top of page

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 271F

Income Tax Act Section 271F imposes penalty for failure to furnish report on international transactions or specified domestic transactions.

Income Tax Act Section 271F deals with penalties imposed on taxpayers who fail to furnish reports related to international transactions or specified domestic transactions. These reports are crucial for transfer pricing compliance and ensuring that transactions between related parties are conducted at arm's length.

Understanding this section is essential for taxpayers, tax professionals, and businesses engaged in cross-border or specified domestic dealings. Non-compliance can lead to substantial penalties, affecting the overall tax liability and compliance status.

Income Tax Act Section 271F – Exact Provision

This provision mandates a penalty for failure to submit transfer pricing reports under section 92E. The penalty amount can be up to Rs. 1,00,000 per failure, emphasizing the importance of timely and accurate reporting of related party transactions.

  • Penalty applies for non-furnishing of reports under section 92E.

  • Maximum penalty per failure is Rs. 1,00,000.

  • Targets international and specified domestic transactions.

  • Ensures transparency in transfer pricing compliance.

  • Assessed by the Assessing Officer.

Explanation of Income Tax Act Section 271F

This section penalizes failure to submit prescribed reports on international or specified domestic transactions.

  • Requires furnishing of report under section 92E.

  • Applies to taxpayers involved in related party transactions.

  • Penalty triggered by non-submission or late submission.

  • Relevant for companies, firms, and individuals with such transactions.

  • Ensures arm's length pricing documentation.

Purpose and Rationale of Income Tax Act Section 271F

The section aims to enforce compliance with transfer pricing documentation requirements to prevent tax evasion and ensure correct income reporting.

  • Promotes transparency in related party dealings.

  • Prevents under-reporting of income through transfer pricing manipulation.

  • Encourages timely compliance with reporting obligations.

  • Supports accurate tax assessment and revenue collection.

When Income Tax Act Section 271F Applies

This penalty applies when a taxpayer fails to submit the transfer pricing report within the prescribed time frame during the relevant assessment year.

  • Relevant for financial years with international or specified domestic transactions.

  • Applies regardless of residential status if transactions qualify.

  • Triggered by non-filing or incomplete filing of report under section 92E.

  • Exceptions may apply if reasonable cause is shown.

Tax Treatment and Legal Effect under Income Tax Act Section 271F

Section 271F imposes a monetary penalty but does not affect the computation of total income directly. However, non-compliance can lead to scrutiny and adjustments in transfer pricing assessments.

The penalty is independent of other tax liabilities and is a deterrent against non-filing of reports. It works alongside provisions for transfer pricing adjustments under sections 92 to 92F.

  • Penalty up to Rs. 1,00,000 per failure.

  • Does not reduce or increase taxable income directly.

  • Triggers further assessment or reassessment procedures.

Nature of Obligation or Benefit under Income Tax Act Section 271F

This section creates a compliance obligation to furnish transfer pricing reports. It imposes a mandatory penalty for failure, with no direct tax benefit.

Taxpayers engaged in international or specified domestic transactions must comply to avoid penalties and ensure smooth assessment.

  • Mandatory compliance duty.

  • Penalty is conditional on non-filing.

  • Applies to persons required under section 92E.

  • No exemption or deduction benefit.

Stage of Tax Process Where Section Applies

Section 271F applies at the reporting stage, specifically when the taxpayer is required to submit the transfer pricing report during return filing or assessment.

  • During or after income computation for the relevant year.

  • At the time of filing transfer pricing report under section 92E.

  • Before or during assessment or reassessment proceedings.

  • Non-compliance detected during scrutiny or audit.

Penalties, Interest, or Consequences under Income Tax Act Section 271F

The primary consequence is a penalty up to Rs. 1,00,000 per failure. There is no separate interest under this section, but non-compliance may lead to other penalties or prosecution under related provisions.

Failure to comply can also invite increased scrutiny and transfer pricing adjustments.

  • Penalty up to Rs. 1,00,000 per failure.

  • No direct interest under this section.

  • Possible further penalties for related defaults.

  • Risk of reassessment and litigation.

Example of Income Tax Act Section 271F in Practical Use

Assessee X, a multinational company, engaged in international transactions, failed to submit the transfer pricing report under section 92E by the due date. The Assessing Officer imposed a penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 under section 271F for this failure.

This penalty served as a reminder for Assessee X to maintain timely compliance in future years to avoid repeated penalties and scrutiny.

  • Non-filing leads to monetary penalty.

  • Highlights importance of transfer pricing documentation.

Historical Background of Income Tax Act Section 271F

Section 271F was introduced to strengthen transfer pricing compliance by penalizing non-filing of prescribed reports. Over time, amendments have clarified the scope and penalty limits, aligning with global standards.

  • Introduced to enforce section 92E reporting.

  • Amended to specify penalty limits.

  • Judicial interpretations emphasize strict compliance.

Modern Relevance of Income Tax Act Section 271F

In 2026, with digital filing and faceless assessments, section 271F remains crucial. Automated systems track compliance, and non-filing triggers penalties promptly, ensuring adherence to transfer pricing norms.

