top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 195

Companies Act 2013 Section 195 governs payments to non-residents and foreign companies, ensuring compliance with RBI and tax regulations.

Companies Act Section 195 regulates payments made by Indian companies to non-residents or foreign companies. It ensures that such transactions comply with Indian laws, including tax and foreign exchange regulations. This section is crucial for corporate governance and cross-border financial dealings.

Understanding Section 195 is essential for directors, finance officers, shareholders, and legal professionals. It helps prevent legal complications and penalties related to foreign remittances and tax withholding obligations, promoting transparency and lawful corporate conduct.

Companies Act Section 195 – Exact Provision

This provision mandates tax deduction at source on payments to non-residents. It aligns with the Income-tax Act, ensuring that companies deduct appropriate taxes before remitting funds abroad. This protects Indian revenue and enforces compliance with tax laws.

  • Mandates tax deduction at source on payments to non-residents.

  • Applies to interest, dividends, royalties, fees, and other sums.

  • Ensures compliance with Income-tax Act provisions.

  • Prevents tax evasion through foreign remittances.

  • Requires proper documentation and reporting.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 195

This section requires companies to deduct tax before paying non-residents any income chargeable under Indian tax laws.

  • Applies to companies, directors, and authorized personnel making payments to non-residents.

  • Mandatory deduction of tax at source (TDS) on specified payments.

  • Triggered when payment or credit is made to a non-resident.

  • Permits remittance only after TDS deduction and compliance.

  • Prohibits payments without proper tax deduction and documentation.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 195

The section strengthens corporate governance by ensuring tax compliance on foreign payments.

  • Protects Indian tax revenue from leakage.

  • Promotes transparency in cross-border transactions.

  • Ensures accountability of companies in foreign remittances.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate payments to evade taxes.

When Companies Act Section 195 Applies

This section applies whenever an Indian company makes payments to non-residents that are taxable under Indian law.

  • Applies to all companies making payments to foreign entities or individuals.

  • Triggered on payments like interest, dividends, royalties, fees.

  • Relevant at payment or credit time.

  • Exceptions may apply under tax treaties or specific RBI approvals.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 195

Section 195 creates a legal duty for companies to deduct tax at source on payments to non-residents. It restricts companies from making payments without fulfilling tax obligations. Non-compliance can lead to penalties, interest, and legal action. The provision works alongside Income-tax Act rules and RBI regulations to regulate foreign payments.

  • Creates mandatory TDS obligation on foreign payments.

  • Impacts timing and legality of cross-border remittances.

  • Non-compliance results in penalties and interest.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 195

Compliance is mandatory and ongoing whenever payments to non-residents occur. Directors and finance officers are responsible for ensuring correct tax deduction and documentation. This obligation affects internal governance and financial controls within companies.

  • Mandatory tax deduction at source on relevant payments.

  • Ongoing obligation for each foreign payment.

  • Responsibility lies with company and authorized personnel.

  • Requires coordination with tax and legal departments.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 195 applies primarily at the payment or credit stage of foreign transactions. It also impacts accounting, reporting, and compliance stages.

  • During approval of foreign payment or contract.

  • At the time of crediting or paying the non-resident.

  • Filing of TDS returns and disclosures.

  • Ongoing monitoring of foreign transactions.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 195

Failure to comply may result in monetary penalties, interest on unpaid tax, and prosecution under tax laws. Directors may face disqualification or legal action. Additional fees or remedial directions can be imposed by tax authorities.

  • Monetary penalties for non-deduction or late deduction.

  • Interest charged on delayed payments.

  • Possible prosecution for willful default.

  • Disqualification of directors in severe cases.

Example of Companies Act Section 195 in Practical Use

Company X, an Indian IT firm, paid royalties to a foreign software provider. Before remitting, Company X deducted tax at source as per Section 195 and filed TDS returns. This ensured compliance and avoided penalties. Conversely, Director Y failed to deduct tax on foreign consultancy fees, leading to penalties and legal scrutiny.

  • Proper TDS deduction prevents penalties.

  • Non-compliance risks legal and financial consequences.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 195

Section 195 was introduced to align Indian corporate law with tax and foreign exchange regulations. It replaced earlier provisions under the Companies Act, 1956, reflecting the need for stricter control over foreign payments. Amendments have enhanced clarity and enforcement over time.

  • Replaced older provisions from Companies Act, 1956.

  • Introduced to integrate tax and foreign exchange compliance.

  • Amended to clarify scope and penalties.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 195

In 2026, Section 195 remains vital amid increased cross-border trade and digital transactions. MCA portal and e-governance facilitate compliance. The section supports ESG and CSR by ensuring lawful financial dealings and transparency in global operations.

  • Supports digital tax filings and MCA compliance.

  • Enhances governance in foreign remittances.

