top of page

IPC Section 492

IPC Section 492 defines the offence of receiving stolen property, outlining its scope and punishment.

IPC Section 492 addresses the crime of receiving stolen property. It is a crucial provision that targets individuals who knowingly receive or retain property that has been dishonestly taken from another person. This section helps in curbing the circulation of stolen goods and supports the recovery of such property by the rightful owners.

Understanding this section is important because it not only punishes theft but also those who aid in concealing stolen goods. It plays a vital role in the criminal justice system by discouraging the demand for stolen items and ensuring accountability for all parties involved in the crime.

IPC Section 492 – Exact Provision

This section makes it an offence to receive or possess stolen property when the person knows or has reason to believe that the property is stolen. It is not necessary that the person stole the property themselves; receiving it with knowledge of its stolen nature is punishable.

  • The offence involves receiving or retaining stolen goods.

  • Knowledge or reason to believe the property is stolen is essential.

  • Punishment can be imprisonment up to three years, fine, or both.

  • The section aims to prevent trafficking in stolen property.

Purpose of IPC Section 492

The primary purpose of IPC Section 492 is to deter individuals from dealing in stolen goods and to break the chain of illegal possession. By penalizing those who receive stolen property, the law discourages the market for such goods and supports the protection of rightful ownership.

  • Prevent circulation of stolen property in the market.

  • Protect property rights of owners.

  • Support law enforcement in tracking stolen goods.

Cognizance under IPC Section 492

Cognizance of offences under Section 492 is generally taken when a complaint or report is filed by the victim or police. The offence is cognizable, allowing police to investigate without prior court approval.

  • Police can register FIR and investigate immediately.

  • Cognizance can be taken on police report or complaint.

  • Courts proceed based on evidence of knowledge or belief about stolen nature.

Bail under IPC Section 492

Offences under Section 492 are bailable, meaning the accused can apply for bail as a matter of right. However, the court may impose conditions depending on the case facts.

  • Bail is generally granted unless serious circumstances exist.

  • Accused must cooperate with investigation.

  • Bail conditions may include surrendering passport or regular court appearances.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 492 are triable by Magistrate courts. Since the punishment is up to three years, it falls within the jurisdiction of the Judicial Magistrate First Class.

  • Judicial Magistrate First Class tries most cases under this section.

  • Sessions Court may try if combined with more serious offences.

  • Summary trial possible if facts are straightforward.

Example of IPC Section 492 in Use

Suppose a person buys a mobile phone from a street vendor at a suspiciously low price. Later, the police recover the phone as stolen property and investigate the buyer. If it is proven that the buyer knew or had reason to believe the phone was stolen, they can be charged under Section 492. Conversely, if the buyer had no knowledge and acted in good faith, they may be acquitted.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 492

Section 492 has its origins in the Indian Penal Code of 1860, designed to address the problem of stolen goods circulation. Over time, courts have clarified the requirement of knowledge or belief to establish guilt.

  • Introduced in IPC, 1860 to combat theft-related crimes.

  • Landmark cases refined the interpretation of 'knowledge'.

  • Amendments ensured clarity on punishment and procedure.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 492

In 2025, Section 492 remains vital in combating the illegal trade of stolen goods, especially with the rise of online marketplaces. Courts emphasize the need for proof of knowledge, balancing protection of innocent buyers and punishment of offenders.

  • Addresses challenges of digital and physical stolen goods trade.

  • Court rulings stress mens rea (knowledge) element.

  • Supports property rights in evolving commercial environments.

Related Sections to IPC Section 492

  • Section 378 – Theft

  • Section 411 – Dishonestly Receiving Stolen Property

  • Section 403 – Dishonest Misappropriation of Property

  • Section 405 – Criminal Breach of Trust

  • Section 406 – Punishment for Criminal Breach of Trust

Case References under IPC Section 492

  1. State of Maharashtra v. Chandraprakash Kewalchand Jain (1990 AIR 713, SC)

    – The Court held that knowledge or reason to believe is essential to convict under Section 492.

