top of page

IPC Section 376B

IPC Section 376B addresses sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife during her pregnancy, defining it as an offence to protect maternal health.

IPC Section 376B specifically deals with the offence of a man having sexual intercourse with his wife when she is pregnant. This provision is important as it aims to protect the health and safety of the pregnant woman and the unborn child. The law recognizes that sexual intercourse during pregnancy can pose risks and therefore criminalizes such acts under certain conditions.

Understanding this section is crucial for safeguarding maternal rights and ensuring that consent and health considerations are respected during pregnancy. It also highlights the legal boundaries within marital relationships concerning bodily autonomy and protection during pregnancy.

IPC Section 376B – Exact Provision

This section criminalizes sexual intercourse by a husband with his pregnant wife if it is done knowing that it may cause harm or miscarriage. The law focuses on the husband's knowledge and the potential risk to the woman or the unborn child.

  • Applies only when the wife is pregnant.

  • Requires knowledge of potential harm or miscarriage risk.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment up to seven years and fine.

  • Protects health of both mother and unborn child.

  • Recognizes bodily autonomy even within marriage.

Purpose of IPC Section 376B

The primary objective of IPC Section 376B is to protect pregnant women from sexual acts that may endanger their health or the life of their unborn child. It acknowledges the vulnerability of pregnancy and the need for legal safeguards against harmful conduct, even within marital relations. This section ensures that consent and safety are prioritized during pregnancy.

  • Prevent harm or miscarriage caused by sexual intercourse during pregnancy.

  • Protect maternal and fetal health legally.

  • Establish accountability for harmful acts within marriage.

Cognizance under IPC Section 376B

Cognizance of an offence under Section 376B is generally taken by the court upon receiving a complaint or report. Since it involves bodily harm and potential miscarriage, it is a serious offence warranting judicial attention.

  • Cognizable offence – police can register FIR and investigate.

  • Complaint or medical evidence may initiate proceedings.

  • Court proceeds based on prima facie evidence of harm or risk.

Bail under IPC Section 376B

Offence under IPC Section 376B is non-bailable due to its serious nature involving harm to a pregnant woman. Bail is granted at the discretion of the court considering the facts and circumstances of the case.

  • Non-bailable offence – bail not a matter of right.

  • Court considers risk to victim and evidence strength.

  • Bail may be granted with strict conditions.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 376B are triable by Sessions Courts due to the severity and punishment involved. Magistrate courts may conduct preliminary inquiries but the trial is before a Sessions Judge.

  • Sessions Court tries the offence.

  • Magistrate courts handle initial investigation and remand.

  • Appeals lie to High Courts as per procedure.

Example of IPC Section 376B in Use

Consider a case where a husband knowingly forces sexual intercourse on his wife during her third trimester, despite medical advice against it. The wife suffers injuries and a threatened miscarriage. Upon complaint, the husband is charged under Section 376B. If proven, he faces imprisonment and fine. Conversely, if intercourse occurred without knowledge of risk or harm, the offence may not be established.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 376B

Section 376B was introduced to address the specific harm caused by sexual intercourse during pregnancy, recognizing the need for protection beyond general sexual offences. It evolved from broader provisions on sexual offences to focus on maternal and fetal safety.

  • Inserted as part of amendments strengthening sexual offence laws.

  • Reflects growing awareness of maternal health risks.

  • Important cases have clarified its scope and application.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 376B

In 2025, IPC Section 376B remains crucial for protecting pregnant women’s rights and health. Courts have interpreted it to emphasize informed consent and medical evidence. Social awareness about maternal health has increased, making this section a vital legal tool against abuse during pregnancy.

  • Supports women’s bodily autonomy during pregnancy.

  • Courts require clear proof of knowledge and harm risk.

  • Contributes to broader maternal health and legal protection frameworks.

Related Sections to IPC Section 376B

  • Section 375 – Definition of rape

  • Section 376 – Punishment for rape

  • Section 313 – Causing miscarriage

  • Section 354 – Assault or criminal force to woman

  • Section 498A – Cruelty by husband or relatives

  • Section 323 – Voluntarily causing hurt

Case References under IPC Section 376B

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Madhukar Narayan Mardikar (1991 AIR 207, SC)

    – The Court held that knowledge of risk to pregnant wife is essential to establish offence under Section 376B.

