top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 397

Companies Act 2013 Section 397 governs the power of the National Company Law Tribunal to order investigations into company affairs.

Companies Act 2013 Section 397 empowers the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to order investigations into the affairs of a company. This provision plays a vital role in ensuring corporate transparency and accountability by allowing scrutiny when there are allegations of mismanagement or fraud.

Understanding Section 397 is crucial for directors, shareholders, auditors, and legal professionals. It helps them recognize when investigations can be initiated and the legal framework governing such inquiries. This ensures companies maintain proper governance and comply with statutory requirements.

Companies Act Section 397 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes the NCLT to initiate investigations into a company's affairs if it believes such action is necessary or expedient. The investigation is conducted by inspectors appointed by the Tribunal to examine the company’s conduct and report on any irregularities.

  • Empowers NCLT to order investigations.

  • Investigations can be initiated on application or suo moto.

  • Inspectors appointed to conduct inquiry.

  • Aims to uncover mismanagement or fraud.

  • Ensures corporate accountability and transparency.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 397

This section allows the NCLT to order investigations into company affairs to protect stakeholders and maintain corporate integrity.

  • States that NCLT may order investigation if deemed necessary or expedient.

  • Applies to any company registered under the Companies Act.

  • Investigations conducted by inspectors appointed by the Tribunal.

  • Triggered by applications from shareholders, creditors, or on Tribunal’s own motion.

  • Permits thorough examination of company records and affairs.

  • Prohibits concealment or destruction of evidence during investigation.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 397

The section strengthens corporate governance by providing a legal mechanism to investigate companies suspected of wrongdoing.

  • Enhances transparency in company operations.

  • Protects shareholders and creditors from fraudulent activities.

  • Ensures accountability of directors and management.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate structure for illegal purposes.

When Companies Act Section 397 Applies

This provision applies when the Tribunal considers investigation necessary based on complaints or its own assessment.

  • Applicable to all companies under the Companies Act.

  • Triggered by shareholder, creditor applications, or suo moto by NCLT.

  • Relevant in cases of suspected fraud, mismanagement, or oppression.

  • No specific financial threshold; applies broadly.

  • Exemptions may apply if other legal remedies suffice.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 397

Section 397 creates a statutory power for the NCLT to order investigations, imposing duties on companies to cooperate. It restricts concealment of information and mandates transparency during inquiry. Non-compliance can lead to penalties and adverse legal consequences. The section interacts with MCA rules governing investigation procedures and reporting.

  • Creates duty to comply with investigation orders.

  • Restricts destruction or concealment of evidence.

  • Non-compliance can attract penalties and legal action.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 397

Compliance with Section 397 is mandatory once the Tribunal orders an investigation. The company and its officers must cooperate fully with inspectors. This is an ongoing obligation during the investigation period and affects internal governance by subjecting company affairs to external scrutiny.

  • Mandatory compliance upon Tribunal order.

  • Ongoing cooperation during investigation.

  • Responsibility lies with company directors and officers.

  • Impacts internal governance and transparency.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 397 applies primarily after incorporation, when issues arise requiring Tribunal intervention. It is relevant during board or shareholder disputes and post-complaint investigations. It does not apply at incorporation but during ongoing company operations.

  • Post-incorporation stage.

  • Triggered by board or shareholder disputes.

  • During investigation and compliance stage.

  • Ongoing monitoring of company affairs.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 397

Failure to comply with investigation orders can result in monetary penalties, imprisonment for obstruction, and disqualification of directors. The Tribunal may also impose additional fees or direct remedial actions to protect stakeholders.

  • Monetary fines for non-compliance.

  • Imprisonment in cases of obstruction.

  • Disqualification of responsible directors.

  • Additional fees or corrective orders by Tribunal.

Example of Companies Act Section 397 in Practical Use

Company X faced allegations of financial mismanagement by minority shareholders. The NCLT, upon application, ordered an investigation under Section 397. Inspectors examined Company X’s records and found irregularities in fund utilization. The Tribunal directed corrective measures and penalized responsible directors, restoring stakeholder confidence.

  • Enables detection of corporate fraud.

  • Protects shareholder interests through legal scrutiny.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 397

Section 397 replaces similar provisions in the Companies Act, 1956, reflecting reforms to empower the NCLT. Introduced in 2013, it modernized investigation powers to enhance corporate governance and align with global best practices.

  • Replaced Companies Act, 1956 investigation provisions.

  • Introduced to strengthen NCLT’s role.

  • Part of 2013 Act’s corporate governance reforms.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 397

In 2026, Section 397 remains vital for digital-era corporate compliance. The MCA portal facilitates filing investigation applications and reports. The provision supports ESG and CSR compliance by ensuring transparency and accountability in company affairs.

