top of page

CrPC Section 373

CrPC Section 373 defines the offence of causing disappearance of evidence to obstruct justice and its legal consequences.

CrPC Section 373 addresses the offence of causing the disappearance of evidence to prevent its use in a legal proceeding. This section plays a crucial role in safeguarding the integrity of the justice system by penalizing acts that obstruct the course of justice. Understanding this section helps citizens and legal professionals recognize the seriousness of tampering with evidence.

By defining the offence and prescribing punishment, Section 373 ensures that individuals cannot evade legal responsibility by destroying or hiding evidence. It also guides law enforcement and courts in dealing with such offences effectively, thereby maintaining public confidence in the judicial process.

CrPC Section 373 – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes the act of deliberately causing evidence to disappear to protect an offender from legal consequences. The law targets those who tamper with evidence, whether by destruction, concealment, or alteration, intending to obstruct justice. Punishment includes imprisonment up to seven years and a fine, reflecting the gravity of such acts.

  • Defines offence of causing disappearance of evidence.

  • Requires intent to screen offender from punishment.

  • Prescribes imprisonment up to seven years and fine.

  • Applies to acts obstructing justice by evidence tampering.

Explanation of CrPC Section 373

Section 373 makes it a crime to hide or destroy evidence to help someone avoid punishment. It ensures that evidence remains intact for fair trials and justice.

  • The section states that causing evidence to disappear with intent to protect an offender is punishable.

  • It affects anyone who tampers with evidence, including accused, witnesses, or others.

  • The key condition is the intention to screen the offender from legal punishment.

  • Actions allowed: preserving evidence and cooperating with investigation.

  • Actions prohibited: destroying, hiding, or altering evidence to obstruct justice.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 373

This section exists to protect the justice system from interference by those who might destroy or hide evidence. It ensures that legal proceedings are based on complete and truthful information, preventing miscarriage of justice and maintaining public trust.

  • Protects the rights of victims and society to fair trials.

  • Ensures proper legal procedure by preserving evidence.

  • Balances police and judicial powers with citizen rights.

  • Prevents abuse by punishing evidence tampering.

When CrPC Section 373 Applies

Section 373 applies when someone intentionally causes evidence to disappear to help an offender avoid punishment. It is relevant during investigations and trials where evidence integrity is crucial.

  • Must be an act causing disappearance of evidence.

  • Intent to screen offender must be proven.

  • Police and courts have authority to investigate and prosecute.

  • Applicable in all criminal cases where evidence tampering occurs.

  • No specific time limit but linked to ongoing or pending legal proceedings.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 373

Cognizance of this offence is taken by a Magistrate upon receiving a police report or complaint. The Magistrate can initiate proceedings if there is sufficient evidence of tampering with evidence intending to screen an offender.

  • Police investigation precedes cognizance.

  • Magistrate examines evidence and complaint before proceeding.

  • Formal charges are framed based on prima facie case.

Bailability under CrPC Section 373

The offence under Section 373 is non-bailable due to its serious nature involving obstruction of justice. However, bail may be granted at the discretion of the Magistrate or Sessions Court depending on the facts and circumstances.

  • Bail is not a right but a privilege.

  • Courts consider factors like nature of offence and likelihood of evidence tampering.

  • Conditions may be imposed to prevent further obstruction.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 373)

Cases under Section 373 are triable by a Magistrate’s Court. The Magistrate has jurisdiction to try the offence and impose punishment as prescribed by law.

  • Trial begins at Magistrate level.

  • Sessions Court may hear appeals or revisions.

  • Summary or regular trial depending on case complexity.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 373

Appeals against convictions or orders under Section 373 lie with the Sessions Court. Further appeals can be made to High Courts and Supreme Court as per procedural rules, usually within prescribed timelines.

  • First appeal to Sessions Court.

  • Revision petitions to High Court.

  • Special leave petitions to Supreme Court.

  • Timelines typically 30 to 90 days depending on court.

Example of CrPC Section 373 in Practical Use

Person X is accused of theft. To protect X, a friend destroys CCTV footage showing the crime. Police discover this and charge the friend under Section 373 for causing disappearance of evidence. The court punishes the friend, reinforcing that tampering with evidence is a serious offence.

  • Section 373 helped hold the friend accountable for obstructing justice.

  • Key takeaway: Evidence tampering is punishable and harms legal process.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 373

Section 373 has evolved to address growing concerns about evidence tampering in criminal cases. Amendments have strengthened penalties and clarified intent requirements to better protect justice.

  • Originally included to deter evidence destruction.

  • Amended to increase punishment severity.

