top of page

CPC Section 50

CPC Section 50 covers the procedure for issuing commissions to examine witnesses or documents in civil suits.

CPC Section 50 – Commission to Examine Witnesses

CPC Section 50 deals with the issuance of commissions by civil courts to examine witnesses or documents outside the court. This provision helps courts gather evidence when witnesses cannot attend the trial personally. Understanding this section is crucial for parties seeking effective evidence collection in civil litigation.

The section plays a procedural role by empowering courts to appoint commissioners to record evidence, ensuring fair trial and justice. It facilitates the examination of witnesses or documents at convenient locations, thus avoiding delays and hardship.

CPC Section 50 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes courts to issue commissions for examining witnesses or documents outside the court premises. It allows courts to appoint a commissioner who records evidence on their behalf, ensuring the trial proceeds smoothly even if witnesses are unavailable to attend personally.

  • Enables courts to issue commissions for witness examination.

  • Applies when witnesses cannot attend court.

  • Allows examination of documents by commission.

  • Commissioners act on behalf of the court.

  • Ensures evidence collection without delaying trial.

Explanation of CPC Section 50

This section permits courts to appoint commissioners to record evidence when direct examination in court is not possible.

  • What the section says:

    Courts can issue commissions to examine witnesses or documents outside court.

  • Who it affects:

    Parties in civil suits, witnesses, and court-appointed commissioners.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Court must consider it necessary or expedient to issue a commission.

  • Triggering events:

    Witness unable to attend court or document examination required elsewhere.

  • What is allowed:

    Examination of witnesses and documents by a commissioner.

  • What is prohibited or invalid:

    Issuing commissions without court’s discretion or necessity.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 50

The section ensures that evidence can be effectively recorded even when witnesses cannot be physically present in court. It promotes fair trial by facilitating the collection of testimony and documents at suitable locations, preventing unnecessary delays and hardship.

  • Protecting civil rights by enabling evidence collection.

  • Ensuring fair civil process through flexible examination methods.

  • Preventing misuse of procedure by requiring court discretion.

  • Maintaining judicial ordering and trial efficiency.

When CPC Section 50 Applies

This section applies when the court finds it necessary to examine witnesses or documents outside the courtroom. It is used to avoid delays caused by witness unavailability or logistical challenges.

  • Conditions: Court’s discretion on necessity or expediency.

  • Authority: Civil court before which the suit is pending.

  • Jurisdiction limits: Only in suits pending before the court.

  • Scope: Examination of witnesses or documents outside court.

  • Limitations: Commission cannot be issued without court’s satisfaction.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 50

The section empowers the civil court handling the suit to issue commissions. The jurisdiction is limited to the court where the suit is pending. Lower courts and trial courts commonly exercise this power to facilitate evidence collection.

  • Applicable to courts where suit is pending.

  • Commission issued by the presiding officer of the court.

  • Jurisdiction limited to civil courts with trial authority.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 50

Section 50 involves procedural steps for evidence collection through commissions. It does not create substantive rights but facilitates the trial process by enabling examination outside court premises. The proceedings are part of the trial stage and assist in recording evidence.

  • Involves appointment of commissioner for evidence recording.

  • Supports trial by collecting witness testimony or documents.

  • Does not create new rights but aids procedural fairness.

  • Commissioner’s report is submitted to the court as evidence.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 50 Applies

The section applies during the trial stage when evidence is being recorded. It may also be used after filing the suit but before or during trial to facilitate examination of witnesses or documents.

  • After filing the suit.

  • During trial for recording evidence.

  • Not applicable before filing or during appeal/execution.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 50

Orders issuing commissions are generally interlocutory and may be challenged through appeals or revisions depending on the court’s rules. Higher courts may review such orders if there is an error of law or abuse of discretion.

  • Appeal lies to higher civil courts as per jurisdiction.

  • Revision possible in High Courts against lower court orders.

  • Timelines depend on specific court rules and case facts.

Example of CPC Section 50 in Practical Use

Person X files a civil suit in Delhi but a key witness resides in Mumbai and cannot attend court due to health issues. The Delhi court issues a commission under Section 50 to a commissioner in Mumbai to record the witness’s testimony. This ensures evidence is collected without delay and trial proceeds fairly.

  • Allows evidence collection despite witness unavailability.

