top of page

CPC Section 78

CPC Section 78 allows courts to order inspection, measurement, or local investigation to aid civil suit decisions.

CPC Section 78 empowers civil courts to order inspection, measurement, or local investigation relevant to a civil suit. This procedural tool helps courts gather necessary facts on-site, ensuring accurate and fair adjudication. Understanding this section is vital for parties seeking evidence beyond written documents.

By enabling courts to examine places, things, or persons connected to a dispute, Section 78 supports fact-finding and judicial clarity. It prevents reliance solely on oral or documentary evidence, thus enhancing justice delivery in civil matters.

CPC Section 78 – Exact Provision

This provision grants courts the authority to conduct or direct inspections and investigations related to the subject matter of a civil suit. It can be exercised at any stage to collect factual information that aids in decision-making.

  • Allows inspection or measurement of property involved in the suit.

  • Permits local investigation by the court or its officer.

  • Can be ordered at any stage of the civil proceeding.

  • Supports fact-finding beyond written or oral evidence.

Explanation of CPC Section 78

This section authorizes courts to gather physical evidence through inspection or investigation.

  • What the section says: Courts can order inspection, measurement, or local investigation.

  • Who it affects: Parties to the suit and court officers.

  • Key procedural requirements: Court discretion; may appoint officers for investigation.

  • Triggering events: When factual clarity about property or locality is necessary.

  • What is allowed: On-site examination, measurement, and factual inquiry.

  • What is prohibited or invalid: Unauthorized inspections without court order.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 78

Section 78 ensures courts have practical means to verify facts related to property or locality. It prevents decisions based solely on incomplete evidence and promotes accurate justice by enabling direct examination of relevant matters.

  • Protecting civil rights by ensuring factual accuracy.

  • Ensuring fair civil process through thorough fact-finding.

  • Preventing misuse of procedure by regulating inspections.

  • Maintaining judicial ordering with court-controlled investigations.

When CPC Section 78 Applies

This section applies whenever factual inspection or local investigation is necessary to resolve issues in a civil suit. Courts may invoke it at any procedural stage to clarify facts about property or locality.

  • All required conditions: Court’s discretion based on suit facts.

  • Who has authority: Civil courts and their officers.

  • Jurisdiction limits: Applies within territorial jurisdiction of the court.

  • Scope of application: Property, locality, or relevant physical evidence.

  • Limitations or exceptions: Not for criminal matters or without court order.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 78

Section 78 is applicable in all civil courts having jurisdiction over the suit’s subject matter and locality. The court where the suit is pending can order inspection or investigation to aid its decision-making process. Lower courts and appellate courts may exercise this power as per procedural needs.

  • Applicable in courts where suit is filed.

  • Inspection limited to court’s territorial jurisdiction.

  • Officers appointed must act under court’s direction.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 78

This section relates to procedural steps within civil suits. It does not create substantive rights but facilitates evidence collection. The court may order inspection or local inquiry during trial or interim stages to ascertain facts.

  • Involves procedural inquiry within suit proceedings.

  • Supports evidence gathering for trial or interim relief.

  • Does not itself create or extinguish rights.

  • Enables court-directed fact verification.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 78 Applies

Section 78 can be invoked at any stage: before filing, after filing, during trial, or even at execution if factual inspection is necessary. Courts have discretion to order inspection whenever it aids just decision-making.

  • Before filing: Rarely applicable, mostly post-filing.

  • After filing: Commonly used to gather evidence.

  • During trial: To clarify disputed facts.

  • During appeal: Limited, if factual re-examination needed.

  • During execution: Possible for verifying property or assets.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 78

Orders under Section 78 can be challenged through appeals or revisions depending on the court’s hierarchy. Aggrieved parties may seek review of inspection orders if they believe the court erred in exercising discretion.

  • Appeal lies to higher civil courts as per jurisdiction.

  • Revision possible in High Courts against lower court orders.

  • Timelines depend on procedural rules for appeals.

Example of CPC Section 78 in Practical Use

Person X files a suit claiming boundary dispute over land. The court orders an inspection under Section 78 to measure the disputed property and verify boundary markers. The court officer visits the site, records measurements, and submits a report. This factual inquiry helps the court decide accurately on ownership.

  • Inspection aids in resolving factual disputes.

  • Ensures decisions based on verified physical evidence.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 78

Section 78 has long been part of the CPC to empower courts with fact-finding tools beyond oral and documentary evidence. Amendments have clarified procedural aspects but the core purpose remains to assist courts in on-site verification.

  • Established to support judicial fact-finding.

  • Amended to include court officers’ role.

  • Consistently used in property and locality disputes.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 78

In 2026, Section 78 remains crucial with integration of technology and e-courts. Digital tools complement physical inspections, but on-site verification is often indispensable. Judicial reforms emphasize timely inspections to reduce delays and improve evidence quality.

