top of page

CrPC Section 320

CrPC Section 320 defines offences compoundable by the victim and the procedure for compounding criminal cases.

CrPC Section 320 lists specific offences that can be legally settled between the victim and the accused without proceeding to a full trial. This provision allows for the amicable resolution of certain criminal cases, saving time and resources for the courts and parties involved.

Understanding Section 320 is important because it outlines which offences can be compounded, the procedure for compounding, and the legal effect of such settlements. It helps victims and accused persons know their rights and options in criminal disputes.

CrPC Section 320 – Exact Provision

This section provides a detailed list of offences that can be settled amicably by the victim and the accused, either before or during the trial. It includes offences like defamation, certain hurt and theft cases below a specified value, and others. The compounding requires court permission, ensuring judicial oversight and fairness.

  • Lists offences that can be legally compounded.

  • Allows compounding before or during trial.

  • Requires court permission for compounding.

  • Includes value limits for property-related offences.

  • Enables Central Government to add offences by notification.

Explanation of CrPC Section 320

Section 320 explains which crimes can be settled between the victim and accused without a full court trial. It simplifies legal processes for minor offences by allowing mutual agreement and court approval.

  • Specifies compoundable offences under law.

  • Affects victims, accused, and courts.

  • Triggers when parties agree to settle the offence.

  • Allows court to approve or reject compounding.

  • Prohibits compounding without court permission.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 320

This section exists to reduce the burden on courts by enabling amicable settlements in minor criminal matters. It protects victims’ rights while promoting reconciliation and saving judicial resources.

  • Protects victim’s right to settle offences.

  • Ensures proper procedure with court oversight.

  • Balances judicial efficiency with justice.

  • Prevents misuse by requiring court permission.

When CrPC Section 320 Applies

Section 320 applies when the offence is listed as compoundable and the victim agrees to settle with the accused. The court must grant permission before compounding can proceed.

  • Offence must be compoundable as per the section.

  • Victim and accused must mutually agree.

  • Court has authority to permit compounding.

  • Applicable before or during trial.

  • Not applicable to non-compoundable offences.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 320

Cognizance in compoundable offences under Section 320 is taken by the court when a complaint is filed or a police report is submitted. The court then may allow the parties to compound the offence with its permission.

  • Court takes cognizance upon complaint or police report.

  • Allows parties to apply for compounding.

  • Court evaluates and grants permission if appropriate.

Bailability under CrPC Section 320

Bailability depends on the nature of the offence listed under Section 320. Many compoundable offences are bailable, but some may be non-bailable depending on the specific crime and circumstances.

  • Most compoundable offences are bailable.

  • Bail conditions depend on offence severity.

  • Court discretion applies in granting bail.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 320)

Offences under Section 320 are generally triable by Magistrate courts. The specific court depends on the offence’s classification and value limits stated in the section.

  • Trial usually before Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions Court may try serious offences if applicable.

  • Trial stages include inquiry, trial, and compounding application.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 320

Decisions on compounding under Section 320 can be appealed or revised in higher courts. The appeal hierarchy depends on the court granting permission or rejecting compounding.

  • Appeal to Sessions Court or High Court as applicable.

  • Revision petitions allowed against lower court orders.

  • Timelines follow general CrPC appeal rules.

Example of CrPC Section 320 in Practical Use

Person X was accused of causing hurt to Person Y in a minor dispute. Both parties agreed to settle the matter amicably. X applied to the Magistrate for compounding under Section 320. The court reviewed the case and permitted compounding, ending the trial and preventing further prosecution.

  • Section 320 enabled amicable resolution.

  • Saved court time and reduced conflict.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 320

Section 320 has evolved to include more offences and clarify compounding procedures. Amendments have introduced value limits and expanded the list of compoundable offences to reflect social changes.

  • Expanded offences over time.

  • Introduced monetary thresholds.

  • Enhanced court oversight for fairness.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 320

In 2026, Section 320 remains vital for reducing court backlog and promoting restorative justice. It supports alternative dispute resolution in criminal law, aligning with modern legal reforms.

  • Encourages settlement and reconciliation.

  • Reduces judicial delays.

