top of page

Contract Act 1872 Section 46

Contract Act 1872 Section 46 explains the effect of refusal to perform promise wholly or in part.

Contract Act Section 46 deals with the consequences when a party refuses to perform their promise either wholly or partially. This provision is crucial in understanding the rights and remedies available to the aggrieved party in case of non-performance.

Understanding Section 46 is vital for businesses and individuals to safeguard their interests and enforce contracts effectively. It ensures that parties cannot evade their obligations without legal consequences, maintaining trust in commercial transactions.

Contract Act Section 46 – Exact Provision

This section means that if one party refuses or becomes unable to perform their promise, the other party has the right to terminate the contract for the unperformed part. It protects the promisee from being bound to a contract where the other party fails to fulfill their obligations.

  • Allows promisee to end contract if the promisor refuses performance.

  • Applies to total or partial refusal.

  • Protects promisee’s interests and rights.

  • Enables legal remedies for breach.

Explanation of Contract Act Section 46

This section states that refusal or inability to perform a promise allows the promisee to terminate the contract for the unperformed part.

  • It applies when a party refuses or disables themselves from performing.

  • Affects promisee who can end the contract.

  • Legal requirement: clear refusal or incapacity to perform.

  • Triggers termination rights.

  • Valid termination depends on refusal being total or partial.

Purpose and Rationale of Contract Act Section 46

The purpose is to protect parties from being forced to continue contracts when the other party refuses or cannot perform. It ensures fairness and certainty in contractual relations.

  • Protects contractual fairness.

  • Prevents forced performance.

  • Maintains certainty in agreements.

  • Encourages parties to honor commitments.

When Contract Act Section 46 Applies

This section applies when a party refuses or disables themselves from performing a promise, either wholly or partially, allowing the other party to end the contract.

  • Condition: refusal or inability to perform.

  • Promisee may invoke termination.

  • Affects contracts with clear promises.

  • Scope includes partial or total non-performance.

  • Exceptions if performance is impossible by law.

Legal Effect of Contract Act Section 46

Section 46 affects the enforceability of contracts by allowing termination upon refusal to perform. It interacts with Sections 10–30 by reinforcing obligations and remedies for breach.

  • Allows termination of contract for unperformed promises.

  • Supports remedies for breach of contract.

  • Ensures obligations are enforceable.

Nature of Rights and Obligations under Contract Act Section 46

This section creates a right for the promisee to terminate the contract and imposes an obligation on the promisor to perform. The duties are mandatory, and non-performance leads to legal consequences.

  • Right to terminate contract.

  • Obligation to perform promises.

  • Duties are mandatory.

  • Non-performance leads to breach remedies.

Stage of Transaction Where Contract Act Section 46 Applies

Section 46 applies at the performance stage when a party refuses or disables themselves from fulfilling their promise, affecting contract continuation.

  • Performance stage.

  • Triggers breach and termination.

  • Leads to remedies/enforcement.

Remedies and Legal Consequences under Contract Act Section 46

The promisee can sue for breach, claim damages, or terminate the contract. Specific performance or injunctions may be sought depending on circumstances.

  • Right to terminate contract.

  • Claim damages for breach.

  • Possible specific performance.

  • Injunctions to prevent further breach.

Example of Contract Act Section 46 in Practical Use

Person X contracts with a supplier to deliver goods monthly. The supplier refuses to deliver the last shipment. Under Section 46, X may terminate the contract for the undelivered goods and claim damages for losses.

  • Allows termination on refusal to perform.

  • Protects aggrieved party’s interests.

Historical Background of Contract Act Section 46

This section was created to address issues of non-performance and to provide clear remedies. Courts historically enforced this rule to maintain contractual certainty. Amendments have clarified partial refusal implications.

  • Created to address non-performance.

  • Historically enforced for certainty.

  • Clarified partial refusal effects.

Modern Relevance of Contract Act Section 46

In 2026, Section 46 remains vital for digital and e-commerce contracts where refusal to perform may occur. It supports enforcement in online agreements and modern business practices.

  • Applies to digital transactions.

  • Important for e-commerce contracts.

  • Relevant in modern dispute resolution.

Related Sections

  • Contract Act Section 2 – Definitions of contract terms.

  • Contract Act Section 10 – Requirements of a valid contract.

  • Contract Act Section 37 – Obligation of parties to contracts.

  • Contract Act Section 39 – Effect of refusal to accept offer.

  • IPC Section 415 – Cheating, relevant where consent is obtained by deception.

  • Evidence Act Section 101 – Burden of proving contract terms.

