top of page

IPC Section 304B

IPC Section 304B defines dowry death, penalizing death caused by harassment or cruelty related to dowry demands.

IPC Section 304B addresses the serious offence of dowry death. It applies when a woman dies due to burns or bodily injury within seven years of marriage, caused by harassment or cruelty related to dowry demands. This section aims to protect married women from dowry-related violence, a significant social issue in India.

Understanding IPC Section 304B is crucial as it provides a legal framework to deter dowry harassment and ensure justice for victims. It holds perpetrators accountable and helps in curbing dowry deaths, which remain a grave concern in Indian society.

IPC Section 304B – Exact Provision

This section defines dowry death as a death occurring within seven years of marriage due to cruelty or harassment related to dowry demands. It covers deaths caused by burns, bodily injury, or unnatural circumstances, establishing a presumption of guilt against the husband or his relatives.

  • Applies if death occurs within seven years of marriage.

  • Death must be linked to cruelty or harassment over dowry.

  • Includes death by burns, bodily injury, or unnatural causes.

  • Presumes husband or his relatives caused the death.

  • Focuses on dowry-related harassment or cruelty.

Purpose of IPC Section 304B

The main objective of IPC Section 304B is to combat the social evil of dowry harassment and dowry deaths. It aims to provide legal protection to married women who face cruelty or harassment from their husbands or in-laws demanding dowry. By defining dowry death as a specific offence, the law facilitates stringent action against offenders and promotes social awareness.

  • Protect women from dowry-related cruelty and harassment.

  • Deter dowry demands leading to fatal consequences.

  • Ensure swift justice for victims of dowry death.

Cognizance under IPC Section 304B

Cognizance of an offence under Section 304B is generally taken by the court upon receiving a police report or complaint. The offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval. Courts proceed with trial based on evidence showing dowry-related cruelty causing death within seven years of marriage.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate without magistrate’s permission.

  • Cognizance taken on police report or complaint by victim’s family.

  • Courts require evidence linking death to dowry harassment.

Bail under IPC Section 304B

Offence under Section 304B is non-bailable due to its serious nature. Bail is granted at the discretion of the court, considering the facts and circumstances of the case. Courts are cautious in granting bail to prevent tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses.

  • Bail is not a right; it depends on court’s discretion.

  • Courts consider severity and evidence before granting bail.

  • Non-bailable status reflects the gravity of dowry death cases.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 304B are triable exclusively by Sessions Courts due to the serious punishment involved. Sessions Courts have jurisdiction to conduct trials and impose sentences for dowry death offences.

  • Sessions Court tries dowry death cases.

  • Magistrate courts conduct preliminary inquiries but cannot try the case.

  • Sessions Court handles evidence, witnesses, and sentencing.

Example of IPC Section 304B in Use

Consider a woman who dies from severe burns within five years of marriage. Before her death, she was repeatedly harassed by her husband demanding additional dowry. The police investigate and find evidence of cruelty linked to dowry demands. Under IPC Section 304B, the husband and his relatives can be charged with dowry death. If proven, they face stringent punishment. Conversely, if evidence shows the death was accidental or unrelated to dowry, the accused may be acquitted.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 304B

Section 304B was introduced in 1986 to address the rising incidence of dowry deaths in India. It was added as a special provision to the Indian Penal Code to provide a distinct legal remedy for dowry-related fatalities.

  • Introduced by the Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986.

  • Responded to increasing social awareness of dowry deaths.

  • Landmark cases like

    State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh

    (1996) shaped its interpretation.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 304B

In 2025, IPC Section 304B remains vital in protecting women from dowry-related violence. Courts continue to interpret it strictly to deter offenders. Social campaigns and legal reforms complement its enforcement, aiming to reduce dowry deaths and promote gender justice.

  • Court rulings emphasize strict proof of dowry harassment.

  • Supports government initiatives against dowry practices.

  • Enhances women's safety within marital homes.

Related Sections to IPC Section 304B

  • Section 498A – Cruelty by husband or relatives

  • Section 306 – Abetment of suicide

  • Section 302 – Murder

  • Section 304 – Culpable homicide not amounting to murder

  • Section 113B of Evidence Act – Presumption in dowry death cases

Case References under IPC Section 304B

  1. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996, AIR 1393, SC)

    – Established guidelines for proving dowry death and clarified evidentiary standards.

