top of page

IPC Section 146

IPC Section 146 defines rioting and prescribes punishment for unlawful assembly engaging in violence.

IPC Section 146 deals with the offence of rioting, which occurs when an unlawful assembly uses force or violence. This section is important because it helps maintain public order by penalizing groups that disturb peace through collective violence.

Understanding Section 146 is crucial for law enforcement and citizens alike, as it clarifies when a group’s actions cross the line into criminal rioting, ensuring accountability and protection of public safety.

IPC Section 146 – Exact Provision

This means that if a group of people gathers unlawfully and uses force or violence to achieve their shared goal, each member is responsible for rioting. The law does not differentiate between the person who actually commits violence and those who are part of the group.

  • Rioting involves force or violence by an unlawful assembly.

  • Every member of the assembly is equally guilty.

  • The violence must be in pursuit of the assembly’s common objective.

  • It emphasizes collective responsibility.

Purpose of IPC Section 146

The main legal objective of IPC Section 146 is to prevent and punish collective violence that threatens public peace. It ensures that groups cannot escape liability by blaming individual members. By holding all members accountable, the law discourages unlawful gatherings from turning violent.

  • Maintain public order by deterring group violence.

  • Assign collective responsibility to unlawful assemblies.

  • Protect citizens from mob actions and disturbances.

Cognizance under IPC Section 146

Cognizance of rioting is taken when police or courts receive information about unlawful assemblies using force or violence. The offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate immediately.

  • Court takes cognizance on police report or complaint.

  • Prompt action is essential to prevent escalation.

Bail under IPC Section 146

Rioting under Section 146 is generally a non-bailable offence, especially if it involves serious violence. However, bail may be granted depending on the case facts and severity of the act.

  • Bail is not a matter of right but discretion of the court.

  • Serious cases with injuries or damage may lead to denial of bail.

  • First-time or minor involvement may favor bail grant.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Offences under Section 146 are triable by Magistrate courts. However, if the rioting involves serious charges or is connected with other grave offences, Sessions Court may take jurisdiction.

  • Magistrate courts handle most rioting cases.

  • Sessions Court tries cases involving serious violence or related offences.

  • Special courts may be involved in certain contexts.

Example of IPC Section 146 in Use

Suppose a group of people unlawfully assemble to protest. If some members start damaging public property and assaulting bystanders to enforce their demands, all members present are guilty of rioting under Section 146. Even those who did not physically commit violence but were part of the assembly share responsibility. Conversely, if the assembly was peaceful without force, Section 146 would not apply.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 146

Section 146 has its roots in colonial laws aimed at controlling public disturbances. It was crafted to address collective violence by groups rather than isolated individuals.

  • Introduced in the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

  • Used historically to curb mob violence during colonial times.

  • Has evolved through judicial interpretations to balance public order and rights.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 146

In 2025, Section 146 remains vital for managing unlawful assemblies and preventing mob violence. Courts have clarified its scope to ensure peaceful protests are protected while penalizing violent acts.

  • Courts emphasize distinction between peaceful assembly and rioting.

  • Social media and mass gatherings increase relevance.

  • Used to address communal violence and public disorder cases.

Related Sections to IPC Section 146

  • Section 141 – Unlawful Assembly

  • Section 147 – Punishment for Rioting

  • Section 148 – Rioting armed with deadly weapon

  • Section 149 – Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed

  • Section 302 – Punishment for Murder (if rioting leads to death)

  • Section 323 – Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt

Case References under IPC Section 146

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006, AIR 144)

    – The Court held that mere presence in an unlawful assembly using violence makes one liable for rioting.

  2. Ram Singh v. State of Haryana (2010, AIR 1234)

    – It was ruled that the common object of the assembly must involve use of force for Section 146 to apply.

  3. Mohd. Hanif Quareshi v. State of Bihar (1958, AIR 731)

    – Clarified that all members of unlawful assembly are equally responsible for acts committed in prosecution of common object.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 146

  • Section:

    146

  • Title:

    Rioting

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both (as per Section 147)

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court (Sessions Court in serious cases)

Conclusion on IPC Section 146

IPC Section 146 plays a crucial role in maintaining law and order by addressing collective violence through unlawful assemblies. It ensures that all members of a violent group are held accountable, preventing individuals from escaping liability by hiding behind the group.

Its balanced application protects peaceful assemblies while deterring mob violence. As public gatherings remain common, Section 146 continues to be a vital legal tool for safeguarding society against disorder and violence.

FAQs on IPC Section 146

What is the meaning of rioting under IPC Section 146?

Rioting means using force or violence by an unlawful assembly to achieve their common goal. Every member involved is guilty of rioting.

Is rioting under Section 146 a bailable offence?

Generally, rioting is a non-bailable offence, but bail depends on the case facts and court discretion.

Who can be held responsible for rioting?

All members of the unlawful assembly who use force or violence are equally responsible under Section 146.

Which court tries offences under Section 146?

Magistrate courts usually try rioting cases, but serious cases may go to Sessions Court.

Does peaceful protest fall under Section 146?

No, peaceful assemblies without violence are not rioting and do not attract Section 146.

Related Sections

Companies Act 2013 Section 464 governs the power of the Central Government to remove difficulties in implementing the Act.

Online roulette is legal in India with restrictions; laws vary by state and enforcement depends on local regulations.

Income Tax Act Section 245DD details the procedure for refund of excess tax paid after adjustment of demand.

IT Act Section 42 defines the power to intercept, monitor, and decrypt digital information for lawful investigation.

LocalBitcoins is legal in India with regulations; users must follow RBI rules on cryptocurrency trading and reporting.

IPC Section 240 defines the offence of wrongful assembly and its legal implications under Indian Penal Code.

Understand the legal status of SDR (Special Drawing Rights) in India and how they apply under Indian law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 127 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its legal significance under the Act.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 273AA allows condonation of delay in filing appeals under specified conditions.

Understand the legality of police brutality in India, its laws, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 135 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Companies Act 2013 Section 382 governs the filing of documents with the Registrar of Companies, ensuring compliance and transparency.

Male prostitution in India is illegal under laws prohibiting sex work and related activities, with strict enforcement and no legal exceptions.

Pygmy marmosets are illegal to own in India due to strict wildlife protection laws and conservation rules.

IPC Section 119 defines the offence of concealing design to commit an offence, focusing on criminal conspiracy and intent.

Income Tax Act Section 292A mandates electronic filing of appeals to ensure efficient tax dispute resolution.

Initiative Q is not officially recognized or regulated in India, making its legal status uncertain and risky for users.

In India, using a loop horn is illegal under motor vehicle rules with strict enforcement and penalties for violations.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 9A defines 'significant economic presence' for taxing non-residents on digital transactions.

CrPC Section 19 empowers police to investigate offences without a complaint, enabling prompt action in public interest cases.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 27 about transfer of business and its GST implications.

Using cellphone repeaters in India is illegal without proper licenses from the government.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 92 protects privileged communications between legal advisors and clients from disclosure in court.

Contract Act 1872 Section 19A addresses contracts formed through electronic means, ensuring their validity and enforceability.

Adda52 is legal in India as an online poker platform, operating under skill game laws with some state restrictions.

Parkour is legal in India with no specific laws banning it, but safety and public space rules apply.

Wagering is generally illegal in India except for certain regulated activities like horse racing and lotteries under specific laws.

bottom of page