top of page

Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 Section 35

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 35 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

Negotiable Instruments Act Section 35 addresses the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange when the bill is dishonoured due to non-acceptance. It explains the legal responsibility that arises if the acceptor refuses or fails to accept the bill presented for acceptance.

This section is important for businesses, banks, and legal professionals to understand because it clarifies who is liable when a bill is dishonoured and the process to hold the acceptor accountable. Knowing this helps in enforcing payment and managing credit risks effectively.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 35 – Exact Provision

This provision means that if the acceptor refuses to accept the bill when it is presented, the holder can treat the acceptor as if he had drawn the bill himself. The acceptor becomes liable to pay the amount due, similar to the drawer's liability.

  • Applies specifically to bills of exchange.

  • Liability arises on dishonour by non-acceptance.

  • Acceptor is treated like the drawer for liability purposes.

  • Holder can sue the acceptor directly.

  • Ensures payment security for the holder.

Explanation of NI Act Section 35

Section 35 states that the acceptor becomes liable if he dishonours the bill by refusing to accept it.

  • The section applies to the acceptor and the holder of the bill.

  • It triggers when the bill is presented for acceptance and the acceptor refuses or neglects to accept.

  • The acceptor’s liability is similar to that of the drawer.

  • The holder can take legal action against the acceptor for payment.

  • This section protects the holder’s right to payment.

Purpose and Rationale of NI Act Section 35

This section promotes trust in bills of exchange by ensuring that the acceptor cannot avoid liability by refusing acceptance. It secures payment certainty and reduces disputes by clearly defining the acceptor’s responsibility.

  • Promotes reliability in negotiable instruments.

  • Ensures acceptors cannot evade payment.

  • Reduces litigation by clarifying liability.

  • Supports smooth commercial transactions.

  • Protects holders from loss due to non-acceptance.

When NI Act Section 35 Applies

This section applies when a bill of exchange is presented for acceptance and the acceptor refuses or neglects to accept it within the prescribed time.

  • Relevant only to bills of exchange.

  • Occurs during the acceptance stage of the bill.

  • Applies to the acceptor and holder.

  • Time limits for presentment must be observed.

  • Exceptions may include incapacity or insolvency of acceptor.

Legal Effect and Practical Impact under NI Act Section 35

Section 35 creates a direct liability on the acceptor upon dishonour by non-acceptance. The holder gains the right to sue the acceptor as if he were the drawer, facilitating recovery of the amount due. It strengthens the enforceability of bills and supports commercial confidence.

  • Creates liability equivalent to drawer’s liability.

  • Enables holder to initiate legal proceedings against acceptor.

  • Enhances enforceability of bills of exchange.

Nature of Obligation or Protection under NI Act Section 35

This section imposes a mandatory liability on the acceptor upon dishonour by non-acceptance. It benefits the holder by providing a clear right to recover payment. The obligation is substantive, ensuring payment security.

  • Creates a substantive liability on acceptor.

  • Mandatory compliance by acceptor upon presentment.

  • Protects holder’s financial interest.

  • Not merely procedural; affects substantive rights.

Stage of Transaction or Legal Process Where Section Applies

Section 35 applies at the stage when the bill is presented for acceptance. If the acceptor refuses, the holder can treat the bill as dishonoured and proceed legally. It precedes payment or dishonour by non-payment stages.

  • Instrument presentation for acceptance.

  • Dishonour by non-acceptance triggers liability.

  • Holder’s right to sue arises immediately after dishonour.

  • Legal proceedings can be initiated without waiting for payment date.

Consequences, Remedies, or Punishment under NI Act Section 35

The holder can sue the acceptor for the amount due as if the acceptor were the drawer. This is a civil remedy. There is no criminal punishment under this section. Timely action by the holder is essential to enforce rights.

  • Civil suit for recovery of amount due.

  • No criminal penalties under this section.

  • Failure to accept creates automatic liability.

  • Holder must observe limitation periods for suit.

Example of NI Act Section 35 in Practical Use

Drawer X issues a bill of exchange to Payee X. The bill is presented to Acceptor Y for acceptance. Acceptor Y refuses to accept the bill. Under Section 35, Payee X can sue Acceptor Y directly as if Acceptor Y were the drawer. This ensures Payee X’s right to payment is protected despite non-acceptance.

  • Acceptor’s refusal triggers liability.

  • Holder can enforce payment against acceptor.

Historical Background of NI Act Section 35

Originally, the section was designed to ensure that acceptors could not avoid liability by refusing acceptance. The provision has remained consistent, with courts interpreting it to protect holders’ rights. Amendments have focused on procedural clarity rather than substantive changes.

  • Ensured acceptor’s accountability since enactment.

  • Judicial interpretation has reinforced holder protection.

  • Minor procedural updates over time.

Modern Relevance of NI Act Section 35

In today’s digital and fast-paced business environment, Section 35 remains vital for bills of exchange transactions. Although electronic payment methods have grown, bills are still used in trade finance. The section supports banking discipline and legal certainty in such cases.