  2. Rajesh Sharma v. State of UP (2017, AIR 4325, SC)

    – Held that mere demand for dowry is insufficient; cruelty or harassment must be established.

  3. Preeti Gupta v. State of Jharkhand (2020, SC)

    – Affirmed the importance of circumstantial evidence in dowry death cases.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 304B

  • Section:

    304B

  • Title:

    Dowry Death

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Minimum 7 years imprisonment, may extend to life imprisonment

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 304B

IPC Section 304B plays a crucial role in addressing the grave issue of dowry deaths in India. By defining dowry death as a distinct offence, it empowers the legal system to take strict action against perpetrators and provide justice to victims and their families.

Its continued enforcement and judicial interpretation help deter dowry-related cruelty and promote social change. Section 304B remains a vital legal tool in the fight against dowry harassment and violence in modern India.

FAQs on IPC Section 304B

What is the time limit for a death to be considered under Section 304B?

The death must occur within seven years of the woman's marriage to qualify as dowry death under Section 304B.

Is Section 304B offence bailable?

No, offences under Section 304B are non-bailable due to their serious nature and potential impact on justice.

Who can be held liable under Section 304B?

The husband or any relative of the husband who subjects the woman to cruelty or harassment related to dowry can be held liable.

What kind of evidence is needed to prove dowry death?

Evidence must show the woman faced cruelty or harassment over dowry demands before her death, which caused burns, bodily injury, or unnatural death.

Which court tries cases under IPC Section 304B?

Sessions Courts have exclusive jurisdiction to try dowry death cases under Section 304B.

Related Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 68 covers the liability of partners for negotiable instruments signed in the firm's name.

Contract Act 1872 Section 19 defines when a contract becomes void due to unlawful consideration or object.

Income Tax Act Section 44AD offers a presumptive taxation scheme for small businesses to simplify income computation and tax compliance.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 32 about time of supply of goods for GST compliance.

CrPC Section 334 defines the offence of voluntarily causing hurt to deter a public servant from duty, outlining punishment and legal implications.

Home brewing beer in India is generally illegal without a license, with strict enforcement and few exceptions.

Prostitution in Bangalore, India is legal but regulated with restrictions on public solicitation and brothel operation.

CrPC Section 314 covers the procedure for transferring a case from one court to another for trial or disposal.

Casual sex is legal in India for consenting adults aged 18 and above with no criminal penalties under current law.

CrPC Section 148 defines the offence of rioting armed with a deadly weapon and its legal consequences.

Ferrets are illegal to own as pets in India due to wildlife protection laws and import restrictions.

Muslim polygamy in India is legally permitted under personal law with specific restrictions and conditions.

CPC Section 148 empowers courts to issue commissions for examination of witnesses or documents in civil suits.

CrPC Section 19 empowers police to investigate offences without a complaint, enabling prompt action in public interest cases.

IPC Section 154 mandates the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) upon receiving information about a cognizable offence.

Creating a porn website in India is illegal under Indian law with strict regulations and penalties.

CrPC Section 459 defines the offence of lurking house-trespass or house-breaking by night and its legal consequences.

CrPC Section 195 outlines the procedure for taking cognizance of offences requiring prior complaint before a Magistrate.

Action cameras are legal in India with certain restrictions on privacy and public use.

IqOption Wallet is not legally recognized in India; trading or using it involves risks under Indian law.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 81A governs the admissibility of electronic records, ensuring their reliability and authenticity in legal proceedings.

Assisted suicide is illegal in India, with strict laws prohibiting it and limited exceptions under passive euthanasia rules.

Learn if charity trusts in India can legally handle legal cases and understand their role and limitations in legal matters.

Buying gold bars in India is legal with certain regulations and taxes. Learn the rules, limits, and compliance for gold bar purchases.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 47 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

Explore the legality of Jeeva Samadhi in India, its cultural context, and how Indian law views this practice.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(27) defines unfair contract terms protecting consumers from exploitative agreements.

bottom of page