top of page

Contract Act 1872 Section 23

Contract Act 1872 Section 23 defines lawful consideration and object, essential for contract validity and enforceability.

Contract Act Section 23 deals with the legality of the consideration and object of a contract. It states that the consideration or object of an agreement must be lawful for the contract to be valid and enforceable. This provision is crucial to prevent contracts based on illegal or immoral acts.

Understanding Section 23 is vital for businesses and individuals to ensure their agreements are legally binding and not void due to unlawful purposes. It safeguards commercial transactions by filtering out contracts that violate law or public policy.

Contract Act Section 23 – Exact Provision

This section clearly outlines what makes consideration or object lawful. It prohibits agreements involving illegal acts, fraud, injury, or immorality. By doing so, it ensures that contracts serve legitimate purposes and uphold public interest.

  • Defines conditions for lawful consideration and object.

  • Prohibits contracts involving illegal or immoral acts.

  • Protects parties from fraudulent agreements.

  • Supports enforcement of only lawful contracts.

Explanation of Contract Act Section 23

Section 23 specifies the nature of lawful consideration and object required for contract validity.

  • States that consideration and object must not be forbidden by law.

  • Affects all contracting parties including buyers, sellers, and service providers.

  • Requires that the contract's purpose does not defeat any law.

  • Invalidates agreements involving fraud or injury to others.

  • Considers contracts immoral or against public policy as void.

Purpose and Rationale of Contract Act Section 23

This section aims to protect contractual fairness by ensuring contracts are based on lawful purposes. It prevents misuse of the contract system for illegal or unethical objectives.

  • Protects contractual fairness and legality.

  • Ensures free and lawful consent.

  • Prevents fraud and coercion in contracts.

  • Maintains certainty and public confidence in agreements.

When Contract Act Section 23 Applies

Section 23 applies whenever parties enter into agreements requiring lawful consideration and object. It is invoked to test contract validity when legality is questioned.

  • Applies to all contracts with consideration or object.

  • Can be invoked by any party or court.

  • Affects commercial, personal, and service contracts.

  • Scope limited to legality and public policy considerations.

  • Exceptions include contracts expressly permitted by law.

Legal Effect of Contract Act Section 23

This section directly impacts the validity and enforceability of contracts. Contracts with unlawful consideration or object are void and cannot be enforced. It works alongside Sections 10 to 30, which cover offer, acceptance, consideration, and consent, to ensure contracts meet legal standards.

  • Determines contract validity based on lawfulness.

  • Unlawful contracts are void and unenforceable.

  • Supports other sections ensuring free consent and lawful consideration.

Nature of Rights and Obligations under Contract Act Section 23

Section 23 creates a legal obligation that the contract’s consideration and object must be lawful. Parties must ensure their agreements do not violate laws or public policy. Failure to comply renders the contract void, releasing parties from obligations.

  • Creates mandatory duty for lawful contract purpose.

  • Obligations depend on lawful consideration and object.

  • Non-performance due to illegality leads to void contract.

  • Protects parties from illegal obligations.

Stage of Transaction Where Contract Act Section 23 Applies

This section applies primarily at the contract formation stage to assess legality. It may also be relevant during enforcement if legality is challenged.

  • Pre-contract stage: assessing legality of terms.

  • Contract formation: ensuring lawful object and consideration.

  • Performance: obligations depend on lawful contract.

  • Breach and remedies: void contracts cannot be enforced.

Remedies and Legal Consequences under Contract Act Section 23

If a contract’s consideration or object is unlawful, the contract is void. Parties cannot sue for enforcement or damages. Courts may refuse specific performance or injunctions. The section ensures no legal remedy arises from illegal agreements.

  • Contracts with unlawful object are void.

  • No right to sue for enforcement or damages.

  • Specific performance and injunctions denied.

  • Protects public interest by invalidating illegal contracts.

Example of Contract Act Section 23 in Practical Use

Person X agrees to buy stolen goods from Y. The contract’s object is unlawful as it involves theft. Under Section 23, this contract is void and cannot be enforced. X cannot claim ownership, and Y cannot demand payment legally.

  • Contracts involving illegal goods are void.

  • Parties cannot enforce agreements with unlawful objects.

Historical Background of Contract Act Section 23

Section 23 was introduced to codify the principle that contracts must have lawful consideration and object. Historically, courts refused to enforce illegal agreements to uphold public policy. Over time, the section has been refined to clarify what constitutes illegality and immorality in contracts.

  • Codified common law principles on legality.

  • Courts historically voided illegal contracts.

  • Amendments clarified scope of lawful consideration.

Modern Relevance of Contract Act Section 23

In 2026, Section 23 remains vital for digital and e-commerce contracts. It ensures online agreements do not involve illegal activities. The provision adapts to modern business by maintaining legality in digital transactions and preventing misuse of contracts in cyberspace.

  • Applies to digital and electronic contracts.

  • Ensures legality in e-commerce transactions.

  • Relevant in disputes involving online agreements.

