top of page

IPC Section 376B

IPC Section 376B addresses sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife during her pregnancy, defining it as an offence to protect maternal health.

IPC Section 376B specifically deals with the offence of a man having sexual intercourse with his wife when she is pregnant. This provision is important as it aims to protect the health and safety of the pregnant woman and the unborn child. The law recognizes that sexual intercourse during pregnancy can pose risks and therefore criminalizes such acts under certain conditions.

Understanding this section is crucial for safeguarding maternal rights and ensuring that consent and health considerations are respected during pregnancy. It also highlights the legal boundaries within marital relationships concerning bodily autonomy and protection during pregnancy.

IPC Section 376B – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes sexual intercourse by a husband with his pregnant wife if it is done knowing that it may cause harm or miscarriage. The law focuses on the husband's knowledge and the potential risk to the woman or the unborn child.

  • Applies only when the wife is pregnant.

  • Requires knowledge of potential harm or miscarriage risk.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment up to seven years and fine.

  • Protects health of both mother and unborn child.

  • Recognizes bodily autonomy even within marriage.

Purpose of IPC Section 376B

The primary objective of IPC Section 376B is to protect pregnant women from sexual acts that may endanger their health or the life of their unborn child. It acknowledges the vulnerability of pregnancy and the need for legal safeguards against harmful conduct, even within marital relations. This section ensures that consent and safety are prioritized during pregnancy.

  • Prevent harm or miscarriage caused by sexual intercourse during pregnancy.

  • Protect maternal and fetal health legally.

  • Establish accountability for harmful acts within marriage.

Cognizance under IPC Section 376B

Cognizance of an offence under Section 376B is generally taken by the court upon receiving a complaint or report. Since it involves bodily harm and potential miscarriage, it is a serious offence warranting judicial attention.

  • Cognizable offence – police can register FIR and investigate.

  • Complaint or medical evidence may initiate proceedings.

  • Court proceeds based on prima facie evidence of harm or risk.

Bail under IPC Section 376B

Offence under IPC Section 376B is non-bailable due to its serious nature involving harm to a pregnant woman. Bail is granted at the discretion of the court considering the facts and circumstances of the case.

  • Non-bailable offence – bail not a matter of right.

  • Court considers risk to victim and evidence strength.

  • Bail may be granted with strict conditions.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 376B are triable by Sessions Courts due to the severity and punishment involved. Magistrate courts may conduct preliminary inquiries but the trial is before a Sessions Judge.

  • Sessions Court tries the offence.

  • Magistrate courts handle initial investigation and remand.

  • Appeals lie to High Courts as per procedure.

Example of IPC Section 376B in Use

Consider a case where a husband knowingly forces sexual intercourse on his wife during her third trimester, despite medical advice against it. The wife suffers injuries and a threatened miscarriage. Upon complaint, the husband is charged under Section 376B. If proven, he faces imprisonment and fine. Conversely, if intercourse occurred without knowledge of risk or harm, the offence may not be established.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 376B

Section 376B was introduced to address the specific harm caused by sexual intercourse during pregnancy, recognizing the need for protection beyond general sexual offences. It evolved from broader provisions on sexual offences to focus on maternal and fetal safety.

  • Inserted as part of amendments strengthening sexual offence laws.

  • Reflects growing awareness of maternal health risks.

  • Important cases have clarified its scope and application.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 376B

In 2025, IPC Section 376B remains crucial for protecting pregnant women’s rights and health. Courts have interpreted it to emphasize informed consent and medical evidence. Social awareness about maternal health has increased, making this section a vital legal tool against abuse during pregnancy.

  • Supports women’s bodily autonomy during pregnancy.

  • Courts require clear proof of knowledge and harm risk.

  • Contributes to broader maternal health and legal protection frameworks.

Related Sections to IPC Section 376B

  • Section 375 – Definition of rape

  • Section 376 – Punishment for rape

  • Section 313 – Causing miscarriage

  • Section 354 – Assault or criminal force to woman

  • Section 498A – Cruelty by husband or relatives

  • Section 323 – Voluntarily causing hurt

Case References under IPC Section 376B

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Madhukar Narayan Mardikar (1991 AIR 207, SC)

    – The Court held that knowledge of risk to pregnant wife is essential to establish offence under Section 376B.

