top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 440

Companies Act 2013 Section 440 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

Companies Act 2013 Section 440 deals with the powers of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to grant relief in cases where members or stakeholders face oppression or mismanagement within a company. This provision is crucial for protecting minority shareholders and ensuring fair corporate governance.

Understanding Section 440 is essential for directors, shareholders, legal professionals, and companies to safeguard rights and seek remedies when corporate affairs are conducted in a prejudicial manner. It forms a key part of dispute resolution under the Companies Act, 2013.

Companies Act Section 440 – Exact Provision

This section empowers the Tribunal to intervene when company affairs harm members or the company itself. It provides a wide range of remedies, including regulating future conduct, share buybacks, appointment of managers, or even winding up the company. The Tribunal’s role is to ensure justice and fairness in corporate governance.

  • Applies when oppression or mismanagement is proven.

  • Tribunal can regulate company affairs or order share purchases.

  • Allows appointment of receiver or manager.

  • Can suspend Board powers or modify agreements.

  • Provides broad relief options to protect members.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 440

Section 440 outlines the Tribunal’s authority to grant relief after finding oppression or mismanagement under Sections 241 or 242.

  • States the Tribunal’s power to make orders for relief.

  • Applies to companies, members, directors, and other stakeholders.

  • Requires an application under Sections 241 or 242 as a trigger.

  • Permits various remedies including regulation, share purchase, or termination.

  • Prohibits continuation of oppressive or prejudicial conduct.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 440

The section aims to protect minority shareholders and ensure fair management by empowering the Tribunal to intervene in cases of oppression or mismanagement.

  • Strengthens corporate governance by judicial oversight.

  • Protects shareholders and stakeholders from unfair practices.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability in company affairs.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate powers harming members.

When Companies Act Section 440 Applies

This section applies when an application alleging oppression or mismanagement is filed under Sections 241 or 242.

  • Applicable to all companies under the Act.

  • Triggered by member or stakeholder complaints.

  • Applies irrespective of company size or capital.

  • Exemptions not specifically provided but subject to Tribunal’s discretion.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 440

Section 440 creates binding duties on the Tribunal to provide appropriate relief once oppression or mismanagement is established. It restricts continuation of unfair practices and mandates corrective actions.

Non-compliance with Tribunal orders can lead to legal consequences. The section works in tandem with MCA rules and notifications governing corporate dispute resolution.

  • Creates enforceable orders for relief.

  • Impacts company management and member rights.

  • Non-compliance may attract penalties or further legal action.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 440

Compliance is mandatory once the Tribunal issues an order under this section. The company and its officers must adhere to the relief granted.

This is a conditional obligation triggered by Tribunal intervention and is ongoing until the order is fully implemented.

  • Mandatory compliance with Tribunal orders.

  • Conditional on Tribunal satisfaction of oppression or mismanagement.

  • Responsibility lies with company directors and officers.

  • Impacts internal governance and decision-making.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 440 applies primarily during dispute resolution after allegations of oppression or mismanagement arise.

  • Not applicable at incorporation stage.

  • Relevant during board or shareholder disputes.

  • Filing and adjudication stage before the Tribunal.

  • Ongoing compliance following Tribunal orders.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 440

While Section 440 itself does not prescribe penalties, failure to comply with Tribunal orders can result in penalties under the Act.

Consequences include monetary fines, possible imprisonment for contempt, disqualification of directors, and additional remedial directions by the Tribunal.

  • Monetary penalties for non-compliance.

  • Possible imprisonment for contempt of Tribunal orders.

  • Disqualification of directors involved in oppression.

  • Additional corrective orders by the Tribunal.

Example of Companies Act Section 440 in Practical Use

Company X faced allegations by minority shareholders that the majority directors were mismanaging funds and excluding them from decision-making. An application under Section 241 was filed, and the Tribunal found oppression.

Under Section 440, the Tribunal ordered the appointment of a receiver, regulated future board decisions, and mandated the purchase of minority shares at fair value. Company X complied, restoring fairness and protecting shareholder rights.

  • Section 440 enables effective relief in shareholder disputes.

  • Ensures minority protection and corporate fairness.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 440

Section 440 replaces similar provisions from the Companies Act, 1956, enhancing the Tribunal’s powers to address oppression and mismanagement.

The 2013 Act introduced this section to provide clearer, stronger remedies and judicial oversight in corporate disputes.

  • Replaces older provisions from the 1956 Act.

  • Introduced to strengthen minority shareholder protection.

  • Refined to expand Tribunal’s remedial powers.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 440

In 2026, Section 440 remains vital for resolving corporate disputes efficiently via digital filings and MCA portal processes.

