top of page

IPC Section 13

IPC Section 13 defines criminal conspiracy, outlining its scope and legal implications in Indian law.

IPC Section 13 deals with the offence of criminal conspiracy, which involves an agreement between two or more persons to commit an illegal act or a legal act by illegal means. This section is crucial because it targets the planning stage of crimes, allowing law enforcement to intervene before the actual offence occurs.

Understanding Section 13 is important as it helps prevent crimes by punishing the agreement itself, even if the planned crime is not executed. It plays a vital role in maintaining public order and safety by discouraging collective criminal intentions.

IPC Section 13 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, Section 13 defines criminal conspiracy as a mutual agreement to commit a crime or to achieve a lawful objective through unlawful methods. The offence is complete once the agreement is made, regardless of whether the crime is actually carried out.

  • Requires at least two persons agreeing to a plan.

  • The plan involves committing an illegal act or legal act by illegal means.

  • The offence is punishable even if the crime is not executed.

  • Focuses on the agreement, not the outcome.

Purpose of IPC Section 13

The main objective of Section 13 is to criminalize the agreement to commit a crime, recognizing that collective planning poses a greater threat to society. By penalizing conspiracy, the law aims to deter groups from organizing criminal activities and to enable early intervention by authorities.

  • Prevent crimes by targeting planning stages.

  • Discourage collective criminal intent.

  • Protect public safety and order.

Cognizance under IPC Section 13

Cognizance of criminal conspiracy is generally taken by courts when there is credible evidence of an agreement to commit a crime. The offence is cognizable, meaning police can investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can initiate investigation suo moto.

  • Court takes cognizance upon receiving a complaint or police report.

  • Evidence of agreement is essential for cognizance.

Bail under IPC Section 13

Offences under Section 13 are generally non-bailable due to the serious nature of conspiracy. However, bail may be granted depending on the circumstances and severity of the planned crime.

  • Bail is not a right but at court's discretion.

  • Severity of intended crime influences bail decision.

  • Courts consider risk of flight or tampering with evidence.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under Section 13 are triable by Sessions Courts because conspiracy often relates to serious offences. However, if the conspiracy is linked to a minor offence, a Magistrate Court may have jurisdiction.

  • Sessions Court tries serious conspiracies.

  • Magistrate Court for minor offences linked to conspiracy.

  • Special courts may try cases involving specific crimes.

Example of IPC Section 13 in Use

Suppose two individuals agree to commit a bank robbery. They plan the details but are caught before executing the crime. Under Section 13, they can be prosecuted for criminal conspiracy even though the robbery did not take place. Conversely, if only one person plans alone, Section 13 does not apply as conspiracy requires an agreement.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 13

Section 13 has its roots in the Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860, reflecting British legal principles on conspiracy. Over time, judicial interpretations have clarified its scope and application.

  • 1860: IPC enacted including Section 13.

  • Landmark cases refined definition of conspiracy.

  • Judicial precedents expanded understanding of 'illegal means.'

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 13

In 2025, Section 13 remains vital in combating organized crime, terrorism, and cyber conspiracies. Courts have interpreted it to include modern forms of criminal agreements, ensuring its applicability in contemporary contexts.

  • Used against cybercrime conspiracies.

  • Applied in terrorism-related cases.

  • Supports preventive legal measures.

Related Sections to IPC Section 13

  • Section 120A – Definition of Criminal Conspiracy

  • Section 120B – Punishment for Criminal Conspiracy

  • Section 34 – Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention

  • Section 41 – Power of police to arrest without warrant

  • Section 107 – Abetment of a thing

  • Section 109 – Punishment for abetment

Case References under IPC Section 13

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub (1980 AIR 1990, SC)

    – The Court held that conspiracy requires an agreement and mere knowledge of a crime is insufficient.

  2. K. M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra (1962 AIR 605, SC)

    – Clarified that conspiracy can be inferred from conduct and circumstances.

