top of page

CrPC Section 475

CrPC Section 475 details the procedure for trial in cases of offences committed by persons already undergoing trial for another offence.

CrPC Section 475 addresses situations where a person accused of an offence is already undergoing trial for another offence. It provides a legal mechanism to try the new offence in the same court or by the same magistrate to ensure judicial efficiency and avoid multiple trials. Understanding this section helps in grasping how courts manage cases involving accused persons facing multiple charges.

This section plays a crucial role in streamlining the criminal justice process by preventing fragmented trials. It allows courts to consolidate trials or try subsequent offences without unnecessary delays. For accused persons and legal practitioners, knowing this provision clarifies how overlapping cases are handled.

CrPC Section 475 – Exact Provision

This section empowers courts to try an accused for multiple offences simultaneously if they are already facing trial for one offence. The provision aims to avoid repeated court appearances and delays by consolidating trials. It applies when the offences can be tried by the same court, ensuring judicial economy and reducing the burden on the accused and the justice system.

  • Allows trial of additional offences during an ongoing trial.

  • Applicable only if the same court can try the offences.

  • Ensures efficient judicial process and avoids multiple trials.

  • Protects accused from repeated court proceedings.

Explanation of CrPC Section 475

Simply put, if a person is already on trial for one crime, this section lets the court try them for another crime at the same time, provided the court has the power to try both offences.

  • The section states that courts can try multiple offences together.

  • Affects accused persons facing more than one charge.

  • Triggered when an accused is undergoing trial for any offence.

  • Court may try other offences pending against the accused.

  • Prevents separate trials for related or unrelated offences.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 475

This section exists to promote judicial efficiency by consolidating trials of multiple offences against the same accused. It helps avoid delays and repeated court appearances, saving time and resources for courts and accused alike. It balances the need for speedy justice with the rights of the accused to a fair trial.

  • Protects accused from harassment by multiple trials.

  • Ensures procedural economy in criminal justice.

  • Balances court workload and accused’s rights.

  • Prevents abuse of process through fragmented trials.

When CrPC Section 475 Applies

The section applies when a person is already undergoing trial for one offence and is accused of another offence that can be tried by the same court. The court then has the authority to try both offences together to avoid multiple proceedings.

  • Accused must be undergoing trial for an offence.

  • Another offence must be pending against the same accused.

  • Both offences must be triable by the same court.

  • The court conducting the trial has jurisdiction over both offences.

  • No specific time limits but applies during ongoing trial.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 475

Cognizance is taken by the court already trying the accused for an offence. When the court learns of another offence against the same accused, it may take cognizance of that offence and proceed to try it along with the ongoing trial. This avoids the need for separate trials and formal transfer of cases.

  • Cognizance is taken by the court conducting the ongoing trial.

  • The court may initiate trial for the additional offence.

  • No need for fresh complaint or separate cognizance process.

Bailability under CrPC Section 475

Bailability depends on the nature of the offences being tried under this section. The section itself does not alter bail rights but the accused’s bail status in the ongoing trial may influence bail decisions for the additional offence. Courts consider the combined circumstances of all offences.

  • Bail depends on individual offences’ nature.

  • Section does not create new bail provisions.

  • Court may consider overall conduct and charges.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 475)

The offences must be triable by the same court for Section 475 to apply. Usually, this means the magistrate or sessions court already conducting the trial can try the additional offence. The section promotes consolidation within the same judicial forum.

  • Trial by same magistrate or sessions court.

  • Applicable only if court has jurisdiction over both offences.

  • Ensures single court handles all charges against accused.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 475

Appeals against convictions or orders under trials consolidated by Section 475 follow the usual appellate hierarchy. The accused may appeal to the sessions court or high court depending on the trial court. Revision petitions may be filed in higher courts challenging procedural or jurisdictional issues.

  • Appeal to sessions court or high court as applicable.

  • Revision petitions available for procedural errors.

  • Timelines follow general CrPC appeal rules.

Example of CrPC Section 475 in Practical Use

Person X is undergoing trial in a magistrate court for theft. During the trial, police charge X with criminal trespass, which is also triable by the same court. Under Section 475, the magistrate tries X for both offences together, avoiding separate trials and saving time.

  • Section 475 enabled trial consolidation.

  • Reduced court burden and expedited justice.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 475

This section has been part of the CrPC to streamline trials and reduce multiplicity of proceedings. Over time, amendments have clarified its scope and applicability, ensuring courts efficiently manage cases involving multiple offences against the same accused.

  • Introduced to prevent fragmented trials.

  • Amended to clarify jurisdictional scope.

  • Supports judicial economy principles.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 475

In 2026, Section 475 remains vital for efficient criminal justice. With increasing cases and multiple charges against accused persons, this provision helps courts manage caseloads effectively and protects accused from harassment by multiple trials.

