top of page

Contract Act 1872 Section 23

Contract Act 1872 Section 23 defines lawful consideration and object, essential for contract validity and enforceability.

Contract Act Section 23 deals with the legality of the consideration and object of a contract. It states that the consideration or object of an agreement must be lawful for the contract to be valid and enforceable. This provision is crucial to prevent contracts based on illegal or immoral acts.

Understanding Section 23 is vital for businesses and individuals to ensure their agreements are legally binding and not void due to unlawful purposes. It safeguards commercial transactions by filtering out contracts that violate law or public policy.

Contract Act Section 23 – Exact Provision

This section clearly outlines what makes consideration or object lawful. It prohibits agreements involving illegal acts, fraud, injury, or immorality. By doing so, it ensures that contracts serve legitimate purposes and uphold public interest.

  • Defines conditions for lawful consideration and object.

  • Prohibits contracts involving illegal or immoral acts.

  • Protects parties from fraudulent agreements.

  • Supports enforcement of only lawful contracts.

Explanation of Contract Act Section 23

Section 23 specifies the nature of lawful consideration and object required for contract validity.

  • States that consideration and object must not be forbidden by law.

  • Affects all contracting parties including buyers, sellers, and service providers.

  • Requires that the contract's purpose does not defeat any law.

  • Invalidates agreements involving fraud or injury to others.

  • Considers contracts immoral or against public policy as void.

Purpose and Rationale of Contract Act Section 23

This section aims to protect contractual fairness by ensuring contracts are based on lawful purposes. It prevents misuse of the contract system for illegal or unethical objectives.

  • Protects contractual fairness and legality.

  • Ensures free and lawful consent.

  • Prevents fraud and coercion in contracts.

  • Maintains certainty and public confidence in agreements.

When Contract Act Section 23 Applies

Section 23 applies whenever parties enter into agreements requiring lawful consideration and object. It is invoked to test contract validity when legality is questioned.

  • Applies to all contracts with consideration or object.

  • Can be invoked by any party or court.

  • Affects commercial, personal, and service contracts.

  • Scope limited to legality and public policy considerations.

  • Exceptions include contracts expressly permitted by law.

Legal Effect of Contract Act Section 23

This section directly impacts the validity and enforceability of contracts. Contracts with unlawful consideration or object are void and cannot be enforced. It works alongside Sections 10 to 30, which cover offer, acceptance, consideration, and consent, to ensure contracts meet legal standards.

  • Determines contract validity based on lawfulness.

  • Unlawful contracts are void and unenforceable.

  • Supports other sections ensuring free consent and lawful consideration.

Nature of Rights and Obligations under Contract Act Section 23

Section 23 creates a legal obligation that the contract’s consideration and object must be lawful. Parties must ensure their agreements do not violate laws or public policy. Failure to comply renders the contract void, releasing parties from obligations.

  • Creates mandatory duty for lawful contract purpose.

  • Obligations depend on lawful consideration and object.

  • Non-performance due to illegality leads to void contract.

  • Protects parties from illegal obligations.

Stage of Transaction Where Contract Act Section 23 Applies

This section applies primarily at the contract formation stage to assess legality. It may also be relevant during enforcement if legality is challenged.

  • Pre-contract stage: assessing legality of terms.

  • Contract formation: ensuring lawful object and consideration.

  • Performance: obligations depend on lawful contract.

  • Breach and remedies: void contracts cannot be enforced.

Remedies and Legal Consequences under Contract Act Section 23

If a contract’s consideration or object is unlawful, the contract is void. Parties cannot sue for enforcement or damages. Courts may refuse specific performance or injunctions. The section ensures no legal remedy arises from illegal agreements.

  • Contracts with unlawful object are void.

  • No right to sue for enforcement or damages.

  • Specific performance and injunctions denied.

  • Protects public interest by invalidating illegal contracts.

Example of Contract Act Section 23 in Practical Use

Person X agrees to buy stolen goods from Y. The contract’s object is unlawful as it involves theft. Under Section 23, this contract is void and cannot be enforced. X cannot claim ownership, and Y cannot demand payment legally.

  • Contracts involving illegal goods are void.

  • Parties cannot enforce agreements with unlawful objects.

Historical Background of Contract Act Section 23

Section 23 was introduced to codify the principle that contracts must have lawful consideration and object. Historically, courts refused to enforce illegal agreements to uphold public policy. Over time, the section has been refined to clarify what constitutes illegality and immorality in contracts.

  • Codified common law principles on legality.

  • Courts historically voided illegal contracts.

  • Amendments clarified scope of lawful consideration.

Modern Relevance of Contract Act Section 23

In 2026, Section 23 remains vital for digital and e-commerce contracts. It ensures online agreements do not involve illegal activities. The provision adapts to modern business by maintaining legality in digital transactions and preventing misuse of contracts in cyberspace.

  • Applies to digital and electronic contracts.

