top of page

Information Technology Act 2000 Section 64

IT Act Section 64 empowers the Controller to suspend or revoke digital signature certificates to maintain trust in electronic authentication.

Section 64 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, deals with the suspension and revocation of digital signature certificates. Digital certificates are crucial for authenticating electronic documents and transactions. This section empowers the Controller of Certifying Authorities to suspend or revoke certificates when they are compromised or misused.

In today's digital world, trust in electronic authentication is vital for secure online communication and transactions. Section 64 helps maintain this trust by ensuring that invalid or fraudulent certificates are promptly invalidated. This protects users, businesses, and law enforcement agencies from cyber fraud and misuse of digital identities.

Information Technology Act Section 64 – Exact Provision

This provision gives the Controller the authority to suspend or revoke digital certificates to prevent misuse. Suspension temporarily disables a certificate, while revocation permanently invalidates it. This ensures that certificates that are compromised, expired, or issued in error do not continue to be trusted.

  • Empowers Controller to suspend or revoke certificates.

  • Applies to digital signature certificates issued by Certifying Authorities.

  • Ensures trust in electronic authentication.

  • Protects against misuse or compromise of certificates.

  • Requires reasons to be recorded in writing.

Explanation of Information Technology Act Section 64

This section authorizes the Controller to act against digital certificates that are no longer trustworthy.

  • States that the Controller may suspend or revoke certificates.

  • Applies to Certifying Authorities and their issued certificates.

  • Triggered when certificates are compromised, misused, or invalid.

  • Legal criteria include written reasons for action.

  • Allows suspension (temporary) or revocation (permanent) of certificates.

  • Prevents use of invalid certificates in electronic transactions.

Purpose and Rationale of IT Act Section 64

The section aims to maintain the integrity and reliability of digital signatures in electronic commerce and communication.

  • Protects users from fraudulent digital certificates.

  • Prevents cybercrimes involving certificate misuse.

  • Ensures secure and trustworthy electronic transactions.

  • Regulates the lifecycle of digital certificates.

When IT Act Section 64 Applies

This section applies when a digital certificate needs to be suspended or revoked due to compromise or invalidity.

  • When a certificate is suspected to be compromised or misused.

  • Upon expiry or error in certificate issuance.

  • Invoked by the Controller of Certifying Authorities.

  • Requires evidence of certificate misuse or invalidity.

  • Relevant to electronic documents and digital signatures.

  • Exceptions may include certificates under investigation.

Legal Effect of IT Act Section 64

Section 64 creates the legal framework for invalidating digital certificates, restricting their use in electronic authentication. It imposes a duty on the Controller to act responsibly by recording reasons for suspension or revocation. Penalties for misuse of certificates are covered under other sections, but this section ensures compromised certificates cannot be used.

  • Creates rights to suspend or revoke certificates.

  • Restricts use of invalid digital certificates.

  • Supports enforcement against cyber fraud.

Nature of Offence or Liability under IT Act Section 64

This section primarily deals with regulatory compliance rather than direct offences. It empowers the Controller to act administratively to maintain certificate trustworthiness. It does not itself create criminal liability but supports enforcement actions under related provisions.

  • Regulatory compliance provision.

  • No direct criminal offence defined.

  • Non-cognizable administrative action.

  • No arrest powers under this section.

Stage of Proceedings Where IT Act Section 64 Applies

Section 64 is relevant during administrative proceedings related to digital certificates.

  • Investigation of certificate misuse or compromise.

  • Collection of evidence regarding certificate validity.

  • Controller issues suspension or revocation orders.

  • May precede criminal or civil proceedings under other sections.

  • Appeals against Controller’s decisions may be filed.

Penalties and Consequences under IT Act Section 64

While Section 64 does not prescribe penalties, suspension or revocation of certificates can have serious consequences. Invalid certificates cannot be used for authentication, affecting businesses and users relying on them. Related offences under the IT Act may attract fines or imprisonment.

  • No direct fines or imprisonment under this section.

  • Suspension/revocation disables certificate use.

  • May lead to liability under other IT Act provisions.

  • Impacts intermediaries and certificate holders.

Example of IT Act Section 64 in Practical Use

Consider a company, X, whose digital certificate is stolen by a hacker. The hacker uses it to sign fraudulent contracts. Upon detection, the Controller suspends the certificate under Section 64 to prevent further misuse. This action protects clients and the company from legal and financial harm.

  • Section 64 enables quick response to certificate compromise.

  • Protects trust in digital transactions.

Historical Background of IT Act Section 64

The IT Act, 2000 was introduced to regulate electronic commerce and digital signatures. Section 64 was included to empower authorities to maintain certificate integrity. The 2008 Amendment strengthened provisions related to cyber security and digital authentication. Over time, interpretation has evolved to address emerging cyber threats.

  • Introduced to support e-commerce and digital signatures.

  • Amended in 2008 for enhanced cyber security.

  • Adapted to evolving digital authentication needs.