  3. R. K. Garg v. Union of India (1981 AIR 1116, SC)

    – Emphasized the importance of proving the agreement for conspiracy conviction.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 13

  • Section:

    13

  • Title:

    Criminal Conspiracy

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    As per Section 120B, varies with offence planned

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court (or Magistrate for minor offences)

Conclusion on IPC Section 13

IPC Section 13 plays a foundational role in Indian criminal law by criminalizing the agreement to commit offences. It empowers law enforcement to act against criminal plans before they materialize, thereby enhancing public safety.

Its application in modern times extends to various forms of organized crime, including cyber offences and terrorism. Understanding Section 13 is essential for grasping how Indian law addresses collective criminal intent and prevents harm at its inception.

FAQs on IPC Section 13

What constitutes criminal conspiracy under IPC Section 13?

It is an agreement between two or more persons to commit an illegal act or a legal act by illegal means. The offence is complete once the agreement is made.

Is actual commission of crime necessary for Section 13 offence?

No, the offence of criminal conspiracy is complete with the agreement itself, even if the planned crime is not executed.

Can one person be charged under Section 13?

No, criminal conspiracy requires at least two persons agreeing to commit a crime.

Is the offence under Section 13 bailable?

Generally, it is non-bailable due to the serious nature of conspiracy, but bail depends on the case facts and court discretion.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 13?

Serious conspiracy cases are tried by Sessions Courts, while minor linked offences may be tried by Magistrate Courts.

Related Sections

Income Tax Act Section 263 empowers the Commissioner to revise erroneous or prejudicial income tax assessments.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 34 details the powers of Consumer Commissions to summon and enforce attendance of witnesses and production of documents.

CrPC Section 96 details the procedure for appeal against an order of acquittal or conviction in criminal cases.

Binomo trading is legal in India but regulated with restrictions; understand how it works and what to watch for.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 73 explains the liability of parties when a negotiable instrument is lost, stolen, or destroyed.

Alexandrine parrots are conditionally legal in India with permits under wildlife laws.

IPC Section 366B criminalizes the importation of girls below 21 years for immoral purposes, protecting minors from trafficking and exploitation.

Companies Act 2013 Section 158 governs the maintenance and inspection of registers of members, crucial for company transparency and compliance.

CPC Section 8 prevents multiple courts from trying the same suit simultaneously, avoiding conflicting decisions.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 54G provides capital gains exemption on transfer of industrial undertakings for specified business relocations.

Income Tax Act Section 125A deals with the recovery of tax in cases of failure to deduct or pay TDS by specified entities.

Companies Act 2013 Section 234 deals with the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

In India, second marriage is legal under certain conditions depending on personal laws and marital status.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 64 explains the liability of a drawee who accepts a bill of exchange and then refuses to pay it.

Companies Act 2013 Section 25 governs the formation of not-for-profit companies for promoting commerce, art, science, or charity.

Recreational drugs are illegal in India, with strict laws banning their use, possession, and trade under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

Love marriage is legal in India with no specific law against it, but social and family dynamics affect its acceptance.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 247 empowers the Commissioner to grant stay of demand during appeal proceedings.

IPC Section 438 provides anticipatory bail to protect individuals from arrest in non-bailable offences.

William Hill is not legally authorized to operate in India, but Indian users can access it with caution under specific conditions.

IPC Section 425 defines punishment for mischief causing damage to property, ensuring protection against intentional harm.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 96 defines the time limit for presenting a promissory note or bill of exchange for payment.

Triple Talaq is illegal in India and punishable by law under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019.

Companies Act 2013 Section 386 governs the power of the Central Government to make rules under the Act.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 75A defines the duties and liabilities of partners in firms regarding negotiable instruments.

In India, 9mm pistols are legal only with a valid firearm license under strict regulations and controls.

Companies Act 2013 Section 157 governs the appointment of auditors and their tenure in Indian companies.

bottom of page