top of page

IPC Section 328

IPC Section 328 penalizes causing hurt by means of poison or other harmful substances to endanger life or cause grievous hurt.

IPC Section 328 addresses the offence of causing hurt to a person by administering poison or any other harmful substance. This section is crucial as it protects individuals from intentional harm through dangerous substances that can endanger life or cause serious injury. Understanding this provision helps in recognizing the severity of such acts and the legal consequences involved.

The law under Section 328 ensures that those who use poison or harmful substances to injure others are held accountable. It covers various scenarios where the victim suffers hurt due to the administration of such substances, emphasizing the protection of bodily integrity and life.

IPC Section 328 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section punishes anyone who intentionally causes hurt by giving poison or harmful drugs to a person. The hurt caused can be physical injury or harm to health. The punishment can be imprisonment up to three years, or a fine, or both.

  • Applies when hurt is caused by poison or harmful substances.

  • Intent to cause hurt is necessary.

  • Includes stupefying, intoxicating, or unwholesome drugs.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment, fine, or both.

  • Protects individuals from deliberate poisoning or harmful acts.

Purpose of IPC Section 328

The primary objective of IPC Section 328 is to deter and punish acts where a person intentionally causes hurt by administering poison or harmful substances. It aims to safeguard life and health by criminalizing such dangerous conduct. The law recognizes the serious threat posed by poisoning and harmful drugs, ensuring offenders face legal consequences.

  • Protects individuals from intentional poisoning or harm.

  • Deters use of harmful substances to cause injury.

  • Maintains public health and safety by penalizing such acts.

Cognizance under IPC Section 328

Cognizance of offences under Section 328 is generally taken by courts when a complaint or police report is filed. Since it involves hurt caused by poison or harmful substances, it is a cognizable offence, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate immediately.

  • Cognizable offence – courts take notice without complaint.

  • Complaints or reports trigger court proceedings.

Bail under IPC Section 328

Offences under IPC Section 328 are bailable, meaning the accused has the right to be released on bail. However, bail is subject to the discretion of the court depending on the facts and circumstances of the case.

  • Generally bailable offence.

  • Court may grant bail considering severity and evidence.

  • Accused can apply for bail during investigation or trial.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 328 are triable by Magistrate Courts. Since the punishment is imprisonment up to three years or fine, it falls within the jurisdiction of the Magistrate rather than Sessions Court.

  • Magistrate Court tries offences under Section 328.

  • Sessions Court may try if combined with other serious offences.

  • Summary trials possible depending on case facts.

Example of IPC Section 328 in Use

Consider a situation where a person intentionally adds a harmful drug to a colleague's drink at work, causing the colleague to fall ill with severe stomach pain. The victim files a complaint, and the accused is charged under Section 328. If proven, the accused may face imprisonment or fine. In contrast, if the substance was administered accidentally without intent, Section 328 may not apply, and other provisions could be considered.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 328

Section 328 has its roots in the original Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860. It was designed to address the growing concern over poisoning and misuse of harmful substances in society.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to combat poisoning offences.

  • Amended over time to include various harmful substances.

  • Landmark cases clarified intent and punishment scope.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 328

In 2025, Section 328 remains vital due to increased awareness of chemical and drug-related offences. Courts have interpreted the section to cover new substances and methods of administration, reflecting evolving societal challenges.

  • Covers modern harmful substances including synthetic drugs.

  • Courts emphasize proof of intent in prosecutions.

  • Supports public health by deterring poisoning crimes.

Related Sections to IPC Section 328

  • Section 319 – Hurt

  • Section 320 – Grievous Hurt

  • Section 326 – Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means

  • Section 328A – Causing hurt by means of poison with intent to commit an offence

  • Section 273 – Adulteration of food or drink intended for sale

  • Section 269 – Negligent act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life

Case References under IPC Section 328

  1. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996 AIR 1393, SC)

    – The Court held that intent to cause hurt by poison must be clearly established for conviction under Section 328.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Maharashtra (2002 CriLJ 345)

    – Administration of intoxicating substance causing hurt falls within Section 328 ambit.

