top of page

IPC Section 492

IPC Section 492 defines the offence of receiving stolen property, outlining its scope and punishment.

IPC Section 492 addresses the crime of receiving stolen property. It is a crucial provision that targets individuals who knowingly receive or retain property that has been dishonestly taken from another person. This section helps in curbing the circulation of stolen goods and supports the recovery of such property by the rightful owners.

Understanding this section is important because it not only punishes theft but also those who aid in concealing stolen goods. It plays a vital role in the criminal justice system by discouraging the demand for stolen items and ensuring accountability for all parties involved in the crime.

IPC Section 492 – Exact Provision

This section makes it an offence to receive or possess stolen property when the person knows or has reason to believe that the property is stolen. It is not necessary that the person stole the property themselves; receiving it with knowledge of its stolen nature is punishable.

  • The offence involves receiving or retaining stolen goods.

  • Knowledge or reason to believe the property is stolen is essential.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment up to three years, fine, or both.

  • The section aims to prevent trafficking in stolen property.

Purpose of IPC Section 492

The primary purpose of IPC Section 492 is to deter individuals from dealing in stolen goods and to break the chain of illegal possession. By penalizing those who receive stolen property, the law discourages the market for such goods and supports the protection of rightful ownership.

  • Prevent circulation of stolen property in the market.

  • Protect property rights of owners.

  • Support law enforcement in tracking stolen goods.

Cognizance under IPC Section 492

Cognizance of offences under Section 492 is generally taken when a complaint or report is filed by the victim or police. The offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate immediately.

  • Cognizance can be taken on police report or complaint.

  • Courts proceed based on evidence of knowledge or belief about stolen nature.

Bail under IPC Section 492

Offences under Section 492 are bailable, meaning the accused can apply for bail as a matter of right. However, the court may impose conditions depending on the case facts.

  • Bail is generally granted unless serious circumstances exist.

  • Accused must cooperate with investigation.

  • Bail conditions may include surrendering passport or regular court appearances.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 492 are triable by Magistrate courts. Since the punishment is up to three years, it falls within the jurisdiction of the Judicial Magistrate First Class.

  • Judicial Magistrate First Class tries most cases under this section.

  • Sessions Court may try if combined with more serious offences.

  • Summary trial possible if facts are straightforward.

Example of IPC Section 492 in Use

Suppose a person buys a mobile phone from a street vendor at a suspiciously low price. Later, the police recover the phone as stolen property and investigate the buyer. If it is proven that the buyer knew or had reason to believe the phone was stolen, they can be charged under Section 492. Conversely, if the buyer had no knowledge and acted in good faith, they may be acquitted.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 492

Section 492 has its origins in the Indian Penal Code of 1860, designed to address the problem of stolen goods circulation. Over time, courts have clarified the requirement of knowledge or belief to establish guilt.

  • Introduced in IPC, 1860 to combat theft-related crimes.

  • Landmark cases refined the interpretation of 'knowledge'.

  • Amendments ensured clarity on punishment and procedure.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 492

In 2025, Section 492 remains vital in combating the illegal trade of stolen goods, especially with the rise of online marketplaces. Courts emphasize the need for proof of knowledge, balancing protection of innocent buyers and punishment of offenders.

  • Addresses challenges of digital and physical stolen goods trade.

  • Court rulings stress mens rea (knowledge) element.

  • Supports property rights in evolving commercial environments.

Related Sections to IPC Section 492

  • Section 378 – Theft

  • Section 411 – Dishonestly Receiving Stolen Property

  • Section 403 – Dishonest Misappropriation of Property

  • Section 405 – Criminal Breach of Trust

  • Section 406 – Punishment for Criminal Breach of Trust

Case References under IPC Section 492

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Chandraprakash Kewalchand Jain (1990 AIR 713, SC)

    – The Court held that knowledge or reason to believe is essential to convict under Section 492.

  2. Ram Narain v. State of U.P. (1959 AIR 1013, SC)

    – Clarified that mere possession without knowledge does not amount to offence under this section.