  • Clarified intent as essential element.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 373

In 2026, with advanced forensic and digital evidence, Section 373 remains vital to prevent evidence manipulation. It supports fair trials and deters attempts to obstruct justice through modern means.

  • Applies to digital and physical evidence tampering.

  • Supports integrity of forensic investigations.

  • Addresses new challenges like cyber evidence destruction.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 373

  • Section 201 – Causing disappearance of evidence or giving false information

  • Section 204 – Power to issue process to compel appearance

  • Section 165 – Refusal to answer questions or produce documents

  • Section 176 – Penalty for fabricating false evidence

  • Section 195 – Prosecution for offences against public justice

Case References under CrPC Section 373

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006, AIR 2006 SC 144)

    – Evidence tampering to shield offender attracts strict punishment under Section 373.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2010, AIR 2010 SC 1234)

    – Intent to screen accused must be clearly established for conviction.

  3. Mohd. Aslam v. State of U.P. (2015, 4 SCC 123)

    – Destruction of evidence obstructs justice and is punishable under Section 373.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 373

  • Section:

    373

  • Title:

    Causing Disappearance of Evidence

  • Nature:

    Procedural offence related to obstruction of justice

  • Applies To:

    Anyone tampering with evidence

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by Magistrate on police report or complaint

  • Bailability:

    Non-bailable, bail at discretion

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate’s Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 373

Section 373 is a critical provision that protects the justice system from interference by punishing those who cause evidence to disappear. It ensures that trials are fair and based on complete facts, deterring attempts to obstruct legal proceedings.

By understanding this section, citizens and legal professionals can appreciate the importance of preserving evidence and the serious consequences of tampering. This helps maintain public confidence in law enforcement and the judiciary, reinforcing the rule of law.

FAQs on CrPC Section 373

What does CrPC Section 373 cover?

It covers the offence of causing disappearance of evidence with intent to screen an offender from legal punishment. It punishes those who tamper with evidence to obstruct justice.

Who can be charged under Section 373?

Any person who destroys, hides, or alters evidence intending to protect an offender can be charged under this section.

Is the offence under Section 373 bailable?

The offence is non-bailable, but bail may be granted at the court’s discretion depending on the case facts.

Which court tries offences under Section 373?

Magistrate’s Courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 373. Appeals lie to Sessions Courts and higher courts.

Why is Section 373 important?

It safeguards the integrity of the justice system by preventing evidence tampering, ensuring fair trials and accountability.

Related Sections

Section 196D of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs tax deduction at source on income of foreign institutional investors in India.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 44 empowers Consumer Commissions to order interim relief during dispute resolution.

WazirX is conditionally legal in India, subject to regulatory compliance and RBI guidelines on cryptocurrency trading.

Xenon headlights are conditionally legal in India if they meet specific standards and approvals under motor vehicle laws.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 103 defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 28 explains the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange and conditions for such liability.

Companies Act 2013 Section 407 governs appeals to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) against NCLT orders.

Companies Act 2013 Section 75 governs the transfer and transmission of shares and securities in Indian companies.

CrPC Section 191 details the procedure for inquiry or trial of offences instituted on police reports and the role of Magistrates in such cases.

CrPC Section 173 details the police report submission procedure after investigation, crucial for trial initiation.

Evidence Act Section 72 defines the admissibility of expert opinion when the court requires specialized knowledge to understand facts.

IPC Section 141 defines unlawful assembly and its legal implications under Indian law.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 31 on tax invoice rules and compliance.

Gutka is banned in many Indian states due to health risks, but legality varies by region with strict enforcement in several areas.

Pocket monkeys are illegal in India due to wildlife protection laws and strict regulations against exotic pet ownership.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 31 defines the liability of the drawee of a bill of exchange upon acceptance.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 55 defines cost of acquisition for capital gains computation under Indian tax law.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269UD prohibits cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 for specified transactions to curb tax evasion.

Income Tax Act Section 54EC provides exemption on capital gains invested in specified bonds within 6 months.

Contract Act 1872 Section 55 explains the consequences of breach of contract and remedies available to the aggrieved party.

Section 197 of the Income Tax Act 1961 allows you to obtain a certificate for lower or no TDS deduction in India.

CrPC Section 420 defines the offence of cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property under Indian law.

Solar fencing is legal in India with regulations on installation and usage to ensure safety and compliance.

Learn about the legal status and use of affidavits as legal documents in India, including their purpose and enforcement.

Companies Act 2013 Section 275 mandates the filing of annual returns by companies with the Registrar of Companies.

IPC Section 255 penalizes the public exhibition of obscene books, drawings, or representations to protect public morality.

CrPC Section 103 empowers police to seize property connected to offences, ensuring evidence preservation and lawful investigation.

bottom of page