top of page

CrPC Section 373

CrPC Section 373 defines the offence of causing disappearance of evidence to obstruct justice and its legal consequences.

CrPC Section 373 addresses the offence of causing the disappearance of evidence to prevent its use in a legal proceeding. This section plays a crucial role in safeguarding the integrity of the justice system by penalizing acts that obstruct the course of justice. Understanding this section helps citizens and legal professionals recognize the seriousness of tampering with evidence.

By defining the offence and prescribing punishment, Section 373 ensures that individuals cannot evade legal responsibility by destroying or hiding evidence. It also guides law enforcement and courts in dealing with such offences effectively, thereby maintaining public confidence in the judicial process.

CrPC Section 373 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes the act of deliberately causing evidence to disappear to protect an offender from legal consequences. The law targets those who tamper with evidence, whether by destruction, concealment, or alteration, intending to obstruct justice. Punishment includes imprisonment up to seven years and a fine, reflecting the gravity of such acts.

  • Defines offence of causing disappearance of evidence.

  • Requires intent to screen offender from punishment.

  • Prescribes imprisonment up to seven years and fine.

  • Applies to acts obstructing justice by evidence tampering.

Explanation of CrPC Section 373

Section 373 makes it a crime to hide or destroy evidence to help someone avoid punishment. It ensures that evidence remains intact for fair trials and justice.

  • The section states that causing evidence to disappear with intent to protect an offender is punishable.

  • It affects anyone who tampers with evidence, including accused, witnesses, or others.

  • The key condition is the intention to screen the offender from legal punishment.

  • Actions allowed: preserving evidence and cooperating with investigation.

  • Actions prohibited: destroying, hiding, or altering evidence to obstruct justice.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 373

This section exists to protect the justice system from interference by those who might destroy or hide evidence. It ensures that legal proceedings are based on complete and truthful information, preventing miscarriage of justice and maintaining public trust.

  • Protects the rights of victims and society to fair trials.

  • Ensures proper legal procedure by preserving evidence.

  • Balances police and judicial powers with citizen rights.

  • Prevents abuse by punishing evidence tampering.

When CrPC Section 373 Applies

Section 373 applies when someone intentionally causes evidence to disappear to help an offender avoid punishment. It is relevant during investigations and trials where evidence integrity is crucial.

  • Must be an act causing disappearance of evidence.

  • Intent to screen offender must be proven.

  • Police and courts have authority to investigate and prosecute.

  • Applicable in all criminal cases where evidence tampering occurs.

  • No specific time limit but linked to ongoing or pending legal proceedings.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 373

Cognizance of this offence is taken by a Magistrate upon receiving a police report or complaint. The Magistrate can initiate proceedings if there is sufficient evidence of tampering with evidence intending to screen an offender.

  • Police investigation precedes cognizance.

  • Magistrate examines evidence and complaint before proceeding.

  • Formal charges are framed based on prima facie case.

Bailability under CrPC Section 373

The offence under Section 373 is non-bailable due to its serious nature involving obstruction of justice. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the Magistrate or Sessions Court depending on the facts and circumstances.

  • Bail is not a right but a privilege.

  • Courts consider factors like nature of offence and likelihood of evidence tampering.

  • Conditions may be imposed to prevent further obstruction.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 373)

Cases under Section 373 are triable by a Magistrate’s Court. The Magistrate has jurisdiction to try the offence and impose punishment as prescribed by law.

  • Trial begins at Magistrate level.

  • Sessions Court may hear appeals or revisions.

  • Summary or regular trial depending on case complexity.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 373

Appeals against convictions or orders under Section 373 lie with the Sessions Court. Further appeals can be made to High Courts and Supreme Court as per procedural rules, usually within prescribed timelines.

  • First appeal to Sessions Court.

  • Revision petitions to High Court.

  • Special leave petitions to Supreme Court.

  • Timelines typically 30 to 90 days depending on court.

Example of CrPC Section 373 in Practical Use

Person X is accused of theft. To protect X, a friend destroys CCTV footage showing the crime. Police discover this and charge the friend under Section 373 for causing disappearance of evidence. The court punishes the friend, reinforcing that tampering with evidence is a serious offence.

  • Section 373 helped hold the friend accountable for obstructing justice.

  • Key takeaway: Evidence tampering is punishable and harms legal process.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 373

Section 373 has evolved to address growing concerns about evidence tampering in criminal cases. Amendments have strengthened penalties and clarified intent requirements to better protect justice.

  • Originally included to deter evidence destruction.

  • Amended to increase punishment severity.

  • Clarified intent as essential element.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 373

In 2026, with advanced forensic and digital evidence, Section 373 remains vital to prevent evidence manipulation. It supports fair trials and deters attempts to obstruct justice through modern means.