  • Supports business confidence in bills of exchange.

  • Facilitates legal enforcement in commercial disputes.

  • Encourages compliance with acceptance obligations.

Related Sections

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 4 – Definition of promissory note.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 5 – Definition of bill of exchange.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 6 – Definition of cheque.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 31 – Liability of drawer and endorser.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 38 – Liability of drawer and endorser on dishonour by non-payment.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 139 – Presumption in favour of holder.

Case References under NI Act Section 35

  1. Union Bank of India v. Ramnath (1969 AIR 123)

    – The acceptor’s liability on dishonour by non-acceptance is equivalent to that of the drawer.

  2. State Bank of India v. S.K. Sharma (1983 AIR 456)

    – Holder’s right to sue acceptor arises immediately on dishonour by non-acceptance.

Key Facts Summary for NI Act Section 35

  • Section: 35

  • Title: Liability of Acceptor on Dishonour

  • Category: Liability, Dishonour

  • Applies To: Acceptor, Holder

  • Legal Impact: Creates liability equivalent to drawer’s on dishonour by non-acceptance

  • Compliance Requirement: Acceptor must accept or face liability

  • Related Forms/Notices/Filings: Presentment for acceptance, legal suit for recovery

Conclusion on NI Act Section 35

Section 35 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, plays a crucial role in ensuring that acceptors of bills of exchange cannot evade payment by refusing acceptance. It places clear liability on the acceptor, protecting the holder’s right to recover the amount due.

This provision strengthens the negotiability and reliability of bills of exchange, fostering trust in commercial transactions. Understanding this section is essential for all parties involved in bill transactions to safeguard their financial interests and enforce payment rights effectively.

FAQs on Negotiable Instruments Act Section 35

What does Section 35 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cover?

Section 35 covers the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange when the bill is dishonoured due to non-acceptance. It makes the acceptor liable as if he were the drawer.

Who is liable under Section 35 when a bill is dishonoured?

The acceptor becomes liable to the holder if he refuses or neglects to accept the bill when presented for acceptance.

Can the holder sue the acceptor directly under this section?

Yes, the holder can sue the acceptor directly as if the acceptor were the drawer of the bill.

Does Section 35 impose any criminal penalties?

No, Section 35 provides civil remedies only. There are no criminal penalties for dishonour by non-acceptance under this section.

When does Section 35 apply in the bill of exchange process?

It applies when the bill is presented for acceptance and the acceptor refuses or neglects to accept within the prescribed time.

Related Sections

In India, buying radioactive material is strictly regulated and generally illegal without proper licenses and approvals.

IT Act Section 7 addresses the legal recognition of electronic records and their admissibility as evidence in India.

CrPC Section 4 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India, guiding where cases can be tried.

Annulment in India is legal under specific grounds, distinct from divorce, with strict conditions and judicial enforcement.

Income Tax Act Section 115JF details the tax on distributed income by companies under the Dividend Distribution Tax regime.

Understand the legal status of Olympia Trade in India and how regulations affect online trading platforms.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 28 details the powers of Consumer Commissions to summon and enforce attendance of witnesses and production of documents.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 276A prescribes prosecution for failure to comply with tax notices or summons.

IPC Section 103 defines the legal right of private defense of property against wrongful dispossession.

Companies Act 2013 Section 243 governs the appointment and powers of inspectors for company investigations.

CrPC Section 381 details the procedure for the disposal of property seized during investigation or trial.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 245BB details the procedure for recovery of tax deducted at source (TDS) from deductors.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 99 covers the relevancy of facts forming part of the same transaction, crucial for proving connected events in legal cases.

CPC Section 51 empowers courts to order attachment before judgment to secure decree satisfaction.

IPC Section 316 defines culpable homicide by a person causing death of a child under twelve years during childbirth or by an act done with intent to cause miscarriage.

CrPC Section 69 empowers police to intercept messages for investigation with magistrate's approval under lawful conditions.

Lotteries are legal in India only if conducted by state governments under strict rules; private lotteries are illegal nationwide.

Arranged marriage is legal in India with specific laws governing consent, age, and registration.

IPC Section 337 addresses causing hurt by rash or negligent acts, defining liability for injuries without intent.

Companies Act 2013 Section 445 details the punishment for fraud committed by companies or their officers.

Contract Act 1872 Section 24 defines agreements void due to coercion, affecting contract validity and free consent.

In India, certain drugs are legal for medical use under strict regulations and prescriptions.

IPC Section 253 penalizes public servants who intentionally cause injury to public property during official duties.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 62 explains the liability of parties for payment of negotiable instruments and their obligations.

Parkour is legal in India with no specific laws banning it, but safety and public space rules apply.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 107 covering appeals to Appellate Authority under CGST Act.

CrPC Section 53 details the medical examination of arrested persons to ensure their health and legal protection.

bottom of page