top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 267

Companies Act 2013 Section 267 governs the procedure for removal of auditors before expiry of term.

Companies Act 2013 Section 267 deals with the removal of auditors before the completion of their term. This provision is crucial for maintaining transparency and accountability in corporate governance. It outlines the procedure companies must follow to remove an auditor, ensuring that the auditor’s rights are protected and that the removal is justified and lawful.

Understanding this section is essential for directors, shareholders, auditors, and company secretaries. It helps prevent arbitrary removal of auditors and safeguards the integrity of the audit process, which is vital for investor confidence and regulatory compliance.

Companies Act Section 267 – Exact Provision

This section mandates a formal process for removing auditors early. It requires a special resolution by the shareholders and a chance for the auditor to respond. The company must also inform the Registrar of Companies with reasons for removal, ensuring transparency and regulatory oversight.

  • Removal requires a special resolution in a general meeting.

  • Auditor must be given a reasonable opportunity to be heard.

  • Company must notify Registrar and auditor within 14 days.

  • Statement explaining reasons for removal must be filed.

  • Ensures protection of auditor’s rights and corporate transparency.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 267

This section sets out the legal framework for removing an auditor before their term ends.

  • The company’s shareholders must approve removal by special resolution.

  • Applies to all companies appointing auditors under the Act.

  • Auditors must be given a chance to present their case.

  • Removal triggers filing requirements with the Registrar of Companies.

  • Prevents arbitrary or unjust removal of auditors.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 267

The section aims to balance company control over auditors with auditor protection and transparency.

  • Strengthens corporate governance by regulating auditor removal.

  • Protects shareholders’ interests by requiring special resolution.

  • Ensures auditors can defend themselves before removal.

  • Promotes transparency by mandating disclosures to the Registrar.

When Companies Act Section 267 Applies

This section applies whenever a company seeks to remove its auditor before term expiry.

  • Applicable to all companies registered under the Companies Act 2013.

  • Triggered by board or shareholder decision to remove auditor early.

  • Must comply regardless of company size or type.

  • Exceptions may apply if auditor resigns voluntarily.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 267

This provision creates a mandatory procedure for auditor removal, ensuring due process.

It imposes duties on the company to obtain shareholder approval and notify authorities. Non-compliance can invalidate removal and attract penalties. It also safeguards auditor rights and maintains audit independence. The section interacts with MCA rules on filing and disclosures.

  • Creates a duty for companies to follow a strict removal process.

  • Requires disclosures to Registrar and auditor.

  • Non-compliance may lead to legal challenges or penalties.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 267

Compliance is mandatory and procedural, involving shareholder approval and regulatory filings.

The obligation is typically one-time per removal event but critical for governance. Directors and company secretaries must ensure proper notice and documentation. It impacts internal governance by requiring transparency and fairness in auditor dealings.

  • Mandatory compliance before removing an auditor.

  • One-time obligation per removal event.

  • Responsibility lies with board, shareholders, and company officers.

  • Ensures procedural fairness and transparency.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section applies during the auditor removal process, usually after board recommendation but before shareholder approval.

  • Board decision or proposal to remove auditor.

  • Calling and conducting general meeting for special resolution.

  • Filing required documents post-resolution.

  • Ongoing compliance with Registrar notifications.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 267

Failure to comply with this section can lead to penalties under the Companies Act.

Improper removal may be challenged in court, and companies can face fines. Directors involved in non-compliance may be held accountable. The section ensures that removal is lawful and transparent to protect all stakeholders.

  • Monetary fines for non-compliance.

  • Possible invalidation of auditor removal.

  • Directors may face disqualification or penalties.

  • Additional fees for late or incorrect filings.

Example of Companies Act Section 267 in Practical Use

Company X decided to remove Auditor Y before term expiry due to alleged audit lapses. They called a general meeting and passed a special resolution after giving Auditor Y a chance to respond. Company X filed the resolution and statement with the Registrar within 14 days, complying fully with Section 267.

  • Shows proper procedure protects auditor rights.

  • Ensures company transparency and regulatory compliance.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 267

This provision evolved from the Companies Act, 1956, which had less detailed auditor removal rules. The 2013 Act introduced clearer safeguards to protect auditors and shareholders.

  • Enhanced auditor protection compared to 1956 Act.

  • Introduced special resolution and hearing requirements.

  • Improved transparency with mandatory filings.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 267

In 2026, this section remains vital for audit integrity and corporate governance. Digital filings via MCA portal streamline compliance. It supports ESG and transparency trends by ensuring audit independence.

  • Digital compliance through MCA e-filing.

  • Supports governance reforms and audit quality.

