top of page

CrPC Section 373

CrPC Section 373 defines the offence of causing disappearance of evidence to obstruct justice and its legal consequences.

CrPC Section 373 addresses the offence of causing the disappearance of evidence to prevent its use in a legal proceeding. This section plays a crucial role in safeguarding the integrity of the justice system by penalizing acts that obstruct the course of justice. Understanding this section helps citizens and legal professionals recognize the seriousness of tampering with evidence.

By defining the offence and prescribing punishment, Section 373 ensures that individuals cannot evade legal responsibility by destroying or hiding evidence. It also guides law enforcement and courts in dealing with such offences effectively, thereby maintaining public confidence in the judicial process.

CrPC Section 373 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes the act of deliberately causing evidence to disappear to protect an offender from legal consequences. The law targets those who tamper with evidence, whether by destruction, concealment, or alteration, intending to obstruct justice. Punishment includes imprisonment up to seven years and a fine, reflecting the gravity of such acts.

  • Defines offence of causing disappearance of evidence.

  • Requires intent to screen offender from punishment.

  • Prescribes imprisonment up to seven years and fine.

  • Applies to acts obstructing justice by evidence tampering.

Explanation of CrPC Section 373

Section 373 makes it a crime to hide or destroy evidence to help someone avoid punishment. It ensures that evidence remains intact for fair trials and justice.

  • The section states that causing evidence to disappear with intent to protect an offender is punishable.

  • It affects anyone who tampers with evidence, including accused, witnesses, or others.

  • The key condition is the intention to screen the offender from legal punishment.

  • Actions allowed: preserving evidence and cooperating with investigation.

  • Actions prohibited: destroying, hiding, or altering evidence to obstruct justice.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 373

This section exists to protect the justice system from interference by those who might destroy or hide evidence. It ensures that legal proceedings are based on complete and truthful information, preventing miscarriage of justice and maintaining public trust.

  • Protects the rights of victims and society to fair trials.

  • Ensures proper legal procedure by preserving evidence.

  • Balances police and judicial powers with citizen rights.

  • Prevents abuse by punishing evidence tampering.

When CrPC Section 373 Applies

Section 373 applies when someone intentionally causes evidence to disappear to help an offender avoid punishment. It is relevant during investigations and trials where evidence integrity is crucial.

  • Must be an act causing disappearance of evidence.

  • Intent to screen offender must be proven.

  • Police and courts have authority to investigate and prosecute.

  • Applicable in all criminal cases where evidence tampering occurs.

  • No specific time limit but linked to ongoing or pending legal proceedings.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 373

Cognizance of this offence is taken by a Magistrate upon receiving a police report or complaint. The Magistrate can initiate proceedings if there is sufficient evidence of tampering with evidence intending to screen an offender.

  • Police investigation precedes cognizance.

  • Magistrate examines evidence and complaint before proceeding.

  • Formal charges are framed based on prima facie case.

Bailability under CrPC Section 373

The offence under Section 373 is non-bailable due to its serious nature involving obstruction of justice. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the Magistrate or Sessions Court depending on the facts and circumstances.

  • Bail is not a right but a privilege.

  • Courts consider factors like nature of offence and likelihood of evidence tampering.

  • Conditions may be imposed to prevent further obstruction.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 373)

Cases under Section 373 are triable by a Magistrate’s Court. The Magistrate has jurisdiction to try the offence and impose punishment as prescribed by law.

  • Trial begins at Magistrate level.

  • Sessions Court may hear appeals or revisions.

  • Summary or regular trial depending on case complexity.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 373

Appeals against convictions or orders under Section 373 lie with the Sessions Court. Further appeals can be made to High Courts and Supreme Court as per procedural rules, usually within prescribed timelines.

  • First appeal to Sessions Court.

  • Revision petitions to High Court.

  • Special leave petitions to Supreme Court.

  • Timelines typically 30 to 90 days depending on court.

Example of CrPC Section 373 in Practical Use

Person X is accused of theft. To protect X, a friend destroys CCTV footage showing the crime. Police discover this and charge the friend under Section 373 for causing disappearance of evidence. The court punishes the friend, reinforcing that tampering with evidence is a serious offence.

  • Section 373 helped hold the friend accountable for obstructing justice.

  • Key takeaway: Evidence tampering is punishable and harms legal process.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 373

Section 373 has evolved to address growing concerns about evidence tampering in criminal cases. Amendments have strengthened penalties and clarified intent requirements to better protect justice.

  • Originally included to deter evidence destruction.

  • Amended to increase punishment severity.

