top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 355

Companies Act 2013 Section 355 governs the power of the Central Government to call for information and conduct inspections of companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 355 empowers the Central Government to call for information, inspect, and investigate companies to ensure compliance with the law. This provision plays a crucial role in corporate governance by enabling regulatory oversight and preventing fraudulent activities.

Understanding Section 355 is essential for directors, shareholders, auditors, and professionals to maintain transparency and adhere to legal requirements. It helps companies prepare for government inspections and respond appropriately to information requests.

Companies Act Section 355 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes the Central Government to seek information and conduct inspections of companies and their subsidiaries. It ensures that companies comply with the Companies Act and related rules.

  • Empowers Central Government to call for company information.

  • Allows inspection of books, papers, registers, and documents.

  • Includes subsidiaries in the scope of inspection.

  • Aims to verify compliance with the Companies Act and rules.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 355

Section 355 mandates government authority to inspect companies for compliance. It applies to all companies and their subsidiaries.

  • States that the Central Government can request information and inspect records.

  • Applies to companies registered under the Companies Act and their subsidiaries.

  • Requires companies to provide access to books, papers, registers, and documents.

  • Triggered when the government suspects non-compliance or for routine checks.

  • Permits thorough examination to ensure adherence to legal provisions.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 355

This section strengthens corporate governance by enabling government oversight. It protects stakeholders by ensuring companies follow the law.

  • Strengthens corporate governance through regulatory checks.

  • Protects shareholders and stakeholders from fraud and mismanagement.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability in company operations.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate structure and promotes legal compliance.

When Companies Act Section 355 Applies

Section 355 applies whenever the Central Government needs to verify compliance or investigate companies.

  • Applicable to all companies and their subsidiaries registered under the Act.

  • Triggered by suspicion of non-compliance or routine inspections.

  • Companies of all sizes and classes must comply.

  • No specific financial threshold; applies broadly.

  • Exceptions may apply for certain government-owned companies under special provisions.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 355

This provision creates a legal obligation for companies to cooperate with government inspections and provide requested information. It impacts corporate transparency and accountability.

Non-compliance may lead to penalties or further investigation. The section works alongside MCA rules and notifications to enforce compliance.

  • Creates duty to provide information and access to records.

  • Enables government to monitor and enforce compliance.

  • Non-compliance can result in penalties or legal action.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 355

Compliance with Section 355 is mandatory and ongoing. Companies must maintain proper records and be prepared for government inspections at any time.

Directors and officers are responsible for ensuring availability of documents and cooperation during inspections. This obligation supports internal governance and legal adherence.

  • Mandatory compliance with information requests and inspections.

  • Ongoing obligation to maintain accurate records.

  • Responsibility lies with directors and company officers.

  • Supports transparency and internal governance.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 355 applies primarily during the ongoing compliance stage but can be relevant at any time after incorporation.

  • Applies post-incorporation during company operations.

  • Relevant during government-initiated inspections or investigations.

  • May coincide with board or shareholder meetings if issues arise.

  • Involves filing and disclosure of information to authorities.

  • Ensures continuous compliance throughout the company’s life.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 355

Failure to comply with Section 355 can lead to monetary penalties and other legal consequences. The government may impose fines or initiate prosecution for obstruction.

Repeated non-compliance can result in stricter actions including disqualification of directors or additional fees.

  • Monetary fines for non-compliance.

  • Possible prosecution for obstruction or false information.

  • Disqualification of directors in severe cases.

  • Additional fees or remedial directions from authorities.

Example of Companies Act Section 355 in Practical Use

Company X received a notice from the Central Government under Section 355 requesting inspection of its financial records. The directors promptly provided access to all books and registers. The inspection revealed minor discrepancies, which Company X rectified immediately, avoiding penalties.

This example shows the importance of cooperation and maintaining accurate records to comply with government inspections.

  • Timely cooperation prevents penalties.

  • Maintaining proper records ensures smooth inspections.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 355

Section 355 replaced similar provisions under the Companies Act, 1956, enhancing government powers to inspect companies. It was introduced in the 2013 Act to strengthen regulatory oversight and align with modern corporate governance standards.

  • Replaced inspection provisions from the 1956 Act.

  • Introduced to improve regulatory oversight.

  • Reflects reforms for transparency and accountability.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 355

In 2026, Section 355 remains vital for digital compliance and corporate governance. The MCA portal facilitates electronic inspections and filings, making government oversight more efficient.

It supports ESG and CSR compliance trends by ensuring companies maintain transparent records accessible to regulators.