  • Ensures legality in e-commerce transactions.

  • Relevant in disputes involving online agreements.

Related Sections

  • Contract Act Section 2 – Definitions of contract terms.

  • Contract Act Section 10 – Requirements of a valid contract.

  • Contract Act Section 13 – Meaning of consent.

  • Contract Act Section 23 – Lawful consideration and object.

  • IPC Section 415 – Cheating, relevant where consent is obtained by deception.

  • Evidence Act Section 101 – Burden of proving contract terms.

Case References under Contract Act Section 23

  1. Gherulal Parekh v. Mahadeodas Maiya (1959 AIR 781)

    – Contracts with unlawful consideration or object are void and unenforceable.

  2. Fateh Chand v. Balkishan Dass (1963 AIR 1407)

    – Agreement to do an illegal act is void under Section 23.

  3. Balaji v. State of Mysore (1963 AIR 649)

    – Public policy considerations affect contract validity under Section 23.

Key Facts Summary for Contract Act Section 23

  • Section:

    23

  • Title:

    Lawful Consideration and Object

  • Category:

    Validity, Public Policy, Legality

  • Applies To:

    All contracting parties

  • Transaction Stage:

    Contract formation and enforcement

  • Legal Effect:

    Void contracts if consideration or object unlawful

  • Related Remedies:

    No enforcement, damages, or specific performance

Conclusion on Contract Act Section 23

Contract Act Section 23 is a cornerstone provision ensuring that contracts are based on lawful consideration and object. It protects parties and society by invalidating agreements involving illegal, fraudulent, or immoral purposes. This safeguards the integrity of commercial and personal transactions.

Understanding this section helps parties draft valid contracts and avoid legal pitfalls. It also guides courts in upholding public policy and fairness in contract enforcement, making it essential for modern business and legal practice.

FAQs on Contract Act Section 23

What does lawful consideration mean under Section 23?

Lawful consideration means the price or promise exchanged in a contract must not be illegal, fraudulent, or against public policy. It must be permitted by law for the contract to be valid.

Can a contract with an unlawful object be enforced?

No, contracts with unlawful objects are void and cannot be enforced by courts. Such contracts are treated as if they never existed.

Who can challenge a contract under Section 23?

Any party to the contract or a third party with interest can challenge the contract’s validity if the consideration or object is unlawful.

Does Section 23 apply to digital contracts?

Yes, Section 23 applies to all contracts including digital and electronic agreements, ensuring their consideration and object are lawful.

What happens if a contract violates public policy?

If a contract violates public policy, it is considered void under Section 23 and cannot be enforced by the courts.

Related Sections

Section 223 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the procedure for assessment of income tax by the assessing officer in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 22 governs the use of the word 'Limited' or 'Private Limited' in company names in India.

CrPC Section 14 empowers police officers to investigate cognizable offences without prior magistrate approval.

Ketamine is a controlled substance in India, legal only for medical use under strict regulation.

IPC Section 489B covers counterfeiting currency notes, defining offences and penalties to protect monetary integrity.

Car window tints are conditionally legal in India, with strict rules on tint darkness and mandatory permits for certain vehicles.

Section 234B of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates interest on default in advance tax payment in India.

Deer hunting in India is largely illegal, with strict protections under wildlife laws and limited exceptions for certain communities.

Bullet proof jackets are legal in India with restrictions and licenses under the Arms Act and related laws.

IPC Section 235 covers the procedure for framing charges in criminal trials, ensuring fair trial commencement.

Pangaea is not legally recognized in India; understand the legal status and implications of Pangaea-related activities in India.

CrPC Section 149 defines liability of every member of an unlawful assembly for offences committed in prosecution of common object.

Job consultancy services are legal in India but must comply with specific regulations and licensing requirements.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 27 covers admissions by persons whose statements explain or are connected to a fact in issue, aiding proof in trials.

IPC Section 348 defines wrongful confinement in a place of worship or religious assembly to outrage religious feelings.

Car roof wrapping is legal in India with specific regulations on colors and reflectivity to ensure road safety.

CrPC Section 158 outlines the procedure for police to register an FIR upon receiving information about a cognizable offence.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 128 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Contract Act 1872 Section 39 explains the effect of refusal to perform promise wholly or in part.

CrPC Section 21 defines the powers of police officers to investigate cognizable offences and outlines their authority during investigations.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 23 defines when oral evidence is relevant to facts in issue or relevant facts in a trial.

WebMoney is not legally recognized in India and faces restrictions under Indian financial laws.

Drone delivery in India is legal with strict regulations and government approvals required for operation and airspace use.

Selling animals in India is legal with regulations on animal welfare, species protection, and trade licenses.

Understand the legality of criticizing the Quran in India, including free speech limits and related laws.

CPC Section 55 details the procedure and consequences of a plaintiff's failure to appear in court after summons.

Conversion therapy is illegal in India with strict laws protecting individuals from such practices.

bottom of page