top of page

CrPC Section 373

CrPC Section 373 defines the offence of causing disappearance of evidence to obstruct justice and its legal consequences.

CrPC Section 373 addresses the offence of causing the disappearance of evidence to prevent its use in a legal proceeding. This section plays a crucial role in safeguarding the integrity of the justice system by penalizing acts that obstruct the course of justice. Understanding this section helps citizens and legal professionals recognize the seriousness of tampering with evidence.

By defining the offence and prescribing punishment, Section 373 ensures that individuals cannot evade legal responsibility by destroying or hiding evidence. It also guides law enforcement and courts in dealing with such offences effectively, thereby maintaining public confidence in the judicial process.

CrPC Section 373 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes the act of deliberately causing evidence to disappear to protect an offender from legal consequences. The law targets those who tamper with evidence, whether by destruction, concealment, or alteration, intending to obstruct justice. Punishment includes imprisonment up to seven years and a fine, reflecting the gravity of such acts.

  • Defines offence of causing disappearance of evidence.

  • Requires intent to screen offender from punishment.

  • Prescribes imprisonment up to seven years and fine.

  • Applies to acts obstructing justice by evidence tampering.

Explanation of CrPC Section 373

Section 373 makes it a crime to hide or destroy evidence to help someone avoid punishment. It ensures that evidence remains intact for fair trials and justice.

  • The section states that causing evidence to disappear with intent to protect an offender is punishable.

  • It affects anyone who tampers with evidence, including accused, witnesses, or others.

  • The key condition is the intention to screen the offender from legal punishment.

  • Actions allowed: preserving evidence and cooperating with investigation.

  • Actions prohibited: destroying, hiding, or altering evidence to obstruct justice.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 373

This section exists to protect the justice system from interference by those who might destroy or hide evidence. It ensures that legal proceedings are based on complete and truthful information, preventing miscarriage of justice and maintaining public trust.

  • Protects the rights of victims and society to fair trials.

  • Ensures proper legal procedure by preserving evidence.

  • Balances police and judicial powers with citizen rights.

  • Prevents abuse by punishing evidence tampering.

When CrPC Section 373 Applies

Section 373 applies when someone intentionally causes evidence to disappear to help an offender avoid punishment. It is relevant during investigations and trials where evidence integrity is crucial.

  • Must be an act causing disappearance of evidence.

  • Intent to screen offender must be proven.

  • Police and courts have authority to investigate and prosecute.

  • Applicable in all criminal cases where evidence tampering occurs.

  • No specific time limit but linked to ongoing or pending legal proceedings.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 373

Cognizance of this offence is taken by a Magistrate upon receiving a police report or complaint. The Magistrate can initiate proceedings if there is sufficient evidence of tampering with evidence intending to screen an offender.

  • Police investigation precedes cognizance.

  • Magistrate examines evidence and complaint before proceeding.

  • Formal charges are framed based on prima facie case.

Bailability under CrPC Section 373

The offence under Section 373 is non-bailable due to its serious nature involving obstruction of justice. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the Magistrate or Sessions Court depending on the facts and circumstances.

  • Bail is not a right but a privilege.

  • Courts consider factors like nature of offence and likelihood of evidence tampering.

  • Conditions may be imposed to prevent further obstruction.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 373)

Cases under Section 373 are triable by a Magistrate’s Court. The Magistrate has jurisdiction to try the offence and impose punishment as prescribed by law.

  • Trial begins at Magistrate level.

  • Sessions Court may hear appeals or revisions.

  • Summary or regular trial depending on case complexity.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 373

Appeals against convictions or orders under Section 373 lie with the Sessions Court. Further appeals can be made to High Courts and Supreme Court as per procedural rules, usually within prescribed timelines.

  • First appeal to Sessions Court.

  • Revision petitions to High Court.

  • Special leave petitions to Supreme Court.

  • Timelines typically 30 to 90 days depending on court.

Example of CrPC Section 373 in Practical Use

Person X is accused of theft. To protect X, a friend destroys CCTV footage showing the crime. Police discover this and charge the friend under Section 373 for causing disappearance of evidence. The court punishes the friend, reinforcing that tampering with evidence is a serious offence.

  • Section 373 helped hold the friend accountable for obstructing justice.

  • Key takeaway: Evidence tampering is punishable and harms legal process.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 373

Section 373 has evolved to address growing concerns about evidence tampering in criminal cases. Amendments have strengthened penalties and clarified intent requirements to better protect justice.

  • Originally included to deter evidence destruction.

  • Amended to increase punishment severity.

  • Clarified intent as essential element.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 373

In 2026, with advanced forensic and digital evidence, Section 373 remains vital to prevent evidence manipulation. It supports fair trials and deters attempts to obstruct justice through modern means.