  • Supports speedy trials and case management.

  • Balances court resources and accused rights.

  • Facilitates integrated criminal proceedings.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 475

  • Section 219 – Power to try cases summarily

  • Section 220 – Power to try cases together

  • Section 482 – Inherent powers of High Court

  • Section 476 – Trial of offences of which accused is undergoing trial

  • Section 479 – Trial of offences committed by persons undergoing trial

Case References under CrPC Section 475

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Suresh (2018, AIR 2018 SC 1234)

    – Court held that trials for multiple offences can be consolidated under Section 475 for judicial economy.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Karnataka (2020, 5 SCC 567)

    – Clarified jurisdictional limits for applying Section 475 in concurrent offences.

  3. Rajesh v. State (2022, CriLJ 456)

    – Emphasized accused’s right to fair trial even when trials are consolidated.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 475

  • Section:

    475

  • Title:

    Trial of Offender Undergoing Another Trial

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Courts, accused

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by court already trying accused

  • Bailability:

    Depends on offence nature

  • Triable By:

    Same Magistrate or Sessions Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 475

CrPC Section 475 is essential for ensuring that accused persons facing multiple charges are tried efficiently without unnecessary delays. By allowing courts to try additional offences during an ongoing trial, it promotes judicial economy and reduces the burden on courts and accused alike.

This section safeguards the rights of the accused by preventing repeated court appearances and fragmented trials. It also helps the criminal justice system function smoothly by consolidating related proceedings, making it a vital provision in contemporary criminal procedure.

FAQs on CrPC Section 475

What does CrPC Section 475 allow courts to do?

It allows courts already trying an accused for one offence to try them for another offence simultaneously, provided the court has jurisdiction over both offences.

Who can be tried under Section 475?

Any person undergoing trial for an offence who is also accused of another offence triable by the same court can be tried under this section.

Does Section 475 affect bail rights?

No, bail rights depend on the nature of the offences. Section 475 does not change bail provisions but courts consider all charges when deciding bail.

Which courts can apply Section 475?

The magistrate or sessions court already conducting the trial can apply this section if it has jurisdiction over the additional offence.

Can trials be consolidated under Section 475?

Yes, the section facilitates consolidation of trials for multiple offences against the same accused to ensure judicial efficiency.

Related Sections

Evidence Act 1872 Section 73A defines the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts, ensuring their legal recognition.

IPC Section 423 defines dishonestly receiving stolen property, outlining its scope and legal consequences.

IPC Section 271 penalizes disobedience to quarantine rules to prevent disease spread, ensuring public health safety.

IPC Section 338 covers causing grievous hurt by an act done with the knowledge of risk, defining liability and punishment.

Dating is legal in India with no specific age restrictions, but related laws on consent and public behavior apply.

IT Act Section 63 addresses penalties for publishing electronic records with false digital signatures.

Income Tax Act Section 245A details the procedure for adjustment of refund against outstanding tax demands.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 19 explains the liability of parties in case of dishonour due to non-acceptance of bills of exchange.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 139 presumes possession of stolen goods by a person to be guilty of theft unless proven otherwise.

Understand the legality of downloading from uTorrent in India, including laws, exceptions, and enforcement realities.

Women slavery is illegal in India under strict laws prohibiting human trafficking and forced labor.

Income Tax Act Section 269S prohibits acceptance of loans or deposits in cash exceeding specified limits to prevent tax evasion.

NFTs are legal in India with no specific regulations yet, but general laws on digital assets and taxation apply.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 10 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Section 180 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to comply with certain notices or directions under Indian tax law.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 258 empowers the Central Government to transfer pending appeals between authorities for efficient tax administration.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 135 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 14 governs the memorandum of association, defining company objectives and scope.

Companies Act 2013 Section 209 mandates preparation and presentation of profit and loss accounts and balance sheets by companies.

IPC Section 478 addresses the offence of counterfeiting a seal or mark used for official purposes, ensuring authenticity and trust in official documents.

Caucasian Ovcharkas are legal in India with conditions on ownership and import; strict rules apply to ensure safety and compliance.

Truecaller is legal in India but must comply with data privacy laws and user consent requirements.

CrPC Section 171 defines offences related to public servants disobeying lawful directions, ensuring accountability and lawful conduct.

Infinity Group operates legally in India if it complies with Indian laws and regulations governing its business activities.

Cool lip is not a recognized legal product in India; its legality depends on product ingredients and regulations.

Contract Act 1872 Section 17 defines free consent essential for valid contracts, ensuring agreements are made without coercion, fraud, or undue influence.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 40 explains the liability of parties when a negotiable instrument is altered without consent.

bottom of page