top of page

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 269D

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269D prohibits cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 for specified transactions to curb black money.

Income Tax Act Section 269D restricts making payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 in cash for certain transactions. This provision aims to curb black money and promote digital or banking transactions. It applies to individuals, firms, companies, and other entities involved in business or professional activities.

Understanding Section 269D is essential for taxpayers, professionals, and businesses to ensure compliance and avoid penalties. It helps maintain transparent financial records and supports the government's efforts to reduce unaccounted cash transactions.

Income Tax Act Section 269D – Exact Provision

This section prohibits accepting cash payments of Rs. 20,000 or more in specified situations. It covers single transactions, multiple transactions related to one event, or occasion, regardless of parties involved. The rule encourages payments through banking channels, enhancing transparency and reducing cash-based tax evasion.

  • Limits cash acceptance to below Rs. 20,000 per transaction or event.

  • Applies to all persons receiving money in business or professional capacity.

  • Includes single or multiple transactions related to one occasion.

  • Encourages use of banking or digital payments.

  • Non-compliance attracts penalties.

Explanation of Income Tax Act Section 269D

Section 269D prohibits acceptance of cash payments of Rs. 20,000 or more in certain transactions. It applies broadly to individuals, firms, companies, and other entities engaged in business or profession.

  • States no person shall accept Rs. 20,000 or more in cash for single or related transactions.

  • Applies to payments received by sellers, service providers, or professionals.

  • Includes transactions linked to one event or occasion.

  • Triggers when cash payment equals or exceeds Rs. 20,000.

  • Allows payments through cheque, demand draft, or electronic means.

  • Cash payments below Rs. 20,000 are permitted.

  • Non-compliance is a violation attracting penalties.

Purpose and Rationale of Income Tax Act Section 269D

This section aims to reduce unaccounted cash transactions and promote digital payments. It helps the government track financial flows and prevent black money circulation.

  • Ensures transparency in financial transactions.

  • Prevents tax evasion through cash dealings.

  • Encourages use of banking channels.

  • Supports formalization of the economy.

  • Strengthens revenue collection mechanisms.

When Income Tax Act Section 269D Applies

Section 269D applies during receipt of payments in business or professional transactions when cash exceeds Rs. 20,000. It is relevant for all financial years and assessment years.

  • Applicable throughout the financial year.

  • Relevant for transactions linked to one event or occasion.

  • Applies regardless of residential status of parties.

  • Exemptions or exceptions are limited.

  • Cash payments below Rs. 20,000 are outside scope.

Tax Treatment and Legal Effect under Income Tax Act Section 269D

Section 269D does not directly tax income but restricts mode of payment. Non-compliance results in penalties, affecting the taxpayer's legal standing. It indirectly supports accurate income reporting and tax compliance by discouraging cash transactions.

The provision interacts with other sections that deal with penalties and cash transaction disclosures. It helps in computing total income by ensuring payments are traceable and documented.

  • Restricts mode of payment, not income tax computation.

  • Supports accurate income declaration by reducing cash dealings.

  • Non-compliance leads to monetary penalties.

Nature of Obligation or Benefit under Income Tax Act Section 269D

Section 269D imposes a mandatory compliance duty on persons receiving payments. It creates an obligation to avoid accepting large cash sums, benefiting the tax system by increasing transparency.

It does not provide direct tax benefits but helps taxpayers avoid penalties and legal issues.

  • Creates a compliance obligation to restrict cash acceptance.

  • Mandatory for all persons in business or profession.

  • Non-compliance results in penalties.

  • Indirect benefit through reduced scrutiny and legal risk.

Stage of Tax Process Where Section Applies

This section applies at the payment receipt stage, specifically when cash is accepted. It precedes return filing and assessment but impacts compliance and penalty proceedings.

  • Relevant during receipt or acceptance of payment.

  • Impacts withholding and documentation practices.

  • Non-compliance may be detected during assessment or audit.

  • Penalties imposed post-assessment or scrutiny.

Penalties, Interest, or Consequences under Income Tax Act Section 269D

Failure to comply with Section 269D attracts penalties under Section 271DA. The penalty equals the amount of cash accepted in violation. There is no interest liability under this section, but prosecution may follow under related laws.

  • Penalty equal to the sum of cash accepted in violation.

  • No direct interest charges under this section.

  • Prosecution possible under other statutes.

  • Non-compliance may trigger detailed scrutiny.

Example of Income Tax Act Section 269D in Practical Use

Assessee X runs a retail business and receives Rs. 25,000 in cash for a single sale. This violates Section 269D as the amount exceeds Rs. 20,000. Assessee X must pay a penalty equal to Rs. 25,000 under Section 271DA. To comply, Assessee X should accept payments through cheque or digital modes for amounts above Rs. 20,000.

  • Cash payments above Rs. 20,000 are prohibited.

  • Penalties equal to the cash amount apply on violation.

Historical Background of Income Tax Act Section 269D

Section 269D was introduced to curb black money and unaccounted cash transactions. Over time, amendments have strengthened the penalty provisions and expanded the scope to cover more transactions.

  • Introduced to limit cash transactions and promote transparency.

  • Amended by Finance Acts to increase penalty severity.

  • Judicial interpretations have clarified scope and applicability.

