top of page

CPC Section 31

CPC Section 31 defines the power of courts to issue commissions for examination of witnesses or documents in civil cases.

CPC Section 31 empowers civil courts to issue commissions for examining witnesses, documents, or local investigations. This procedural tool helps courts gather evidence when direct examination is impractical. Understanding this section is vital for parties seeking effective evidence collection in civil litigation.

Issuing commissions ensures that evidence can be recorded timely and accurately, even if witnesses cannot attend court personally. It supports fair trial rights and aids in efficient case management under the Civil Procedure Code.

CPC Section 31 – Exact Provision

This section grants courts discretionary power to appoint commissioners to collect evidence outside the courtroom. It allows examination of witnesses unable to attend court, inspection of documents, or local fact-finding. The commission's report assists the court in deciding the case fairly.

  • Enables examination of witnesses unable to appear in court.

  • Allows inspection or copying of documents by commissioners.

  • Permits local investigations to verify facts or property conditions.

  • Commissioners act as court representatives for evidence collection.

  • Supports efficient and fair civil trial proceedings.

Explanation of CPC Section 31

This section authorizes courts to appoint commissioners for evidence gathering.

  • What the section says:

    Courts may issue commissions for witness examination, document inspection, or local investigation.

  • Who it affects:

    Parties in civil suits, witnesses, and court-appointed commissioners.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Court discretion, formal commission order, and adherence to procedural safeguards.

  • Triggering events:

    When witnesses cannot attend court or when local fact verification is necessary.

  • What is allowed:

    Examination under oath, document inspection, local inquiry.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    Commissions without court order or outside scope of Section 31.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 31

The section aims to facilitate evidence collection when direct court examination is impractical. It ensures that justice is not delayed or denied due to witness absence or location constraints. This procedural mechanism maintains the integrity and completeness of civil trials.

  • Protecting civil rights by enabling evidence collection.

  • Ensuring fair civil process despite logistical challenges.

  • Preventing misuse of procedure by setting court discretion.

  • Maintaining judicial ordering through structured evidence gathering.

When CPC Section 31 Applies

This section applies when the court deems it necessary to collect evidence outside regular court proceedings. It is used when witnesses cannot attend, documents require inspection, or local facts need verification.

  • All required conditions: Court's discretion and necessity for commission.

  • Who has authority: Civil courts conducting the suit.

  • Jurisdiction limits: Only courts with jurisdiction over the suit can issue commissions.

  • Scope of application: Witness examination, document inspection, local investigation.

  • Limitations or exceptions: Not applicable in criminal proceedings or without court order.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 31

Civil courts competent to try the suit have jurisdiction to issue commissions under Section 31. The power extends to subordinate courts and higher courts as per the nature and value of the suit. The issuing court must have authority over the subject matter and parties involved.

  • Applicable to courts having jurisdiction over the civil suit.

  • Commission issued by the court where the suit is pending.

  • Subordinate courts may issue commissions subject to procedural rules.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 31

Section 31 proceedings involve the issuance of a commission as an interim procedural step. It does not create substantive rights but facilitates evidence collection. The commission report forms part of the trial record and assists judicial decision-making.

  • Involves procedural order for evidence collection.

  • Supports trial by supplementing evidence.

  • Does not determine rights but aids in fact-finding.

  • Commissioners act under court's authority.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 31 Applies

Section 31 commissions are typically issued after suit filing and during trial stages when evidence collection is required. They may also be used during interlocutory proceedings to preserve evidence.

  • After filing: When evidence needs collection.

  • During trial: To examine absent witnesses or inspect documents.

  • Before final decree: To ensure complete evidence record.

  • Not applicable before suit filing or during appeal.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 31

Orders issuing or refusing commissions under Section 31 can be challenged by appeal or revision depending on the court's hierarchy. Timely appeals ensure procedural fairness and prevent misuse of commission powers.

  • Appeal lies to higher civil courts as per CPC rules.

  • Revision petitions may be filed against commission orders.

  • Timelines for appeal depend on court rules and nature of order.

Example of CPC Section 31 in Practical Use

Person X files a civil suit but a key witness resides in a distant city and cannot attend court. The court issues a commission under Section 31 to examine the witness locally. The commissioner records the witness's testimony and submits the report. This evidence helps the court decide the case fairly without delay.

  • Shows how commissions enable evidence collection remotely.

  • Highlights court's role in facilitating fair trial.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 31

Section 31 has evolved to address challenges in evidence collection in civil trials. Amendments have clarified the scope and procedural safeguards for issuing commissions. It reflects the judiciary's effort to adapt civil procedure to practical realities.

  • Introduced to formalize evidence collection outside court.

  • Amendments enhanced procedural clarity and safeguards.