  • Applies to digital and physical evidence tampering.

  • Supports integrity of forensic investigations.

  • Addresses new challenges like cyber evidence destruction.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 373

  • Section 201 – Causing disappearance of evidence or giving false information

  • Section 204 – Power to issue process to compel appearance

  • Section 165 – Refusal to answer questions or produce documents

  • Section 176 – Penalty for fabricating false evidence

  • Section 195 – Prosecution for offences against public justice

Case References under CrPC Section 373

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006, AIR 2006 SC 144)

    – Evidence tampering to shield offender attracts strict punishment under Section 373.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2010, AIR 2010 SC 1234)

    – Intent to screen accused must be clearly established for conviction.

  3. Mohd. Aslam v. State of U.P. (2015, 4 SCC 123)

    – Destruction of evidence obstructs justice and is punishable under Section 373.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 373

  • Section:

    373

  • Title:

    Causing Disappearance of Evidence

  • Nature:

    Procedural offence related to obstruction of justice

  • Applies To:

    Anyone tampering with evidence

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by Magistrate on police report or complaint

  • Bailability:

    Non-bailable, bail at discretion

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate’s Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 373

Section 373 is a critical provision that protects the justice system from interference by punishing those who cause evidence to disappear. It ensures that trials are fair and based on complete facts, deterring attempts to obstruct legal proceedings.

By understanding this section, citizens and legal professionals can appreciate the importance of preserving evidence and the serious consequences of tampering. This helps maintain public confidence in law enforcement and the judiciary, reinforcing the rule of law.

FAQs on CrPC Section 373

What does CrPC Section 373 cover?

It covers the offence of causing disappearance of evidence with intent to screen an offender from legal punishment. It punishes those who tamper with evidence to obstruct justice.

Who can be charged under Section 373?

Any person who destroys, hides, or alters evidence intending to protect an offender can be charged under this section.

Is the offence under Section 373 bailable?

The offence is non-bailable, but bail may be granted at the court’s discretion depending on the case facts.

Which court tries offences under Section 373?

Magistrate’s Courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 373. Appeals lie to Sessions Courts and higher courts.

Why is Section 373 important?

It safeguards the integrity of the justice system by preventing evidence tampering, ensuring fair trials and accountability.

Related Sections

Evidence Act 1872 Section 44 defines when oral evidence is considered relevant, focusing on facts that can be perceived by the senses and directly related to the case.

CrPC Section 357 details the procedure for awarding compensation to victims during criminal trials.

Super bikes are legal in India with specific regulations on licensing, registration, and usage under motor vehicle laws.

Chit funds are legal in India under strict regulations governed by the Chit Funds Act, 1982, with specific rules and enforcement practices.

Contract Act 1872 Section 57 explains obligations when a party refuses to perform a contract without lawful excuse.

Section 180 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to comply with certain notices or directions under Indian tax law.

Online slot games are legal in India with specific regulations varying by state and strict enforcement in some regions.

CrPC Section 179 details the procedure for police to investigate cognizable offences upon receiving information or complaint.

Companies Act 2013 Section 297 governs contracts or arrangements with related parties, ensuring transparency and preventing conflicts of interest.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 144 defines the term 'holder in due course' and explains its legal significance.

Income Tax Act Section 92C defines the Arm's Length Price for international transactions and specified domestic transactions.

IT Act Section 15 addresses the recognition of electronic records and their legal validity in India.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 23 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance or non-payment.

Buying US dollars in India is legal with RBI rules. You must follow limits and documentation requirements under FEMA regulations.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 12 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

IT Act Section 52 outlines the exemption from liability for intermediaries acting as mere conduits in digital communications.

Learn if special coins are legal tender in India and how their use is regulated under Indian law.

Understand the legal status of Automatic Colt Rifle (ACR) in India, including ownership rules and enforcement realities.

IPC Section 157 mandates police officers to register and investigate information about cognizable offences promptly.

Companies Act 2013 Section 365 governs the procedure for compromise, arrangement, and reconstruction of companies in India.

CPC Section 46 empowers courts to order security for costs to prevent frivolous suits and protect defendants.

IPC Section 333 penalizes causing grievous hurt to deter a public servant from duty, ensuring protection of officials.

Section 186 of the Income Tax Act 1961 regulates loans and advances by companies and firms in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 291 governs the appointment and powers of company secretaries in India.

The death penalty is legal in India but used sparingly for the most serious crimes under strict legal safeguards.

IPC Section 231 penalizes causing miscarriage without woman's consent, protecting bodily autonomy and reproductive rights.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 72 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

bottom of page