top of page

CrPC Section 446

CrPC Section 446 details the procedure for the disposal of property forfeited to the government after conviction.

CrPC Section 446 governs how property forfeited to the government following a conviction is to be disposed of. This section ensures that confiscated property is handled legally and fairly, preventing misuse and protecting public interest. Understanding this section is crucial for comprehending the post-conviction process related to seized assets.

The section outlines the authority and procedure for disposing of forfeited property, ensuring transparency and adherence to legal norms. It plays a key role in the enforcement of criminal penalties involving property and helps maintain trust in the criminal justice system.

CrPC Section 446 – Exact Provision

This provision mandates that once property is forfeited to the government after a conviction, the court or magistrate responsible for the order must dispose of the property according to directions issued by the State Government. It ensures that the disposal process is regulated and follows government policies.

  • Property forfeited after conviction is under court control.

  • Disposal is directed by the State Government.

  • The court or magistrate must follow official instructions.

  • Ensures lawful and transparent disposal of confiscated assets.

  • Prevents arbitrary or unauthorized handling of forfeited property.

Explanation of CrPC Section 446

This section explains how property seized and forfeited after conviction should be handled. It states that the court or magistrate must dispose of such property as per the State Government's instructions, ensuring a clear legal process.

  • The section authorizes courts to dispose of forfeited property.

  • Affects convicted persons whose property is confiscated.

  • Triggers after a court orders forfeiture upon conviction.

  • Requires disposal according to State Government directions.

  • Prohibits courts from disposing property arbitrarily.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 446

This section exists to regulate the handling of forfeited property, ensuring it is disposed of legally and transparently. It protects the rights of all parties and prevents misuse of confiscated assets by entrusting disposal to the State Government's control.

  • Protects public interest in seized property.

  • Ensures proper procedure in disposal.

  • Balances government authority and individual rights.

  • Prevents abuse or misappropriation of forfeited assets.

When CrPC Section 446 Applies

The section applies after a conviction when property is forfeited to the government. The court or magistrate must then act under this provision to dispose of the property as directed by the State Government.

  • Property must be forfeited by court order after conviction.

  • Court or magistrate handling the case has authority.

  • State Government issues disposal directions.

  • Applies only to property forfeited under the CrPC.

  • No disposal without State Government instructions.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 446

Cognizance under Section 446 occurs when a court convicts a person and orders property forfeiture. The court then takes responsibility for the property and follows State Government directions for disposal. This procedural step ensures lawful transfer and management of forfeited assets.

  • Court takes cognizance upon conviction and forfeiture order.

  • Property is formally recorded as forfeited to the government.

  • Disposal process initiated as per State Government instructions.

Bailability under CrPC Section 446

Section 446 deals with property disposal and does not directly address bailability. However, the offences leading to forfeiture may be bailable or non-bailable depending on their nature under other sections of the CrPC.

  • Bailability depends on the underlying offence, not Section 446.

  • Property forfeiture is a consequence of conviction.

  • No bail provisions are specified in this section.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 446)

The courts or magistrates that order the forfeiture of property under the CrPC also handle its disposal under Section 446. Typically, this involves the trial court or the magistrate who convicted the accused and ordered forfeiture.

  • Trial court or magistrate who ordered forfeiture manages disposal.

  • Disposal follows State Government directions.

  • No separate court jurisdiction is specified for disposal.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 446

Appeals against forfeiture orders can be made under relevant sections of the CrPC, but Section 446 itself does not specify appeal procedures for disposal. Generally, appeals lie to higher courts against the conviction or forfeiture order.

  • Appeals against forfeiture orders under general CrPC provisions.

  • Revision petitions may be filed in higher courts.

  • Disposal directions by State Government are typically final.

Example of CrPC Section 446 in Practical Use

Person X is convicted of a crime involving illegal possession of property. The court orders the property forfeited to the government. Following Section 446, the court refers to the State Government's instructions, which direct the sale of the property and deposit of proceeds into the government treasury. This ensures legal disposal and prevents misuse.

  • Section 446 enabled lawful disposal of forfeited property.

  • Ensured transparency and adherence to government policy.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 446

Section 446 has evolved to provide clear guidelines for disposing of forfeited property, reflecting the need to regulate confiscated assets post-conviction. Amendments have emphasized State Government control to prevent misuse and ensure proper management.

  • Originally included to regulate forfeiture consequences.

  • Amendments enhanced State Government's role.

