top of page

CPC Section 24

CPC Section 24 defines the power of courts to grant temporary injunctions to protect rights during civil suits.

CPC Section 24 empowers civil courts to issue temporary injunctions to prevent harm or preserve the status quo during the pendency of a suit. This provision is crucial for safeguarding parties' rights before the final decision is made. Understanding this section helps litigants and lawyers navigate interim relief effectively.

Temporary injunctions under Section 24 serve as a protective measure, ensuring that the subject matter of the dispute is not damaged or altered. This prevents injustice and maintains fairness throughout the litigation process.

CPC Section 24 – Exact Provision

This section allows courts to grant temporary injunctions when there is a risk of property being wasted, damaged, or alienated during a suit. It protects the plaintiff’s interests by restraining defendants from acts that could harm the subject matter or frustrate the claim.

  • Allows courts to issue temporary injunctions to protect property in dispute.

  • Requires proof by affidavit or other evidence of danger to property.

  • Covers threats of alienation, removal, or disposal of property.

  • Aims to prevent fraud on creditors and defeat of claims.

Explanation of CPC Section 24

This section sets the framework for courts to grant temporary injunctions during civil suits to protect property or rights.

  • What the section says:

    Courts may grant temporary injunctions if property is at risk of damage or alienation.

  • Who it affects:

    Plaintiffs seeking protection and defendants whose actions may harm the property.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Proof by affidavit or other evidence showing risk to property.

  • Triggering events:

    Threats or actual acts of wasting, damaging, alienating, or disposing of property.

  • What is allowed:

    Court can restrain parties from harmful acts via temporary injunction.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    Injunctions without sufficient proof or for improper purposes.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 24

The main purpose of Section 24 is to protect the subject matter of a suit from harm or alteration before the final judgment. It ensures that the plaintiff’s claim is not rendered useless by the defendant’s actions and maintains fairness in civil litigation.

  • Protecting civil rights and property during litigation.

  • Ensuring fair civil process by preserving status quo.

  • Preventing misuse of procedure to defeat claims.

  • Maintaining judicial order and preventing injustice.

When CPC Section 24 Applies

Section 24 applies during the pendency of a civil suit when there is a real threat to the property or rights involved. Courts exercise this power to prevent irreparable harm or injustice before the final decree.

  • Conditions: Proof of danger to property or rights in dispute.

  • Authority: Civil courts hearing the suit.

  • Jurisdiction limits: Only during pendency of suit and within court’s territorial jurisdiction.

  • Scope: Temporary relief to maintain status quo.

  • Exceptions: Not applicable if no real threat or misuse of injunction sought.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 24

Civil courts that have jurisdiction over the suit can grant temporary injunctions under Section 24. This includes courts competent to try the suit based on subject matter and territorial jurisdiction. The power is exercised as an interim measure pending final adjudication.

  • Applicable in courts competent to try the main suit.

  • Territorial jurisdiction must align with the property or parties involved.

  • Higher courts may grant injunctions in appeals or revisions if appropriate.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 24

Proceedings under Section 24 are interim and preventive in nature. They do not decide the merits but aim to protect rights during the suit. The section creates a procedural right to seek temporary injunctions, imposing obligations on parties to maintain status quo.

  • Involves application for interim relief during suit.

  • Does not determine final rights or liabilities.

  • Creates temporary obligations to refrain from harmful acts.

  • Requires evidence and judicial discretion.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 24 Applies

Section 24 applies after the suit is filed and during its pendency, including trial. It is not applicable before filing or after the final decree. The injunction protects the subject matter until the court delivers its final judgment.

  • After filing of suit.

  • During trial and interim stages.

  • Not applicable before suit or after decree execution.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 24

Orders granting or refusing temporary injunctions under Section 24 are generally appealable or revisable depending on the court’s rules. Parties can challenge such orders in higher courts within prescribed timelines to ensure fairness.

  • Appeal lies to higher civil courts as per jurisdiction.

  • Revision may be possible in some cases.

  • Timelines for appeal typically short to preserve interim relief.

Example of CPC Section 24 in Practical Use

Person X files a suit claiming ownership of a disputed property. The defendant threatens to sell the property to a third party. X applies under Section 24 for a temporary injunction. The court, satisfied with the proof, restrains the defendant from selling until the suit is decided, protecting X’s interest.

  • Temporary injunction prevents alienation of property.

  • Ensures plaintiff’s claim is not defeated prematurely.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 24

Section 24 has been part of the CPC since its inception, reflecting the need for interim protection in civil disputes. Amendments have clarified procedural aspects and strengthened courts’ powers to grant injunctions effectively.

  • Established to prevent injustice during litigation.

  • Procedural refinements over time for clarity.

  • Adapted to evolving civil litigation needs.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 24

In 2026, Section 24 remains vital for interim relief in civil suits. With e-courts and digital filings, applications for injunctions are processed faster. Judicial reforms emphasize timely interim orders to reduce litigation delays and protect rights effectively.

  • Supports digital filing and e-hearings for injunctions.

