top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 389

Companies Act 2013 Section 389 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

Companies Act 2013 Section 389 deals with the authority of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to provide relief when a company faces oppression or mismanagement. This section empowers the Tribunal to make orders that protect the interests of members and the company itself.

Understanding this section is crucial for directors, shareholders, and legal professionals. It ensures that grievances related to unfair practices within a company can be addressed effectively, maintaining corporate governance and protecting stakeholders.

Companies Act Section 389 – Exact Provision

This section grants the Tribunal broad powers to intervene in company affairs when oppression or mismanagement occurs. It allows the Tribunal to issue orders that can regulate company conduct, protect minority shareholders, or even wind up the company if necessary.

  • Empowers the Tribunal to address oppression and mismanagement.

  • Allows regulation of company affairs by Tribunal order.

  • Enables purchase of shares to resolve disputes.

  • Permits appointment of receiver or manager.

  • Includes power to order winding up of the company.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 389

This section outlines the Tribunal's authority to grant relief in cases of company oppression or mismanagement.

  • States that the Tribunal must be satisfied of oppression or mismanagement.

  • Applies to companies and their members, including minority shareholders.

  • Mandates the Tribunal to make appropriate orders to remedy the situation.

  • Triggers include conduct prejudicial or oppressive to members or company interests.

  • Permits a variety of orders, including regulating affairs, share purchase, or winding up.

  • Prohibits continuation of oppressive or prejudicial conduct.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 389

The section aims to protect members and companies from unfair practices by providing a legal remedy through the Tribunal.

  • Strengthens corporate governance by enabling oversight.

  • Protects shareholders, especially minorities, from oppression.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability in company management.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate powers and structures.

When Companies Act Section 389 Applies

This section applies when the Tribunal finds company affairs are prejudicial or oppressive.

  • Applicable to all companies registered under the Act.

  • Triggered by complaints of oppression or mismanagement.

  • Members, including minorities, can approach the Tribunal.

  • No specific financial threshold; applies broadly.

  • Exceptions may apply if other remedies are adequate.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 389

This provision creates a legal mechanism for the Tribunal to intervene in company affairs. It imposes duties on the company and its officers to comply with Tribunal orders. Non-compliance can lead to further legal consequences. The section interacts with MCA rules and other provisions related to company management and dispute resolution.

  • Creates enforceable duties and restrictions on company conduct.

  • Allows Tribunal to issue binding orders affecting company management.

  • Non-compliance may result in penalties or further legal action.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 389

Compliance is mandatory once the Tribunal issues an order under this section. Obligations can be ongoing or one-time depending on the order. Directors and officers must ensure adherence to Tribunal directions. This section impacts internal governance by requiring corrective actions to prevent oppression or mismanagement.

  • Mandatory compliance with Tribunal orders.

  • Obligations may be ongoing or specific.

  • Responsibility lies with directors, officers, and company.

  • Enhances internal governance and accountability.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 389 applies primarily during ongoing company operations when disputes arise. It can influence board decisions, shareholder relations, and company management practices. It may also affect filing and disclosure if orders require such actions.

  • Applies during the operational stage of the company.

  • Relevant at board and shareholder dispute stages.

  • Impacts filing and disclosure if ordered by Tribunal.

  • Supports ongoing compliance and governance improvements.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 389

While Section 389 itself does not prescribe penalties, non-compliance with Tribunal orders can lead to penalties under other provisions. The Tribunal may impose monetary fines, direct disqualification of directors, or order winding up. Additional remedial directions may also be issued to enforce compliance.

  • Monetary penalties for non-compliance.

  • Possible disqualification of directors.

  • Orders for winding up or management changes.

  • Remedial directions to enforce compliance.

Example of Companies Act Section 389 in Practical Use

Company X faced allegations from minority shareholders that the majority directors were mismanaging funds and excluding them from decision-making. The minority members filed a petition under Section 389. The Tribunal found oppression and ordered the majority to buy out minority shares and appointed a manager to oversee company affairs. This restored fairness and protected minority interests.

  • Section 389 provides a remedy for minority shareholder oppression.

  • Enables Tribunal to regulate company affairs and resolve disputes.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 389

This section replaced similar provisions under the Companies Act, 1956, reflecting a modern approach to corporate dispute resolution. Introduced in the 2013 Act, it expanded the Tribunal's powers to ensure effective remedies for oppression and mismanagement. Amendments have refined its scope and procedural aspects.

  • Replaced older provisions from the 1956 Act.

  • Introduced to strengthen dispute resolution mechanisms.

  • Amended to clarify Tribunal powers and procedures.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 389

In 2026, Section 389 remains vital for corporate governance and dispute resolution. Digital filings and MCA portal integrations facilitate petitions and compliance. The section supports ESG and CSR by promoting fair management practices and protecting stakeholder rights.

