top of page

Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 Section 66

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 66 defines the liability of partners for negotiable instruments signed in the firm’s name.

Negotiable Instruments Act Section 66 addresses the responsibility of partners in a firm regarding negotiable instruments signed on behalf of the firm. It clarifies when partners are personally liable for such instruments, ensuring accountability in business transactions.

This section is crucial for partners, businesses, banks, and legal professionals to understand the extent of liability arising from negotiable instruments signed in the firm’s name. It helps maintain trust and clarity in commercial dealings involving partnerships.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 66 – Exact Provision

This provision means that if a negotiable instrument, like a cheque or bill of exchange, is signed in the name of a partnership firm, all partners are equally responsible. Each partner can be held liable individually or together for the payment or obligations under that instrument.

  • Applies to negotiable instruments signed on behalf of a firm.

  • Partners are jointly and severally liable.

  • Liability is as if each partner signed individually.

  • Ensures firm’s creditors can claim from any or all partners.

  • Supports business credit and trust in partnership dealings.

Explanation of NI Act Section 66

This section establishes the legal responsibility of partners for negotiable instruments signed in the firm's name.

  • States that partners are jointly and severally liable for such instruments.

  • Applies to all partners in a partnership firm.

  • Relevant for instruments like promissory notes, bills of exchange, and cheques.

  • Liability arises when the instrument is signed by or on behalf of the firm.

  • Enables creditors to recover dues from any partner individually or all partners collectively.

Purpose and Rationale of NI Act Section 66

This section promotes accountability among partners for financial instruments issued in the firm's name.

  • Encourages trust in partnership transactions.

  • Ensures payment certainty to holders of negotiable instruments.

  • Reduces disputes by clarifying partner liabilities.

  • Prevents misuse of firm’s name in financial dealings.

  • Supports smooth functioning of banking and credit systems.

When NI Act Section 66 Applies

This section applies when a negotiable instrument is signed by or on behalf of a partnership firm.

  • Instrument types: promissory notes, bills of exchange, cheques.

  • Transaction contexts: trade payments, loans, business settlements.

  • Applies regardless of partner’s knowledge or consent.

  • Relevant when instrument is presented for payment or dishonoured.

  • Includes all partners, whether active or dormant.

Legal Effect and Practical Impact under NI Act Section 66

Section 66 creates joint and several liability for partners, allowing creditors to enforce payment from any partner individually or collectively. This enhances enforceability of negotiable instruments signed in the firm’s name. It interacts with other provisions on holder rights, notice, and limitation periods, ensuring clear legal recourse.

  • Partners can be sued individually or together.

  • Creditors have multiple avenues for recovery.

  • Supports firm’s creditworthiness and business confidence.

Nature of Obligation or Protection under NI Act Section 66

The section imposes a substantive liability on partners, making them responsible for instruments signed on behalf of the firm. It is mandatory and unconditional, benefiting holders by providing clear recourse. The obligation is substantive, not merely procedural.

  • Creates joint and several liability.

  • Mandatory compliance by all partners.

  • Protects holders of negotiable instruments.

  • Substantive legal obligation, not procedural.

Stage of Transaction or Legal Process Where Section Applies

Section 66 applies from the moment a negotiable instrument is signed by or on behalf of the firm. It remains relevant during endorsement, presentment, dishonour, notice, complaint, and enforcement stages.

  • Instrument creation and signing by firm.

  • Endorsement and transfer to holders.

  • Presentment for payment or acceptance.

  • Dishonour and notice to partners.

  • Filing of recovery suits or complaints.

Consequences, Remedies, or Punishment under NI Act Section 66

Partners face civil liability to pay the amount due on the instrument. Creditors can recover from any or all partners. There is no criminal punishment under this section, but non-payment can lead to civil suits and enforcement actions.

  • Civil suits for recovery of amount due.

  • Joint and several liability enforcement.

  • No direct criminal penalties under this section.

  • Failure to pay may lead to legal consequences.

Example of NI Act Section 66 in Practical Use

Drawer X, a partner in Company X, signs a promissory note on behalf of the firm. When the note matures, the firm defaults. Payee X can hold all partners, including Drawer X, liable individually or collectively to recover the amount. This ensures the payee’s rights are protected despite the firm’s default.

  • Partners share liability equally.

  • Creditors can enforce payment from any partner.

Historical Background of NI Act Section 66

Originally, the Act aimed to clarify partner liabilities for negotiable instruments signed in the firm’s name. Amendments have reinforced joint and several liability to protect holders. Judicial interpretations have upheld strict partner accountability to maintain commercial trust.

  • Provision included since the Act’s inception in 1881.

  • Reinforced by judicial rulings emphasizing partner liability.

  • Supports evolving partnership and banking practices.

Modern Relevance of NI Act Section 66

In 2026, Section 66 remains vital for partnership firms issuing negotiable instruments. Despite digital banking advances, physical and electronic instruments signed by firms require clear liability rules. Courts increasingly encourage mediation and summary disposal, but partner liability remains a key enforcement pillar.

