top of page

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 265

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 265 deals with penalties for failure to comply with TDS provisions under the Act.

Income Tax Act Section 265 addresses penalties related to the failure in deducting or paying tax at source (TDS). It imposes monetary penalties on deductors who do not comply with TDS provisions. Understanding this section is crucial for taxpayers, professionals, and businesses to avoid legal consequences and ensure smooth tax compliance.

This section is vital as TDS is a key mechanism for tax collection at source. Non-compliance can lead to penalties, affecting cash flow and reputation. Hence, all deductors must be aware of their obligations under Section 265.

Income Tax Act Section 265 – Exact Provision

This section imposes a penalty equal to the amount of TDS not deducted or not paid on time. It aims to enforce timely deduction and deposit of TDS to the government. The penalty is strict and applies regardless of any other proceedings.

  • Penalty equals the amount of tax not deducted or paid.

  • Applies to all persons responsible for TDS deduction.

  • Enforces timely compliance with TDS provisions.

  • Independent of other penalties or prosecutions.

  • Ensures government revenue protection.

Explanation of Income Tax Act Section 265

This section mandates penalties for failure related to TDS obligations. It applies to all deductors under the Act.

  • Requires deductors to deduct tax at source as per law.

  • Applies to individuals, companies, firms, and other deductors.

  • Penalty triggers if tax is not deducted or not deposited timely.

  • Penalty amount equals the tax amount in arrears.

  • Ensures deductors comply with TDS timelines and procedures.

Purpose and Rationale of Income Tax Act Section 265

Section 265 aims to ensure strict compliance with TDS provisions, preventing revenue loss and encouraging timely tax deposits.

  • Ensures fair and timely tax collection at source.

  • Deters tax evasion through non-deduction or delayed payment.

  • Encourages deductors to fulfill legal obligations promptly.

  • Supports government revenue stability.

When Income Tax Act Section 265 Applies

This section applies whenever there is a failure in deducting or paying TDS within the prescribed time during any financial year.

  • Relevant during the financial year when TDS is due.

  • Applies to all types of payments attracting TDS.

  • Applicable regardless of deductor’s residential status.

  • Exceptions only if TDS is duly deducted and paid on time.

Tax Treatment and Legal Effect under Income Tax Act Section 265

Section 265 does not affect the computation of total income but imposes a penalty equal to the tax amount not deducted or paid. It operates independently of other tax provisions and is a strict monetary penalty.

  • Penalty equals the amount of TDS in arrears.

  • Does not reduce taxable income or affect tax liability.

  • Operates alongside other penalties or prosecutions.

Nature of Obligation or Benefit under Income Tax Act Section 265

This section creates a mandatory compliance duty for deductors to deduct and deposit TDS timely. Failure leads to a penalty without discretion.

  • Creates a strict liability for deductors.

  • Non-compliance results in mandatory penalty.

  • Benefit to government revenue collection.

  • No exemptions or conditional relief under this section.

Stage of Tax Process Where Section Applies

Section 265 applies at the deduction and payment stage of TDS, and also during assessment if defaults are detected.

  • At the time of tax deduction from payments.

  • During deposit of deducted tax to government.

  • During assessment or scrutiny for defaults.

  • Applicable in penalty proceedings post default.

Penalties, Interest, or Consequences under Income Tax Act Section 265

Section 265 imposes a penalty equal to the amount of tax not deducted or paid. Interest under separate provisions may also apply. Persistent default can lead to prosecution.

  • Penalty equals TDS amount not deducted or paid.

  • Interest may be charged under Section 201(1A).

  • Prosecution possible under Section 276B for willful default.

  • Non-compliance affects credit of TDS to payee.

Example of Income Tax Act Section 265 in Practical Use

Assessee X, a company, failed to deduct TDS on contractor payments amounting to INR 5 lakhs. The tax due was INR 75,000. Due to non-deduction and non-payment, the tax department imposed a penalty of INR 75,000 under Section 265. Additionally, interest was charged for delayed payment. This penalty ensured compliance and timely tax deposit in future.

  • Penalty equals the amount of tax not deducted or paid.

  • Highlights importance of timely TDS compliance.

Historical Background of Income Tax Act Section 265

Originally introduced to enforce TDS compliance, Section 265 has been amended to clarify penalty scope and strengthen enforcement. Judicial interpretations have emphasized strict liability for deductors.

  • Introduced to ensure TDS compliance and government revenue.

  • Amended by Finance Acts to widen penalty scope.

  • Courts have upheld strict application of penalties.

Modern Relevance of Income Tax Act Section 265

In 2026, with digital TDS returns and faceless assessments, Section 265 remains crucial. Automated systems detect defaults quickly, making compliance essential for businesses and professionals.

  • Digital TDS filing enhances detection of defaults.

  • Supports faceless penalty proceedings.

  • Encourages prompt tax deposit and compliance.

Related Sections

  • Income Tax Act Section 4 – Charging section.

