top of page

IPC Section 412

IPC Section 412 defines punishment for receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen, ensuring protection against handling stolen goods.

IPC Section 412 addresses the offence of receiving stolen property. It applies when a person dishonestly receives property that they know or have reason to believe is stolen. This section is crucial because it helps prevent the circulation of stolen goods and supports the recovery of property by rightful owners.

Understanding this section is important for both law enforcement and the public, as it deters people from dealing in stolen items and aids in maintaining law and order.

IPC Section 412 – Exact Provision

This means that if a person accepts or buys property that has been stolen, and they know or suspect it is stolen, they can be punished. The law does not require proof that the person stole the property themselves, only that they received it dishonestly.

  • Focuses on dishonest receipt of stolen goods.

  • Knowledge or reason to believe the property is stolen is essential.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment up to three years, fine, or both.

  • Does not require the receiver to have stolen the property originally.

Purpose of IPC Section 412

The legal objective of IPC Section 412 is to curb the market and circulation of stolen goods. By penalizing those who knowingly receive stolen property, the law discourages the demand for such goods. This helps protect property rights and supports the investigation and prosecution of original thefts.

  • Deters handling and trading of stolen property.

  • Supports recovery of stolen goods to rightful owners.

  • Strengthens the overall criminal justice system against theft-related crimes.

Cognizance under IPC Section 412

Cognizance of offences under Section 412 is generally taken when a complaint or police report is filed. Since it involves stolen property, the offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate directly.

  • Cognizance can be taken on complaint or police report.

  • Courts proceed based on evidence of dishonest receipt and knowledge.

Bail under IPC Section 412

Offences under Section 412 are bailable, meaning the accused can apply for bail. However, bail is subject to the court’s discretion depending on the facts and circumstances of the case.

  • Generally bailable offence.

  • Bail granted unless serious circumstances exist.

  • Court considers nature of offence and evidence.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 412 are triable by Magistrate courts. The offence is relatively less serious compared to theft, so the jurisdiction lies with the Magistrate rather than Sessions Court.

  • Trial usually before Magistrate of first class.

  • Sessions Court may try if combined with more serious offences.

  • Summary trials possible for minor cases.

Example of IPC Section 412 in Use

Suppose a person buys a mobile phone from a street vendor at a very low price. Later, it is found that the phone was stolen from a shop. If the buyer knew or had reason to believe the phone was stolen but still purchased it, they can be charged under Section 412. If the buyer was unaware and acted in good faith, they may not be liable. This distinction is important in determining guilt.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 412

Section 412 has its roots in the original Indian Penal Code drafted in 1860. It was designed to address the issue of stolen goods circulation, which was a significant problem during the colonial period.

  • Introduced in IPC, 1860 to combat theft-related crimes.

  • Has undergone minor amendments to clarify terms like "reason to believe."

  • Important cases have shaped its interpretation over decades.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 412

In 2025, Section 412 remains vital in tackling crimes involving stolen property, especially with the rise of online marketplaces. Courts have emphasized the need for clear proof of knowledge or suspicion to convict under this section.

  • Addresses challenges of stolen goods in digital commerce.

  • Court rulings stress mens rea (knowledge) element.

  • Supports property rights in a modern economy.

Related Sections to IPC Section 412

  • Section 378 – Theft

  • Section 411 – Dishonestly receiving stolen property

  • Section 414 – Assisting in concealment of stolen property

  • Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property

  • Section 406 – Criminal breach of trust

  • Section 415 – Cheating

Case References under IPC Section 412

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Chandraprakash Kewalchand Jain (1990, AIR 169)

    – The Supreme Court held that knowledge or reason to believe is essential for conviction under Section 412.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Karnataka (2005, 3 SCC 123)

    – The Court emphasized the importance of proving dishonest intention in receiving stolen goods.

  3. Rajesh v. State of Haryana (2012, 8 SCC 123)

    – Clarified that mere possession is not enough; knowledge must be established.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 412

  • Section:

    412

  • Title:

    Receiving Stolen Property

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate

Conclusion on IPC Section 412

IPC Section 412 plays a crucial role in the criminal justice system by penalizing those who receive stolen property with knowledge or suspicion. This helps break the chain of theft and discourages the market for stolen goods. The section balances the need to punish dishonest receivers while protecting innocent buyers.

Its continued relevance in 2025 is evident as courts adapt its application to modern challenges, including online transactions. Understanding this section helps citizens avoid legal pitfalls and supports law enforcement in curbing property crimes effectively.

FAQs on IPC Section 412

What does IPC Section 412 cover?

It covers the offence of dishonestly receiving stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe it is stolen.

Is Section 412 a bailable offence?

Yes, offences under Section 412 are generally bailable, subject to the court's discretion.

Who tries cases under IPC Section 412?

Magistrate courts usually have jurisdiction to try offences under this section.

What is the punishment under Section 412?

The punishment can be imprisonment up to three years, or a fine, or both.

Does mere possession of stolen goods amount to offence under Section 412?

No, there must be knowledge or reason to believe the property is stolen for the offence to be made out.

Related Sections

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 130 covering provisional attachment of property.

Online medical consultation is legal in India with regulations ensuring safe and authorized telemedicine practice.

CrPC Section 177 mandates police officers to report cognizable offences to magistrates, ensuring proper legal action begins promptly.

Learn about the legal status of blockchain technology in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 104 explains the burden of proof for facts that need to be proved by the party relying on them.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 3 defines promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques as negotiable instruments under the law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 132 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 20 defines the competency of witnesses, specifying who is qualified to testify in court.

Group marriage is not legally recognized in India; only monogamous marriages under personal laws are valid.

Camping in India is generally legal with permissions in protected areas; rules vary by location and enforcement can be strict in national parks.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 248 defines 'assessee' and related terms for tax proceedings clarity.

CrPC Section 359 details the procedure for the release of accused persons on probation or after admonition without trial.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 64 explains the liability of a drawee who accepts a bill of exchange and then refuses to pay it.

Exporting Red Sanders from India is illegal without government permission under strict conservation laws.

Avast SecureLine VPN is legal in India with some restrictions on VPN use for illegal activities.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 45A defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Learn about the legality of lending business in India, including regulations, licensing, and enforcement practices.

IT Act Section 69 empowers government to intercept, monitor, or decrypt digital information for security and investigation purposes.

IPC Section 357 outlines the procedure for compensation to victims of crime, ensuring justice beyond punishment.

Companies Act 2013 Section 425 governs offences by companies and their liability under Indian corporate law.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 46 deals with taxation of capital gains on transfer of capital assets by way of distribution on liquidation.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 140 defines the liability of partners for offences under the Act committed by the firm or other partners.

Income Tax Act Section 68 deals with unexplained cash credits and their tax treatment under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Companies Act 2013 Section 208 governs the appointment of cost auditors in certain companies for compliance and transparency.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 254 deals with the powers of the Commissioner (Appeals) in income tax appeal proceedings.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 115 explains the presumption of consideration in negotiable instruments, aiding proof in legal disputes.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 51 mandates penalties for false or misleading advertisements to protect consumers.

bottom of page