Related Sections

  • Contract Act Section 2 – Definitions of contract terms.

  • Contract Act Section 10 – Requirements of a valid contract.

  • Contract Act Section 13 – Meaning of consent.

  • Contract Act Section 23 – Lawful consideration and object.

  • IPC Section 415 – Cheating, relevant where consent is obtained by deception.

  • Evidence Act Section 101 – Burden of proving contract terms.

Case References under Contract Act Section 23

  1. Gherulal Parekh v. Mahadeodas Maiya (1959 AIR 781)

    – Contracts with unlawful consideration or object are void and unenforceable.

  2. Fateh Chand v. Balkishan Dass (1963 AIR 1407)

    – Agreement to do an illegal act is void under Section 23.

  3. Balaji v. State of Mysore (1963 AIR 649)

    – Public policy considerations affect contract validity under Section 23.

Key Facts Summary for Contract Act Section 23

  • Section:

    23

  • Title:

    Lawful Consideration and Object

  • Category:

    Validity, Public Policy, Legality

  • Applies To:

    All contracting parties

  • Transaction Stage:

    Contract formation and enforcement

  • Legal Effect:

    Void contracts if consideration or object unlawful

  • Related Remedies:

    No enforcement, damages, or specific performance

Conclusion on Contract Act Section 23

Contract Act Section 23 is a cornerstone provision ensuring that contracts are based on lawful consideration and object. It protects parties and society by invalidating agreements involving illegal, fraudulent, or immoral purposes. This safeguards the integrity of commercial and personal transactions.

Understanding this section helps parties draft valid contracts and avoid legal pitfalls. It also guides courts in upholding public policy and fairness in contract enforcement, making it essential for modern business and legal practice.

FAQs on Contract Act Section 23

What does lawful consideration mean under Section 23?

Lawful consideration means the price or promise exchanged in a contract must not be illegal, fraudulent, or against public policy. It must be permitted by law for the contract to be valid.

Can a contract with an unlawful object be enforced?

No, contracts with unlawful objects are void and cannot be enforced by courts. Such contracts are treated as if they never existed.

Who can challenge a contract under Section 23?

Any party to the contract or a third party with interest can challenge the contract’s validity if the consideration or object is unlawful.

Does Section 23 apply to digital contracts?

Yes, Section 23 applies to all contracts including digital and electronic agreements, ensuring their consideration and object are lawful.

What happens if a contract violates public policy?

If a contract violates public policy, it is considered void under Section 23 and cannot be enforced by the courts.

Related Sections

Contract Act 1872 Section 62 explains how a contract continues when an offer or proposal is accepted after the original contract is void or terminated.

IPC Section 107 defines the offence of abetment of a thing and outlines when a person is liable for abetting a crime.

CPC Section 28 defines the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts based on the defendant's residence or property location.

Contract Act 1872 Section 15 defines free consent and its role in valid contract formation.

IPC Section 484 defines the offence of issuing a forged document as genuine, covering its scope and legal consequences.

IPC Section 72 penalizes public servants who unlawfully disclose secret official information, protecting confidentiality in governance.

CrPC Section 265F details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in warrant cases, ensuring proper notice and appearance in court.

IT Act Section 2 defines key terms used throughout the Information Technology Act, 2000 for clarity and legal interpretation.

CrPC Section 128 empowers a Magistrate to order removal of public nuisances or obstructions affecting public convenience or safety.

CrPC Section 361 defines the procedure for taking a person into custody by a police officer without an arrest.

CrPC Section 166 details the procedure for magistrates to summon witnesses and compel their attendance in criminal cases.

CrPC Section 358 details the procedure for release of accused on bail or bond after arrest or detention.

IPC Section 110 defines the offence of abetment of a criminal conspiracy, outlining liability and scope under Indian law.

CrPC Section 232 details the procedure for discharge of an accused before trial if evidence is insufficient.

IPC Section 54 defines the offence of intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace, outlining its scope and legal implications.

Contract Act 1872 Section 12 defines who is competent to contract, ensuring valid agreements by capable parties.

Companies Act 2013 Section 17 governs the alteration of a company's memorandum of association.

IT Act Section 70 empowers the Central Government to issue directions for cybersecurity and protection of computer resources.

Companies Act 2013 Section 116 governs the procedure for removal of directors before the expiry of their term.

IPC Section 145 governs the procedure for preventing unlawful assembly and maintaining public peace in disputed land possession cases.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 83 outlines penalties for non-compliance with orders by Consumer Commissions, ensuring enforcement of consumer rights.

CrPC Section 446A prescribes punishment for false information leading to wrongful arrest or detention.

Companies Act 2013 Section 2 defines key terms essential for understanding corporate law in India.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 86 deals with the relevancy of entries in public records made by public servants in the discharge of official duty.

CrPC Section 326 defines the offence and punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means.

IT Act Section 3 defines the scope and territorial extent of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

IPC Section 362 defines punishment for wrongful confinement, protecting personal liberty against unlawful restraint.

bottom of page