Modern Relevance of IT Act Section 64

In 2026, with increased digital transactions, Section 64 remains crucial for cybersecurity. It supports data protection, fintech security, and digital identity management. Social media and intermediary reforms also rely on robust certificate management. Enforcement challenges persist due to sophisticated cyber threats.

  • Supports digital evidence authenticity.

  • Enhances online safety and trust.

  • Addresses enforcement challenges in cybercrime.

Related Sections

  • IT Act Section 43 – Penalty for unauthorised access and data theft.

  • IT Act Section 65 – Tampering with computer source documents.

  • IT Act Section 66 – Computer-related offences.

  • IT Act Section 72 – Breach of confidentiality and privacy.

  • Evidence Act Section 65B – Admissibility of electronic evidence.

  • CrPC Section 91 – Summons for digital records or documents.

Case References under IT Act Section 64

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for IT Act Section 64

  • Section: 64

  • Title: Suspension and Revocation of Digital Signature Certificates

  • Category: Digital Signature Regulation

  • Applies To: Controller, Certifying Authorities, Certificate Holders

  • Stage: Administrative action, investigation, appeal

  • Legal Effect: Empowers suspension/revocation of certificates

  • Penalties: No direct penalties; supports enforcement under other provisions

Conclusion on IT Act Section 64

Section 64 is a vital regulatory provision ensuring the credibility of digital signature certificates. By empowering the Controller to suspend or revoke certificates, it protects users and businesses from cyber threats and fraudulent electronic transactions.

Maintaining trust in digital authentication is essential for secure e-commerce and communication. Section 64 plays a key role in India's cybersecurity framework by enabling timely action against compromised certificates, thereby upholding the integrity of electronic records and signatures.

FAQs on IT Act Section 64

What authority does Section 64 grant regarding digital certificates?

Section 64 empowers the Controller to suspend or revoke digital signature certificates issued by Certifying Authorities to prevent misuse or compromise.

When can a digital certificate be suspended or revoked?

A certificate can be suspended or revoked if it is compromised, misused, expired, or issued in error, based on written reasons by the Controller.

Does Section 64 impose penalties for misuse of certificates?

No, Section 64 itself does not impose penalties but supports enforcement actions under other IT Act provisions related to cyber offences.

Who can invoke the suspension or revocation of a certificate?

The Controller of Certifying Authorities has the exclusive power to suspend or revoke digital signature certificates under Section 64.

Is suspension of a certificate permanent?

No, suspension is temporary, whereas revocation permanently invalidates a digital signature certificate.

Related Sections

IPC Section 41 empowers police to arrest without warrant under specific conditions to prevent crime or secure evidence.

IPC Section 375 defines the legal parameters of rape, detailing acts constituting the offence and its scope under Indian law.

IPC Section 64 provides immunity from punishment for acts done by a child under seven years of age, ensuring protection for minors.

IPC Section 438 provides anticipatory bail to protect individuals from arrest in non-bailable offences.

IPC Section 448 defines house trespass, covering unlawful entry into a property with intent to commit an offence.

CrPC Section 34 defines joint liability for criminal acts done by several persons in furtherance of a common intention.

CrPC Section 470 deals with the procedure when a person is tried for an offence not punishable under the law.

IPC Section 380 defines theft in a dwelling house, emphasizing protection of homes from burglary and theft.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 53 defines the admissibility of confessions made to police officers, outlining when such confessions are valid in court.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 119 defines the presumption of ownership when possession of property is proved.

CrPC Section 187 defines the offence of obstructing a public servant in discharge of public functions and its legal consequences.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 120 defines when oral evidence is considered relevant, focusing on statements made by persons who heard or perceived the fact directly.

IPC Section 133 empowers authorities to disperse unlawful assemblies to maintain public peace and order.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 51 defines expert opinion evidence and its admissibility in court proceedings.

Companies Act 2013 Section 125 governs the procedure for unclaimed dividends and their transfer to the Investor Education and Protection Fund.

IPC Section 464 defines the offence of making a false document with intent to cause damage or injury.

IPC Section 294A penalizes obscene acts and songs in public places to maintain public decency and order.

IPC Section 157 mandates police officers to register and investigate information about cognizable offences promptly.

IPC Section 356 addresses the punishment for criminal trespass by a public servant in a place of worship or sacred precincts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 44 defines when oral evidence is considered relevant, focusing on facts that can be perceived by the senses and directly related to the case.

IPC Section 485 addresses the offence of lurking house-trespass or house-breaking in the night, focusing on unlawful entry with intent.

IPC Section 500 defines punishment for defamation, addressing harm to a person's reputation through false statements.

CPC Section 114 empowers courts to presume certain facts based on common experience and judicial knowledge.

CrPC Section 257 empowers courts to order the disposal of seized property in criminal cases after trial completion.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(42) defines unfair contract terms protecting consumers from exploitative agreements.

CrPC Section 166 details the procedure for magistrates to summon witnesses and compel their attendance in criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 32 covers admissions by persons who cannot be called as witnesses, crucial for proving facts in their absence.

bottom of page