top of page

CrPC Section 6

CrPC Section 6 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India, guiding where cases can be tried.

CrPC Section 6 establishes the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India. It specifies that a court can try offences committed within its local limits. Understanding this section is crucial for determining the appropriate venue for criminal trials and ensuring cases are heard by the correct authority.

This section helps avoid jurisdictional conflicts and ensures that the administration of justice is efficient and orderly. It guides police, magistrates, and courts on where to file and try criminal cases based on where the offence occurred.

CrPC Section 6 – Exact Provision

This provision means that criminal offences must be tried by courts that have territorial authority over the place where the offence happened. It ensures that cases are handled locally, promoting convenience and relevance. Exceptions exist, but the general rule is local jurisdiction.

  • Offences are tried by courts within the area of the offence.

  • Ensures local courts handle local crimes.

  • Prevents jurisdictional disputes.

  • Supports efficient justice delivery.

Explanation of CrPC Section 6

This section simply means that a crime should be tried in the court that covers the area where the crime took place. It helps decide the right court to hear the case.

  • The offence must be tried in the court with local jurisdiction.

  • Affects courts, police, accused, and victims.

  • Triggers when a crime is committed in a specific location.

  • Allows courts to try offences within their territorial limits.

  • Prohibits trying offences outside the local jurisdiction unless exceptions apply.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 6

This section exists to ensure that criminal cases are tried in the proper local courts. It protects the rights of the accused and victims by providing clarity on where trials should occur. It balances judicial efficiency with fairness and prevents misuse of jurisdiction.

  • Protects territorial rights of courts and parties.

  • Ensures proper procedure in criminal trials.

  • Balances police and court powers with citizen rights.

  • Avoids abuse of jurisdiction and forum shopping.

When CrPC Section 6 Applies

Section 6 applies whenever a criminal offence is committed. The court with jurisdiction over the place of offence will handle the case, unless specific exceptions or special provisions apply.

  • The offence must have a defined location.

  • Police and magistrates have authority within their territorial limits.

  • Local courts are involved in trial and inquiry.

  • Time limits and jurisdiction rules depend on offence and court hierarchy.

  • Exceptions may include offences committed outside India or special laws.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 6

Cognizance of an offence under Section 6 is taken by the court having jurisdiction over the place where the offence occurred. Police submit reports or complaints to the appropriate court, which then decides whether to proceed with trial.

  • Police file charge sheets in the local court.

  • Court examines if offence falls within its territorial limits.

  • Cognizance is taken only if jurisdiction is proper.

Bailability under CrPC Section 6

Section 6 itself does not determine bailability but relates to jurisdiction. Bailability depends on the nature of the offence and relevant provisions. However, the court with territorial jurisdiction will decide bail applications.

  • Bail conditions depend on offence severity.

  • Local court hears bail petitions.

  • Jurisdiction affects where bail is applied for and granted.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 6)

Offences under Section 6 are triable by courts within whose local limits the offence was committed. This includes Magistrate courts or Sessions courts depending on offence type and severity.

  • Magistrate courts try less serious offences within jurisdiction.

  • Sessions courts try serious offences in the same area.

  • Trial stages follow court hierarchy within territorial limits.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 6

Appeals and revisions from trials under Section 6 follow the normal criminal procedure. Higher courts hear appeals from lower courts within the same territorial jurisdiction or appellate jurisdiction.

  • Appeals filed in higher courts of same region.

  • Revision petitions follow procedural rules.

  • Timelines depend on offence and court rules.

Example of CrPC Section 6 in Practical Use

Person X commits theft in City A. The police in City A investigate and file a charge sheet in the Magistrate court of City A. The court takes cognizance and tries the case since the offence occurred within its local limits. This avoids confusion about where the trial should be held and ensures justice is administered locally.

  • Section 6 ensured correct court jurisdiction.

  • Key takeaway: offences must be tried locally.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 6

Section 6 has been part of the CrPC since its early versions, reflecting the importance of territorial jurisdiction in criminal law. Amendments have clarified exceptions and special cases, but the core principle remains unchanged.

  • Established territorial jurisdiction principle.

  • Amended to include exceptions for special cases.

  • Consistent with principles of fair trial and locality.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 6

In 2026, Section 6 remains vital for defining court jurisdiction amid increasing cyber and cross-border crimes. Courts rely on territorial jurisdiction to manage cases effectively while adapting to new challenges in criminal law enforcement.

  • Supports jurisdiction in digital and physical offences.

  • Helps courts manage cases locally despite modern complexities.

