Indian Law

Evidence Act 1872 Section 78 empowers courts to exclude evidence if its probative value is outweighed by undue delay, confusion, or waste of time.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 79 defines the expert witness rule, allowing opinion evidence from qualified experts to assist courts in technical matters.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 80 presumes due care and caution in acts done by public servants in official duties.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 81 covers admissions made by persons who cannot be called as witnesses, crucial for proving facts in their absence.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 82 covers the admissibility of confessions caused by inducement, threat, or promise, protecting against involuntary statements.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 83 defines the presumption of death when a person has been missing for seven years, aiding proof in civil and criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 84 defines the presumption of death after seven years of absence, aiding proof in civil and criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 85 presumes ownership of possession, aiding proof of title unless disproved by evidence.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 85A deals with presumption of electronic records' authenticity, crucial for admitting digital evidence in court.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 85B deals with presumption of electronic records' authenticity, crucial for digital evidence admissibility in courts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 85C covers the presumption of electronic records' authenticity, crucial for digital evidence admissibility in courts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 86 deals with the relevancy of entries in public records made by public servants in the discharge of official duty.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 87 explains when acts causing death are presumed to be intended, crucial for proving intent in criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 88 protects official communications from being disclosed without authority, ensuring confidentiality in public service.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 88A governs the admissibility of electronic records as evidence in Indian courts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 89 allows courts to presume the existence of certain facts based on official records, aiding proof in civil and criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 90 addresses admissions by persons whose position or relationship makes their statements relevant in legal proceedings.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 90A defines the presumption of genuineness for electronic records, crucial for digital evidence admissibility.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 91 explains when facts not otherwise relevant become relevant to explain or rebut other facts.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 92 protects privileged communications between legal advisors and clients from disclosure in court.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 93 governs the exclusion of evidence obtained illegally or unfairly, ensuring justice and fairness in trials.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 94 empowers courts to ask questions or order production of evidence to discover truth and ensure justice.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 95 explains the rule of estoppel, preventing parties from denying facts they previously accepted or represented.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 96 covers the exclusion of evidence obtained illegally or unfairly, ensuring justice by barring such evidence in trials.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 97 addresses the exclusion of evidence obtained by illegal means, ensuring fairness in legal proceedings.

Evidence Act Section 98 deals with the relevancy of facts showing the existence of any state of mind, such as intention, knowledge, or belief.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 99 covers the relevancy of facts forming part of the same transaction, crucial for proving connected events in legal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 100 defines the exclusion of evidence obtained by illegal means, ensuring fairness in trials.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 101 defines the burden of proof, specifying who must prove a fact in civil and criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 102 explains the burden of proof lies on the person who asserts a fact, crucial for civil and criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 103 covers the presumption of possession of stolen goods, crucial for proving theft-related offenses.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 104 explains the burden of proof for facts that need to be proved by the party relying on them.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 105 explains the burden of proof for possession of stolen property, shifting it to the accused under specific conditions.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 106 deals with the burden of proving facts especially when a party relies on a fact to prove their case.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 107 covers the burden of proving possession when ownership is disputed, crucial in property and criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 108 covers the burden of proof when a person is in possession of stolen property, presuming guilt unless explained.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 109 explains the burden of proving possession of stolen property by the accused in criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 110 presumes the legitimacy of a child born during marriage, crucial for establishing parentage in civil and criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 111 addresses the presumption of ownership when possession is proved, aiding proof in civil and criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 111A addresses presumption of death when a person has been missing for seven years, aiding legal clarity in civil and criminal matters.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 112 presumes legitimacy of a child born during wedlock, crucial for family and criminal law proof.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 113 presumes culpable homicide if a person causes death by rash or negligent act, shifting burden to the accused.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 113A presumes sexual intercourse when a man is found in possession of a woman's private parts under specific conditions.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 113B presumes sexual intercourse between accused and victim when accused is in custody, aiding proof in sexual offense cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 114 empowers courts to presume certain facts based on common experience and logical inference.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 114A presumes electronic records as genuine, aiding proof of authenticity in digital evidence cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 115 explains the presumption of fact when a person is found in possession of stolen property shortly after theft.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 116 explains the presumption against persons who destroy evidence, aiding courts in inferring guilt or liability.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 117 covers admissions by party-opponents, allowing statements against interest as evidence in civil and criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 118 defines the proof of documents, detailing how primary and secondary evidence are admissible in court.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 119 defines the presumption of ownership when possession of property is proved.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 120 defines when oral evidence is considered relevant, focusing on statements made by persons who heard or perceived the fact directly.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 121 defines when oral admissions are relevant, detailing their use in proving facts in civil and criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 122 defines the term 'confession' and its significance in criminal trials.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 123 defines when oral admissions are relevant, impacting proof and credibility in civil and criminal cases.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 124 defines the admissibility of oral evidence, emphasizing that oral evidence must be direct and relevant to the facts in issue.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 125 defines the admissibility of confessions made to police officers, protecting against coerced evidence.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 126 protects communications between legal advisers and clients, ensuring confidentiality in legal proceedings.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 127 governs the admissibility of confessions made to police officers, ensuring protection against coerced evidence.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 128 defines the proof required to establish a fact, crucial for determining admissibility and relevance in trials.