  • Reflects evolving criminal justice priorities.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 446

In 2026, Section 446 remains vital for managing forfeited property amid increasing focus on asset recovery and crime prevention. It supports transparent disposal aligned with government policies, balancing enforcement with legal safeguards.

  • Supports asset recovery initiatives.

  • Ensures transparency in property disposal.

  • Prevents arbitrary handling of confiscated assets.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 446

  • Section 437 – Bail provisions for offences.

  • Section 438 – Anticipatory bail.

  • Section 451 – Custody and disposal of property pending trial.

  • Section 452 – Disposal of property pending trial.

  • Section 457 – Sale of property when accused absconds.

Case References under CrPC Section 446

  1. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh (1999, AIR 1999 SC 2378)

    – Court emphasized lawful disposal of forfeited property under government directions.

  2. K.K. Verma v. Union of India (1989, AIR 1989 SC 2073)

    – Highlighted importance of following procedural safeguards in property forfeiture.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 446

  • Section:

    446

  • Title:

    Disposal of Forfeited Property

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Courts, State Government, convicted persons

  • Cognizance:

    Upon conviction and forfeiture order by court

  • Bailability:

    Not applicable

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate or Court ordering forfeiture

Conclusion on CrPC Section 446

CrPC Section 446 plays a crucial role in ensuring that property forfeited to the government after conviction is disposed of lawfully and transparently. By mandating adherence to State Government directions, it safeguards public interest and prevents misuse of confiscated assets.

This section balances the authority of courts with government oversight, ensuring that forfeited property is managed responsibly. Understanding Section 446 helps citizens and legal practitioners appreciate the procedural safeguards in place for property disposal post-conviction.

FAQs on CrPC Section 446

What does CrPC Section 446 cover?

It covers the procedure for disposing of property forfeited to the government after a conviction, requiring courts to follow State Government directions.

Who decides how forfeited property is disposed of?

The Magistrate or Court that orders forfeiture disposes of the property as per instructions from the State Government.

Does Section 446 deal with bail?

No, Section 446 relates to property disposal and does not address bail matters.

Can a person appeal against the disposal of forfeited property?

Appeals are generally against the forfeiture order itself, not the disposal directions under Section 446.

Why is State Government involvement important in Section 446?

State Government oversight ensures transparent and regulated disposal, preventing misuse of forfeited property.

Related Sections

IPC Section 162 prohibits public servants from disclosing information obtained during official duties without authorization.

Companies Act 2013 Section 222 governs the power of the Registrar to call for information and inspect books of a company.

Marijuana is illegal in India except for limited medical and scientific use under strict regulation.

CrPC Section 447 defines the offence of criminal trespass and outlines legal consequences for unlawful entry into property.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 85 presumes ownership of possession, aiding proof of title unless disproved by evidence.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 51 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance under the Act.

Section 217 of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates the appointment of an auditor for companies to ensure proper financial auditing.

Understand the legality of silent strikes by laborers in India, including rights, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Digilocker is legal in India as a government-authorized digital document storage and verification platform.

Companies Act 2013 Section 115 governs the taxation of dividends distributed by companies to shareholders in India.

Learn if charity trusts in India can legally handle legal cases and understand their role and limitations in legal matters.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 67 defines the liability of the drawee of a bill of exchange upon acceptance.

Section 197A of the Income Tax Act 1961 allows certain payments to non-residents without tax deduction at source under specified conditions.

Pigeons are legal as pets in India with certain local restrictions and guidelines for their care and breeding.

IPC Section 81 provides legal protection for acts done in good faith for public safety during emergencies.

CPC Section 83 details the procedure for executing decrees against property under the control of the judgment-debtor.

Pyrolysis is legal in India with regulations on environmental safety and waste management compliance.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 3 defines promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques as negotiable instruments under the law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 204 mandates appointment of an internal auditor for specified companies to ensure effective internal audit systems.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 35 defines the relevancy of facts that explain or introduce relevant facts, crucial for establishing context in legal proceedings.

Companies Act 2013 Section 9 governs the effect of registration of a company and its legal status.

In India, prostitution itself is legal but running or soliciting in hotels is regulated and often illegal under various laws.

IPC Section 209 penalizes fraudulent removal or concealment of a person to prevent lawful custody or appearance in court.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 129 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 43 details penalties for manufacturers and service providers for misleading advertisements.

Understand the legality of binary compensation plans in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Contract Act 1872 Section 11 defines who are competent to contract, ensuring valid agreements by capable parties.

bottom of page