  • Balances rights and efficiency in criminal justice.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 320

  • Section 321 – Procedure for compounding offences

  • Section 482 – Power of High Court to quash proceedings

  • Section 41 – Arrest without warrant conditions

  • Section 154 – Information to police and FIR

  • Section 125 – Maintenance of wives, children, and parents

Case References under CrPC Section 320

  1. Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980, AIR 1980 SC 1632)

    – Supreme Court held that compounding of offences under Section 320 is a right of the victim and court’s permission is procedural.

  2. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992, AIR 1992 SC 604)

    – Court emphasized the importance of compounding to prevent abuse of process in minor offences.

  3. Ramesh Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh (2001, AIR 2001 SC 2590)

    – Clarified scope of offences compoundable under Section 320 and court’s discretion.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 320

  • Section:

    320

  • Title:

    Compoundable Offences

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Victim, accused, courts

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by court on complaint or police report

  • Bailability:

    Depends on offence; mostly bailable

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate courts

Conclusion on CrPC Section 320

CrPC Section 320 plays a crucial role in the Indian criminal justice system by allowing certain offences to be settled amicably between the victim and accused. This helps reduce the burden on courts and promotes reconciliation, saving time and resources.

The section ensures that compounding is done with court permission, protecting the rights of both parties and maintaining judicial oversight. Understanding this section empowers citizens to seek peaceful resolutions in minor criminal matters while preserving the rule of law.

FAQs on CrPC Section 320

What offences can be compounded under Section 320?

Section 320 lists offences like defamation, voluntarily causing hurt, theft below a certain value, and others that can be compounded with court permission. The list includes both cognizable and non-cognizable offences.

Can compounding happen after the trial has started?

Yes, compounding can occur before or after the commencement of inquiry or trial, but it requires the court’s permission to ensure fairness and legality.

Who must agree to compound an offence?

The person against whom the offence is committed (the victim) and the accused must mutually agree to compound the offence. The court then considers their application.

Does compounding mean the accused is acquitted?

Compounding results in the offence being settled and the case closed, but it is not an acquittal. The accused is released from liability for that offence as per the compounding agreement.

Can the court refuse permission to compound?

Yes, the court has discretion to refuse compounding if it feels the settlement is not in the interest of justice or if the offence is serious in nature.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 91 mandates annual return filing by companies to ensure transparency and compliance.

In India, buying and selling bitcoins is legal but regulated with specific guidelines and restrictions.

Rabbits are legal to keep as pets in India with some local restrictions. Learn about ownership, breeding, and regulations here.

CPC Section 37 details the appeal process against orders from courts of original civil jurisdiction.

Possessing old East India coins is legal in India, but selling or exporting them requires compliance with laws protecting cultural heritage.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 99 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder of a negotiable instrument.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 82 deals with the power to make rules for the Act's effective implementation.

Companies Act 2013 Section 210 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

In India, keeping a pistol legally requires a license issued under strict conditions and is subject to rigorous enforcement.

Detailed analysis of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 45 on payment of tax in special cases.

IPC Section 406 defines criminal breach of trust, covering misappropriation or conversion of property entrusted to someone.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(13) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

Contract Act 1872 Section 66 explains the effect of novation, rescission, and alteration of contracts on original parties’ liabilities.

CrPC Section 333 details punishment for public servants who intentionally cause injury to deter duty performance.

Soma is not legally approved for use or sale in India, with strict regulations against its possession and distribution.

Income Tax Act Section 94 addresses the anti-avoidance rule on dividend stripping transactions.

Copybooking or copying homework is illegal in India and can lead to academic penalties and legal issues under education laws.

Understand the legality of online contracts in India, their enforceability, and key rules under Indian law.

IPC Section 53 outlines the punishment for offences, detailing imprisonment terms, fines, or both as prescribed by law.

IPC Section 73 addresses the punishment for counterfeiting property marks, protecting property authenticity and ownership rights.

IPC Section 508 addresses the offence of intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace, focusing on maintaining public order and respect.

Selling game hacks in India is illegal under IT laws and can lead to penalties and criminal charges.

Companies Act 2013 Section 363 governs the appointment of a receiver or manager by the court to protect company assets.

Companies Act 2013 Section 111 governs the procedure for passing resolutions by postal ballot, enhancing shareholder participation and compliance.

Income Tax Act Section 59 explains the procedure for rectification of mistakes in orders or decisions by tax authorities.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 146 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Pen cameras are conditionally legal in India, allowed for personal use but restricted under privacy and surveillance laws.

bottom of page