top of page

IPC Section 6

IPC Section 6 defines offences committed outside India by Indian citizens or residents, addressing extraterritorial jurisdiction.

IPC Section 6 – Offences Outside India

IPC Section 6 deals with offences committed beyond Indian territory by Indian citizens or persons in service of the government. It establishes the legal framework for prosecuting such crimes under Indian law, ensuring that individuals cannot evade justice by committing offences abroad. This section is crucial for maintaining the rule of law and upholding India's sovereignty in criminal matters involving its nationals.

Understanding IPC Section 6 is important because it clarifies when Indian courts have jurisdiction over crimes committed outside India. It helps in addressing cross-border crimes and ensures accountability, especially in an increasingly globalized world where actions abroad can impact Indian interests.

IPC Section 6 – Exact Provision

This section means that if an act committed outside India would be an offence if done within India, then Indian law applies to that act. It extends the reach of Indian criminal law to certain extraterritorial acts.

  • Applies to Indian citizens and government servants abroad.

  • Ensures offences outside India are punishable under Indian law.

  • Supports prosecution of crimes affecting Indian interests.

  • Does not cover all acts abroad, only those punishable in India.

Purpose of IPC Section 6

The main legal objective of IPC Section 6 is to assert India's jurisdiction over offences committed outside its borders by its nationals or government servants. This prevents individuals from escaping liability by committing crimes abroad. It also protects India's sovereignty and interests by enabling prosecution of extraterritorial offences under Indian law.

  • To extend Indian criminal law beyond territorial limits.

  • To hold Indian citizens accountable for crimes abroad.

  • To uphold national sovereignty and legal order.

Cognizance under IPC Section 6

Cognizance under this section is taken when there is sufficient evidence that an offence punishable under Indian law was committed outside India by a relevant person. Courts may proceed if the offence has a direct connection to India.

  • Cognizance can be taken on police report or complaint.

  • Requires proof the accused is Indian or government servant.

  • Offence must be punishable if committed in India.

Bail under IPC Section 6

Offences under IPC Section 6 are generally non-bailable as they often involve serious crimes committed abroad. However, bail decisions depend on the nature of the offence and judicial discretion.

  • Bail may be granted depending on offence severity.

  • Courts consider flight risk and evidence strength.

  • Non-bailable status common for grave offences.

Triable By (Which Court Has Jurisdiction?)

Cases under IPC Section 6 are usually triable by Sessions Courts due to the serious nature of offences. However, depending on the offence, Magistrate courts may also have jurisdiction.

  • Sessions Court tries serious offences under this section.

  • Magistrate Court may try less serious offences.

  • Special courts may be involved for specific crimes.

Example of IPC Section 6 in Use

Suppose an Indian government official stationed abroad commits bribery related to Indian government contracts. Although the act occurred outside India, IPC Section 6 allows Indian courts to prosecute the official for the offence. If the official were a foreign national, this section would not apply, and prosecution would depend on local laws or international agreements.

In contrast, if a foreigner commits the same act abroad, Indian courts generally lack jurisdiction unless other provisions apply.

Historical Relevance of IPC Section 6

IPC Section 6 has its roots in colonial-era laws designed to maintain control over British subjects abroad. It has evolved to address modern challenges of extraterritorial crimes committed by Indian nationals.

  • Introduced in the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

  • Adapted post-independence to include government servants.

  • Referenced in landmark cases on extraterritorial jurisdiction.

Modern Relevance of IPC Section 6

In 2025, IPC Section 6 remains vital for prosecuting crimes like corruption, terrorism, and cyber offences committed abroad by Indians. Courts have interpreted it to cover various extraterritorial acts affecting India’s interests. It supports international cooperation in criminal justice.

  • Used in prosecuting cybercrimes by Indians abroad.

  • Supports anti-corruption cases involving officials overseas.

  • Facilitates India's role in global law enforcement.

Related Sections to IPC Section 6

  • Section 5 – Territorial Scope of Indian Penal Code

  • Section 7 – Offences by Foreigners on Ships and Aircraft

  • Section 188 – Disobedience to Order Lawfully Promulgated

  • Section 120B – Criminal Conspiracy

  • Section 420 – Cheating and Dishonest Inducement

Case References under IPC Section 6

  1. R. v. Keyn (1876) LR 2 CCR 63 (UK)

    – Established principles on extraterritorial jurisdiction relevant to IPC Section 6.

  2. State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai (2003) 4 SCC 601

    – Discussed jurisdiction over offences committed partly outside India.

  3. Union of India v. Ibrahim Uddin (1978) AIR 851

    – Affirmed applicability of IPC Section 6 to government servants abroad.

Key Facts Summary for IPC Section 6

  • Section:

    6

  • Title:

    Offences Outside India

  • Offence Type:

    Non-bailable; Cognizable

  • Punishment:

    As prescribed for the offence committed

  • Triable By:

    Sessions Court / Magistrate

Conclusion on IPC Section 6

IPC Section 6 plays a crucial role in extending Indian criminal law beyond its territorial boundaries. It ensures that Indian citizens and government servants cannot evade prosecution by committing offences abroad. This provision strengthens the legal framework to uphold justice and national interests globally.

As cross-border crimes increase, IPC Section 6 remains relevant and essential for Indian courts to assert jurisdiction and maintain law and order. Its application supports India's commitment to combating crime irrespective of geographic boundaries.

FAQs on IPC Section 6

What types of offences does IPC Section 6 cover?

It covers offences committed outside India by Indian citizens or government servants that would be punishable if committed within India.

Can foreign nationals be prosecuted under IPC Section 6?

No, IPC Section 6 applies only to Indian citizens or persons in government service abroad.

Is IPC Section 6 applicable to cybercrimes committed abroad?

Yes, if the cybercrime is committed by an Indian citizen or government servant and is punishable under Indian law.

Which courts try offences under IPC Section 6?

Mostly Sessions Courts try these offences, but Magistrate courts may also have jurisdiction depending on the case.

Is bail easily granted for offences under IPC Section 6?

Bail depends on the offence's nature; serious offences are usually non-bailable, but courts decide based on circumstances.

Related Sections

IPC Section 225 defines the offence of concealing a person to prevent their appearance in court or custody.

CrPC Section 111 details the procedure for a Magistrate to require security for keeping peace or good behavior.

IPC Section 120B defines criminal conspiracy, outlining liability for those involved in planning unlawful acts.

IPC Section 171 defines offences related to bribery and corrupt practices in elections to ensure free and fair electoral processes.

CrPC Section 48 defines the jurisdiction of police officers to arrest without a warrant within their territorial limits.

CPC Section 11 explains the doctrine of res judicata, preventing repeated litigation of the same matter.

IPC Section 146 defines rioting and prescribes punishment for unlawful assembly engaging in violence.

CPC Section 39 empowers courts to grant injunctions to prevent wrongful dispossession without due process.

IPC Section 216A penalizes the act of harboring or concealing offenders to prevent their arrest or trial.

IPC Section 265 defines the offence of making a false statement causing public mischief, aiming to protect public order and trust.

IPC Section 107 defines the offence of abetment of a thing and outlines when a person is liable for abetting a crime.

IPC Section 158 defines the procedure for recording information about offences by police officers upon receiving a complaint.

bottom of page