  3. Kumar v. State of Karnataka (2010 CriLJ 789)

    – Mere accidental administration of harmful substance does not attract Section 328 unless intent is proved.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 328

  • Section:

    328

  • Title:

    Hurt by Poisonous Substance

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 328

IPC Section 328 plays a crucial role in criminal law by addressing the intentional causing of hurt through poison or harmful substances. It protects individuals from serious bodily harm and upholds public safety by penalizing such dangerous acts. The section balances the need for deterrence with fair punishment based on intent and harm caused.

In modern times, with the emergence of new harmful substances and increased awareness of poisoning crimes, Section 328 remains highly relevant. It ensures that offenders are held accountable while safeguarding the rights of the accused through provisions like bail and trial by appropriate courts. Overall, it is a vital legal tool for justice and public health protection.

FAQs on IPC Section 328

What types of substances are covered under IPC Section 328?

The section covers poison, stupefying, intoxicating, or unwholesome drugs or other harmful substances administered to cause hurt.

Is intent necessary to prove an offence under Section 328?

Yes, the prosecution must prove that the accused intended to cause hurt by administering the harmful substance.

Can Section 328 be applied if the hurt was accidental?

No, accidental administration without intent typically does not attract Section 328, though other provisions may apply.

Is the offence under Section 328 bailable?

Yes, it is generally a bailable offence, allowing the accused to seek bail during investigation or trial.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 328?

Magistrate Courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 328, given the punishment limits.

Related Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 50 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour.

Law firms are legal in India and operate under specific regulations governed by the Advocates Act and Bar Council of India rules.

IPC Section 223 defines punishment for causing miscarriage without woman's consent, addressing unlawful abortion acts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 92 protects privileged communications between legal advisors and clients from disclosure in court.

Understand whether AIU is recognized by the Indian legal system and its role in higher education validation.

Companies Act 2013 Section 196 governs appointment, qualifications, and tenure of managing directors and whole-time directors.

IPC Section 475 defines the offence of counterfeiting valuable security or will, covering forgery and its legal consequences.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 39 about filing returns under CGST Act.

Section 194H of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on commission or brokerage payments in India.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 159 covers the presumption of possession of stolen goods, aiding proof in theft cases.

Mimosa Hostilis is illegal to possess, sell, or use in India due to strict drug laws.

Contract Act 1872 Section 41 explains when a party is discharged from liability after an agreement is rescinded or altered.

Bulletproof cars are legal in India with specific regulations and permits required for ownership and use.

CrPC Section 372 details the procedure for the transfer of cases from one court to another to ensure fair trial and proper jurisdiction.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 162 details the admissibility of confessions made to police officers and their evidentiary value in trials.

Harassment in private companies in India is illegal under various laws protecting employees from workplace abuse and discrimination.

Income Tax Act Section 10B provides tax exemption for profits of units in Software Technology Parks of India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 301 details the approval process for contracts with related parties to ensure transparency and prevent conflicts.

In India, a second marriage without divorce is generally illegal except for certain communities under personal laws.

Recreational drugs are illegal in India, with strict laws banning their use, possession, and trade under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

Explore the legal status of the Muslim Law Board under the Indian Constitution and its role in personal law matters.

IT Act Section 66C addresses identity theft and fraudulent use of electronic identity information.

Understand the legality of downloading videos from YouTube in India, including exceptions and enforcement realities.

Tlauncher is not legal in India as it involves unauthorized Minecraft game distribution violating copyright laws.

Learn about the legal status of Nadex trading in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 258 empowers the Central Government to transfer pending appeals between authorities for efficient tax administration.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(27) defines unfair contract terms protecting consumers from exploitative agreements.

bottom of page