  • Enables digital inspections via MCA portal.

  • Supports governance reforms and transparency.

  • Important for ESG and CSR compliance monitoring.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 143 – Powers and duties of auditors.

  • Companies Act Section 206 – Inspection, inquiry, and investigation.

  • Companies Act Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 355

  1. Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Ltd. v. Diamond & Gem Development Corporation Ltd. (2000, AIR SC 329)

    – Government’s power to inspect company records upheld to ensure compliance with statutory provisions.

  2. Union of India v. R. Gandhi (2007, AIR SC 2896)

    – Emphasized the importance of regulatory inspections in preventing corporate fraud.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 355

  • Section: 355

  • Title: Power of Central Government to call for information and inspect companies

  • Category: Governance, Compliance

  • Applies To: All companies and their subsidiaries

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, ongoing

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, prosecution, disqualification

  • Related Filings: Information and documents as requested by government

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 355

Companies Act Section 355 is a critical provision empowering the Central Government to ensure corporate compliance through inspections and information requests. It fosters transparency and accountability, which are essential for sound corporate governance.

For companies, understanding and adhering to this section is vital to avoid penalties and maintain trust with regulators and stakeholders. Proper record-keeping and cooperation with government authorities help companies navigate inspections smoothly and uphold legal standards.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 355

What authority does Section 355 give to the Central Government?

Section 355 authorizes the Central Government to call for information and inspect the books, papers, registers, and documents of any company and its subsidiaries to ensure compliance with the Companies Act.

Who must comply with inspections under Section 355?

All companies registered under the Companies Act, including their subsidiaries, must comply with government inspections and provide requested information under Section 355.

What happens if a company refuses to cooperate with an inspection?

Refusal to cooperate can lead to monetary penalties, prosecution, disqualification of directors, and other legal consequences as per the Companies Act and related laws.

Is Section 355 applicable only to large companies?

No, Section 355 applies to all companies regardless of size or financial thresholds. It is a broad provision for regulatory oversight.

How does Section 355 support corporate governance?

By enabling government inspections and information requests, Section 355 promotes transparency, accountability, and adherence to legal requirements, strengthening corporate governance.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 92 mandates annual return filing requirements for companies in India.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 72AB details the conditions for carry forward and set off of losses under specified circumstances.

Changing VPN in India is legal, but using it for illegal activities is prohibited and monitored by authorities.

Section 139D of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates filing of annual returns by charitable trusts in India.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 58 defines 'Capital Asset' for taxation under capital gains provisions.

Hacking someone's phone is illegal in India under IT Act and IPC with strict penalties and exceptions only for authorized agencies.

Understand the legality of B grade movies in India, including regulations, censorship, and enforcement practices.

At-will employment is not legal in India; employment laws require just cause for termination.

Storing porn on devices in India is conditionally legal but restricted by law and subject to strict regulations.

Bluetooth helmets are legal in India if they meet safety standards and do not obstruct hearing or vision while riding.

Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) is legal in India, governed by the LLP Act 2008 with specific rules and protections.

IPC Section 4 defines the extension of the Indian Penal Code to extra-territorial offences committed by Indian citizens or against Indian interests.

Section 194Q of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on purchase of goods exceeding ₹50 lakh from a resident seller in India.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 76 addresses the admissibility of confessions caused by inducement, threat, or promise, ensuring such confessions are not used as evidence.

Companies Act 2013 Section 401 governs the power of the Central Government to call for information, inspect books, and conduct inquiries.

Contract Act 1872 Section 50 explains when a contract becomes void due to impossibility of performance.

CrPC Section 195A details the procedure for filing complaints about offences against public servants during duty.

Income Tax Act Section 129 deals with detention, seizure, and release of books of account and assets during income tax searches.

IPC Section 88 covers acts not intended to cause death done by consent in good faith for medical treatment or surgical operations.

Companies Act 2013 Section 103 governs quorum requirements for board meetings, ensuring valid corporate decision-making.

Swingarm extensions are generally illegal in India as they alter vehicle dimensions and safety standards.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 27 defines the holder in due course and its legal significance under the Act.

Batons are conditionally legal in India, allowed for self-defense with restrictions and licenses under the Arms Act.

IPC Section 355 penalizes assault or criminal force intended to dishonour a person, protecting individual dignity and social respect.

CrPC Section 294 deals with punishment for obscene acts or songs in public places causing annoyance to others.

CrPC Section 428 details the procedure for the disposal of property when no person claims it during investigation.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 146 defines the admissibility of oral admissions made by a party, crucial for proving facts in dispute.

bottom of page