  • Balances rights and procedural efficiency in policing.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 6

  • Section 177 – Place of inquiry and trial

  • Section 178 – Offences committed partly within and partly outside jurisdiction

  • Section 179 – Offences committed outside India

  • Section 190 – Cognizance of offences by Magistrates

  • Section 482 – Inherent powers of High Court

Case References under CrPC Section 6

  1. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh (1999, AIR 1999 SC 2378)

    – Territorial jurisdiction must be strictly followed to maintain fairness in criminal trials.

  2. Union of India v. Ibrahim Uddin (1978, AIR 1978 SC 851)

    – Courts cannot try offences outside their territorial limits except as provided by law.

  3. R. v. Governor of Brixton Prison (1913, 1 KB 740)

    – Territorial jurisdiction is a fundamental principle in criminal procedure.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 6

  • Section:

    6

  • Title:

    Territorial Jurisdiction

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Courts, Police, Accused

  • Cognizance:

    Taken by court having jurisdiction over offence location

  • Bailability:

    Depends on offence, decided by territorial court

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate or Sessions court within local limits

Conclusion on CrPC Section 6

CrPC Section 6 is fundamental in criminal law, defining the territorial limits within which courts can try offences. It ensures that trials occur in the correct location, promoting fairness and judicial efficiency. This clarity helps avoid jurisdictional conflicts and supports orderly administration of justice.

For citizens, understanding Section 6 means knowing where their cases will be heard and which courts have authority. For police and magistrates, it guides proper filing and trial procedures. Overall, Section 6 balances legal certainty with procedural fairness in India's criminal justice system.

FAQs on CrPC Section 6

What does CrPC Section 6 mean by territorial jurisdiction?

It means that a criminal offence must be tried in the court that covers the area where the offence was committed. This ensures the right court handles the case.

Can a court try an offence committed outside its area under Section 6?

Generally no, courts must have jurisdiction over the place of offence. Exceptions exist but are limited and specified by law.

Who decides if a court has jurisdiction under Section 6?

The court itself examines if the offence falls within its territorial limits before taking cognizance and proceeding with trial.

Does Section 6 affect where bail is granted?

Yes, bail applications are made to the court having jurisdiction over the offence location as per Section 6.

Are there related sections that deal with jurisdiction issues?

Yes, Sections 177, 178, 179, and 190 of the CrPC also address various aspects of jurisdiction and trial venue.

Related Sections

Section 194R of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on benefits or perquisites provided by a business or profession in India.

IPC Section 295A punishes deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings.

Laughing gas (nitrous oxide) is regulated and largely illegal for recreational use in India with strict controls and penalties.

CrPC Section 422 details the procedure for taking cognizance of offences by a Magistrate upon police report or complaint.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 83 outlines penalties for non-compliance with orders by Consumer Commissions, ensuring enforcement of consumer rights.

CrPC Section 60 defines the jurisdiction of Magistrates to try offences based on their nature and severity.

Paid sex is illegal in India under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, with strict enforcement and limited exceptions.

CrPC Section 216 empowers courts to summon witnesses and examine them to ensure fair trial proceedings.

Noopept is not approved or regulated in India, making its legal status unclear and potentially restricted.

Oral and anal sex in India are legal only under specific conditions, with strict laws against non-consensual acts and public obscenity.

Paid games are legal in India with certain regulations on gambling and age restrictions.

Comprehensive guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 165 covering powers of officers and GST compliance.

CPC Section 143 empowers courts to summon witnesses to ensure proper evidence in civil suits.

Alpari is not legally authorized to operate in India due to regulatory restrictions by Indian authorities.

Yukon Gold Casino is not legally accessible in India; online gambling laws restrict such foreign platforms.

Income Tax Act Section 269C restricts cash transactions exceeding Rs. 20,000 to curb tax evasion and promote digital payments.

Knives are conditionally legal in India with restrictions on type, size, and intent under Indian law.

Contract Act 1872 Section 64 covers the consequences when a contract becomes void due to the impossibility of performance.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 98 details the power of the Central Government to make rules for effective implementation of the Act.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 63 covering assessment of tax by proper officer.

Surrogacy in India is legal under strict conditions as per the 2018 Surrogacy Regulation Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 405 defines 'winding up' and outlines its significance in company dissolution processes.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 55 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour.

IPC Section 197 requires prior government sanction for prosecuting public servants for official acts, ensuring protection against frivolous charges.

Conscription is not legal in India; the country relies on a voluntary military service system without mandatory draft laws.

Keeping a pet fennec fox in India is illegal without special permissions due to wildlife protection laws.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 106 defines the procedure for appeals to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals).

bottom of page