top of page

IPC Section 328

IPC Section 328 penalizes causing hurt by means of poison or other harmful substances to endanger life or cause grievous hurt.

IPC Section 328 addresses the offence of causing hurt to a person by administering poison or any other harmful substance. This section is crucial as it protects individuals from intentional harm through dangerous substances that can endanger life or cause serious injury. Understanding this provision helps in recognizing the severity of such acts and the legal consequences involved.

The law under Section 328 ensures that those who use poison or harmful substances to injure others are held accountable. It covers various scenarios where the victim suffers hurt due to the administration of such substances, emphasizing the protection of bodily integrity and life.

IPC Section 328 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section punishes anyone who intentionally causes hurt by giving poison or harmful drugs to a person. The hurt caused can be physical injury or harm to health. The punishment can be imprisonment up to three years, or a fine, or both.

  • Applies when hurt is caused by poison or harmful substances.

  • Intent to cause hurt is necessary.

  • Includes stupefying, intoxicating, or unwholesome drugs.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment, fine, or both.

  • Protects individuals from deliberate poisoning or harmful acts.

Purpose of IPC Section 328

The primary objective of IPC Section 328 is to deter and punish acts where a person intentionally causes hurt by administering poison or harmful substances. It aims to safeguard life and health by criminalizing such dangerous conduct. The law recognizes the serious threat posed by poisoning and harmful drugs, ensuring offenders face legal consequences.

  • Protects individuals from intentional poisoning or harm.

  • Deters use of harmful substances to cause injury.

  • Maintains public health and safety by penalizing such acts.

Cognizance under IPC Section 328

Cognizance of offences under Section 328 is generally taken by courts when a complaint or police report is filed. Since it involves hurt caused by poison or harmful substances, it is a cognizable offence, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate immediately.

  • Cognizable offence – courts take notice without complaint.

  • Complaints or reports trigger court proceedings.

Bail under IPC Section 328

Offences under IPC Section 328 are bailable, meaning the accused has the right to be released on bail. However, bail is subject to the discretion of the court depending on the facts and circumstances of the case.

  • Generally bailable offence.

  • Court may grant bail considering severity and evidence.

  • Accused can apply for bail during investigation or trial.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 328 are triable by Magistrate Courts. Since the punishment is imprisonment up to three years or fine, it falls within the jurisdiction of the Magistrate rather than Sessions Court.

  • Magistrate Court tries offences under Section 328.

  • Sessions Court may try if combined with other serious offences.

  • Summary trials possible depending on case facts.

Example of IPC Section 328 in Use

Consider a situation where a person intentionally adds a harmful drug to a colleague's drink at work, causing the colleague to fall ill with severe stomach pain. The victim files a complaint, and the accused is charged under Section 328. If proven, the accused may face imprisonment or fine. In contrast, if the substance was administered accidentally without intent, Section 328 may not apply, and other provisions could be considered.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 328

Section 328 has its roots in the original Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860. It was designed to address the growing concern over poisoning and misuse of harmful substances in society.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to combat poisoning offences.

  • Amended over time to include various harmful substances.

  • Landmark cases clarified intent and punishment scope.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 328

In 2025, Section 328 remains vital due to increased awareness of chemical and drug-related offences. Courts have interpreted the section to cover new substances and methods of administration, reflecting evolving societal challenges.

  • Covers modern harmful substances including synthetic drugs.

  • Courts emphasize proof of intent in prosecutions.

  • Supports public health by deterring poisoning crimes.

Related Sections to IPC Section 328

  • Section 319 – Hurt

  • Section 320 – Grievous Hurt

  • Section 326 – Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means

  • Section 328A – Causing hurt by means of poison with intent to commit an offence

  • Section 273 – Adulteration of food or drink intended for sale

  • Section 269 – Negligent act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life

Case References under IPC Section 328

  1. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996 AIR 1393, SC)

    – The Court held that intent to cause hurt by poison must be clearly established for conviction under Section 328.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Maharashtra (2002 CriLJ 345)

    – Administration of intoxicating substance causing hurt falls within Section 328 ambit.

  3. Kumar v. State of Karnataka (2010 CriLJ 789)

    – Mere accidental administration of harmful substance does not attract Section 328 unless intent is proved.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 328

  • Section:

    328

  • Title:

    Hurt by Poisonous Substance

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 328

IPC Section 328 plays a crucial role in criminal law by addressing the intentional causing of hurt through poison or harmful substances. It protects individuals from serious bodily harm and upholds public safety by penalizing such dangerous acts. The section balances the need for deterrence with fair punishment based on intent and harm caused.

In modern times, with the emergence of new harmful substances and increased awareness of poisoning crimes, Section 328 remains highly relevant. It ensures that offenders are held accountable while safeguarding the rights of the accused through provisions like bail and trial by appropriate courts. Overall, it is a vital legal tool for justice and public health protection.

FAQs on IPC Section 328

What types of substances are covered under IPC Section 328?

The section covers poison, stupefying, intoxicating, or unwholesome drugs or other harmful substances administered to cause hurt.

Is intent necessary to prove an offence under Section 328?

Yes, the prosecution must prove that the accused intended to cause hurt by administering the harmful substance.

Can Section 328 be applied if the hurt was accidental?

No, accidental administration without intent typically does not attract Section 328, though other provisions may apply.

Is the offence under Section 328 bailable?

Yes, it is generally a bailable offence, allowing the accused to seek bail during investigation or trial.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 328?

Magistrate Courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 328, given the punishment limits.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Capital punishment is legal in India but applied rarely and under strict conditions.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 82 outlines penalties for false or misleading advertisements to protect consumers.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 141 covering audit provisions and compliance.

Guns are conditionally legal in India with strict licensing and regulations under the Arms Act, 1959.

IPC Section 364 defines punishment for kidnapping or abducting a person with intent to murder or cause harm.

Martial rape is illegal in India with strict laws protecting spouses from sexual violence within marriage.

CrPC Section 76 defines the powers of a police officer to seize property connected with an offence during investigation.

Vyvanse is not legally approved or available in India; its use and sale are restricted under Indian drug laws.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 74 covering assessment of unregistered persons.

IPC Section 270 addresses the offence of malignant act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life.

In India, a 6-day workweek is legal with specific labor laws regulating hours and conditions.

CPC Section 74 deals with the procedure for granting a new trial when a decree is reversed or varied on appeal.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 78 deals with the recovery of tax in cases of loss or misappropriation by an agent or trustee.

Companies Act 2013 Section 183 governs the disclosure of interest by directors in contracts or arrangements.

Comprehensive guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 67 covering inspection, search, and seizure provisions.

CrPC Section 171 defines offences related to public servants disobeying lawful directions, ensuring accountability and lawful conduct.

CrPC Section 154 mandates police to register FIR upon receiving information about a cognizable offence promptly and accurately.

Driving from India to Singapore is not legally possible due to geographic and international restrictions.

Pangaea is not legally recognized in India; understand the legal status and implications of Pangaea-related activities in India.

Ganja is illegal in India except for limited medical and scientific use under strict regulations.

In India, pursuing a double major is legally allowed with no restrictions under education laws.

CrPC Section 205 details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons to ensure their presence in court.

Panniers are legal in India for carrying goods on bicycles and motorcycles, subject to safety and traffic rules.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 15 outlines the jurisdiction of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for complaints up to ₹1 crore.

Red-eared sliders are illegal to own or trade in India due to invasive species laws and wildlife protection regulations.

Section 145A of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates valuation rules for stock and inventory for accurate tax computation in India.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 286 restricts the filing of appeals by the revenue against certain orders.

bottom of page