  2. Ram Narain v. State of U.P. (1959 AIR 1013, SC)

    – Clarified that mere possession without knowledge does not amount to offence under this section.

  3. Ramesh Chand v. State of Haryana (1977 AIR 1368, SC)

    – Emphasized the importance of proving mens rea for conviction.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 492

  • Section:

    492

  • Title:

    Receiving Stolen Property

  • Offence Type:

    Bailable, Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate Court

Conclusion on IPC Section 492

IPC Section 492 plays a significant role in the Indian legal framework by criminalizing the receipt of stolen property. It helps in breaking the chain of theft by targeting not only the original thief but also those who facilitate the circulation of stolen goods. This section ensures that individuals cannot benefit from dishonest acts without facing legal consequences.

Its application requires careful examination of the accused's knowledge or belief about the stolen nature of the property. In modern times, with the complexity of trade and online transactions, Section 492 remains a vital tool to protect property rights and maintain public trust in commerce and law enforcement.

FAQs on IPC Section 492

What is the main offence under IPC Section 492?

The main offence is receiving or possessing stolen property knowing or having reason to believe it is stolen. It punishes those who handle stolen goods.

Is IPC Section 492 a bailable offence?

Yes, offences under Section 492 are generally bailable, allowing the accused to apply for bail as a right.

Which court tries cases under IPC Section 492?

Cases are typically tried by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, as the punishment is up to three years.

Does mere possession of stolen property amount to offence?

No, possession alone is not enough. The person must know or have reason to believe the property is stolen.

What is the punishment for offence under IPC Section 492?

The punishment may extend to three years imprisonment, or fine, or both, depending on the case facts.

Related Sections

Killing stray dogs in India is illegal under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and local laws.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 1 defines the scope and extent of the Act, establishing its application across India except Jammu and Kashmir.

Advertising for votes in India is illegal under the Representation of the People Act and Election Commission rules.

IT Act Section 45 defines digital signature certificates and their role in electronic authentication.

In India, motorized cycles are legal with specific rules on engine capacity, licensing, and safety requirements.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 59 covering assessment of unregistered persons under GST.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 82 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

Income Tax Act Section 44BBB prescribes presumptive taxation for non-resident professionals providing technical services in India.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 117 covers admissions by party-opponents, allowing statements against interest as evidence in civil and criminal cases.

IPC Section 228 punishes wrongful public exhibition of obscene objects to insult modesty or outrage public decency.

iForex is not fully legal in India due to regulatory restrictions on forex trading platforms without RBI approval.

Blockchain-based smart contracts are conditionally legal in India with evolving regulations and certain legal challenges.

IPC Section 68 defines the offence of public servant unlawfully buying property to prevent its seizure.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 118 defines the proof of documents, detailing how primary and secondary evidence are admissible in court.

Planting trees in India is generally legal but subject to environmental laws and local regulations to protect forests and biodiversity.

Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 1 defines the short title, extent, commencement, and application of the Act.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 20 covering change in place of business rules.

Income Tax Act Section 116 defines 'person' including individuals, companies, firms, and others for tax purposes.

Income Tax Act Section 54B provides capital gains exemption on transfer of agricultural land used for farming.

Explore the legality of Jeeva Samadhi in India, its cultural context, and how Indian law views this practice.

CrPC Section 271 details penalties for disobedience to summons or warrants issued by a criminal court.

IPC Section 120 defines criminal conspiracy, outlining when two or more persons agree to commit an illegal act or a legal act by illegal means.

Love marriage is legal in India with no specific law against it, but social and family dynamics affect its acceptance.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 22 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Whatsapp marketing is legal in India but must comply with IT and telecom rules to avoid penalties.

Contract Act 1872 Section 10 explains when an agreement becomes a legally valid and enforceable contract.

CPC Section 102 covers the procedure for execution of decrees by delivery of possession in civil suits.

bottom of page