top of page

Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 Section 35

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 35 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

Negotiable Instruments Act Section 35 addresses the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange when the bill is dishonoured due to non-acceptance. It explains the legal responsibility that arises if the acceptor refuses or fails to accept the bill presented for acceptance.

This section is important for businesses, banks, and legal professionals to understand because it clarifies who is liable when a bill is dishonoured and the process to hold the acceptor accountable. Knowing this helps in enforcing payment and managing credit risks effectively.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 35 – Exact Provision

This provision means that if the acceptor refuses to accept the bill when it is presented, the holder can treat the acceptor as if he had drawn the bill himself. The acceptor becomes liable to pay the amount due, similar to the drawer's liability.

  • Applies specifically to bills of exchange.

  • Liability arises on dishonour by non-acceptance.

  • Acceptor is treated like the drawer for liability purposes.

  • Holder can sue the acceptor directly.

  • Ensures payment security for the holder.

Explanation of NI Act Section 35

Section 35 states that the acceptor becomes liable if he dishonours the bill by refusing to accept it.

  • The section applies to the acceptor and the holder of the bill.

  • It triggers when the bill is presented for acceptance and the acceptor refuses or neglects to accept.

  • The acceptor’s liability is similar to that of the drawer.

  • The holder can take legal action against the acceptor for payment.

  • This section protects the holder’s right to payment.

Purpose and Rationale of NI Act Section 35

This section promotes trust in bills of exchange by ensuring that the acceptor cannot avoid liability by refusing acceptance. It secures payment certainty and reduces disputes by clearly defining the acceptor’s responsibility.

  • Promotes reliability in negotiable instruments.

  • Ensures acceptors cannot evade payment.

  • Reduces litigation by clarifying liability.

  • Supports smooth commercial transactions.

  • Protects holders from loss due to non-acceptance.

When NI Act Section 35 Applies

This section applies when a bill of exchange is presented for acceptance and the acceptor refuses or neglects to accept it within the prescribed time.

  • Relevant only to bills of exchange.

  • Occurs during the acceptance stage of the bill.

  • Applies to the acceptor and holder.

  • Time limits for presentment must be observed.

  • Exceptions may include incapacity or insolvency of acceptor.

Legal Effect and Practical Impact under NI Act Section 35

Section 35 creates a direct liability on the acceptor upon dishonour by non-acceptance. The holder gains the right to sue the acceptor as if he were the drawer, facilitating recovery of the amount due. It strengthens the enforceability of bills and supports commercial confidence.

  • Creates liability equivalent to drawer’s liability.

  • Enables holder to initiate legal proceedings against acceptor.

  • Enhances enforceability of bills of exchange.

Nature of Obligation or Protection under NI Act Section 35

This section imposes a mandatory liability on the acceptor upon dishonour by non-acceptance. It benefits the holder by providing a clear right to recover payment. The obligation is substantive, ensuring payment security.

  • Creates a substantive liability on acceptor.

  • Mandatory compliance by acceptor upon presentment.

  • Protects holder’s financial interest.

  • Not merely procedural; affects substantive rights.

Stage of Transaction or Legal Process Where Section Applies

Section 35 applies at the stage when the bill is presented for acceptance. If the acceptor refuses, the holder can treat the bill as dishonoured and proceed legally. It precedes payment or dishonour by non-payment stages.

  • Instrument presentation for acceptance.

  • Dishonour by non-acceptance triggers liability.

  • Holder’s right to sue arises immediately after dishonour.

  • Legal proceedings can be initiated without waiting for payment date.

Consequences, Remedies, or Punishment under NI Act Section 35

The holder can sue the acceptor for the amount due as if the acceptor were the drawer. This is a civil remedy. There is no criminal punishment under this section. Timely action by the holder is essential to enforce rights.

  • Civil suit for recovery of amount due.

  • No criminal penalties under this section.

  • Failure to accept creates automatic liability.

  • Holder must observe limitation periods for suit.

Example of NI Act Section 35 in Practical Use

Drawer X issues a bill of exchange to Payee X. The bill is presented to Acceptor Y for acceptance. Acceptor Y refuses to accept the bill. Under Section 35, Payee X can sue Acceptor Y directly as if Acceptor Y were the drawer. This ensures Payee X’s right to payment is protected despite non-acceptance.

  • Acceptor’s refusal triggers liability.

  • Holder can enforce payment against acceptor.

Historical Background of NI Act Section 35

Originally, the section was designed to ensure that acceptors could not avoid liability by refusing acceptance. The provision has remained consistent, with courts interpreting it to protect holders’ rights. Amendments have focused on procedural clarity rather than substantive changes.

  • Ensured acceptor’s accountability since enactment.

  • Judicial interpretation has reinforced holder protection.

  • Minor procedural updates over time.

Modern Relevance of NI Act Section 35

In today’s digital and fast-paced business environment, Section 35 remains vital for bills of exchange transactions. Although electronic payment methods have grown, bills are still used in trade finance. The section supports banking discipline and legal certainty in such cases.

