top of page

IPC Section 20

IPC Section 20 defines 'Court of Justice' and outlines which courts qualify under Indian law for legal proceedings.

IPC Section 20 – Court of Justice Definition

IPC Section 20 clarifies the meaning of the term "Court of Justice" within the Indian Penal Code. It specifies which courts are recognized legally to try offences and deliver judgments. Understanding this section is crucial as it determines the authority of courts in criminal matters.

This section matters because it sets the foundation for jurisdiction and legal proceedings. Knowing which courts are empowered to act as courts of justice helps in identifying proper legal forums and ensures that cases are heard by competent authorities.

IPC Section 20 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, IPC Section 20 defines a "Court of Justice" as any court that has the legal power to hear criminal cases and pass judgments. This includes courts established by law with authority to try offences and deliver sentences.

  • Defines the legal meaning of "Court of Justice".

  • Includes courts empowered to take cognizance of offences.

  • Enables understanding of jurisdiction in criminal law.

  • Applies to all courts recognized under Indian law.

Purpose of IPC Section 20

The main objective of IPC Section 20 is to clearly identify which courts are legally competent to try offences and deliver judgments. This ensures that only authorized courts handle criminal cases, maintaining the rule of law and proper administration of justice.

  • Clarifies jurisdictional authority of courts.

  • Prevents unauthorized courts from trying offences.

  • Supports orderly legal proceedings in criminal law.

Cognizance under IPC Section 20

Cognizance refers to the court's authority to take notice of an offence and start legal proceedings. Under IPC Section 20, courts of justice are those empowered to take such cognizance.

  • Cognizance can only be taken by courts defined under this section.

  • Ensures proper legal authority before trial begins.

  • Prevents invalid trials by unauthorized bodies.

Bail under IPC Section 20

IPC Section 20 itself does not specify bail provisions. However, since it defines courts of justice, it indirectly relates to which courts can grant bail in criminal cases.

  • Bail decisions are made by courts recognized as courts of justice.

  • Bail eligibility depends on the offence and court jurisdiction.

  • Section 20 ensures only authorized courts handle bail applications.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Section 20 defines courts of justice as those empowered to try offences. This includes various courts established under Indian law, such as Magistrate Courts and Sessions Courts, depending on the offence.

  • Magistrate Courts try less serious offences.

  • Sessions Courts try serious offences.

  • High Courts and Supreme Court act as courts of justice for appeals and special cases.

Example of IPC Section 20 in Use

Suppose a person commits theft in a city. The local Magistrate Court, being a court of justice under IPC Section 20, takes cognizance and begins trial. If the case is serious, it may be transferred to the Sessions Court, also a court of justice. If a non-judicial body attempted to try the case, it would be invalid as it is not a court of justice as per Section 20.

This example shows how Section 20 ensures only authorized courts conduct trials, maintaining legal validity.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 20

IPC Section 20 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its inception in 1860. It was included to provide clarity on the authority of courts in criminal matters.

  • 1860: IPC enacted including Section 20.

  • Important for establishing judicial authority in colonial India.

  • Has remained unchanged, underscoring its foundational role.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 20

In 2025, IPC Section 20 continues to be vital in defining courts' jurisdiction. With evolving judicial structures, this section ensures clarity on which courts can try offences and deliver judgments, supporting fair trials and justice delivery.

  • Supports digital and special courts by defining legal authority.

  • Courts interpret Section 20 to confirm jurisdiction in new contexts.

  • Helps maintain judicial hierarchy and procedure.

Related Sections to IPC Section 20

  • Section 19 – Definition of "Court

  • Section 21 – Definition of "Public Servant"

  • Section 22 – Definition of "Judge"

  • Section 177 – Power of Magistrate to take cognizance

  • Section 190 – Cognizance of offences by Magistrates

  • Section 197 – Prosecution of Judges and public servants

Case References under IPC Section 20

  1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006 AIR SCW 3197)

    – The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of courts having proper jurisdiction as defined under Section 20.

  2. R. v. Berwick (1867) LR 2 CCR 1

    – Early case affirming the necessity of courts being legally empowered to try offences.

  3. Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth (1977 AIR 713, SC)

    – Clarified the scope of courts of justice in administrative and criminal matters.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 20

  • Section:

    20

  • Title:

    Court of Justice Definition

  • Offence Type:

    Not an offence; definitional provision

  • Punishment:

    Not applicable

  • Triable By:

    Defines courts empowered to try offences

Conclusion on IPC Section 20

IPC Section 20 plays a foundational role in the Indian Penal Code by defining what constitutes a "Court of Justice." This definition is critical to ensuring that only authorized courts have the power to try offences and deliver judgments. Without such clarity, the legal system could face challenges regarding jurisdiction and legitimacy of trials.

In modern legal practice, Section 20 remains relevant as courts evolve and new judicial bodies emerge. It safeguards the administration of justice by confirming the authority of courts, thereby upholding the rule of law and protecting citizens' rights.

FAQs on IPC Section 20

What does IPC Section 20 define?

IPC Section 20 defines "Court of Justice" as any court legally empowered to take cognizance of offences and pronounce sentences.

Why is the definition of "Court of Justice" important?

It ensures that only authorized courts try offences, maintaining legal validity and proper jurisdiction in criminal cases.

Does IPC Section 20 specify punishments?

No, Section 20 is a definitional section and does not prescribe any punishment.

Which courts qualify as courts of justice under Section 20?

Magistrate Courts, Sessions Courts, High Courts, and the Supreme Court are examples of courts of justice empowered to try offences.

How does Section 20 affect bail decisions?

While Section 20 does not address bail directly, it defines courts that have authority to grant bail in criminal matters.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 176 details the procedure for an inquest by a Magistrate into unnatural or suspicious deaths.

CrPC Section 8 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India, specifying where offences can be tried.

CrPC Section 108 empowers Magistrates to order security for keeping the peace or good behaviour in specific situations.

CrPC Section 384 defines the offence of extortion and its legal consequences under Indian law.

IPC Section 45 defines the term 'Court of Justice' for legal clarity in criminal proceedings.

CPC Section 40 outlines the procedure for transferring suits from one court to another for convenience or justice.

IPC Section 428 defines the offence of malicious injury to property by killing or maiming cattle or animals, outlining penalties and legal scope.

CrPC Section 452 deals with the procedure for taking possession of property in cases of house-breaking or wrongful occupation.

CrPC Section 347 defines the procedure when a Magistrate refuses to take cognizance of an offence.

IPC Section 171 defines offences related to bribery and corrupt practices in elections to ensure free and fair electoral processes.

CrPC Section 313 mandates the examination of accused to ensure fair trial by allowing them to explain evidence against them.

IPC Section 389 covers punishment for wrongful confinement with intent to commit an offence or to extort property.

bottom of page