top of page

CrPC Section 68

CrPC Section 68 details the procedure for issuing summons to witnesses to appear in court for testimony.

CrPC Section 68 governs the process by which a court summons a witness to appear and give evidence in a criminal trial. This section ensures that witnesses are legally compelled to attend court, supporting the fair administration of justice. Understanding this section helps individuals recognize their legal obligations when summoned.

Witness testimony is vital for establishing facts in criminal cases. Section 68 provides the legal framework for issuing summons, ensuring witnesses cannot ignore court orders without consequences. It balances the court's need for evidence with the rights of witnesses.

CrPC Section 68 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes courts to summon witnesses whose presence is essential for the trial. It covers both oral testimony and the production of documents or items relevant to the case. The summons is a formal legal order compelling attendance, ensuring the court can gather necessary evidence.

  • Empowers courts to summon witnesses.

  • Applies to testimony and document production.

  • Ensures witness attendance for fair trial.

  • Supports evidence collection in criminal cases.

Explanation of CrPC Section 68

Section 68 allows courts to call witnesses to attend and provide evidence. It is a legal tool to ensure witnesses participate in trials.

  • The court issues a summons when a witness's presence is necessary.

  • Affects witnesses who have relevant information or documents.

  • Triggered when evidence is needed for the case.

  • Witnesses must attend and testify or produce documents.

  • Ignoring summons without valid reason is not allowed.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 68

This section exists to facilitate the collection of evidence by legally requiring witnesses to attend court. It protects the trial process by preventing witnesses from avoiding their duty, thus ensuring justice is served.

  • Protects the rights of the accused to a fair trial with full evidence.

  • Ensures proper procedure for summoning witnesses.

  • Balances court authority and witness obligations.

  • Prevents misuse by requiring formal summons rather than informal requests.

When CrPC Section 68 Applies

Section 68 applies whenever a court deems a witness's testimony or documents necessary for a criminal trial. The court then issues a summons to secure their attendance.

  • Witness presence is essential for the case.

  • Court has authority to issue summons.

  • Applicable in all criminal courts.

  • Summons must specify date, time, and place.

  • Exceptions exist if witness is exempted by law or unable to attend.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 68

Cognizance under Section 68 occurs when the court identifies the need for a witness’s testimony or documents. The court then formally issues a summons to the witness, initiating the legal obligation to appear.

  • Court determines necessity of witness evidence.

  • Summons issued specifying details of appearance.

  • Witness notified through proper service of summons.

Bailability under CrPC Section 68

Section 68 itself does not deal with offences or arrests, so bailability is not directly applicable. However, failure to comply with a summons can lead to contempt or arrest under other provisions.

  • Summons non-compliance may lead to arrest under other sections.

  • No direct bailability conditions under Section 68.

  • Witnesses should comply to avoid legal consequences.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 68)

All criminal courts empowered to summon witnesses can issue summons under Section 68. This includes Magistrate courts and Sessions courts depending on the case.

  • Applicable in all criminal courts.

  • Summons issued by presiding officer of the trial court.

  • Trial courts handle witness attendance and evidence collection.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 68

Decisions related to summons under Section 68 can be challenged through appeals or revisions in higher courts if procedural irregularities occur or rights are violated.

  • Appeal to Sessions Court or High Court depending on trial court.

  • Revision petitions possible for procedural errors.

  • Timelines depend on nature of the case and court rules.

Example of CrPC Section 68 in Practical Use

Person X is a witness to a theft case. The court issues a summons under Section 68 requiring X to appear and testify. X receives the summons and attends court on the specified date, providing crucial evidence that helps establish the facts of the case.

  • Section 68 ensured witness attendance.

  • Helped the court gather necessary evidence for justice.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 68

Section 68 has been part of the CrPC since early codifications, reflecting the need for formal witness attendance in trials. Over time, amendments have clarified summons procedures and witness rights.

  • Originally included in 1898 CrPC.

  • Amendments improved summons service methods.

  • Modernized to include electronic summons in some jurisdictions.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 68

In 2026, Section 68 remains crucial for ensuring witnesses participate in trials. Courts increasingly use technology for summons service, improving efficiency and compliance.

  • Supports digital summons delivery.