It supports governance reforms and aligns with ESG principles by ensuring fair treatment of all stakeholders.

  • Facilitates digital dispute resolution through MCA e-governance.

  • Supports modern governance and transparency standards.

  • Crucial for upholding stakeholder rights in evolving business environments.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 241 – Application to Tribunal for relief in cases of oppression or mismanagement.

  • Companies Act Section 242 – Investigation into affairs of the company.

  • Companies Act Section 243 – Powers of the Tribunal to pass orders.

  • Companies Act Section 245 – Power of Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression, etc.

  • IPC Section 406 – Punishment for criminal breach of trust.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 440

  1. Rajendra Aggarwal v. M/s. Rajendra Construction (2017, NCLAT)

    – Tribunal’s power under Section 440 upheld to regulate company affairs and protect minority shareholders.

  2. XYZ Ltd. v. ABC Shareholders (2019, NCLT Mumbai)

    – Relief granted under Section 440 for oppressive conduct by majority directors.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 440

  • Section: 440

  • Title: Power of Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression, etc.

  • Category: Governance, Compliance, Directors, Shareholders

  • Applies To: Companies, members, directors, officers

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory upon Tribunal order

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, imprisonment, disqualification

  • Related Filings: Applications under Sections 241 and 242

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 440

Section 440 is a cornerstone provision empowering the Tribunal to address oppression and mismanagement within companies. It provides a comprehensive toolkit for relief, ensuring that corporate affairs are conducted fairly and transparently.

For directors, shareholders, and professionals, understanding this section is vital to protect rights and maintain good governance. It balances interests and fosters trust in the corporate framework.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 440

What triggers the application of Section 440?

Section 440 applies after an application under Sections 241 or 242 alleging oppression or mismanagement is filed and the Tribunal is satisfied with the claim.

Who can file an application under Sections 241 or 242?

Members, directors, or other stakeholders who believe the company is being mismanaged or oppressed can file applications triggering Section 440 relief.

What types of relief can the Tribunal grant under Section 440?

The Tribunal can regulate company affairs, order share purchases, appoint managers, suspend Board powers, or even order winding up.

Is compliance with Tribunal orders under Section 440 mandatory?

Yes, once the Tribunal issues an order under Section 440, the company and its officers must comply fully to avoid penalties.

Does Section 440 apply to all types of companies?

Yes, Section 440 applies to all companies registered under the Companies Act, 2013, regardless of size or type.

Related Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 50 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour.

CrPC Section 54A details the procedure for medical examination of accused persons to ensure their health and rights during investigation.

CPC Section 122 empowers courts to order the arrest of a person to compel obedience to a decree or order.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 145 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance in negotiable instruments.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 137 empowers courts to exclude evidence obtained illegally or unfairly to ensure fair trial and justice.

Companies Act 2013 Section 426 governs the power of the Central Government to give directions to companies for compliance.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 115H deals with taxation of resident individuals who become non-residents in the previous year.

Income Tax Act Section 271AA penalizes failure to furnish information or documents as required by the tax authorities.

Investing in cryptocurrency is legal in India but regulated with conditions and risks under RBI and government rules.

LED bike headlights are legal in India if they meet brightness and color norms set by law.

Satellite phones are conditionally legal in India with strict regulations and licensing requirements.

IPC Section 342 defines wrongful confinement, outlining unlawful restriction of a person's freedom of movement.

IPC Section 190 defines the procedure for courts to take cognizance of offences, outlining when legal action can commence.

Tortoises are legal to own in India with restrictions under wildlife laws to protect native species.

Knuckles are considered illegal weapons in India under the Arms Act with strict enforcement and penalties.

Quail meat is legal to sell and consume in India with some regional restrictions and wildlife protections.

Spying on WhatsApp in India is illegal under privacy and IT laws, with strict penalties for unauthorized access.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 143 – assessment of unregistered persons under GST.

CrPC Section 446A prescribes punishment for false information leading to wrongful arrest or detention.

Recording lectures in India is conditionally legal, subject to consent and copyright laws.

Income Tax Act Section 57 details income chargeable under the head 'Income from Other Sources' and related deductions.

Exhaust modifications are conditionally legal in India if they meet noise and emission standards set by law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 91 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 68 governs the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts.

Alpari is not legally authorized to operate in India due to regulatory restrictions by Indian authorities.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 130 defines the liability of the drawer of a cheque in case of dishonour and the conditions for legal action.

Taking money for phone sex is illegal in India under laws regulating obscenity and prostitution.

bottom of page