  • Maintains investor confidence in financial reporting.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 139 – Appointment of auditors.

  • Companies Act Section 140 – Removal, resignation, and remuneration of auditors.

  • Companies Act Section 141 – Eligibility and qualifications of auditors.

  • Companies Act Section 143 – Powers and duties of auditors.

  • Companies Act Section 148 – Cost audit.

  • SEBI Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements (LODR) – Auditor related disclosures for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 267

  1. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd. v. SEBI (2003)

    – Emphasized auditor independence and procedural fairness in removal.

  2. ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Official Liquidator (2006)

    – Highlighted importance of shareholder approval in auditor removal.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 267

  • Section:

    267

  • Title:

    Removal of auditors before expiry of term

  • Category:

    Governance, Compliance, Audit

  • Applies To:

    All companies with appointed auditors

  • Compliance Nature:

    Mandatory procedural compliance with special resolution and filings

  • Penalties:

    Monetary fines, invalidation of removal, director penalties

  • Related Filings:

    Special resolution copy, explanatory statement to Registrar and auditor

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 267

Section 267 of the Companies Act 2013 provides a clear and fair procedure for removing auditors before their term ends. It protects auditor rights by requiring a special resolution and an opportunity to be heard. This ensures that auditor removal is not arbitrary and maintains trust in the audit process.

Compliance with this section strengthens corporate governance and promotes transparency. Companies must follow the prescribed steps and notify the Registrar to avoid penalties. Overall, Section 267 balances company control with auditor independence, which is essential for sound corporate management.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 267

Who can initiate the removal of an auditor under Section 267?

The company’s board or shareholders can propose removal, but it must be approved by shareholders through a special resolution in a general meeting.

Is the auditor entitled to be heard before removal?

Yes, the auditor must be given a reasonable opportunity to present their case before the special resolution for removal is passed.

What documents must the company file after removing an auditor?

The company must file a copy of the special resolution and a statement explaining the reasons for removal with the Registrar and send a copy to the auditor within fourteen days.

Can an auditor be removed without shareholder approval?

No, removal before term expiry requires prior approval by a special resolution of the company’s shareholders.

What are the consequences of not complying with Section 267?

Non-compliance can lead to penalties, invalidation of the removal, and possible director disqualification or fines under the Companies Act.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(41) defines 'product liability' and its scope under the Act.

CPC Section 115 governs the power of High Courts to revise lower court orders in civil cases.

Comprehensive guide to Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 101 on power to arrest without warrant.

Sride is not a recognized legal term or item in India; its legality depends on context and specific usage under Indian law.

Killing snakes in India is conditionally legal, regulated by the Wildlife Protection Act with strict protections for many species.

LGBT rights in India are legally recognized with protections and challenges under current laws.

IPC Section 104 defines the offence of abetment of suicide of a child or insane person, outlining liability and punishment.

CrPC Section 265H details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in summons cases under Indian criminal law.

Bitcoin mining in India is legal but faces regulatory uncertainty and practical challenges.

Income Tax Act Section 94B limits interest deduction on debt paid to associated enterprises to curb base erosion.

IPC Section 275 penalizes adulteration of food or drink intended to cause hurt or danger to health.

IPC Section 331 penalizes voluntarily obstructing a public servant from discharging official duties, ensuring lawful authority is respected.

Explore the legality of Jeeva Samadhi in India, its cultural context, and how Indian law views this practice.

CPC Section 119 empowers High Courts to pass orders necessary for ends of justice or to prevent abuse of process.

CPC Section 25 covers the procedure for setting aside ex parte decrees in civil suits.

Hoisting the Indian flag is legal on specific days and under rules; random hoisting any day is restricted by law in India.

IPC Section 491 penalizes knowingly marrying again during the lifetime of a spouse, addressing bigamy and protecting marital fidelity.

Online medical consultation is legal in India with regulations ensuring safe and authorized telemedicine practice.

Companies Act 2013 Section 113 governs the procedure for service of documents to companies and their members.

Mushroom cultivation and use in India are legal with restrictions; psychedelic mushrooms are banned under narcotic laws.

In India, fitting LED headlamps is legal if they meet government standards and are properly installed with approval.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(8) defines 'goods' and their scope under the Act for consumer rights and protections.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 241 deals with rectification of mistakes in income tax orders, ensuring correct tax administration.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 251 covers the procedure for rectification of mistakes in income tax orders and assessments.

NIOS is a legal and recognized education board in India offering flexible learning options for students across the country.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 97 addresses the exclusion of evidence obtained by illegal means, ensuring fairness in legal proceedings.

CrPC Section 213 details the procedure for framing charges by the Magistrate after considering the police report and evidence.

bottom of page