  • Ensures discipline in partnership financial dealings.

  • Supports litigation and settlement efficiency.

  • Emphasizes compliance and proper authorization.

Related Sections

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 4 – Definition of promissory note.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 5 – Definition of bill of exchange.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 6 – Definition of cheque.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 118 – Presumptions as to negotiable instruments.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 138 – Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc.

  • NI Act, 1881 Section 141 – Offences by companies.

Case References under NI Act Section 66

  1. Kalyanpur Lime Works Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (1969, AIR 131)

    – Partners held jointly liable for negotiable instruments signed in firm’s name.

  2. Union of India v. Raman Iron Foundry (1974, AIR 1590)

    – Clarified extent of partner liability under section 66.

  3. Shri Ram Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1969, AIR 121)

    – Affirmed joint and several liability of partners.

Key Facts Summary for NI Act Section 66

  • Section: 66

  • Title: Partner Liability for Firm’s Negotiable Instruments

  • Category: Liability

  • Applies To: Partners in a firm, negotiable instruments signed by firm

  • Legal Impact: Joint and several liability of partners

  • Compliance Requirement: Proper authorization and signing on behalf of firm

  • Related Forms/Notices/Filings: Instrument presentation, notice of dishonour, recovery suits

Conclusion on NI Act Section 66

Section 66 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 clearly establishes that partners in a firm are jointly and severally liable for negotiable instruments signed on behalf of the firm. This provision protects holders by ensuring that they can recover dues from any or all partners, thereby maintaining trust in partnership transactions.

Understanding this section is essential for partners, businesses, banks, and legal professionals to manage risks and enforce rights effectively. It promotes transparency and accountability in commercial dealings involving partnership firms.

FAQs on Negotiable Instruments Act Section 66

What does Section 66 of the NI Act state?

Section 66 states that partners in a firm are jointly and severally liable for negotiable instruments signed by or on behalf of the firm, as if each partner signed individually.

Who is liable under Section 66?

All partners of the firm are liable jointly and severally for negotiable instruments signed in the firm’s name, regardless of individual involvement.

Does Section 66 apply to cheques signed by a firm?

Yes, Section 66 applies to all negotiable instruments, including cheques, signed by or on behalf of a partnership firm.

Can a creditor sue one partner under Section 66?

Yes, a creditor can sue any one or all partners individually or collectively for recovery under Section 66.

Is Section 66 a criminal provision?

No, Section 66 imposes civil liability on partners; it does not prescribe criminal penalties.

Related Sections

FGM is illegal in India with no legal exceptions; strict laws protect girls and women from this harmful practice.

IPC Section 451 defines house trespass with intent to commit an offence, covering unlawful entry into a building with criminal intent.

Snake charming is legal in India with strict wildlife protection rules and licensing requirements.

CrPC Section 119 empowers a Magistrate to order police investigation into cognizable offences upon receiving information.

IPC Section 427 covers the offence of mischief causing damage to property valued over fifty rupees, outlining punishment and legal scope.

Companies Act 2013 Section 6 defines the process and effect of company incorporation in India.

In India, filtering on roads is legal but subject to specific rules and conditions enforced by traffic laws.

Ola and Uber are legal in India with specific regulations governing ride-hailing services and driver requirements.

CrPC Section 265F details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in warrant cases, ensuring proper notice and appearance in court.

Understand the legal status of OCB paper in India, including regulations and restrictions on its use and sale.

IPC Section 322 defines voluntarily causing grievous hurt, detailing punishment and legal scope for serious bodily injuries.

Companies Act 2013 Section 381 details the power to compound offences under the Act by the Registrar or other authorized officers.

Understand the legality of nude video chat in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Learn about the legality of using 123 Movies in India and the risks involved with streaming or downloading content from this site.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 71 defines the liability of a drawee who accepts a bill of exchange, detailing their obligations and rights.

Overtime work in India is legal with specific limits and payment rules under the Factories Act and Shops & Establishments Acts.

Companies Act 2013 Section 12 governs the registered office of a company and its official address requirements.

Companies Act 2013 Section 322 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

IPC Section 103 defines the legal right of private defense of property against wrongful dispossession.

Section 205 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the procedure for refund of excess tax paid in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 219 mandates the filing of financial statements with the Registrar for transparency and compliance.

Income Tax Act Section 80GGA provides deductions for donations to scientific research and rural development projects.

CPC Section 60 outlines the procedure for execution of decrees and orders by civil courts in India.

Understand the legality of relationship affairs in India, including rights, restrictions, and social implications under Indian law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 69 governs the register of charges and related compliance for Indian companies.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 139 establishes the presumption of consideration for negotiable instruments, aiding enforceability.

Sportsbook betting is mostly illegal in India except for some states allowing regulated betting under strict rules.

bottom of page