top of page

IPC Section 328

IPC Section 328 penalizes causing hurt by means of poison or other harmful substances to endanger life or cause grievous hurt.

IPC Section 328 addresses the offence of causing hurt to a person by administering poison or any other harmful substance. This section is crucial as it protects individuals from intentional harm through dangerous substances that can endanger life or cause serious injury. Understanding this provision helps in recognizing the severity of such acts and the legal consequences involved.

The law under Section 328 ensures that those who use poison or harmful substances to injure others are held accountable. It covers various scenarios where the victim suffers hurt due to the administration of such substances, emphasizing the protection of bodily integrity and life.

IPC Section 328 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, this section punishes anyone who intentionally causes hurt by giving poison or harmful drugs to a person. The hurt caused can be physical injury or harm to health. The punishment can be imprisonment up to three years, or a fine, or both.

  • Applies when hurt is caused by poison or harmful substances.

  • Intent to cause hurt is necessary.

  • Includes stupefying, intoxicating, or unwholesome drugs.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment, fine, or both.

  • Protects individuals from deliberate poisoning or harmful acts.

Purpose of IPC Section 328

The primary objective of IPC Section 328 is to deter and punish acts where a person intentionally causes hurt by administering poison or harmful substances. It aims to safeguard life and health by criminalizing such dangerous conduct. The law recognizes the serious threat posed by poisoning and harmful drugs, ensuring offenders face legal consequences.

  • Protects individuals from intentional poisoning or harm.

  • Deters use of harmful substances to cause injury.

  • Maintains public health and safety by penalizing such acts.

Cognizance under IPC Section 328

Cognizance of offences under Section 328 is generally taken by courts when a complaint or police report is filed. Since it involves hurt caused by poison or harmful substances, it is a cognizable offence, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate immediately.

  • Cognizable offence – courts take notice without complaint.

  • Complaints or reports trigger court proceedings.

Bail under IPC Section 328

Offences under IPC Section 328 are bailable, meaning the accused has the right to be released on bail. However, bail is subject to the discretion of the court depending on the facts and circumstances of the case.

  • Generally bailable offence.

  • Court may grant bail considering severity and evidence.

  • Accused can apply for bail during investigation or trial.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 328 are triable by Magistrate Courts. Since the punishment is imprisonment up to three years or fine, it falls within the jurisdiction of the Magistrate rather than Sessions Court.

  • Magistrate Court tries offences under Section 328.

  • Sessions Court may try if combined with other serious offences.

  • Summary trials possible depending on case facts.

Example of IPC Section 328 in Use

Consider a situation where a person intentionally adds a harmful drug to a colleague's drink at work, causing the colleague to fall ill with severe stomach pain. The victim files a complaint, and the accused is charged under Section 328. If proven, the accused may face imprisonment or fine. In contrast, if the substance was administered accidentally without intent, Section 328 may not apply, and other provisions could be considered.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 328

Section 328 has its roots in the original Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860. It was designed to address the growing concern over poisoning and misuse of harmful substances in society.

  • Introduced in IPC 1860 to combat poisoning offences.

  • Amended over time to include various harmful substances.

  • Landmark cases clarified intent and punishment scope.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 328

In 2025, Section 328 remains vital due to increased awareness of chemical and drug-related offences. Courts have interpreted the section to cover new substances and methods of administration, reflecting evolving societal challenges.

  • Covers modern harmful substances including synthetic drugs.

  • Courts emphasize proof of intent in prosecutions.

  • Supports public health by deterring poisoning crimes.

Related Sections to IPC Section 328

  • Section 319 – Hurt

  • Section 320 – Grievous Hurt

  • Section 326 – Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means

  • Section 328A – Causing hurt by means of poison with intent to commit an offence

  • Section 273 – Adulteration of food or drink intended for sale

  • Section 269 – Negligent act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life

Case References under IPC Section 328

  1. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996 AIR 1393, SC)

    – The Court held that intent to cause hurt by poison must be clearly established for conviction under Section 328.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Maharashtra (2002 CriLJ 345)

    – Administration of intoxicating substance causing hurt falls within Section 328 ambit.

  3. Kumar v. State of Karnataka (2010 CriLJ 789)

    – Mere accidental administration of harmful substance does not attract Section 328 unless intent is proved.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 328

  • Section:

    328

  • Title:

    Hurt by Poisonous Substance

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 328

IPC Section 328 plays a crucial role in criminal law by addressing the intentional causing of hurt through poison or harmful substances. It protects individuals from serious bodily harm and upholds public safety by penalizing such dangerous acts. The section balances the need for deterrence with fair punishment based on intent and harm caused.

In modern times, with the emergence of new harmful substances and increased awareness of poisoning crimes, Section 328 remains highly relevant. It ensures that offenders are held accountable while safeguarding the rights of the accused through provisions like bail and trial by appropriate courts. Overall, it is a vital legal tool for justice and public health protection.

FAQs on IPC Section 328

What types of substances are covered under IPC Section 328?

The section covers poison, stupefying, intoxicating, or unwholesome drugs or other harmful substances administered to cause hurt.

Is intent necessary to prove an offence under Section 328?

Yes, the prosecution must prove that the accused intended to cause hurt by administering the harmful substance.

Can Section 328 be applied if the hurt was accidental?

No, accidental administration without intent typically does not attract Section 328, though other provisions may apply.

Is the offence under Section 328 bailable?

Yes, it is generally a bailable offence, allowing the accused to seek bail during investigation or trial.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 328?

Magistrate Courts have jurisdiction to try offences under Section 328, given the punishment limits.

Related Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 117 governs the procedure for filing revised income tax returns by taxpayers.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 107 covering appeals to Appellate Authority under CGST Act.

CrPC Section 222 details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 75 deals with the presumption of ownership of documents, aiding proof of possession and control in legal proceedings.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 5 defines a bill of exchange and explains its key elements under Indian law.

Koenigsegg cars are not officially legal in India due to import restrictions and homologation rules.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 40 explains the liability of parties when a negotiable instrument is altered without consent.

CPC Section 133 empowers courts to prevent public nuisance by ordering removal of obstructions or nuisances.

Cannabis oil is illegal in India except for limited medical and scientific use under strict regulation.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 46 defines how facts can be proved by oral evidence, emphasizing the importance of witness testimony in legal proceedings.

Single parent adoption is legal in India under specific conditions with court approval and strict guidelines.

Income Tax Act Section 112A deals with taxation of long-term capital gains on listed equity shares and equity-oriented mutual funds.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 98 details the power of the Central Government to make rules for effective implementation of the Act.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 293 restricts the power of civil courts in matters related to income tax proceedings.

Bitcoin mining in India is legal but faces regulatory uncertainty and practical challenges.

Companies Act 2013 Section 178 mandates the constitution and duties of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee in Indian companies.

Playing Louf music in India is legal with no specific restrictions, but public performance rules and copyright laws apply.

CrPC Section 60A details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in criminal cases.

Kula is not legal in India due to strict drug laws prohibiting its use and possession.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 103 defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments law.

Artemisia absinthium is legal in India with no specific restrictions, but its use is regulated under general herbal and medicinal laws.

Income Tax Act Section 10B provides tax exemption for profits of units in Software Technology Parks of India.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269UN mandates quoting PAN for specified financial transactions to ensure tax compliance.

IPC Section 424 covers the offence of maliciously sending letters or articles with intent to cause distress or anxiety.

CrPC Section 367 details the procedure when a person accused of an offence absconds or cannot be found by the police.

HYIP schemes are illegal in India due to their fraudulent nature and lack of regulatory approval.

Section 194J of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on fees for professional or technical services in India.

bottom of page