top of page

IPC Section 406

IPC Section 406 defines criminal breach of trust, covering misappropriation or conversion of property entrusted to someone.

IPC Section 406 – Criminal Breach of Trust

IPC Section 406 addresses the offence of criminal breach of trust. It applies when a person is entrusted with property or dominion over it and dishonestly misappropriates or converts it for their own use. This section is important because it protects the rights of owners and ensures trust is not violated in transactions or relationships.

The law under Section 406 helps maintain social and commercial trust by penalizing those who abuse their position of responsibility. It is commonly invoked in cases involving financial fraud, embezzlement, or misuse of entrusted assets.

IPC Section 406 – Exact Provision

In simple terms, Section 406 punishes a person who is trusted with property but dishonestly takes it or uses it in a way that breaks that trust. The property can be money, goods, or any valuable item. The breach occurs when the person acts against the terms of the trust or contract.

  • Applies when property is entrusted to someone.

  • Focuses on dishonest misappropriation or conversion.

  • Requires violation of trust or legal contract.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment, fine, or both.

  • Protects owners and rightful holders of property.

Purpose of IPC Section 406

The main objective of IPC Section 406 is to safeguard property that is entrusted to individuals in various relationships or agreements. It ensures that trust placed in a person is not abused by dishonest acts. This section promotes honesty and accountability in dealings involving property.

  • To prevent misuse of entrusted property.

  • To penalize dishonest conduct violating trust.

  • To maintain confidence in personal and commercial relationships.

Cognizance under IPC Section 406

Cognizance of offences under Section 406 is generally taken when a complaint or report is filed by the aggrieved party. The offence is cognizable, meaning police can investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate on complaint.

  • Cognizable offence allowing prompt legal action.

  • Courts take cognizance upon receiving police report or complaint.

Bail under IPC Section 406

Offence under Section 406 is bailable, allowing the accused to apply for bail. Since the punishment is up to three years, courts generally grant bail unless there are aggravating circumstances.

  • Offence is bailable by nature.

  • Bail usually granted on reasonable grounds.

  • Serious cases with additional charges may affect bail decisions.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 406 are triable by Magistrate courts. Depending on the severity and accompanying offences, Sessions Court may also have jurisdiction.

  • Primarily triable by Magistrate courts.

  • Sessions Court if linked with more serious offences.

  • Civil courts do not try criminal breach of trust cases.

Example of IPC Section 406 in Use

Suppose Mr. A entrusts his friend Mr. B with Rs. 5 lakh to invest on his behalf. Instead of investing, Mr. B uses the money for personal expenses without Mr. A's consent. Mr. A files a complaint under Section 406. The court finds Mr. B guilty of criminal breach of trust and sentences him to imprisonment and fine.

In contrast, if Mr. B had invested the money as agreed but the investment failed, it would not amount to breach of trust. Honest failure does not attract Section 406.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 406

Section 406 has its roots in the Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860. It was designed to address breaches of trust in a colonial commercial context and has evolved to cover various forms of entrusted property misuse.

  • Introduced in IPC, 1860 to curb property misuse.

  • Expanded through judicial interpretations over decades.

  • Landmark cases refined the scope of 'trust' and 'dishonesty.'

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 406

In 2025, Section 406 remains crucial for combating financial fraud and embezzlement. Courts increasingly interpret 'trust' broadly, covering digital assets and corporate responsibilities. The section supports transparency and ethical conduct in business and personal dealings.

  • Applies to digital and intangible property entrusted.

  • Used in white-collar crime and corporate fraud cases.

  • Supports enforcement of contractual and fiduciary duties.

Related Sections to IPC Section 406

  • Section 405 – Definition of Criminal Breach of Trust

  • Section 407 – Criminal Breach of Trust by Public Servant

  • Section 408 – Criminal Breach of Trust by Clerk or Servant

  • Section 409 – Criminal Breach of Trust by Public Servant or Banker

  • Section 420 – Cheating and Dishonest Inducement

  • Section 403 – Dishonest Misappropriation of Property

Case References under IPC Section 406

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Vasudeo Balwantrao Ghaisas (1991 AIR 1111, SC)

    – The Supreme Court clarified the distinction between criminal breach of trust and misappropriation.

  2. R. K. Garg v. Union of India (1981 AIR 1115, SC)

    – Held that dishonesty and entrustment are essential elements under Section 406.

  3. Bhagwan Das v. State of Rajasthan (1954 AIR 381, SC)

    – Defined the scope of 'entrustment' and 'property' under this section.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 406

  • Section:

    406

  • Title:

    Criminal Breach of Trust

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 406

IPC Section 406 plays a vital role in protecting property entrusted to individuals and ensuring that trust is not violated. It balances the need for accountability with the protection of honest conduct. The section deters misuse of property in personal, commercial, and official relationships.

Its application continues to evolve with changing social and technological contexts. As trust forms the foundation of many interactions, Section 406 remains a key legal tool to uphold integrity and justice in India’s criminal law framework.

FAQs on IPC Section 406

What is the difference between Section 405 and Section 406 IPC?

Section 405 defines criminal breach of trust, while Section 406 prescribes the punishment for it. Essentially, 405 explains the offence, and 406 deals with penalties.

Is Section 406 a cognizable offence?

Yes, offences under Section 406 are cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

Can someone be punished under Section 406 for honest failure?

No, honest failure to perform a duty or loss without dishonest intent does not attract Section 406.

Is Section 406 bailable?

Yes, Section 406 is a bailable offence, and bail is generally granted unless other factors apply.

Which courts try cases under Section 406?

Cases under Section 406 are primarily tried by Magistrate courts, but Sessions courts may try cases with additional serious offences.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 265D details the procedure for recording confessions and statements before a Magistrate during investigation.

CrPC Section 384 defines the offence of extortion and its legal consequences under Indian law.

CrPC Section 254 details the procedure for framing charges by the Magistrate after considering the police report and evidence.

CrPC Section 335 outlines the procedure when an offence is compoundable, allowing parties to settle and avoid prosecution.

IPC Section 198 outlines the procedure for complaint in cases of offences against public servants, ensuring proper legal process.

CrPC Section 201 deals with punishment for causing the disappearance of evidence or giving false information to screen offenders.

IPC Section 283 penalizes causing danger to life or personal safety of others by acts likely to cause public nuisance.

IPC Section 13 defines criminal conspiracy, outlining its scope and legal implications in Indian law.

CrPC Section 141 defines an unlawful assembly and its legal implications under Indian criminal law.

IPC Section 356 addresses the punishment for criminal trespass by a public servant in a place of worship or sacred precincts.

IPC Section 431 punishes mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to cause damage to property.

IPC Section 46 defines the right of private defense of the body, detailing when and how force may be used to protect oneself.

bottom of page