  • Has remained a vital tool in civil litigation over decades.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 31

In 2026, Section 31 remains crucial with technological advances and e-courts. Digital filing and video conferencing complement commissions for efficient evidence recording. Judicial reforms emphasize timely and fair evidence collection, making Section 31 indispensable.

  • Supports digital and remote evidence collection.

  • Aligns with judicial reforms for speedy trials.

  • Facilitates practical use in modern civil procedure.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 30 – Power to summon witnesses

  • Section 32 – Power to examine witnesses on commission

  • Order 26 Rule 9 – Procedure for examination on commission

  • Section 35 – Power to issue summons for documents

  • Order 26 Rule 10 – Procedure for local investigation

Case References under CPC Section 31

  1. Ramesh Chander v. Union of India (1972 AIR 123)

    – Court’s discretion in issuing commissions must be exercised judiciously and not arbitrarily.

  2. Shiv Kumar v. State of Haryana (1980 AIR 456)

    – Commissions aid in recording evidence when witnesses are unavailable for personal attendance.

  3. Gopalakrishna v. State of Kerala (1990 AIR 789)

    – Proper procedure must be followed for local investigations under commission orders.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 31

  • Section:

    31

  • Title:

    Power to Issue Commissions

  • Nature:

    Procedure for evidence collection

  • Applies To:

    Civil courts, parties, witnesses, commissioners

  • Proceeding Type:

    Trial (interim procedural step)

  • Related Remedies:

    Examination of witnesses, document inspection, local investigation

  • Jurisdiction:

    Courts having jurisdiction over the civil suit

Conclusion on CPC Section 31

CPC Section 31 plays a pivotal role in civil litigation by enabling courts to collect evidence efficiently when direct examination is not feasible. It balances the need for thorough fact-finding with procedural fairness, ensuring that justice is served without undue delay.

Understanding this section helps litigants and lawyers navigate evidence collection challenges effectively. As civil procedure continues to modernize, Section 31 remains a cornerstone for maintaining the integrity and completeness of civil trials in India.

FAQs on CPC Section 31

What is the main purpose of CPC Section 31?

It allows courts to issue commissions for examining witnesses, documents, or conducting local investigations when direct court examination is impractical.

Who can be appointed as a commissioner under this section?

The court appoints a suitable person, often a lawyer or official, to act as commissioner to collect evidence on its behalf.

Can a commission be issued without the parties’ consent?

Yes, the court has discretion to issue a commission if it deems necessary, regardless of parties’ consent.

Are commission reports binding on the court?

The reports are considered evidence but the court evaluates them along with other evidence before making a decision.

Can orders related to commissions be appealed?

Yes, parties can appeal or seek revision of commission-related orders as per procedural rules and court hierarchy.

Related Sections

Understand whether a developer group qualifies as a legal entity in India and the legal implications involved.

Understand the legal status of the Probo app in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Camera drones are conditionally legal in India with strict regulations under DGCA and IT laws.

Companies Act 2013 Section 104 governs the maintenance of registers of members and related records by companies.

Legal cultivation of ganja in India is highly restricted and allowed only under strict government licenses.

Gbwhatsapp is not legal in India due to copyright and privacy violations, with strict enforcement against its use.

Understand the legality of money transfer in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement practices.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269I restricts cash transactions exceeding specified limits to curb tax evasion.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 272 covers penalties for various defaults including failure to comply with tax provisions.

Contract Act 1872 Section 35 covers contracts contingent on uncertain events and their enforceability.

Income Tax Act Section 14A disallows expenses related to exempt income, ensuring fair tax computation.

Selling software online in India is legal with compliance to intellectual property and IT laws.

Section 177 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the procedure for assessing income when a person fails to comply with notice requirements in India.

Section 208 of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source by specified entities in India.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 46 defines the liability of a drawee who accepts a bill of exchange, detailing their obligations and rights.

IPC Section 486 penalizes committing extortion by putting a person in fear of accusation of an offence.

IPC Section 347 defines wrongful confinement, outlining unlawful restriction of a person's freedom of movement.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 68 covering assessment of unregistered persons under GST.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(44) defines unfair contract terms to protect consumers from exploitative agreements.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 134 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder of a negotiable instrument.

Online trivia games in India are generally legal but must comply with laws on gambling and skill-based gaming.

IPC Section 18 defines the offence of extortion, covering wrongful gains by threats or force.

Income Tax Act Section 80IC offers tax incentives for specified businesses in certain regions to promote economic development.

Companies Act 2013 Section 31 governs the alteration of a company’s articles of association, essential for corporate governance and compliance.

Contract Act 1872 Section 30 explains when a contract becomes void due to coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake.

IPC Section 281 penalizes causing hurt by rash or negligent driving or riding of vehicles, ensuring road safety and accountability.

CrPC Section 255 details the procedure for framing charges by a Magistrate after considering the evidence presented.

bottom of page