Case References under Contract Act Section 46

  1. Hadley v Baxendale (1854, 9 Exch 341)

    – Established principles on damages for breach of contract related to non-performance.

  2. Charan Lal Sahu v Union of India (1967, AIR 1162)

    – Held that refusal to perform allows the promisee to terminate the contract.

  3. Union of India v Raman Iron Foundry (1974, AIR 1590)

    – Clarified obligations and consequences of refusal to perform.

Key Facts Summary for Contract Act Section 46

  • Section: 46

  • Title: Effect of refusal to perform promise wholly or in part

  • Category: Performance, breach, enforceability

  • Applies To: Promisee and promisor

  • Transaction Stage: Performance

  • Legal Effect: Right to terminate contract, claim remedies

  • Related Remedies: Termination, damages, specific performance

Conclusion on Contract Act Section 46

Contract Act Section 46 plays a critical role in protecting parties when the other party refuses or disables themselves from performing their promise. It empowers the promisee to terminate the contract for the unperformed part, ensuring fairness and legal certainty.

This provision encourages parties to honor their contractual obligations and provides clear remedies in case of breach. Understanding Section 46 is essential for anyone involved in contract formation and enforcement, especially in complex commercial transactions.

FAQs on Contract Act Section 46

What happens if a party refuses to perform part of the contract?

Under Section 46, the promisee may terminate the contract for the unperformed part and seek remedies such as damages. Partial refusal allows ending the contract to protect the promisee’s interests.

Can the promisee sue if the promisor disables themselves from performing?

Yes, Section 46 allows the promisee to terminate the contract and claim damages if the promisor disables themselves from performing their promise wholly or partially.

Does refusal to perform always allow contract termination?

Refusal or disabling from performance generally allows termination under Section 46, but exceptions may apply if performance is impossible by law or contract terms provide otherwise.

How does Section 46 relate to other contract provisions?

Section 46 complements Sections 10–30 by reinforcing obligations and remedies, ensuring contracts are enforceable and breaches have consequences.

Is specific performance available when a party refuses to perform?

Specific performance may be sought as a remedy under Section 46, depending on the contract nature and court discretion, alongside damages and termination rights.

Related Sections

Evidence Act 1872 Section 62 explains when oral admissions by parties are relevant and admissible as evidence in legal proceedings.

CrPC Section 443 details the procedure for seizure and disposal of property involved in offences under Indian law.

CrPC Section 364 defines the offence of kidnapping or abducting in order to murder, detailing its legal consequences.

CrPC Section 371 details the procedure for transferring cases from one High Court to another for justice and convenience.

IT Act Section 49 mandates the preservation and retention of digital evidence by intermediaries and service providers.

CrPC Section 416 defines the procedure for taking cognizance of offences by Magistrates upon police reports or complaints.

Companies Act 2013 Section 112 governs the execution of powers of attorney by companies under Indian law.

CrPC Section 143 defines unlawful assembly and the conditions under which a group is deemed unlawful.

IPC Section 171F penalizes bribery by public servants to influence their official duties, ensuring integrity in public administration.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 115 explains the presumption of fact when a person is found in possession of stolen property shortly after theft.

IPC Section 242 defines the offence of wrongful confinement and its legal implications under Indian law.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 81A governs the admissibility of electronic records, ensuring their reliability and authenticity in legal proceedings.

IPC Section 431 punishes mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to cause damage to property.

IPC Section 508 addresses the offence of intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace, focusing on maintaining public order and respect.

CrPC Section 463 defines the offence of forgery and its legal implications under Indian criminal law.

IPC Section 7 defines 'Local Law' as laws in force in a local area, clarifying their application within the Indian Penal Code.

IPC Section 148 addresses rioting armed with a deadly weapon, defining the offence and its legal consequences.

IPC Section 217 penalizes public servants who voluntarily cause grievous hurt while discharging official duties.

IPC Section 172 penalizes intentional disobedience of lawful public servant's order issued for public safety or convenience.

CPC Section 92 empowers courts to order temporary injunctions to prevent harm during civil suits.

IPC Section 370 criminalizes human trafficking, prohibiting buying, selling, or recruiting persons for exploitation.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 47A governs the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts.

IT Act Section 69 empowers government to intercept, monitor, or decrypt digital information for security and investigation purposes.

IT Act Section 38 empowers police officers to investigate cyber offences without prior magistrate approval.

CrPC Section 80 mandates prior notice before suing the government, ensuring fair opportunity to settle disputes.

IT Act Section 67B addresses punishment for publishing sexually explicit material involving children online.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 15 defines relevancy of facts that explain or introduce relevant facts, crucial for establishing context in trials.

bottom of page