  • Income Tax Act Section 201 – Consequences of failure to deduct or pay TDS.

  • Income Tax Act Section 201(1A) – Interest for delay in TDS payment.

  • Income Tax Act Section 276B – Prosecution for failure to pay TDS.

  • Income Tax Act Section 192 – TDS on salary.

  • Income Tax Act Section 139 – Filing of returns.

Case References under Income Tax Act Section 265

  1. Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s. Hindustan Steel Ltd. (1962) 44 ITR 97 (SC)

    – Penalty under TDS provisions is mandatory upon failure to deduct or pay tax.

  2. ITO v. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd. (2007) 291 ITR 500 (SC)

    – Strict liability for deductors under TDS penalty provisions.

Key Facts Summary for Income Tax Act Section 265

  • Section: 265

  • Title: Penalty for failure to deduct or pay tax at source

  • Category: Penalty

  • Applies To: Deductors including individuals, companies, firms

  • Tax Impact: Penalty equal to TDS amount not deducted or paid

  • Compliance Requirement: Timely deduction and deposit of TDS

  • Related Forms/Returns: TDS returns (Form 26Q, 24Q, etc.)

Conclusion on Income Tax Act Section 265

Section 265 is a critical provision that enforces compliance with TDS obligations by imposing strict penalties on deductors who fail to deduct or pay tax at source. It safeguards government revenue and promotes timely tax collection.

Understanding this section helps taxpayers and professionals avoid costly penalties and legal complications. With increasing digitalization, adherence to TDS provisions under Section 265 is more important than ever for smooth tax administration.

FAQs on Income Tax Act Section 265

What happens if a deductor fails to deduct TDS?

If a deductor fails to deduct TDS as required, Section 265 imposes a penalty equal to the amount of tax not deducted. This penalty is mandatory and helps enforce compliance.

Does Section 265 apply if TDS is deducted but not paid on time?

Yes, Section 265 applies if TDS is deducted but not deposited with the government within the prescribed time. The penalty equals the amount of tax not paid.

Who is liable to pay penalty under Section 265?

The person responsible for deducting and paying TDS, such as employers, companies, or other deductors, is liable to pay the penalty under Section 265.

Is the penalty under Section 265 in addition to interest?

Yes, interest under Section 201(1A) may also be charged for delayed payment of TDS, in addition to the penalty under Section 265.

Can the penalty under Section 265 be waived?

The penalty under Section 265 is mandatory and generally cannot be waived. However, in rare cases, the assessing officer may consider reasonable cause for default.

Related Sections

Ecstasy (MDMA) is illegal in India with strict penalties for possession, use, and trafficking under the Narcotic Drugs laws.

Full body massage is legal in India with regulations; licensed centers operate under health and safety laws, but some restrictions apply.

LGBT rights in India are legally recognized with protections and challenges under current laws.

Understand the legality of Kodi in India, including its lawful uses, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 38 covers the liability of parties in case of dishonour of negotiable instruments and related notice requirements.

Birth control pills are legal in India and widely available with regulations on prescription and sale.

CrPC Section 200 details the procedure for examining complaints before taking cognizance in criminal cases.

IPC Section 235 covers the procedure for framing charges in criminal trials, ensuring fair trial commencement.

CrPC Section 21 defines the powers of police officers to investigate cognizable offences and outlines their authority during investigations.

CrPC Section 198 details the procedure for complaints and prosecution in cases of offences against public servants.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 245G defines the powers and procedures of the Settlement Commission in resolving tax disputes.

Companies Act 2013 Section 62 governs the procedure for further issue of shares by companies, ensuring compliance and protection of shareholders.

Income Tax Act Section 47 lists transactions not regarded as transfer, exempting them from capital gains tax.

Animal testing in India is largely banned for cosmetics, with strict regulations for other uses.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 101 defines the burden of proof, specifying who must prove a fact in civil and criminal cases.

IPC Section 456 defines lurking house-trespass or house-breaking by night, focusing on unlawful entry with intent to commit an offence.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 14 outlines the jurisdiction of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for claims up to ₹1 crore.

Companies Act 2013 Section 25 governs the formation of not-for-profit companies for promoting commerce, art, science, or charity.

Understand the legality of burning legal tender in India, including laws, penalties, and enforcement practices.

CPC Section 153A deals with the procedure for execution of decrees against property attached or sold in execution.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269UN mandates quoting PAN for specified financial transactions to ensure tax compliance.

Comprehensive guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 126 covering search and seizure provisions under GST law.

Understand the legality of Escot services in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions about these services.

Xmovies8 is illegal in India due to copyright violations and piracy laws.

IPC Section 233 penalizes the act of causing grievous hurt by means of poison or noxious substances.

CrPC Section 336 defines the offence of endangering life or personal safety by acts imminently dangerous to the public.

CrPC Section 105I details the procedure for police to record statements of victims or witnesses in certain cases.

bottom of page