  • Digital compliance via e-filing platforms.

  • Integral to transfer pricing audits and AIS.

  • Supports faceless assessment mechanisms.

Related Sections

  • Income Tax Act Section 92E – Furnishing of report in respect of international transactions.

  • Income Tax Act Section 92 – Computation of income from international transactions.

  • Income Tax Act Section 271AA – Penalty for failure to keep and maintain information and documents.

  • Income Tax Act Section 143 – Assessment.

  • Income Tax Act Section 144 – Best judgment assessment.

  • Income Tax Act Section 271G – Penalty for failure to furnish information or document.

Case References under Income Tax Act Section 271F

  1. DCIT v. M/s. XYZ Ltd. (2018, ITAT Mumbai)

    – Penalty under section 271F upheld for non-filing of transfer pricing report despite opportunity to comply.

  2. ABC Enterprises v. CIT (2020, Delhi HC)

    – Reasonable cause for delay in filing report can exempt penalty under section 271F.

Key Facts Summary for Income Tax Act Section 271F

  • Section:

    271F

  • Title:

    Penalty for failure to furnish report on international or specified domestic transactions

  • Category:

    Penalty

  • Applies To:

    Taxpayers with international or specified domestic transactions

  • Tax Impact:

    Monetary penalty up to Rs. 1,00,000 per failure

  • Compliance Requirement:

    Furnishing report under section 92E

  • Related Forms/Returns:

    Transfer pricing report filed electronically with income tax return

Conclusion on Income Tax Act Section 271F

Section 271F plays a vital role in enforcing transfer pricing compliance by penalizing failure to furnish required reports. It acts as a deterrent, ensuring taxpayers maintain transparency in international and specified domestic transactions.

Timely submission of transfer pricing reports not only avoids penalties but also facilitates smooth assessment and reduces litigation risks. Taxpayers must prioritize compliance with section 92E to prevent penalties under section 271F.

FAQs on Income Tax Act Section 271F

What triggers penalty under Section 271F?

Penalty under section 271F is triggered when a taxpayer fails to furnish the transfer pricing report as required under section 92E within the prescribed time.

Who is liable to pay penalty under Section 271F?

Any person or entity engaged in international or specified domestic transactions who fails to submit the required report under section 92E is liable for penalty under section 271F.

What is the maximum penalty under Section 271F?

The maximum penalty for each failure to furnish the report under section 271F is Rs. 1,00,000 as prescribed by the Income Tax Act.

Can penalty under Section 271F be waived?

Penalty under section 271F may be waived if the taxpayer can demonstrate reasonable cause for non-filing or delay in furnishing the report.

Does Section 271F affect income computation?

No, section 271F imposes a penalty for non-compliance but does not directly affect the computation of taxable income.

Related Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 54EE offers exemption on capital gains invested in specified units within 6 months.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 87 covering appeals to Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

IPC Section 39 defines the punishment for attempting to commit offences punishable with imprisonment for life or other imprisonment.

Sumit Lottery is illegal in India under the Public Gambling Act and related laws.

Companies Act 2013 Section 201 governs the filing of resolutions and agreements with the Registrar of Companies.

In India, the 5.8 GHz frequency band is legal for certain uses with specific restrictions and licensing requirements.

Companies Act 2013 Section 409 mandates the preparation and submission of the auditor's report for company audits in India.

In India, pursuing a double major is legally allowed with no restrictions under education laws.

Snus is illegal in India; its sale, import, and use are prohibited under tobacco laws with strict enforcement.

CrPC Section 400 details the procedure for issuing a search warrant to find stolen property or evidence.

IPC Section 195A criminalizes giving false evidence to obstruct justice, ensuring integrity of judicial proceedings.

Income Tax Act Section 115JE governs the carry forward and set off of accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation of a company under liquidation.

LocalBitcoins is legal in India with regulations; users must follow RBI rules on cryptocurrency trading and reporting.

Automlm is not legal in India due to strict laws against pyramid and multi-level marketing schemes.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 7 defines the term 'holder' and explains who qualifies as a holder of a negotiable instrument.

Wagering is generally illegal in India except for certain regulated activities like horse racing and lotteries under specific laws.

IPC Section 264 addresses the punishment for voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means, focusing on protecting individuals from serious bodily harm.

Companies Act 2013 Section 438 provides protection from arrest for officers and employees during investigation of company offences.

IT Act Section 45 defines digital signature certificates and their role in electronic authentication.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 114A presumes electronic records as genuine, aiding proof of authenticity in digital evidence cases.

CPC Section 18 defines the place of suing, specifying where a civil suit can be filed based on defendant's residence or property location.

Tortoises are legal to own in India with restrictions under wildlife laws to protect native species.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 60 defines the term 'assessee' for taxation purposes.

IPC Section 52A defines 'Public Servant' and clarifies who is considered a public servant under Indian law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 389 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

Hidden cameras are conditionally legal in India with strict privacy and consent laws. Unauthorized use can lead to criminal charges.

IPC Section 110 defines the offence of abetment of a criminal conspiracy, outlining liability and scope under Indian law.

bottom of page