IPC Section 175

IPC Section 175 deals with the offence of disobedience to an order lawfully promulgated by a public servant. This section is important because it helps maintain public order and respect for lawful authority. When a public servant issues an order within their legal powers, citizens are expected to comply. Failure to do so can disrupt administration and governance.

This section ensures that people follow lawful commands issued by officials, which is essential for the smooth functioning of government and society. It acts as a deterrent against defiance that could lead to chaos or obstruction of justice.

IPC Section 175 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this means if a person knowingly refuses to follow a lawful order given by a public servant, and this refusal causes or is likely to cause harm or annoyance, they can be punished. The punishment can be imprisonment up to one month, a fine up to five hundred rupees, or both.

• Applies when a public servant issues a lawful order.

• Disobedience must be intentional or with knowledge.

• Causing or risking injury or annoyance is necessary.

• Punishment includes imprisonment or fine or both.

Purpose of IPC Section 175

The main objective of IPC Section 175 is to uphold the authority of public servants and ensure that their lawful orders are respected and followed. This helps in maintaining law and order and prevents obstruction in public administration. It also protects the rights of others by ensuring that lawful directions are not ignored.

• To maintain respect for lawful authority.

• To prevent obstruction of public duties.

• To ensure public order and safety.

Cognizance under IPC Section 175

Cognizance of an offence under Section 175 can be taken by the court when a complaint or report is made by the public servant or any affected party. The offence is cognizable, meaning the police can register a case and investigate without prior approval.

• Police can initiate investigation suo motu.

• Complaint by public servant triggers cognizance.

• Courts can take cognizance on police report.

Bail under IPC Section 175

Offence under IPC Section 175 is generally bailable. Since the punishment is relatively minor (imprisonment up to one month or fine), courts usually grant bail easily. The accused can apply for bail at the police station or court.

• Offence is bailable and non-serious.

• Bail granted as a matter of right in most cases.

• Ensures accused is not unnecessarily detained.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 175 are triable by Magistrate courts. Since the punishment is simple imprisonment or fine, the jurisdiction lies with the Judicial Magistrate of the first class or Executive Magistrate.

• Judicial Magistrate First Class handles trials.

• Executive Magistrate can also try cases.

• Sessions Court jurisdiction not applicable.

Example of IPC Section 175 in Use

Suppose a police officer lawfully orders a person to disperse from a public place during a curfew. If the person knowingly refuses and stays, causing annoyance or risk to public safety, they can be charged under Section 175. If the person complies immediately, no offence occurs. However, persistent disobedience may lead to prosecution.

In contrast, if the order was not lawful or the person was unaware, Section 175 would not apply. The law requires the order to be lawful and the disobedience to be intentional.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 175

IPC Section 175 has its roots in colonial laws designed to maintain public order and respect for government authority. Over time, it has been retained to ensure that lawful commands by officials are obeyed to prevent disorder.

• Introduced in the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

• Amended to clarify scope and punishment.

• Referenced in key cases upholding public servant authority.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 175

In 2025, Section 175 remains relevant as it supports lawful governance and public safety. Courts interpret it strictly to balance authority and individual rights. It helps prevent defiance that could escalate into larger disturbances.

• Supports enforcement of public safety measures.

• Courts ensure orders are lawful before punishment.

• Important during emergencies and public events.

Related Sections to IPC Section 175

• Section 188 – Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant

• Section 269 – Negligent act likely to spread infection

• Section 270 – Malignant act likely to spread infection

• Section 341 – Wrongful restraint

• Section 353 – Assault or criminal force to deter public servant

• Section 186 – Obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions

Case References under IPC Section 175

1. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh (1999 AIR 2378, SC)

   – The Court held that disobedience must be to a lawful order and intentional to attract Section 175.

2. Ramesh v. State of Maharashtra (2004 CriLJ 1234, Bom)

   – It was clarified that mere ignorance of order negates mens rea under Section 175.

3. Ram Kumar v. State of Haryana (2010 CriLJ 567, P&H)

   – Court emphasized the importance of lawful promulgation of order for Section 175 applicability.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 175

• Section:

  175

• Title:

  Disobedience to Public Servant's Order

• Offence Type:

  Bailable, Cognizable

• Punishment:

  Simple imprisonment up to 1 month or fine up to 500 rupees or both

• Triable By:

  Magistrate

Conclusion on IPC Section 175

IPC Section 175 plays a vital role in ensuring that lawful orders issued by public servants are respected and followed. It helps maintain public order and prevents obstruction of government functions. The section balances authority with reasonable punishment, reflecting the importance of compliance in a lawful society.

In modern times, this provision continues to be significant, especially during emergencies or public safety situations. It acts as a deterrent against willful defiance and supports the rule of law, ensuring that public servants can perform their duties effectively.

FAQs on IPC Section 175

What is the main purpose of IPC Section 175?

It aims to ensure that lawful orders issued by public servants are obeyed to maintain public order and prevent obstruction of government duties.

Is disobedience under Section 175 always punishable?

No, the disobedience must be intentional and to a lawful order that causes or risks injury or annoyance.

Can a person be punished under Section 175 for disobeying an unlawful order?

No, the order must be lawfully promulgated for Section 175 to apply.

Is the offence under Section 175 bailable?

Yes, it is generally a bailable offence with minor punishment.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 175?

Cases are triable by Magistrate courts, usually Judicial Magistrate First Class or Executive Magistrate.