  • Ensures practical importance in globalized business.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 2 – Definitions relevant to corporate entities.

  • Companies Act Section 179 – Powers of the Board.

  • Companies Act Section 186 – Loans and investments by company.

  • Income-tax Act Section 195 – Tax deduction at source on payments to non-residents.

  • Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) Section 6 – Restrictions on foreign exchange transactions.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 195

  1. Commissioner of Income Tax v. Vodafone India Ltd. (2012, 348 ITR 1)

    – Clarified tax deduction obligations on cross-border payments under Section 195.

  2. Azadi Bachao Andolan v. Union of India (2003, 263 ITR 706)

    – Addressed withholding tax compliance on foreign remittances.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 195

  • Section: 195

  • Title: Payments to Non-Residents and Tax Deduction

  • Category: Compliance, Finance, Taxation

  • Applies To: Companies, Directors, Finance Officers

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory, Ongoing TDS Obligation

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, interest, prosecution, disqualification

  • Related Filings: TDS returns, MCA disclosures

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 195

Companies Act Section 195 plays a critical role in regulating payments to non-residents by mandating tax deduction at source. It ensures that Indian companies comply with tax laws and foreign exchange regulations, protecting government revenue and promoting transparent corporate governance.

Directors and finance professionals must understand and implement this section diligently. Non-compliance can lead to severe penalties and legal consequences. As cross-border transactions grow, Section 195 remains a cornerstone for lawful and accountable corporate financial practices.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 195

What types of payments require tax deduction under Section 195?

Payments such as interest, dividends, royalties, fees for technical services, and other sums payable to non-residents require tax deduction at source under Section 195.

Who is responsible for deducting tax under Section 195?

The person responsible for making the payment to a non-resident, usually the company or its authorized officer, must deduct tax at source before remitting the payment.

Can a company make payments to non-residents without deducting tax?

No, payments chargeable under the Income-tax Act to non-residents must have tax deducted at source as per Section 195 before payment or credit.

What happens if a company fails to comply with Section 195?

Failure to deduct tax can lead to penalties, interest charges, prosecution, and possible disqualification of directors under tax and company laws.

Are there any exemptions or lower TDS rates under Section 195?

Yes, tax treaties between India and other countries may provide exemptions or lower TDS rates. Companies must obtain necessary approvals or certificates to apply these benefits.

Related Sections

IPC Section 274 penalizes the act of adulterating food or drink intended for sale, ensuring public health safety.

IT Act Section 6A mandates electronic signature authentication for secure digital transactions under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

IPC Section 311 empowers courts to summon any person as a witness or for production of document during trial.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 105 outlines the power to make rules for effective implementation of the Act.

IPC Section 116 addresses the offence of voluntarily causing hurt to extort property or valuable security.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 99 covers the relevancy of facts forming part of the same transaction, crucial for proving connected events in legal cases.

Companies Act 2013 Section 192 governs the procedure for passing resolutions by postal ballot in Indian companies.

CPC Section 158 empowers courts to issue commissions for examination of witnesses or documents in civil suits.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(31) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 5 establishes the Central Consumer Protection Authority for safeguarding consumer rights.

Companies Act 2013 Section 200 governs the power to call for information, inspect books, and conduct inquiries by the Registrar.

IPC Section 471 addresses punishment for using a forged document as genuine to deceive others.

IPC Section 179 defines the punishment for public servants who unlawfully disobey lawfully issued government orders.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 18 explains how admissions made by parties are relevant and admissible as evidence in legal proceedings.

CrPC Section 25 prohibits the use of confessions made to police officers as evidence in court to ensure fair trial rights.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 94 empowers courts to ask questions or order production of evidence to discover truth and ensure justice.

CrPC Section 286 defines the offence of negligent conduct with respect to explosive substances and its legal consequences.

IPC Section 389 covers punishment for wrongful confinement with intent to commit an offence or to extort property.

CrPC Section 8 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India, specifying where offences can be tried.

CPC Section 149 defines the power of the court to order the arrest of a judgment-debtor for willful disobedience of its decree.

Companies Act 2013 Section 48 governs the issue and transfer of shares and securities in India.

IT Act Section 31 empowers the Controller to grant or revoke digital signature certificates under the IT Act, 2000.

IPC Section 173 outlines the procedure for police to submit a final report after investigation, detailing findings and recommendations.

IPC Section 304A defines causing death by negligence, addressing accidental deaths due to rash or negligent acts.

IPC Section 157 mandates police officers to register and investigate information about cognizable offences promptly.

CPC Section 145 details the procedure for the arrest of a judgment-debtor in civil suits to enforce decrees.

IPC Section 345 defines wrongful confinement in a place of worship or public religious assembly, protecting religious freedom and public order.

bottom of page