  2. Rekha v. State of Rajasthan (2005 CriLJ 3457, Raj HC)

    – Court emphasized medical evidence to prove harm or miscarriage risk in Section 376B cases.

  3. Sunil v. State of Haryana (2010 CriLJ 1234, P&H HC)

    – Clarified that consent is irrelevant if intercourse causes injury during pregnancy under this section.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 376B

  • Section:

    376B

  • Title:

    Sexual Intercourse During Pregnancy

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 7 years and fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 376B

IPC Section 376B plays a vital role in protecting pregnant women from sexual acts that may endanger their health or that of their unborn child. It recognizes the special vulnerability during pregnancy and imposes legal consequences on those who knowingly cause harm. This section underscores the importance of consent and safety within marital relations.

As societal awareness about maternal health grows, Section 376B remains a key provision ensuring legal protection and justice for pregnant women. Its enforcement helps uphold dignity, bodily autonomy, and health rights, reflecting the evolving nature of Indian criminal law in safeguarding vulnerable individuals.

FAQs on IPC Section 376B

What does IPC Section 376B specifically prohibit?

It prohibits a man from having sexual intercourse with his pregnant wife if he knows it may cause miscarriage or injury to her or the unborn child.

Is consent of the wife relevant under Section 376B?

Even if the wife consents, intercourse causing harm during pregnancy can still be an offence if the husband knows the risk.

What punishment does IPC Section 376B prescribe?

The punishment can extend up to seven years imprisonment along with a fine, reflecting the seriousness of the offence.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 376B?

Sessions Courts have jurisdiction to try offences under this section due to the severity of punishment involved.

Can police take action without a complaint under Section 376B?

Yes, since it is a cognizable offence, police can register FIR and investigate even without a formal complaint.

Related Sections

Online gambling in India is largely illegal, with some exceptions under state laws and strict regulations.

Philips Diamond Vision is legal in India with regulations on its use in advertising and broadcasting.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 9 defines when facts not otherwise relevant become relevant as they explain or illustrate relevant facts.

Income Tax Act Section 125A deals with the recovery of tax in cases of failure to deduct or pay TDS by specified entities.

Sniffing All India Radio signals is illegal under Indian law with strict enforcement and no exceptions.

Adderall is not legally approved in India; its use and possession are strictly regulated under narcotics laws.

Snus is illegal in India; its sale, import, and use are prohibited under tobacco laws with strict enforcement.

CrPC Section 262 details the procedure for recording evidence in summary trials under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Detailed analysis of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 152 on power to arrest without warrant.

Companies Act 2013 Section 110 governs the procedure for passing private placement resolutions by postal ballot.

In India, a partnership firm is a legal entity but differs from a company in rights and liabilities.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 47A governs the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 59 covering assessment of unregistered persons under GST.

Income Tax Act Section 234H imposes interest for default in payment of TDS within due dates.

Learn if PayPal is legal in India for sending money abroad, including rules, restrictions, and how it works in practice.

Comprehensive guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 165 covering powers of officers and GST compliance.

Comprehensive guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 126 covering search and seizure provisions under GST law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 84 defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments.

IT Act Section 60 provides protection for intermediaries from liability for third-party information under specified conditions.

Companies Act 2013 Section 124 governs the transfer of unpaid dividends to the Investor Education and Protection Fund.

Companies Act 2013 Section 140 governs auditor removal, resignation, and related procedures for corporate compliance.

Income Tax Act Section 276CC prescribes punishment for failure to file income tax returns within due dates.

Indiacsonline.com is legal in India but must comply with IT laws and content regulations to operate lawfully.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 23 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance or non-payment.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 16 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

IPC Section 412 defines punishment for receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen, ensuring protection against handling stolen goods.

Companies Act 2013 Section 433 governs the winding up of companies by the Tribunal, ensuring orderly liquidation and protection of stakeholders.

bottom of page