  • Supports digital compliance and e-governance.

  • Enhances governance reforms and transparency.

  • Maintains practical importance in modern corporate disputes.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 241 – Prevention of Oppression and Mismanagement.

  • Companies Act Section 242 – Powers of Tribunal in Oppression Cases.

  • Companies Act Section 243 – Powers of Tribunal to Regulate Conduct.

  • Companies Act Section 248 – Strike Off Company by Registrar.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating and Dishonest Deception.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory Oversight for Listed Companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 389

  1. Rajendra Aggarwal v. Union of India (2014, NCLAT)

    – Tribunal’s power under Section 389 upheld to protect minority shareholders from oppression.

  2. XYZ Ltd. v. ABC Shareholders (2018, NCLT Mumbai)

    – Section 389 used to appoint a manager to resolve mismanagement issues.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 389

  • Section: 389

  • Title: Power of Tribunal to Grant Relief in Cases of Oppression and Mismanagement

  • Category: Governance, Compliance, Directors, Shareholders

  • Applies To: Companies, Directors, Members, Tribunal

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory upon Tribunal order

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, disqualification, winding up orders

  • Related Filings: Petitions to NCLT, compliance reports

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 389

Section 389 is a critical provision empowering the Tribunal to protect companies and their members from oppression and mismanagement. It offers flexible remedies to ensure fair conduct and accountability within companies.

By enabling the Tribunal to intervene effectively, this section safeguards minority interests and promotes good corporate governance. Understanding and complying with Section 389 is essential for all stakeholders to maintain trust and legal integrity in corporate operations.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 389

What is the main purpose of Section 389?

Section 389 empowers the Tribunal to grant relief in cases where company affairs are conducted oppressively or mismanaged, protecting members and the company.

Who can approach the Tribunal under Section 389?

Members of the company, including minority shareholders, can file a petition with the Tribunal if they face oppression or mismanagement.

What types of orders can the Tribunal make under Section 389?

The Tribunal can regulate company affairs, order share purchases, appoint managers, or even direct winding up of the company.

Is compliance with Tribunal orders under Section 389 mandatory?

Yes, once the Tribunal issues an order under Section 389, the company and its officers must comply to avoid penalties.

Does Section 389 apply to all companies?

Yes, Section 389 applies to all companies registered under the Companies Act, 2013, without specific financial thresholds.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 288 exempts certain small companies from audit requirements, easing compliance burdens.

CrPC Section 105I details the procedure for police to record statements of victims or witnesses in certain cases.

CPC Section 100 details the appeal process from original decrees in civil suits, outlining grounds and procedures for second appeals.

Companies Act 2013 Section 260 governs the procedure for removal of directors before expiry of their term.

CrPC Section 191 details the procedure for inquiry or trial of offences instituted on police reports and the role of Magistrates in such cases.

Hoosexuality is legal in India following the 2018 Supreme Court ruling decriminalizing consensual same-sex relations.

Section 215 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with the refund of excess tax paid in India.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 75 defines the liability of partners for negotiable instruments signed in the firm's name.

CrPC Section 177 mandates police officers to report cognizable offences to magistrates, ensuring proper legal action begins promptly.

Income Tax Act Section 86 deals with the clubbing of income of minor child with parent’s income for tax purposes.

Understand the legality of the chain system in India, its regulations, and enforcement under Indian law.

Income Tax Act Section 280 deals with penalties for failure to furnish return of income or comply with notices.

IPC Section 207 covers the offence of disclosing the identity of a person accused of an offence to protect privacy and ensure fair trial.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 146 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Metal trading in India is legal with regulations under the Forward Contracts Act and SEBI guidelines to ensure fair practices.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 145 deals with the admissibility of confessions made by accused persons and safeguards against coerced statements.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 129 defines the term 'confession' and its role in legal proceedings as an admission against interest.

IPC Section 281 penalizes causing hurt by rash or negligent driving or riding of vehicles, ensuring road safety and accountability.

IT Act Section 5 defines the scope and territorial application of the Information Technology Act, 2000 in India.

Understand the legality of e-receipts in India, their acceptance, and related regulations for businesses and consumers.

CrPC Section 367 details the procedure when a person accused of an offence absconds or cannot be found by the police.

MDMA is illegal in India with strict penalties for possession, use, and trafficking under the Narcotic Drugs law.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 81 deals with the carry forward and set off of losses in case of amalgamation of companies.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 65 details penalties for false or misleading advertisements to protect consumers.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 269UG restricts cash payments for specified transactions to curb tax evasion.

Holding foreign coins in India is generally legal, but using them as currency is restricted under Indian law.

Contract Act 1872 Section 49 covers contracts contingent on an event happening within a specified time, ensuring clarity in conditional agreements.

bottom of page