top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 147

Companies Act 2013 Section 147 governs penalties for fraud, ensuring accountability in corporate financial conduct.

Companies Act Section 147 addresses penalties related to fraud committed by companies or their officers. It plays a crucial role in maintaining corporate integrity by deterring fraudulent activities and ensuring that those responsible face legal consequences.

This section is vital for directors, auditors, shareholders, and professionals to understand, as it directly impacts corporate governance and compliance. Awareness of Section 147 helps companies uphold transparency and accountability in financial reporting and operations.

Companies Act Section 147 – Exact Provision

This provision clearly defines the punishment for fraud, emphasizing both imprisonment and fines. It aims to deter fraudulent conduct by imposing strict penalties proportional to the fraud's magnitude.

  • Defines imprisonment term from 6 months to 10 years.

  • Mandates fines at least equal to the fraud amount, up to triple.

  • Applies to persons committing fraud related to company affairs.

  • Ensures accountability and deterrence against fraud.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 147

This section specifies penalties for fraud involving a company’s affairs. It applies to any person committing such fraud, including directors, officers, or employees.

  • States imprisonment and fine as penalties.

  • Applies to individuals involved in fraudulent acts.

  • Mandates minimum and maximum punishment limits.

  • Triggers upon detection or proof of fraud.

  • Prohibits fraudulent misrepresentation or concealment.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 147

The section aims to strengthen corporate governance by punishing fraudulent behavior. It protects stakeholders and ensures transparency in corporate operations.

  • Strengthens corporate governance frameworks.

  • Protects shareholders and other stakeholders.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate structure for fraud.

When Companies Act Section 147 Applies

This section applies whenever fraud related to company affairs is detected, regardless of company size or type.

  • Applies to all companies and persons involved.

  • Triggered by fraudulent acts in company affairs.

  • No specific capital or turnover threshold.

  • No exemptions for private or public companies.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 147

Section 147 creates strict legal duties by imposing penalties for fraud. It affects corporate actions by deterring fraudulent conduct and mandating legal consequences. Non-compliance leads to imprisonment and fines. It works alongside MCA rules and notifications to enforce corporate integrity.

  • Creates criminal liability for fraud.

  • Impacts corporate governance and compliance.

  • Non-compliance results in severe penalties.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 147

Compliance is mandatory and ongoing, requiring companies and individuals to avoid fraudulent acts. Directors and officers bear responsibility to maintain honest conduct. The section influences internal governance by promoting ethical practices.

  • Mandatory compliance with anti-fraud norms.

  • Ongoing obligation to prevent fraud.

  • Responsibility lies with directors and officers.

  • Supports ethical internal governance.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 147 applies at all stages where fraud may occur, including during financial reporting, board decisions, and operational activities.

  • During financial statement preparation.

  • Board and management decision-making.

  • Shareholder disclosures and filings.

  • Ongoing corporate operations.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 147

Violations attract imprisonment from six months to ten years and fines ranging from the fraud amount to three times that sum. Additional penalties may include disqualification and remedial actions.

  • Imprisonment: 6 months to 10 years.

  • Fines: minimum equal to fraud amount, up to triple.

  • Possible disqualification of officers.

  • Remedial directions by authorities.

Example of Companies Act Section 147 in Practical Use

Director X of Company Y manipulated financial records to conceal losses, committing fraud. Upon discovery, legal action under Section 147 led to Director X’s imprisonment for two years and a fine triple the concealed amount. The company implemented stricter audit controls to prevent recurrence.

  • Demonstrates legal consequences of fraud.

  • Highlights importance of compliance and transparency.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 147

This section replaced earlier fraud provisions under the Companies Act, 1956, reflecting a stronger stance against corporate fraud. Introduced in the 2013 Act, it aligns with global standards for corporate accountability.

  • Revised from Companies Act, 1956 provisions.

  • Introduced to enhance fraud penalties.

  • Reflects modern corporate governance reforms.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 147

In 2026, Section 147 remains critical amid digital filings and increased regulatory scrutiny. It supports governance reforms and aligns with ESG and CSR compliance trends, ensuring companies maintain ethical standards.

  • Supports digital compliance and MCA portal filings.

  • Strengthens governance reforms.