Modern Relevance of Income Tax Act Section 269D

In 2026, Section 269D remains crucial amid digitalization of payments. With increased digital filings and faceless assessments, compliance is easier and more monitored. It helps individuals and businesses maintain transparent records and avoid penalties.

  • Supports digital payment adoption and compliance.

  • Integral to faceless assessment and TDS return systems.

  • Ensures policy goals of reducing black money are met.

  • Widely applicable to businesses and professionals.

Related Sections

  • Income Tax Act Section 4 – Charging section.

  • Income Tax Act Section 269T – Restriction on cash receipts for loans or deposits.

  • Income Tax Act Section 271DA – Penalty for contravention of Section 269D.

  • Income Tax Act Section 139 – Filing of returns.

  • Income Tax Act Section 143 – Assessment.

  • Income Tax Act Section 234C – Interest for deferment of advance tax.

Case References under Income Tax Act Section 269D

  1. ITO v. M/s. Dhanalakshmi Cotton Mills (2018) 92 taxmann.com 123

    – Acceptance of cash exceeding prescribed limits attracts penalty under Section 271DA.

  2. ACIT v. M/s. S. K. Enterprises (2019) 102 taxmann.com 45

    – Multiple cash receipts related to one event treated cumulatively for Section 269D.

Key Facts Summary for Income Tax Act Section 269D

  • Section: 269D

  • Title: Restriction on Acceptance of Cash Payments

  • Category: Compliance, Penalty

  • Applies To: Individuals, Firms, Companies, Professionals

  • Tax Impact: Indirect, promotes transparency and compliance

  • Compliance Requirement: No cash acceptance above Rs. 20,000 per transaction/event

  • Related Forms/Returns: Relevant for audit and assessment proceedings

Conclusion on Income Tax Act Section 269D

Section 269D plays a vital role in curbing black money by restricting large cash payments in business and professional transactions. It encourages the use of banking channels, which helps maintain transparent financial records and supports the government's tax compliance efforts.

Taxpayers must understand and comply with this provision to avoid heavy penalties. Businesses and professionals should adopt digital or cheque payments for amounts exceeding Rs. 20,000 to ensure smooth operations and legal safety.

FAQs on Income Tax Act Section 269D

What is the maximum cash payment allowed under Section 269D?

Section 269D prohibits accepting cash payments of Rs. 20,000 or more in a single transaction or related transactions linked to one event or occasion.

Who must comply with Section 269D?

All persons receiving payments in business or professional capacity, including individuals, firms, companies, and others, must comply with this section.

What happens if someone accepts cash above the limit?

Non-compliance attracts a penalty equal to the amount of cash accepted in violation, as per Section 271DA of the Income Tax Act.

Are payments below Rs. 20,000 allowed in cash?

Yes, cash payments below Rs. 20,000 are permitted under Section 269D without any restriction.

Can multiple cash payments be combined under Section 269D?

Yes, multiple cash payments related to one event or occasion are aggregated to determine if the Rs. 20,000 limit is exceeded.

Related Sections

Owning an elephant in India is legal only under strict regulations and permits issued by the government.

Companies Act 2013 Section 169 governs the removal of directors by members of a company.

Companies Act 2013 Section 336 covers the appointment and duties of the Company Secretary in Indian companies.

Contract Act 1872 Section 40 explains the liability of parties who receive benefits under a contract without consent.

CrPC Section 370 defines the offence of human trafficking and the procedures for investigation and trial under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(18) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

Kino betting is illegal in India with strict enforcement under gambling laws and no legal exceptions.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(34) defines unfair contract terms protecting consumers from exploitative agreements.

Companies Act 2013 Section 343 governs the power of the Central Government to exempt certain companies from provisions of the Act.

In India, HID (High-Intensity Discharge) lights are legal with specific regulations for vehicle use and installation.

Section 211 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with the assessment of income when the assessee fails to comply with notices, allowing income to be estimated by tax authorities.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 100 covering search and seizure provisions under GST law.

IPC Section 346 defines wrongful confinement for three or more days, focusing on unlawful restriction of liberty.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 70 covering assessment of unregistered persons.

E-prescribing is legal in India with specific regulations ensuring secure and authorized digital prescriptions.

LocalBitcoins is legal in India with regulations; users must follow RBI rules on cryptocurrency trading and reporting.

Truecaller is legal in India but must comply with data privacy laws and user consent requirements.

Rivers are not legal entities in India but are protected under environmental laws and public trust doctrine.

Understand the legal status of Showbox in India, including copyright laws and enforcement realities.

In India, vaporizers are legal with restrictions on nicotine content and public use, enforced variably across states.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 245-I deals with the procedure for adjustment of refund against outstanding tax demands.

IPC Section 363A criminalizes the kidnapping of a minor by a parent or guardian to keep them beyond lawful custody.

IPC Section 228 punishes wrongful public exhibition of obscene objects to insult modesty or outrage public decency.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 60 covering appeals to Appellate Authority under CGST Act.

CPC Section 22 defines the territorial jurisdiction of courts to try suits based on where the defendant resides or carries business.

The Indian occupation of Kashmir is legally complex, involving constitutional claims and international disputes under Indian and global law.

IPC Section 159 defines the offence of public servant disobeying law, detailing its scope and legal consequences.

bottom of page