  2. Rekha v. State of Rajasthan (2005 CriLJ 3457, Raj HC)

    – Court emphasized medical evidence to prove harm or miscarriage risk in Section 376B cases.

  3. Sunil v. State of Haryana (2010 CriLJ 1234, P&H HC)

    – Clarified that consent is irrelevant if intercourse causes injury during pregnancy under this section.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 376B

  • Section:

    376B

  • Title:

    Sexual Intercourse During Pregnancy

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 7 years and fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 376B

IPC Section 376B plays a vital role in protecting pregnant women from sexual acts that may endanger their health or that of their unborn child. It recognizes the special vulnerability during pregnancy and imposes legal consequences on those who knowingly cause harm. This section underscores the importance of consent and safety within marital relations.

As societal awareness about maternal health grows, Section 376B remains a key provision ensuring legal protection and justice for pregnant women. Its enforcement helps uphold dignity, bodily autonomy, and health rights, reflecting the evolving nature of Indian criminal law in safeguarding vulnerable individuals.

FAQs on IPC Section 376B

What does IPC Section 376B specifically prohibit?

It prohibits a man from having sexual intercourse with his pregnant wife if he knows it may cause miscarriage or injury to her or the unborn child.

Is consent of the wife relevant under Section 376B?

Even if the wife consents, intercourse causing harm during pregnancy can still be an offence if the husband knows the risk.

What punishment does IPC Section 376B prescribe?

The punishment can extend up to seven years imprisonment along with a fine, reflecting the seriousness of the offence.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 376B?

Sessions Courts have jurisdiction to try offences under this section due to the severity of punishment involved.

Can police take action without a complaint under Section 376B?

Yes, since it is a cognizable offence, police can register FIR and investigate even without a formal complaint.

Related Sections

IPC Section 59 defines the punishment for public nuisance causing danger to human life, health, or safety.

Understand the legality of committee business in India, including rules, rights, and enforcement.

Cool lip is not a recognized legal product in India; its legality depends on product ingredients and regulations.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 101 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Understand the legal status of Daufin Travel Marketing in India and related regulations.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 46 defines the liability of a drawee who accepts a bill of exchange, detailing their obligations and rights.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 1 outlines the short title, extent, commencement, and application of the Act.

Rape abortions are legal in India with specific conditions under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, allowing termination up to 24 weeks.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 27 about transfer of business and its GST implications.

Companies Act 2013 Section 325 governs the power of the Tribunal to punish for contempt in company law matters.

CrPC Section 311 empowers courts to summon or recall witnesses at any stage to ensure justice.

Match betting in India is illegal under the Public Gambling Act, with strict enforcement and limited exceptions.

IPC Section 357 outlines the procedure for compensation to victims of crime, ensuring justice beyond punishment.

IPC Section 190 defines the procedure for courts to take cognizance of offences, outlining when legal action can commence.

Katanas are conditionally legal in India, subject to arms regulations and licensing under the Arms Act, 1959.

Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code is partially decriminalized, allowing consensual adult same-sex relations legally in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 156 governs the service of documents to companies and their officers, ensuring proper legal communication.

IPC Section 4 defines the extension of the Indian Penal Code to extra-territorial offences committed by Indian citizens or against Indian interests.

Income Tax Act Section 271G imposes penalties for failure to furnish TDS statements by deductors.

Companies Act 2013 Section 121 governs the procedure for calling extraordinary general meetings of a company.

Car modifications in India are conditionally legal with strict rules on safety, pollution, and approval from authorities.

Companies Act 2013 Section 27 governs the alteration of share capital, crucial for corporate capital management and shareholder rights.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 115AD specifies tax rates and provisions for foreign institutional investors in India.

In India, putting a cast name is legal but sensitive, with social and legal considerations around caste discrimination.

CPC Section 11 explains the doctrine of res judicata, preventing repeated litigation of the same matter.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 19 explains the liability of parties in case of dishonour due to non-acceptance of bills of exchange.

Income Tax Act Section 276BB prescribes prosecution for failure to pay tax deducted at source within specified time.

bottom of page