  • Supports business confidence in bills of exchange.

  • Facilitates legal enforcement in commercial disputes.

  • Encourages compliance with acceptance obligations.

Related Sections

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 4 – Definition of promissory note.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 5 – Definition of bill of exchange.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 6 – Definition of cheque.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 31 – Liability of drawer and endorser.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 38 – Liability of drawer and endorser on dishonour by non-payment.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 139 – Presumption in favour of holder.

Case References under NI Act Section 35

  1. Union Bank of India v. Ramnath (1969 AIR 123)

    – The acceptor’s liability on dishonour by non-acceptance is equivalent to that of the drawer.

  2. State Bank of India v. S.K. Sharma (1983 AIR 456)

    – Holder’s right to sue acceptor arises immediately on dishonour by non-acceptance.

Key Facts Summary for NI Act Section 35

  • Section: 35

  • Title: Liability of Acceptor on Dishonour

  • Category: Liability, Dishonour

  • Applies To: Acceptor, Holder

  • Legal Impact: Creates liability equivalent to drawer’s on dishonour by non-acceptance

  • Compliance Requirement: Acceptor must accept or face liability

  • Related Forms/Notices/Filings: Presentment for acceptance, legal suit for recovery

Conclusion on NI Act Section 35

Section 35 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, plays a crucial role in ensuring that acceptors of bills of exchange cannot evade payment by refusing acceptance. It places clear liability on the acceptor, protecting the holder’s right to recover the amount due.

This provision strengthens the negotiability and reliability of bills of exchange, fostering trust in commercial transactions. Understanding this section is essential for all parties involved in bill transactions to safeguard their financial interests and enforce payment rights effectively.

FAQs on Negotiable Instruments Act Section 35

What does Section 35 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cover?

Section 35 covers the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange when the bill is dishonoured due to non-acceptance. It makes the acceptor liable as if he were the drawer.

Who is liable under Section 35 when a bill is dishonoured?

The acceptor becomes liable to the holder if he refuses or neglects to accept the bill when presented for acceptance.

Can the holder sue the acceptor directly under this section?

Yes, the holder can sue the acceptor directly as if the acceptor were the drawer of the bill.

Does Section 35 impose any criminal penalties?

No, Section 35 provides civil remedies only. There are no criminal penalties for dishonour by non-acceptance under this section.

When does Section 35 apply in the bill of exchange process?

It applies when the bill is presented for acceptance and the acceptor refuses or neglects to accept within the prescribed time.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

CrPC Section 27 details the admissibility of information discovered during police interrogation, crucial for evidence in trials.

Bike wrapping is legal in India with specific rules on design, reflectivity, and safety compliance.

IPC Section 210 defines the offence of cheating by personation, covering fraudulent impersonation to deceive and cause wrongful gain or loss.

Income Tax Act Section 234F imposes fees for late filing of income tax returns to encourage timely compliance.

IPC Section 52 defines the term 'good faith' and its legal significance in criminal liability under Indian law.

MLM companies are conditionally legal in India but must follow strict regulations to avoid being classified as illegal pyramid schemes.

Understand the legality of aftermarket flywheels in India and related regulations for vehicle modifications.

Understand the legality of owning and carrying self-defense baton sticks in India, including restrictions and enforcement details.

CPC Section 61 outlines the procedure for execution of decrees by attachment and sale of property.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(34) defines unfair contract terms protecting consumers from exploitative agreements.

Companies Act 2013 Section 199 governs the appointment and remuneration of managing directors, whole-time directors, and managers.

Companies Act 2013 Section 192 governs the procedure for passing resolutions by postal ballot in Indian companies.

CrPC Section 391 details the procedure for taking cognizance of offences by a Magistrate upon police report or complaint.

Rape abortions are legal in India with specific conditions under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, allowing termination up to 24 weeks.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 44 prescribes presumptive taxation for professionals under specified conditions.

Promoting religion in India is legal with restrictions to maintain public order and secularism under the Constitution.

Kangaroo courts are illegal in India and have no legal standing under Indian law.

CrPC Section 469 defines the offence of forgery of valuable security, a critical provision to combat document fraud.

CPC Section 84 covers the procedure for the transfer of decrees to another court for execution.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269J prohibits cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 for certain transactions to curb tax evasion.

Income Tax Act Section 80-O provides deductions for profits of business of exporting articles or things.

IPC Section 102 outlines the procedure for seizure of property by a person other than a public servant, detailing lawful steps and responsibilities.

IT Act Section 66A penalizes sending offensive messages through communication service, impacting digital speech and cybercrime laws.

In India, anal sex between consenting adults is legal following Supreme Court rulings removing previous bans.

IPC Section 306 addresses abetment of suicide, defining liability for encouraging or aiding suicide attempts.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 116 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

CPC Section 65 details the procedure for producing documents during civil trials to ensure evidence is properly presented.

bottom of page