require adjudication.

  • Permits the Tribunal to exercise powers under this Act and other laws.

  • Restricts other courts from interfering in matters under the Tribunal’s jurisdiction.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 320

The section aims to create a specialized forum for resolving company law disputes, enhancing efficiency and expertise.

  • Strengthens corporate governance by expert adjudication.

  • Protects shareholders and stakeholders through fair dispute resolution.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability in company law matters.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate structure by timely legal intervention.

When Companies Act Section 320 Applies

This section applies whenever company law disputes require adjudication by a specialized tribunal.

  • Applicable to all companies under the Companies Act, 2013.

  • Mandatory for disputes involving insolvency, mergers, oppression, and other company matters.

  • Triggered upon filing of petitions or applications before the Tribunal.

  • Exemptions may exist for matters outside the Tribunal’s jurisdiction.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 320

This provision creates the legal framework for the NCLT’s formation and authority. It imposes duties on the Central Government to appoint qualified members. The Tribunal’s decisions have binding effect on company law disputes. Non-compliance with Tribunal orders can lead to penalties or further legal action. It interacts with MCA rules and notifications that regulate Tribunal procedures and appointments.

  • Creates duties for the Central Government to constitute the Tribunal.

  • Establishes binding authority of the Tribunal in company law matters.

  • Non-compliance with Tribunal orders can attract penalties.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 320

Compliance involves adherence to the Tribunal’s jurisdiction and procedures. Companies and stakeholders must recognize the Tribunal’s authority in relevant disputes. The obligation is ongoing as the Tribunal continuously adjudicates company law issues. Directors and officers must cooperate with Tribunal processes. This section impacts internal governance by providing a legal forum for dispute resolution.

  • Mandatory compliance with Tribunal jurisdiction and orders.

  • Ongoing obligation for companies involved in disputes.

  • Responsibility on directors and officers to cooperate.

  • Enhances internal governance through legal oversight.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 320 applies primarily at the dispute resolution stage but influences various corporate actions.

  • Not applicable at incorporation stage.

  • Relevant during board decisions leading to disputes.

  • Crucial at shareholder approval stage if disputes arise.

  • Essential during filing and disclosure of petitions to the Tribunal.

  • Ongoing compliance during Tribunal proceedings.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 320

While Section 320 itself does not prescribe penalties, non-compliance with Tribunal orders can lead to sanctions under related provisions. Penalties may include monetary fines, imprisonment for contempt, or disqualification of directors. The Tribunal can also impose additional fees or remedial directions to enforce compliance.

  • Monetary penalties for non-compliance with Tribunal orders.

  • Possible imprisonment for contempt of Tribunal.

  • Disqualification of directors in certain cases.

  • Additional fees or remedial directions by the Tribunal.

Example of Companies Act Section 320 in Practical Use

Company X faced a dispute regarding a merger approval. The matter was brought before the NCLT under Section 320. The Tribunal, comprising judicial and technical members, adjudicated the case efficiently. Director X complied with all procedural requirements, ensuring a lawful resolution. This avoided prolonged litigation and protected shareholder interests.

  • Shows the Tribunal’s role in resolving complex company disputes.

  • Highlights importance of compliance with Tribunal procedures.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 320

This section replaced provisions under the Companies Act, 1956, which lacked a specialized tribunal. The 2013 Act introduced the NCLT to streamline company law adjudication. Amendments have enhanced the Tribunal’s powers and composition to improve efficiency and expertise.

  • Shift from 1956 Act’s limited adjudicatory bodies.

  • Introduction of NCLT for specialized company law disputes.

  • Subsequent amendments to expand Tribunal’s jurisdiction and powers.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 320

In 2026, Section 320 remains vital for digital filings and e-governance through the MCA portal. The NCLT supports ESG and CSR compliance by resolving related disputes. Governance reforms continue to enhance the Tribunal’s efficiency, making it indispensable in today’s corporate environment.

  • Supports digital compliance via MCA portal.

  • Integral to governance reforms and dispute resolution.

  • Ensures practical importance in modern corporate law.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 242 – Powers of the Tribunal.

  • Companies Act Section 245 – Oppression and mismanagement remedies.

  • Companies Act Section 253 – Appeals from Tribunal orders.

  • IPC Section 420 – Punishment for cheating and dishonesty.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 320

  1. Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India (2019, SCC 130)

    – Affirmed the constitutionality and powers of the NCLT under Section 320.

