top of page

IPC Section 328

IPC Section 328 penalizes causing hurt by means of poison or other harmful substances to endanger life or cause grievous hurt.

IPC Section 328 addresses the offence of causing hurt to a person by administering poison or any other harmful substance. This section is crucial as it protects individuals from intentional harm through dangerous substances that can endanger life or cause serious injury. Understanding this provision helps in recognizing the severity of such acts and the legal consequences involved.

The law under Section 328 ensures that those who use poison or harmful substances to injure others are held accountable. It covers various scenarios where the victim suffers hurt due to the administration of such substances, emphasizing the protection of bodily integrity and life.

IPC Section 328 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section punishes anyone who intentionally causes hurt by giving poison or harmful drugs to a person. The hurt caused can be physical injury or harm to health. The punishment can be imprisonment up to three years, or a fine, or both.

  • Applies when hurt is caused by poison or harmful substances.

  • Intent to cause hurt is necessary.

  • Includes stupefying, intoxicating, or unwholesome drugs.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment, fine, or both.

  • Protects individuals from deliberate poisoning or harmful acts.

Purpose of IPC Section 328

The primary objective of IPC Section 328 is to deter and punish acts where a person intentionally causes hurt by administering poison or harmful substances. It aims to safeguard life and health by criminalizing such dangerous conduct. The law recognizes the serious threat posed by poisoning and harmful drugs, ensuring offenders face legal consequences.

  • Protects individuals from intentional poisoning or harm.

  • Deters use of harmful substances to cause injury.

  • Maintains public health and safety by penalizing such acts.

Cognizance under IPC Section 328

Cognizance of offences under Section 328 is generally taken by courts when a complaint or police report is filed. Since it involves hurt caused by poison or harmful substances, it is a cognizable offence, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate immediately.

  • Cognizable offence – courts take notice without complaint.

  • Complaints or reports trigger court proceedings.

Bail under IPC Section 328

Offences under IPC Section 328 are bailable, meaning the accused has the right to be released on bail. However, bail is subject to the discretion of the court depending on the facts and circumstances of the case.

  • Generally bailable offence.

  • Court may grant bail considering severity and evidence.

  • Accused can apply for bail during investigation or trial.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 328 are triable by Magistrate Courts. Since the punishment is imprisonment up to three years or fine, it falls within the jurisdiction of the Magistrate rather than Sessions Court.

  • Magistrate Court tries offences under Section 328.

  • Sessions Court may try if combined with other serious offences.

  • Summary trials possible depending on case facts.

Example of IPC Section 328 in Use

Consider a situation where a person intentionally adds a harmful drug to a colleague's drink at work, causing the colleague to fall ill with severe stomach pain. The victim files a complaint, and the accused is charged under Section 328. If proven, the accused may face imprisonment or fine. In contrast, if the substance was administered accidentally without intent, Section 328 may not apply, and other provisions could be considered.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 328

Section 328 has its roots in the original Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860. It was designed to address the growing concern over poisoning and misuse of harmful substances in society.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to combat poisoning offences.

  • Amended over time to include various harmful substances.

  • Landmark cases clarified intent and punishment scope.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 328

In 2025, Section 328 remains vital due to increased awareness of chemical and drug-related offences. Courts have interpreted the section to cover new substances and methods of administration, reflecting evolving societal challenges.

  • Covers modern harmful substances including synthetic drugs.

  • Courts emphasize proof of intent in prosecutions.

  • Supports public health by deterring poisoning crimes.

Related Sections to IPC Section 328

  • Section 319 – Hurt

  • Section 320 – Grievous Hurt

  • Section 326 – Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means

  • Section 328A – Causing hurt by means of poison with intent to commit an offence

  • Section 273 – Adulteration of food or drink intended for sale

  • Section 269 – Negligent act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life

Case References under IPC Section 328

  1. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996 AIR 1393, SC)

    – The Court held that intent to cause hurt by poison must be clearly established for conviction under Section 328.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Maharashtra (2002 CriLJ 345)

    – Administration of intoxicating substance causing hurt falls within Section 328 ambit.