  3. Ramesh Chand v. State of Haryana (1977 AIR 1368, SC)

    – Emphasized the importance of proving mens rea for conviction.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 492

  • Section:

    492

  • Title:

    Receiving Stolen Property

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 492

IPC Section 492 plays a significant role in the Indian legal framework by criminalizing the receipt of stolen property. It helps in breaking the chain of theft by targeting not only the original thief but also those who facilitate the circulation of stolen goods. This section ensures that individuals cannot benefit from dishonest acts without facing legal consequences.

Its application requires careful examination of the accused's knowledge or belief about the stolen nature of the property. In modern times, with the complexity of trade and online transactions, Section 492 remains a vital tool to protect property rights and maintain public trust in commerce and law enforcement.

FAQs on IPC Section 492

What is the main offence under IPC Section 492?

The main offence is receiving or possessing stolen property knowing or having reason to believe it is stolen. It punishes those who handle stolen goods.

Is IPC Section 492 a bailable offence?

Yes, offences under Section 492 are generally bailable, allowing the accused to apply for bail as a right.

Which court tries cases under IPC Section 492?

Cases are typically tried by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, as the punishment is up to three years.

Does mere possession of stolen property amount to offence?

No, possession alone is not enough. The person must know or have reason to believe the property is stolen.

What is the punishment for offence under IPC Section 492?

The punishment may extend to three years imprisonment, or fine, or both, depending on the case facts.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Learn about the legal status of Lotus365 in India, including regulations, risks, and enforcement realities.

CPC Section 44 explains the power of courts to order discovery and inspection of documents in civil suits.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 60 covering appeals to Appellate Authority under CGST Act.

Selling mined gold in India is legal with proper licenses and adherence to regulations under the Gold Control Act and GST laws.

IT Act Section 34 addresses joint liability for offences committed by multiple persons under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

IPC Section 78 defines the legal presumption of good faith in acts done under official authority.

CrPC Section 357 details the procedure for awarding compensation to victims during criminal trials.

IPC Section 61 defines the offence of kidnapping from lawful guardianship, covering unlawful taking or enticing away of a minor or person of unsound mind.

Section 194IA of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on property purchase payments above ₹50 lakh in India.

Understand the legality of Qnet in India, its regulatory status, and common misconceptions about its business model.

CrPC Section 41A mandates police to issue a notice before arresting a person in certain cases, ensuring fair procedure and protecting individual liberty.

Having an offshore company is legal in India if you comply with RBI and tax laws, but strict reporting is required.

Pen down strike is not legally recognized in Indian schools and may lead to disciplinary action.

Income Tax Act Section 10AA provides tax exemption for units in Special Economic Zones (SEZs) to promote exports and economic growth.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 139 presumes possession of stolen goods by a person to be guilty of theft unless proven otherwise.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 1 defines key terms and scope of the Act, essential for understanding negotiable instruments law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 361 empowers the Central Government to exempt certain companies from provisions for efficient regulation.

Section 201 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with the liability of persons responsible for deducting tax at source in India.

CPC Section 43 defines the procedure for arresting a judgment-debtor to enforce a decree in civil cases.

CrPC Section 418 details the procedure for executing warrants and summons when the person is not found at their residence.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 16 details the jurisdiction of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for consumer complaints.

In India, sex determination tests are illegal except for medical reasons, with strict enforcement to prevent gender-based abortions.

Companies Act 2013 Section 115 governs the taxation of dividends distributed by companies to shareholders in India.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 24 excludes evidence obtained by illegal means, protecting fairness in trials and ensuring only lawful proof is admitted.

Porn sites are illegal to access in India under current laws, with strict government blocks and penalties for violations.

Companies Act 2013 Section 427 governs the procedure for filing appeals against orders of the National Company Law Tribunal.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 78 outlines the powers of the Central Consumer Protection Authority to investigate unfair trade practices.

bottom of page