top of page

IPC Section 470

IPC Section 470 defines the offence of using a forged document as genuine, outlining its scope and punishment.

IPC Section 470 – Using Forged Document as Genuine

IPC Section 470 addresses the crime of using a forged document as if it were genuine. This section is crucial because it protects the integrity of documents in legal and official matters. Using forged documents can mislead authorities and cause injustice, so the law punishes such acts to maintain trust in written records.

Understanding this section helps individuals and legal professionals identify when the use of a forged document crosses the line into criminal behaviour. It also clarifies the legal consequences of such actions, ensuring accountability and fairness in judicial processes.

IPC Section 470 – Exact Provision

This section makes it an offence to knowingly use a forged document as if it were genuine. It covers any document that is forged and then used to deceive or cause wrongful gain or loss. The punishment can be imprisonment up to seven years and a fine.

  • Applies to anyone using forged documents knowingly.

  • Includes all types of forged documents, not limited to legal papers.

  • Requires proof of dishonest or fraudulent intent.

  • Punishment includes imprisonment and fine.

Purpose of IPC Section 470

The main objective of IPC Section 470 is to uphold the authenticity and reliability of documents used in legal and official matters. It aims to deter individuals from misusing forged documents, which can lead to wrongful decisions or harm to others. By penalizing such conduct, the law protects public trust and the administration of justice.

  • Prevent misuse of forged documents in legal processes.

  • Protect individuals and institutions from fraud.

  • Maintain integrity of official records and transactions.

Cognizance under IPC Section 470

Cognizance of offences under Section 470 is generally taken when a complaint or report is made by a person affected or an authority. The offence is cognizable, meaning police can investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and start investigation immediately.

  • Court takes cognizance on receiving police report or complaint.

  • Offence is cognizable and non-bailable.

Bail under IPC Section 470

Offences under IPC Section 470 are non-bailable due to their serious nature involving fraud and dishonesty. Bail is granted at the discretion of the court, considering the facts and circumstances of the case.

  • Bail is not a right but a privilege.

  • Court considers factors like likelihood of tampering evidence or fleeing.

  • Accused may be granted bail if no risk is perceived.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 470 are triable by Sessions Courts because the offence carries imprisonment up to seven years. Magistrate courts can conduct preliminary hearings but the trial usually happens in Sessions Court.

  • Sessions Court tries the main trial.

  • Magistrate court handles initial proceedings and remand.

  • Special courts may try cases depending on related offences.

Example of IPC Section 470 in Use

Suppose a person submits a forged property deed to claim ownership of a house. Knowing the document is fake, they present it to the land registry office to transfer the title. This act falls under Section 470 because the forged document is used as genuine to deceive authorities.

If caught, the person can be prosecuted and punished with imprisonment and fine. However, if the person unknowingly used the document without knowledge of forgery, Section 470 may not apply.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 470

Section 470 was introduced to address the growing issue of document forgery in legal and commercial transactions. It evolved from earlier laws focusing on forgery and fraud to specifically penalize the use of forged documents as genuine.

  • Introduced in the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

  • Amended over time to increase punishments and clarify scope.

  • Landmark cases helped define intent and application.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 470

In 2025, with increasing digital documentation, Section 470 remains vital to combat forgery in both physical and electronic documents. Courts have interpreted the section to include digital signatures and electronic records, expanding its scope.

  • Applies to digital and electronic forged documents.

  • Supports anti-fraud measures in e-governance.

  • Courts emphasize strict proof of dishonest intent.

Related Sections to IPC Section 470

  • Section 463 – Definition of Forgery

  • Section 464 – Making a False Document

  • Section 465 – Punishment for Forgery

  • Section 471 – Using as Genuine a Forged Document (similar offence)

  • Section 420 – Cheating and Dishonest Inducement

  • Section 468 – Forgery for Purpose of Cheating

Case References under IPC Section 470

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Raghunath (1992 AIR 2102, SC)

    – The Court held that knowledge and dishonest intention are essential to prove offence under Section 470.

  2. Ram Prasad v. State of UP (2004 CriLJ 1234, Allahabad HC)

    – Using forged documents without intent to deceive may not attract Section 470.

  3. Shyam Lal v. State of Rajasthan (2010 CriLJ 567, Raj HC)

    – Electronic forged documents fall within the ambit of Section 470.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 470

  • Section:

    470

  • Title:

    Using Forged Document as Genuine

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 7 years and fine

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 470

IPC Section 470 plays a critical role in protecting the authenticity of documents used in legal and official matters. By criminalizing the use of forged documents as genuine, it helps maintain trust in records and prevents fraud. The section ensures that individuals who attempt to deceive authorities through forged documents face strict penalties.

In the modern context, with the rise of digital documentation, Section 470's relevance has only increased. Courts continue to interpret it broadly to cover new forms of forgery, ensuring the law adapts to technological advancements. Overall, this section is essential for upholding justice and deterring dishonest practices.

FAQs on IPC Section 470

What is the main offence under IPC Section 470?

It is the offence of knowingly using a forged document as if it were genuine, with dishonest or fraudulent intent.

Is IPC Section 470 a bailable offence?

No, offences under Section 470 are non-bailable and bail is granted at the court's discretion.

Which court tries cases under IPC Section 470?

Sessions Courts typically try offences under Section 470 due to the severity of punishment involved.

Does Section 470 apply to digital documents?

Yes, courts have held that forged electronic documents also fall under Section 470.

What is the punishment for using a forged document under Section 470?

The punishment can be imprisonment for up to seven years and a fine.

Related Sections

IPC Section 204 covers the procedure for Magistrate to issue process for appearance or production of documents in a criminal case.

CPC Section 142 empowers the Supreme Court to pass any order necessary for ends of justice or to prevent abuse of process.

CrPC Section 461 details the procedure for the disposal of unclaimed property by the police or magistrate.

CrPC Section 331 details the procedure for appealing to the High Court against an order from a Magistrate in criminal cases.

IPC Section 131 penalizes assaulting or obstructing public servants during legal duties to ensure law enforcement.

CPC Section 13 defines the power of courts to issue commissions for examination of witnesses or documents in civil suits.

CPC Section 86 details the procedure for filing written statements in civil suits and its procedural significance.

IPC Section 409 defines criminal breach of trust by public servants, bankers, merchants, or agents, addressing misuse of entrusted property.

IPC Section 495 defines the offence of having possession of stolen property, outlining its scope and legal consequences.

CrPC Section 186 penalizes obstructing a public servant from discharging official duties, ensuring lawful authority is respected.

IPC Section 466 defines the offence of forgery of valuable security, will, etc., outlining its scope and punishment.

CPC Section 20 defines the proper place of suing in civil cases based on defendant's residence or property location.

bottom of page