  • Integral to judicial reforms for speedy justice.

  • Widely used to safeguard property and rights today.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 9 – Jurisdiction of civil courts

  • Section 10 – Stay of suit

  • Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 – Temporary injunctions and interlocutory orders

  • Section 151 – Court’s inherent powers

  • Order XXI – Execution of decrees

Case References under CPC Section 24

  1. American Express Bank Ltd. v. Kalpana Mohan (1995 AIR SC 1811)

    – Courts must exercise discretion judiciously while granting temporary injunctions under Section 24.

  2. Dalpat Kumar v. Prahlad Singh (1993 AIR SC 276)

    – Temporary injunctions protect the plaintiff’s rights until final adjudication.

  3. Rangachari v. Rangachari (AIR 1924 Mad 220)

    – Early precedent on restraining alienation of property during suit.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 24

  • Section:

    24

  • Title:

    Power to Grant Temporary Injunctions

  • Nature:

    Procedure for interim relief

  • Applies To:

    Civil courts, plaintiffs, defendants

  • Proceeding Type:

    Interim relief during trial

  • Related Remedies:

    Temporary injunction, restraining orders

  • Jurisdiction:

    Courts competent to try the suit

Conclusion on CPC Section 24

CPC Section 24 plays a crucial role in civil litigation by enabling courts to grant temporary injunctions that protect the rights and property of parties during the pendency of a suit. This interim relief prevents irreparable harm and preserves the status quo, ensuring that the final judgment is meaningful and effective.

Understanding Section 24 is essential for litigants and legal practitioners to safeguard interests promptly. Its application requires careful judicial discretion and sufficient proof, balancing the rights of both parties while maintaining fairness and justice in civil proceedings.

FAQs on CPC Section 24

What is a temporary injunction under CPC Section 24?

A temporary injunction is a court order that restrains a party from doing certain acts that may harm the property or rights in dispute during a civil suit. It preserves the status quo until the final decision.

Who can apply for a temporary injunction under Section 24?

The plaintiff or any party to the suit who proves that the property or rights are in danger of being wasted, damaged, or alienated can apply for a temporary injunction.

What proof is required to obtain a temporary injunction?

Proof by affidavit or other evidence showing a real threat or danger to the property or rights in dispute is necessary for the court to grant a temporary injunction.

Can a temporary injunction be appealed?

Yes, orders granting or refusing temporary injunctions can generally be appealed or revised in higher courts within prescribed timelines to ensure fairness.

Does Section 24 apply before filing a suit?

No, Section 24 applies only during the pendency of a civil suit. Temporary injunctions cannot be granted before the suit is filed.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 342 governs the power of the Central Government to give directions to companies for public interest.

Companies Act 2013 Section 25 governs the formation of not-for-profit companies for promoting commerce, art, science, or charity.

Companies Act 2013 Section 380 governs the power of the Central Government to make rules for carrying out the Act's provisions.

Companies Act 2013 Section 226 empowers the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

Modafinil is legal in India with a prescription; unauthorized sale or use is regulated under drug laws.

IPC Section 139 presumes possession of stolen property by a person in control of it, aiding prosecution in theft cases.

Section 227 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the powers of income tax authorities to summon persons for inquiry in India.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269A prohibits cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 for specified transactions to curb black money.

Companies Act 2013 Section 243 governs the appointment and powers of inspectors for company investigations.

Iridium is legal in India for commercial and personal use, subject to regulatory approvals and import controls.

Detailed analysis of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 110 on appeals to the Appellate Authority.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 39 defines the liability of the drawee of a bill of exchange upon acceptance.

CrPC Section 440 details the procedure for compounding offences with the court's permission to promote settlement and reduce litigation.

IT Act Section 60 provides protection for intermediaries from liability for third-party information under specified conditions.

NDAs are legal in India but must meet specific conditions to be enforceable under Indian law.

Khel9 is an online fantasy sports platform in India with legal considerations based on skill game laws and regulations.

IPC Section 156 empowers police to investigate cognizable offences upon receiving information, ensuring prompt legal action.

CrPC Section 128 empowers a Magistrate to order removal of public nuisances or obstructions affecting public convenience or safety.

Microfinance is legal in India, regulated by RBI and other bodies with specific rules for lending and operations.

Section 194N of the Income Tax Act 1961 regulates cash withdrawals and mandates TDS on large cash withdrawals in India.

Matka gambling is illegal in India, with strict enforcement and no legal exceptions for participation.

Cannabis harvesting is illegal in India except for licensed industrial hemp under strict regulations.

Companies Act 2013 Section 192 governs the procedure for passing resolutions by postal ballot in Indian companies.

CPC Section 6 defines the territorial jurisdiction of civil courts in India, guiding where suits can be filed.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 81 covers admissions made by persons who cannot be called as witnesses, crucial for proving facts in their absence.

IPC Section 360 covers the provision for releasing offenders on probation to reform without punishment.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 96 details the powers of the Central Consumer Protection Authority to conduct investigations.

bottom of page