  • Clarified intent as essential element.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 373

In 2026, with advanced forensic and digital evidence, Section 373 remains vital to prevent evidence manipulation. It supports fair trials and deters attempts to obstruct justice through modern means.

  • Applies to digital and physical evidence tampering.

  • Supports integrity of forensic investigations.

  • Addresses new challenges like cyber evidence destruction.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 373

  • Section 201 – Causing disappearance of evidence or giving false information

  • Section 204 – Power to issue process to compel appearance

  • Section 165 – Refusal to answer questions or produce documents

  • Section 176 – Penalty for fabricating false evidence

  • Section 195 – Prosecution for offences against public justice

Case References under CrPC Section 373

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006, AIR 2006 SC 144)

    – Evidence tampering to shield offender attracts strict punishment under Section 373.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2010, AIR 2010 SC 1234)

    – Intent to screen accused must be clearly established for conviction.

  3. Mohd. Aslam v. State of U.P. (2015, 4 SCC 123)

    – Destruction of evidence obstructs justice and is punishable under Section 373.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 373

  • Section:

    373

  • Title:

    Causing Disappearance of Evidence

  • Nature:

    Procedural offence related to obstruction of justice

  • Applies To:

    Anyone tampering with evidence

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by Magistrate on police report or complaint

  • Bailability:

    Non-bailable, bail at discretion

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate’s Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 373

Section 373 is a critical provision that protects the justice system from interference by punishing those who cause evidence to disappear. It ensures that trials are fair and based on complete facts, deterring attempts to obstruct legal proceedings.

By understanding this section, citizens and legal professionals can appreciate the importance of preserving evidence and the serious consequences of tampering. This helps maintain public confidence in law enforcement and the judiciary, reinforcing the rule of law.

FAQs on CrPC Section 373

What does CrPC Section 373 cover?

It covers the offence of causing disappearance of evidence with intent to screen an offender from legal punishment. It punishes those who tamper with evidence to obstruct justice.

Who can be charged under Section 373?

Any person who destroys, hides, or alters evidence intending to protect an offender can be charged under this section.

Is the offence under Section 373 bailable?

The offence is non-bailable, but bail may be granted at the court’s discretion depending on the case facts.

Which court tries offences under Section 373?

Magistrate’s Courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 373. Appeals lie to Sessions Courts and higher courts.

Why is Section 373 important?

It safeguards the integrity of the justice system by preventing evidence tampering, ensuring fair trials and accountability.

Related Sections

IPC Section 324 covers voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means, defining punishment and legal scope.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 87 explains when acts causing death are presumed to be intended, crucial for proving intent in criminal cases.

Companies Act 2013 Section 435 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

Section 230 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to furnish return of income in India.

Section 179 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with the recovery of tax in India through attachment and sale of movable or immovable property.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 60 outlines the power to make rules for effective implementation of the Act.

Understand the legality of relationship affairs in India, including rights, restrictions, and social implications under Indian law.

Gleeden is illegal in India as it promotes extramarital affairs, which are against Indian laws and social norms.

Companies Act 2013 Section 30 governs the appointment of directors to fill casual vacancies on the board.

Surrogacy is legal in India under strict conditions and regulations, with costs varying based on type and services involved.

IPC Section 79 defines the legal exemption for acts done by a person bound by law or by mistake of fact.

Explore the legal status of Sonagachi, India's largest red-light area, and understand the laws governing it.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 70 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance in negotiable instruments.

Understand the legal status and enforcement of the National Building Code in India, including its role and exceptions.

Companies Act 2013 Section 252 governs the filing of annual returns by companies with the Registrar of Companies.

Inter religion marriage is legal in India under special laws like the Special Marriage Act, with conditions and protections for both parties.

Income Tax Act Section 129 deals with detention, seizure, and release of books of account and assets during income tax searches.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 129 defines the term 'confession' and its role in legal proceedings as an admission against interest.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 93 governs the exclusion of evidence obtained illegally or unfairly, ensuring justice and fairness in trials.

Independent escorts are illegal in India under laws prohibiting prostitution and related activities.

Lysergic acid and its derivatives are illegal in India with strict enforcement and no legal exceptions.

IPC Section 171C penalizes illegal hiring or engagement of persons as election workers to ensure free and fair elections.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 3 defines relevant facts as those connected to facts in issue, crucial for proving or disproving a case.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 28 defines the rule against hearsay, restricting secondhand statements to ensure reliable evidence in court.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 64 explains the liability of a drawee who accepts a bill of exchange and then refuses to pay it.

Understand the legal status of Dash coins in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

IPC Section 244 defines unlawful assembly by five or more persons armed with deadly weapons or with common intent to commit a crime.

bottom of page