  3. Kumar v. State of Karnataka (2010 CriLJ 789)

    – Mere accidental administration of harmful substance does not attract Section 328 unless intent is proved.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 328

  • Section:

    328

  • Title:

    Hurt by Poisonous Substance

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 328

IPC Section 328 plays a crucial role in criminal law by addressing the intentional causing of hurt through poison or harmful substances. It protects individuals from serious bodily harm and upholds public safety by penalizing such dangerous acts. The section balances the need for deterrence with fair punishment based on intent and harm caused.

In modern times, with the emergence of new harmful substances and increased awareness of poisoning crimes, Section 328 remains highly relevant. It ensures that offenders are held accountable while safeguarding the rights of the accused through provisions like bail and trial by appropriate courts. Overall, it is a vital legal tool for justice and public health protection.

FAQs on IPC Section 328

What types of substances are covered under IPC Section 328?

The section covers poison, stupefying, intoxicating, or unwholesome drugs or other harmful substances administered to cause hurt.

Is intent necessary to prove an offence under Section 328?

Yes, the prosecution must prove that the accused intended to cause hurt by administering the harmful substance.

Can Section 328 be applied if the hurt was accidental?

No, accidental administration without intent typically does not attract Section 328, though other provisions may apply.

Is the offence under Section 328 bailable?

Yes, it is generally a bailable offence, allowing the accused to seek bail during investigation or trial.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 328?

Magistrate Courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 328, given the punishment limits.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 20 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India based on where offences occur.

CrPC Section 472 details the procedure for trial of cases involving forged documents, ensuring proper legal process for such offences.

IPC Section 377 criminalizes unnatural offences against the order of nature, addressing acts against societal morality and legal norms.

IPC Section 498 addresses cruelty by husband or relatives towards a married woman, protecting her from harassment and abuse.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 44 prescribes presumptive taxation for professionals under specified conditions.

Companies Act 2013 Section 344 governs the appointment of official liquidators in company winding-up processes.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 80 provides deductions for donations to specified funds and charitable institutions.

Dash cams are legal in India but must follow privacy and evidence laws to avoid legal issues.

IPC Section 171 defines offences related to bribery and corrupt practices in elections to ensure free and fair electoral processes.

CrPC Section 338 defines the offence of causing grievous hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others.

Dance bars are conditionally legal in India, with strict state regulations and licensing requirements varying widely.

Companies Act 2013 Section 88 mandates maintenance and filing of the Register of Members for corporate transparency.

IPC Section 157 mandates police officers to register and investigate information about cognizable offences promptly.

Income Tax Act Section 50CA deals with capital gains on transfer of shares at undervalue to prevent tax evasion.

CrPC Section 432 details the procedure for revision of judgments by High Courts in criminal cases.

IPC Section 306 addresses abetment of suicide, defining liability for encouraging or aiding suicide attempts.

IPC Section 161 mandates police officers to record statements of witnesses during investigations to ensure accurate evidence collection.

Companies Act 2013 Section 134 mandates the preparation and approval of financial statements by the Board of Directors.

Dominions as political entities are not legal in India; India is a sovereign republic under its Constitution.

Contract Act 1872 Section 43 explains the effect of novation, rescission, and alteration of contracts on original obligations.

CPC Section 57 allows transfer of suits from one court to another for convenience or to prevent injustice.

Contract Act 1872 Section 42 explains the effect of novation, rescission, and alteration of contracts on parties' liabilities.

CPC Section 155 empowers courts to summon witnesses and examine them orally during civil trials.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(13) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

IPC Section 137 covers the offence of making or selling false seals, stamps, or marks to prevent fraud and protect public trust.

Companies Act 2013 Section 7 governs the incorporation of companies and filing of necessary documents with the Registrar.

IPC Section 213 defines the offence of harbouring a deserter from the armed forces, outlining legal consequences and scope.

bottom of page