  2. Macquarie Bank Ltd. v. Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd. (2018, NCLAT)

    – Clarified the Tribunal’s jurisdiction in insolvency matters.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 320

  • Section: 320

  • Title: Appointment and Powers of Tribunal

  • Category: Governance, Compliance, Dispute Resolution

  • Applies To: Central Government, NCLT members, companies, directors, shareholders

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory adherence to Tribunal jurisdiction and orders

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, imprisonment, disqualification for non-compliance

  • Related Filings: Petitions and applications before NCLT

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 320

Section 320 is foundational for establishing the National Company Law Tribunal, a specialized body for resolving company law disputes. It empowers the Central Government to appoint qualified members and grants the Tribunal wide jurisdiction and authority. This ensures expert and efficient adjudication, strengthening corporate governance and protecting stakeholder interests.

Understanding this section is essential for companies, directors, shareholders, and legal professionals. It facilitates compliance with procedural requirements and helps avoid penalties. As corporate disputes grow complex, the Tribunal’s role under Section 320 remains critical for maintaining transparency, accountability, and legal certainty in India’s corporate sector.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 320

What is the National Company Law Tribunal under Section 320?

The NCLT is a specialized judicial body constituted under Section 320 to adjudicate company law disputes. It consists of judicial and technical members appointed by the Central Government.

Who appoints the members of the Tribunal?

The Central Government appoints the President, judicial members, and technical members of the NCLT as per Section 320.

What types of cases does the Tribunal handle?

The Tribunal handles insolvency, mergers, oppression, mismanagement, and other company law disputes under the Companies Act and related laws.

Are companies required to comply with Tribunal orders?

Yes, compliance with Tribunal orders is mandatory. Non-compliance can lead to penalties, including fines and imprisonment.

Can decisions of the Tribunal be appealed?

Yes, appeals against Tribunal orders can be filed before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) as per the Companies Act provisions.

Related Sections

Evidence Act 1872 Section 163 mandates that police officers must prepare a written report of all information received about a cognizable offence.

Raffles in India are legal only with government permission under the Lotteries Act, with strict rules and penalties for unauthorized conduct.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 89 mandates mediation for dispute resolution before complaint adjudication.

Single parent fertility treatment is legal in India with specific guidelines and restrictions under the ART Act 2021.

Companies Act 2013 Section 148 mandates cost audit for specified companies to ensure financial compliance and transparency.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 92 governs transfer pricing rules for transactions between associated enterprises.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 123 deals with interest on delayed refund of income tax to taxpayers.

The death penalty is legal in India but used sparingly for the most serious crimes under strict legal safeguards.

CrPC Section 333 details punishment for public servants who intentionally cause injury to deter duty performance.

IPC Section 171C penalizes illegal hiring or engagement of persons as election workers to ensure free and fair elections.

CrPC Section 344 details the procedure for summoning witnesses and recording their evidence in trials.

Section 206 of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on specified payments in India.

IPC Section 249 defines the offence of assaulting a public servant to deter them from duty, ensuring protection of lawful authority.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 49 mandates product liability for manufacturers, ensuring consumer safety and accountability.

IPC Section 48 defines the territorial jurisdiction of Indian courts over offences committed outside India by Indian citizens or persons on ships or aircraft registered in India.

IPC Section 171E penalizes promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, or language to disturb public tranquility.

IPC Section 198 outlines the procedure for complaint in cases of offences against public servants, ensuring proper legal process.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 72 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Lesbian marriages are not legally recognized in India, but same-sex relationships are decriminalized under certain conditions.

CrPC Section 169 details the procedure for police to submit a charge-sheet after investigation in criminal cases.

Understand the legality of money transfer in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

IPC Section 316 defines culpable homicide by a person causing death of a child under twelve years during childbirth or by an act done with intent to cause miscarriage.

CrPC Section 155 mandates police officers to investigate complaints and report findings to magistrates, ensuring proper inquiry into offences.

IPC Section 134 defines the offence of intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace, addressing public order protection.

Understand the legal status of matte olive green color in India and its regulations for use and restrictions.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 36 defines the relevance of facts showing the existence of a course of dealing, crucial for proving habitual conduct in disputes.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 245C details the procedure for rectification of mistakes in income tax orders and assessments.

bottom of page