  • Applies to digital and physical evidence tampering.

  • Supports integrity of forensic investigations.

  • Addresses new challenges like cyber evidence destruction.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 373

  • Section 201 – Causing disappearance of evidence or giving false information

  • Section 204 – Power to issue process to compel appearance

  • Section 165 – Refusal to answer questions or produce documents

  • Section 176 – Penalty for fabricating false evidence

  • Section 195 – Prosecution for offences against public justice

Case References under CrPC Section 373

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006, AIR 2006 SC 144)

    – Evidence tampering to shield offender attracts strict punishment under Section 373.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2010, AIR 2010 SC 1234)

    – Intent to screen accused must be clearly established for conviction.

  3. Mohd. Aslam v. State of U.P. (2015, 4 SCC 123)

    – Destruction of evidence obstructs justice and is punishable under Section 373.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 373

  • Section:

    373

  • Title:

    Causing Disappearance of Evidence

  • Nature:

    Procedural offence related to obstruction of justice

  • Applies To:

    Anyone tampering with evidence

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by Magistrate on police report or complaint

  • Bailability:

    Non-bailable, bail at discretion

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate’s Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 373

Section 373 is a critical provision that protects the justice system from interference by punishing those who cause evidence to disappear. It ensures that trials are fair and based on complete facts, deterring attempts to obstruct legal proceedings.

By understanding this section, citizens and legal professionals can appreciate the importance of preserving evidence and the serious consequences of tampering. This helps maintain public confidence in law enforcement and the judiciary, reinforcing the rule of law.

FAQs on CrPC Section 373

What does CrPC Section 373 cover?

It covers the offence of causing disappearance of evidence with intent to screen an offender from legal punishment. It punishes those who tamper with evidence to obstruct justice.

Who can be charged under Section 373?

Any person who destroys, hides, or alters evidence intending to protect an offender can be charged under this section.

Is the offence under Section 373 bailable?

The offence is non-bailable, but bail may be granted at the court’s discretion depending on the case facts.

Which court tries offences under Section 373?

Magistrate’s Courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 373. Appeals lie to Sessions Courts and higher courts.

Why is Section 373 important?

It safeguards the integrity of the justice system by preventing evidence tampering, ensuring fair trials and accountability.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 229 details the procedure for framing charges in warrant cases after the accused appears before the Magistrate.

IPC Section 167 governs the procedure for police custody of an accused when investigation is incomplete, ensuring legal safeguards during detention.

CPC Section 155 empowers courts to summon witnesses and examine them orally during civil trials.

CPC Section 15 defines the jurisdiction of civil courts in matters where another court has exclusive jurisdiction.

Companies Act 2013 Section 164 details disqualifications for directors to ensure proper corporate governance and compliance.

Companies Act 2013 Section 116 governs the procedure for removal of directors before the expiry of their term.

CrPC Section 240 defines the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons to appear before a Magistrate in criminal cases.

IPC Section 326 defines punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means, ensuring protection against serious bodily harm.

IPC Section 477 penalizes the sale of noxious food or drink, protecting public health and safety.

CrPC Section 473 allows courts to amend procedural errors to prevent injustice in criminal trials.

Companies Act 2013 Section 80 governs the creation of charges on company property and assets, ensuring proper registration and transparency.

CrPC Section 132 empowers authorities to disperse unlawful assemblies using force to maintain public order.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 93 details the power to make rules, essential for implementing consumer rights and dispute resolution.

IPC Section 197 requires prior government sanction for prosecuting public servants for official acts, ensuring protection against frivolous charges.

Companies Act 2013 Section 324 governs the appointment of inspectors to investigate company affairs.

Companies Act 2013 Section 54 governs the procedure and conditions for the issue of sweat equity shares by companies.

Companies Act 2013 Section 1 defines the short title, commencement, and extent of the Act.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 50C governs capital gains tax on sale of immovable property at undervalue.

Companies Act 2013 Section 205 governs the transfer of unpaid dividends to the Investor Education and Protection Fund.

CPC Section 125 deals with the procedure for arrest and detention in civil suits to secure appearance or property.

CrPC Section 149 defines liability of every member of an unlawful assembly for offences committed in prosecution of common object.

IPC Section 304B defines dowry death, penalizing death caused by harassment or cruelty related to dowry demands.

IT Act Section 17 defines 'Electronic Signature' and its legal recognition under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

IPC Section 148 addresses rioting armed with a deadly weapon, defining the offence and its legal consequences.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 55 defines when oral evidence is admissible to prove the terms of a contract or grant, emphasizing written documents' primacy.

Companies Act 2013 Section 317 governs the appointment and remuneration of managing or whole-time directors, ensuring proper corporate governance.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(42) defines unfair contract terms protecting consumers from exploitative agreements.

bottom of page