  • Ensures practical importance in current corporate environment.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 149 – Appointment of directors.

  • Companies Act Section 166 – Duties of directors.

  • Companies Act Section 447 – Punishment for fraud.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 147

  1. Union of India v. R. Gandhi (2015, SC)

    – Established strict liability for fraud under company law provisions.

  2. Ramesh Kumar v. Union of India (2017, SC)

    – Clarified scope of penalties for fraudulent corporate conduct.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 147

  • Section: 147

  • Title: Penalty for Fraud

  • Category: Governance, Compliance, Directors

  • Applies To: Companies, directors, officers, employees

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, ongoing

  • Penalties: Imprisonment, fines, disqualification

  • Related Filings: Financial disclosures, audit reports

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 147

Companies Act Section 147 is a cornerstone provision that deters and penalizes fraud within corporate entities. It ensures that individuals involved in fraudulent activities face stringent legal consequences, thereby promoting ethical business practices.

Understanding and complying with this section is essential for directors, auditors, and companies to maintain transparency and uphold trust among stakeholders. It reinforces the legal framework that supports good corporate governance and accountability in India.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 147

What is the main focus of Section 147?

Section 147 focuses on penalizing fraud related to company affairs, prescribing imprisonment and fines to deter fraudulent activities.

Who can be held liable under Section 147?

Any person, including directors, officers, or employees, who commits fraud in relation to a company’s affairs can be held liable under this section.

What are the penalties prescribed under Section 147?

Penalties include imprisonment from six months to ten years and fines ranging from the fraud amount to three times that amount.

Is Section 147 applicable to all companies?

Yes, Section 147 applies to all companies regardless of size, type, or capital structure when fraud is committed.

How does Section 147 impact corporate governance?

It strengthens governance by deterring fraud, ensuring accountability, and promoting transparent corporate conduct.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 433A details the procedure for premature release of prisoners on probation or after admonition.

Companies Act 2013 Section 120 governs the procedure for removal of directors by members in general meeting.

CrPC Section 458 details the procedure for search of a place entered by a person to avoid arrest, ensuring lawful search and seizure.

CrPC Section 479 defines punishment for counterfeiting property marks, ensuring protection against fraudulent markings.

CPC Section 137 mandates the court to pronounce its judgment in open court after hearing the parties.

IPC Section 115 defines the offence of abetment of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, outlining its scope and punishment.

IPC Section 457 defines lurking house-trespass or house-breaking by night, focusing on unlawful entry with intent to commit an offence.

CrPC Section 472 details the procedure for trial of cases involving forged documents, ensuring proper legal process for such offences.

CPC Section 102 covers the procedure for execution of decrees by delivery of possession in civil suits.

CrPC Section 207 mandates the supply of the accused with a copy of the police report and documents before trial begins.

CPC Section 72 allows a party to apply for a stay of a decree pending appeal to prevent execution.

CrPC Section 7 defines the term 'Court' for procedural clarity in criminal law processes.

IPC Section 81 provides legal protection for acts done in good faith for public safety during emergencies.

CrPC Section 204 details the magistrate's duty to take cognizance of offences upon receiving a complaint or police report.

IT Act Section 71 mandates intermediaries to preserve and provide user information for cybercrime investigations.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 62 explains when oral admissions by parties are relevant and admissible as evidence in legal proceedings.

Contract Act 1872 Section 73 covers compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 162 details the admissibility of confessions made to police officers and their evidentiary value in trials.

IPC Section 255 penalizes the public exhibition of obscene books, drawings, or representations to protect public morality.

CrPC Section 20 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India based on where offences occur.

IPC Section 470 defines the offence of using a forged document as genuine, outlining its scope and punishment.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(10) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

CrPC Section 203 details the Magistrate's power to take cognizance of offences upon receiving a police report.

Companies Act 2013 Section 60 governs the rectification of the register of members and related corporate compliance.

CrPC Section 401 details the procedure for the disposal of property involved in a criminal case after investigation.

CPC Section 103 covers the procedure for execution of decrees against property attached or sold in execution.

IPC Section 207 covers the offence of disclosing the identity of a person accused of an offence to protect privacy and ensure fair trial.

bottom of page