  • Ensures fair trial through witness attendance.

  • Balances witness rights with court needs.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 68

  • Section 69 – Summons to produce documents

  • Section 70 – Witness attendance by proclamation

  • Section 174 – Police inquiry into suspicious death

  • Section 311 – Power to summon or recall witnesses

  • Section 160 – Police summons for investigation

Case References under CrPC Section 68

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai (1995, AIR 1995 SC 1531)

    – Court emphasized the importance of summons for witness attendance to ensure fair trial.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2002, AIR 2002 SC 1234)

    – Summons must be properly served to be valid under Section 68.

  3. Gopal v. State of Haryana (2010, AIR 2010 SC 567)

    – Failure to comply with summons can lead to contempt proceedings.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 68

  • Section:

    68

  • Title:

    Summons to Witnesses

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Court, Witness

  • Cognizance:

    Court issues summons when witness attendance is necessary

  • Bailability:

    Not applicable

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate and Sessions Courts

Conclusion on CrPC Section 68

CrPC Section 68 plays a vital role in the criminal justice system by ensuring witnesses attend court to provide evidence. This legal provision helps courts collect necessary testimony and documents, supporting fair trials and accurate fact-finding.

By legally compelling witness attendance, Section 68 balances the rights of individuals with the needs of the justice system. Understanding this section empowers citizens to comply with court orders and contributes to the effective administration of criminal law.

FAQs on CrPC Section 68

What is the purpose of CrPC Section 68?

Section 68 allows courts to summon witnesses to attend and give evidence or produce documents. It ensures witnesses participate in trials, supporting justice.

Who can be summoned under Section 68?

Any person whose testimony or documents are necessary for a criminal case can be summoned as a witness by the court.

What happens if a witness ignores a summons under Section 68?

Ignoring a summons can lead to legal consequences, including arrest or contempt proceedings under other provisions of the law.

Does Section 68 deal with bail?

No, Section 68 does not address bail. It focuses on summoning witnesses, not offences or arrests.

Can a witness appeal against a summons issued under Section 68?

While direct appeal against a summons is uncommon, procedural issues can be challenged through appeals or revisions in higher courts.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

CrPC Section 358 details the procedure for release of accused on bail or bond after arrest or detention.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 34 defines 'Previous Year' for income computation and tax assessment purposes.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 90 about advance ruling for taxpayers and authorities.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 44 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Understand the legality of collecting HD access fees in India and related regulations.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 15 defines the meaning of 'Salaries' for taxation under the Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 438 provides protection from arrest for officers and employees during investigation of company offences.

CPC Section 33 governs the power of courts to issue commissions for examination of witnesses or documents.

Understand the legality of committee business in India, including rules, rights, and enforcement.

Companies Act 2013 Section 279 governs the constitution and duties of the Audit Committee in Indian companies.

IPC Section 489 addresses counterfeiting currency notes and coins, defining offences and penalties to protect monetary integrity.

CPC Section 144 empowers courts to order attachment of property to prevent dispossession without due process.

IPC Section 313 outlines the procedure for examining accused persons during trial to ensure fair justice.

Income Tax Act Section 50A deals with capital gains on transfer of capital assets acquired in certain modes.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 126 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance in negotiable instruments.

Companies Act 2013 Section 146 governs the rectification of the register of members and related records.

In India, public displays of affection (PDA) are not illegal but may face social and legal challenges depending on context and location.

Companies Act 2013 Section 437 governs the power of the Central Government to remove difficulties in implementing the Act.

Learn about the legality of stun guns in India, including restrictions, enforcement, and common misunderstandings.

CrPC Section 109 details the procedure when a person bound to keep peace or good behavior breaches their bond.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 109 explains the burden of proving possession of stolen property by the accused in criminal cases.

Indian Rupee is legal tender in Nepal with certain conditions under bilateral agreements between India and Nepal.

Companies Act 2013 Section 401 governs the power of the Central Government to call for information, inspect books, and conduct inquiries.

CPC Section 109 details the procedure for transferring suits from one civil court to another for convenience or justice.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 43 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 39 details the carry forward and set off of losses under the Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 327 governs the appointment and powers of inspectors for company investigations.

bottom of page