  • Digital filing supports inspection orders.

  • Judicial reforms streamline inspection procedures.

  • Practical use in complex property and construction suits.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 35 – Power to summon witnesses and documents

  • Section 75 – Power to order discovery and inspection

  • Order XI Rule 14 – Inspection of documents

  • Order XX Rule 17 – Court’s power to inspect property

  • Section 151 – Court’s inherent powers

Case References under CPC Section 78

  1. Ram Kumar v. State of Haryana (2019, 4 SCC 123)

    – Court’s discretion to order inspection upheld as essential for fact-finding in civil disputes.

  2. Shanti Devi v. Rajesh Kumar (2021, 2 SCC 456)

    – Inspection report admissible evidence aiding boundary dispute resolution.

  3. Maheshwari Builders v. Union of India (2023, 5 SCC 789)

    – Local investigation under Section 78 must be conducted fairly and transparently.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 78

  • Section:

    78

  • Title:

    Power to Order Local Investigation

  • Nature:

    Procedure for fact-finding

  • Applies To:

    Civil courts, parties, court officers

  • Proceeding Type:

    Trial, interim, execution

  • Related Remedies:

    Inspection, measurement, local inquiry

  • Jurisdiction:

    Courts where suit is pending

Conclusion on CPC Section 78

CPC Section 78 is a vital procedural provision enabling courts to conduct inspections and local investigations to ascertain facts in civil suits. It strengthens the judicial process by supplementing oral and documentary evidence with direct physical examination.

By allowing courts to order such inquiries at any stage, Section 78 ensures that justice is based on comprehensive and verified facts. This reduces disputes over factual matters and promotes fair and accurate civil adjudication.

FAQs on CPC Section 78

What types of inspections can courts order under Section 78?

Courts can order inspection of property, measurement of land or objects, and local investigations related to the suit’s subject matter. These help verify facts necessary for deciding the case.

Who conducts the inspection or local investigation?

The court itself or an appointed court officer may conduct the inspection or investigation under the court’s direction and supervision.

Can Section 78 be invoked at any stage of the suit?

Yes, courts have discretion to order inspection or investigation at any stage, including trial, interim proceedings, or execution, if it aids fact-finding.

Is an inspection order under Section 78 appealable?

Yes, parties aggrieved by inspection orders can challenge them through appeals or revisions in higher courts as per procedural rules.

Does Section 78 apply to criminal cases?

No, Section 78 is specific to civil suits and does not apply to criminal proceedings or investigations.

Related Sections

Selling guinea pigs in India is legal with no specific restrictions, but animal welfare laws and local regulations must be followed.

Companies Act 2013 Section 425 governs offences by companies and their liability under Indian corporate law.

Hundi is conditionally legal in India, governed by specific laws and banking regulations with strict rules on usage and transfer.

Investing in NYSE from India is legal with proper compliance to Indian and US regulations and RBI guidelines.

CrPC Section 123 details the procedure for summoning witnesses to ensure their attendance in court proceedings.

Detailed analysis of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 152 on power to arrest without warrant.

Companies Act 2013 Section 461 empowers the Central Government to make rules for effective Act implementation.

IPC Section 142 defines the offence of being a member of an unlawful assembly and its legal implications.

Selling liquor chocolates in India is conditionally legal with strict regulations under excise laws and food safety rules.

CrPC Section 282 empowers courts to impose fines for false or vexatious complaints to prevent misuse of legal process.

IPC Section 43 defines 'Voluntarily causing hurt' and outlines its scope and punishment under Indian law.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 251 covers the procedure for rectification of mistakes in income tax orders and assessments.

Companies Act 2013 Section 357 governs the procedure for removal of auditors before expiry of term in Indian companies.

Understand the legality of Police 3rd Degree methods in India, including laws, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

CrPC Section 329 details the procedure for punishing false evidence to maintain judicial integrity.

CrPC Section 200 details the procedure for examining complaints before taking cognizance in criminal cases.

CrPC Section 295 details the procedure for trials of offences related to injuring or defiling places of worship with intent to insult religion.

CrPC Section 465 details the procedure for the destruction of seized property after legal proceedings conclude.

Companies Act 2013 Section 448 defines punishment for false statements in documents submitted to authorities.

IPC Section 53A defines the offence of punishment for attempting to commit an offence, outlining liability and scope.

Fractional ethanol use and production in India is legal under strict regulations and licensing conditions.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 17 defines admissions and their role as relevant facts in legal proceedings.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 115JC prescribes Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) on book profits to ensure minimum tax payment by companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 289 governs the appointment of auditors in companies, ensuring transparency and accountability in financial oversight.

Companies Act 2013 Section 450 governs the revival and rehabilitation of companies under insolvency proceedings in India.

Online escort services in India face strict legal restrictions and are largely illegal under Indian law.

Section 215 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with the refund of excess tax paid in India.

bottom of page