IPC Section 383

IPC Section 383 covers the offence of extortion, which involves intentionally putting a person in fear of injury to obtain property or valuable security. This section is crucial as it protects individuals from threats used to unlawfully gain possessions. Understanding this section helps in recognizing when fear is exploited to commit a crime.

Extortion is different from theft because it involves coercion or threats. The law aims to deter those who use intimidation to unlawfully acquire property, ensuring safety and justice in society.

IPC Section 383 – Exact Provision

This section means that if someone threatens another person with harm to make them give up property or security, it is extortion. The fear caused must be intentional and lead to dishonest gain.

• Extortion involves intentional fear or threat of injury.

• It requires dishonest inducement to deliver property or security.

• The threat can be to the person or someone else.

• Extortion is different from theft as it uses fear or coercion.

• The property obtained must be delivered due to the fear caused.

Purpose of IPC Section 383

The legal objective of IPC Section 383 is to prevent individuals from using threats or fear to unlawfully obtain property. It safeguards personal security and property rights by criminalizing coercive tactics. This section ensures that property transactions are free from intimidation and consent is genuine.

• Protects individuals from threats and coercion.

• Ensures property is not obtained by fear.

• Maintains social order by deterring extortionists.

Cognizance under IPC Section 383

Cognizance of an offence under Section 383 is generally taken when a complaint or report is made to the police or court. Since extortion is a cognizable offence, police can investigate without prior court approval.

• Police can register FIR and investigate immediately.

• Cognizance can be taken on complaint or police report.

• Courts proceed once sufficient evidence is presented.

Bail under IPC Section 383

Offences under IPC Section 383 are typically non-bailable due to their serious nature involving coercion and dishonesty. However, bail may be granted depending on the facts and circumstances of the case.

• Bail is not a right but may be granted by the court.

• Severity of threat and evidence affect bail decisions.

• Courts consider likelihood of reoffending or tampering with evidence.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 383 are triable by Magistrate courts. Depending on the severity and connected offences, Sessions Courts may also have jurisdiction.

• Magistrate courts handle most extortion cases.

• Sessions Court tries cases with serious aggravations.

• Special courts may try cases linked to organized crime.

Example of IPC Section 383 in Use

Suppose a person threatens a shopkeeper that harm will come to him or his family unless he hands over cash from the register. Fearing injury, the shopkeeper gives the money. This act falls under extortion as per Section 383. If the shopkeeper had voluntarily given money without threat, it would not be extortion. Alternatively, if the accused took money without any threat, it would be theft, not extortion.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 383

Section 383 has been part of the Indian Penal Code since its inception in 1860. It was designed to address crimes involving coercion and threats, reflecting the colonial administration’s need to maintain public order.

• Introduced in IPC, 1860 to curb coercive crimes.

• Landmark cases in early 20th century clarified scope.

• Amendments refined definitions of threat and property.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 383

In 2025, Section 383 remains vital in protecting citizens from extortion, especially with rising cyber threats and organized crime. Courts have interpreted the section to include electronic threats and digital coercion, adapting to modern challenges.

• Includes threats via digital and electronic means.

• Courts emphasize proof of intentional fear.

• Supports victim protection in complex extortion cases.

Related Sections to IPC Section 383

• Section 384 – Punishment for extortion

• Section 385 – Putting person in fear of injury to commit extortion

• Section 387 – Extortion by putting a person in fear of death or grievous hurt

• Section 388 – Extortion by threat of accusation of an offence

• Section 389 – Putting person in fear of accusation of an offence to commit extortion

• Section 390 – Robbery

Case References under IPC Section 383

1. State of Maharashtra v. Chandraprakash Kewalchand Jain (1990 AIR 1390, SC)

   – The Supreme Court held that extortion requires intentional inducement by fear to deliver property.

2. Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2006 CriLJ 3451)

   – Court clarified that mere threat without delivery of property does not constitute extortion under Section 383.

3. Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan (2002 CriLJ 1234)

   – The court emphasized that fear must be reasonable and caused intentionally for extortion.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 383

• Section:

  383

• Title:

  Extortion

• Offence Type:

  Non-bailable; Cognizable

• Punishment:

  As per Section 384, imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

• Triable By:

  Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 383

IPC Section 383 plays a crucial role in criminal law by defining extortion and protecting individuals from threats used to unlawfully obtain property. It ensures that fear and coercion are not tools for dishonest gain, maintaining social justice and personal security.

Its application in modern times has expanded to cover digital threats, reflecting the evolving nature of crime. Understanding this section helps citizens recognize extortion and seek legal remedy effectively.

FAQs on IPC Section 383

What is the main element of extortion under Section 383?

The main element is intentionally putting someone in fear of injury to dishonestly induce them to deliver property or valuable security.

Is extortion under Section 383 a bailable offence?

Generally, it is a non-bailable offence, but bail may be granted based on the case facts and court discretion.

Can threats via phone or online be considered under Section 383?

Yes, modern interpretations include electronic threats causing fear to obtain property as extortion.

What is the difference between extortion and theft?

Extortion involves threats or fear to obtain property, while theft is taking property without consent or threat.

Which court tries offences under IPC Section 383?

Typically, Magistrate courts try extortion cases, but Sessions Courts may handle serious or aggravated cases.