  • Supports digital filing and e-governance.

  • Enhances governance reforms and transparency.

  • Critical for ESG and CSR compliance monitoring.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 206 – Power to call for information, inspect books.

  • Companies Act Section 210 – Investigation into company affairs.

  • Companies Act Section 213 – Powers of inspectors.

  • Companies Act Section 397 – Tribunal’s power to order investigation.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 397

  1. In Re: Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd (2012) 10 SCC 603

    – Supreme Court emphasized the importance of investigations to protect investor interests under company law provisions.

  2. Rajendra Prasad Gupta v. Union of India (2019) NCLAT

    – Tribunal upheld investigation order under Section 397 for alleged mismanagement.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 397

  • Section: 397

  • Title: Power of Tribunal to Order Investigation

  • Category: Governance, Compliance, Corporate Investigation

  • Applies To: All companies under Companies Act

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory upon Tribunal order

  • Penalties: Fines, imprisonment, disqualification

  • Related Filings: Investigation applications, inspection reports

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 397

Section 397 is a critical provision empowering the NCLT to order investigations into company affairs. It ensures that companies operate transparently and that any mismanagement or fraud is promptly addressed. This fosters trust among shareholders, creditors, and the public.

Directors and officers must understand their obligations under this section to avoid penalties and maintain good corporate governance. The provision’s role in modern corporate law remains indispensable for upholding accountability and protecting stakeholder interests.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 397

What triggers an investigation under Section 397?

An investigation can be triggered by an application from shareholders, creditors, or the Tribunal’s own motion if it deems it necessary to examine company affairs.

Who conducts the investigation ordered by the Tribunal?

The Tribunal appoints one or more inspectors to conduct a thorough investigation into the company’s affairs and report their findings.

Is the company required to cooperate during the investigation?

Yes, the company and its officers must fully cooperate with the inspectors and provide access to records as mandated by the Tribunal.

What are the consequences of obstructing an investigation under Section 397?

Obstruction can lead to monetary penalties, imprisonment, and disqualification of directors responsible for non-compliance.

Does Section 397 apply to all types of companies?

Yes, it applies broadly to all companies registered under the Companies Act, regardless of size or type.

Related Sections

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 80 covering demand, recovery, and related procedures.

Medicinal weed is illegal in India except for limited use of cannabis derivatives under strict government regulation.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 22 defines the admissibility of admissions made by parties, crucial for establishing facts in civil and criminal cases.

Learn about the legality of dolphin silencers in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

In India, writing sex stories is legal but subject to obscenity laws that restrict explicit content distribution and publication.

Contract Act 1872 Section 41 explains when a party is discharged from liability after an agreement is rescinded or altered.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 2 defines key terms used throughout the Act for clear tax law interpretation.

Gold mining in India is legal but regulated under strict government laws and licenses.

Companies Act 2013 Section 272 defines key terms used throughout the Act, essential for corporate legal clarity and compliance.

Income Tax Act Section 50CA deals with capital gains on transfer of shares at undervalue to prevent tax evasion.

Income Tax Act Section 294 deals with penalties for failure to comply with TDS provisions under the Act.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 81A governs the admissibility of electronic records, ensuring their reliability and authenticity in legal proceedings.

Understand the legal status of Psiphon in India, including restrictions, enforcement, and common misconceptions about its use.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 61 defines the term 'holder' and explains who is entitled to enforce a negotiable instrument.

Owning a thermal scope in India is conditionally legal with strict regulations and licensing under arms laws.

In India, a second marriage without divorce is generally illegal except for certain communities under personal laws.

Wikileaks is not legal in India due to laws on national security and unauthorized disclosure of classified information.

Understand the legality of BitTorrent use in India, including copyright laws and enforcement realities.

CrPC Section 458 details the procedure for search of a place entered by a person to avoid arrest, ensuring lawful search and seizure.

CPC Section 87A empowers courts to order discovery and inspection of documents before suit filing to aid civil dispute resolution.

CPC Section 10 prevents courts from trying suits that are already pending between the same parties on the same matter.

Income Tax Act Section 59 explains the procedure for rectification of mistakes in orders or decisions by tax authorities.

Sugar babies system is not legally recognized in India and may involve legal risks under various laws.

Companies Act 2013 Section 426 governs the power of the Central Government to give directions to companies for compliance.

Companies Act 2013 Section 343 governs the power of the Central Government to exempt certain companies from provisions of the Act.

IPC Section 256 addresses the punishment for public nuisance causing obstruction or annoyance to the public.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 87A provides a rebate on tax payable for resident individual taxpayers with income below a specified limit.

bottom of page