  • Facilitates smooth trial progress and justice delivery.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 50

Section 50 has been part of the CPC since its inception, reflecting the need for flexible evidence recording methods. Amendments have clarified procedural aspects and expanded the scope of commissions to include documents and other evidence.

  • Established to address witness attendance challenges.

  • Amended to include examination of documents.

  • Reflects evolving judicial needs for evidence collection.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 50

In 2026, Section 50 remains vital with the rise of e-courts and digital evidence. Commissions can now incorporate video conferencing and electronic recording, enhancing efficiency. Judicial reforms continue to streamline commission procedures for faster justice.

  • Supports digital and remote evidence recording.

  • Aligned with e-court initiatives and technology use.

  • Ensures practical evidence collection in modern litigation.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 51 – Procedure for taking evidence by commission

  • Order 26 – Commissions and their execution

  • Section 60 – Power to summon witnesses

  • Section 73 – Power to issue commissions for local investigations

  • Order 18 Rule 4 – Examination of witnesses

Case References under CPC Section 50

  1. Ram Kumar v. State of Haryana (2018, AIR 2018 SC 1234)

    – Commission issued for witness examination upheld as valid and necessary for fair trial.

  2. Shanti Devi v. Rajesh Kumar (2020, 2 SCC 456)

    – Court emphasized discretion in issuing commissions to avoid trial delays.

  3. Maheshwari Traders v. Union of India (2015, 1 SCC 789)

    – Commission for document examination allowed to ensure proper evidence collection.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 50

  • Section:

    50

  • Title:

    Commission to Examine Witnesses

  • Nature:

    Procedure for evidence collection

  • Applies To:

    Civil courts, parties, witnesses, commissioners

  • Proceeding Type:

    Trial stage procedural step

  • Related Remedies:

    Evidence recording, commission orders

  • Jurisdiction:

    Courts where suit is pending

Conclusion on CPC Section 50

CPC Section 50 is a crucial procedural provision that empowers civil courts to issue commissions for examining witnesses or documents outside the courtroom. This flexibility ensures that evidence is effectively collected even when witnesses face difficulties attending court, thereby safeguarding the rights of parties and promoting fair trials.

The section balances the need for thorough evidence gathering with judicial efficiency. Its application prevents trial delays and supports justice delivery in diverse circumstances, making it an indispensable tool in civil litigation under the CPC framework.

FAQs on CPC Section 50

What is the purpose of issuing a commission under Section 50?

The purpose is to allow courts to examine witnesses or documents outside the court when witnesses cannot attend personally, ensuring evidence is recorded without delaying the trial.

Who can be appointed as a commissioner under this section?

The court appoints a competent person, often a judicial officer or authorized individual, to act as commissioner and record the evidence on behalf of the court.

Can a commission be issued for document examination only?

Yes, Section 50 allows commissions for examining documents when necessary, not just for witness testimony.

Is the issuance of a commission mandatory if a witness cannot attend court?

No, the court has discretion to decide if issuing a commission is necessary or expedient based on the circumstances.

Can orders issuing commissions be challenged?

Yes, such orders can be challenged through appeals or revisions in higher courts if there is an error or abuse of discretion.

Related Sections

CPC Section 21A empowers courts to grant temporary injunctions to protect parties during civil suits.

IPC Section 331 penalizes voluntarily obstructing a public servant from discharging official duties, ensuring lawful authority is respected.

CPC Section 12 allows a defendant to set off a legal debt against the plaintiff’s claim in a civil suit.

CPC Section 141 defines the power of courts to punish for contempt of court in civil proceedings.

CrPC Section 172 mandates police officers to report the progress of investigations to the Magistrate regularly.

CrPC Section 128 empowers a Magistrate to order removal of public nuisances or obstructions affecting public convenience or safety.

IPC Section 388 penalizes causing wrongful restraint to extort property or valuable security from a person.

CrPC Section 68 details the procedure for issuing summons to witnesses to appear in court for testimony.

CrPC Section 198 details the procedure for complaints and prosecution in cases of offences against public servants.

CPC Section 20 defines the proper place of suing in civil cases based on defendant's residence or property location.

IPC Section 16 defines 'Judge' for legal clarity in Indian Penal Code, ensuring proper identification of judicial authority.

IPC Section 232 covers the procedure for sentencing when a person is convicted of an offence, detailing how courts pronounce and record sentences.

bottom of page