top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 210

Companies Act 2013 Section 210 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

Companies Act 2013 Section 210 deals with the authority of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to provide relief to members or stakeholders in cases of oppression or mismanagement within a company. This section is crucial for protecting the interests of minority shareholders and ensuring fair corporate governance.

Understanding Section 210 is vital for directors, shareholders, legal professionals, and companies to navigate disputes effectively and maintain compliance with corporate laws. It empowers the Tribunal to intervene and order remedies when company affairs are conducted in a prejudicial manner.

Companies Act Section 210 – Exact Provision

This section empowers the Tribunal to intervene in company affairs when oppression or mismanagement is proven. It allows the Tribunal to order various remedies, including share buybacks, regulation of company conduct, modification of agreements, appointment or removal of officers, or even winding up the company. The provision ensures that minority shareholders and the company’s interests are protected against unfair practices.

  • Applies when oppression or mismanagement is established.

  • Tribunal can order share purchase or regulation of affairs.

  • Allows modification or setting aside of unlawful agreements.

  • Enables appointment or removal of directors or officers.

  • Can order winding up or other relief as deemed fit.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 210

Section 210 outlines the Tribunal’s powers to grant relief in cases of oppression or mismanagement affecting a company or its members.

  • States that the Tribunal may act if oppression or prejudicial conduct is proven.

  • Applies to members, directors, officers, and the company itself.

  • Mandates an application under Section 241 to trigger action.

  • Permits various remedies including share purchase, regulation of affairs, and removal of officers.

  • Prohibits continuation of oppressive or prejudicial conduct.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 210

The section aims to strengthen corporate governance by providing a legal mechanism to address unfair practices and protect stakeholders.

  • Protects minority shareholders from oppression.

  • Ensures fair management and accountability.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate powers.

  • Maintains trust in corporate operations.

When Companies Act Section 210 Applies

This section applies when members or stakeholders file an application alleging oppression or mismanagement under Section 241.

  • Applicable to all companies under the Act.

  • Triggered by an application to the Tribunal.

  • Relevant when company affairs are prejudicial or oppressive.

  • No specific financial threshold; depends on facts of the case.

  • Exemptions may apply to certain government companies.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 210

Section 210 creates a statutory duty for the Tribunal to provide appropriate relief in cases of proven oppression or mismanagement. It impacts corporate actions by allowing judicial intervention to correct unfair practices. Non-compliance or continuation of oppression can lead to Tribunal orders including share buybacks or winding up. This section works in conjunction with MCA rules and notifications governing company disputes.

  • Creates binding orders enforceable by law.

  • Enables corrective corporate governance measures.

  • Non-compliance may attract penalties or further legal action.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 210

The obligation under Section 210 is conditional, triggered by an application to the Tribunal. Compliance involves adhering to Tribunal orders which may be ongoing or one-time depending on the relief granted. Directors and officers must cooperate with the Tribunal’s directives, impacting internal governance and corporate conduct.

  • Compliance is mandatory once Tribunal orders are issued.

  • Obligation arises only after an application and Tribunal satisfaction.

  • Directors and officers bear responsibility to implement relief.

  • May require changes in company management or operations.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 210 applies primarily during dispute resolution stages after company incorporation and operational decisions have led to alleged oppression or mismanagement. It may affect board decisions, shareholder rights, and filing stages related to Tribunal proceedings.

  • Post-incorporation dispute stage.

  • Triggered by member or stakeholder application.

  • Impacts board and shareholder decision-making.

  • Involves Tribunal hearings and orders.

  • May lead to changes in company filings or structure.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 210

While Section 210 itself does not prescribe penalties, failure to comply with Tribunal orders can lead to legal consequences including fines, imprisonment for officers under related provisions, or disqualification. The Tribunal’s orders are enforceable and non-compliance may invite additional regulatory action.

  • Enforcement of Tribunal orders is mandatory.

  • Non-compliance may lead to penalties under related sections.

  • Possible disqualification or imprisonment for officers.

  • Additional fees or remedial directions may be imposed.

Example of Companies Act Section 210 in Practical Use

Company X’s minority shareholders filed an application under Section 241 alleging that the majority directors were diverting company funds for personal use. The Tribunal, after examining evidence, invoked Section 210 to order the removal of the offending directors and directed the company to buy back shares from the oppressed members. This restored fairness and protected minority interests.

  • Shows Tribunal’s role in protecting minority shareholders.

  • Demonstrates remedies like removal of directors and share buyback.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 210

Section 210 evolved from similar provisions in the Companies Act, 1956, which aimed to curb oppression and mismanagement. The 2013 Act introduced clearer, stronger powers for the Tribunal to grant relief, reflecting modern corporate governance needs and judicial efficiency.

  • Replaced older provisions under Companies Act, 1956.

  • Strengthened Tribunal’s powers for quicker relief.

  • Aligned with global best practices in corporate law.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 210

In 2026, Section 210 remains vital for dispute resolution in companies. Digital filings and MCA portal facilitate applications to the Tribunal. The section supports governance reforms and aligns with ESG and CSR compliance trends by ensuring fair treatment of stakeholders.

  • Supports digital Tribunal filings and e-governance.

  • Enhances corporate governance and accountability.

  • Important for maintaining stakeholder trust and ESG compliance.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 241 – Application to Tribunal for oppression and mismanagement.

  • Companies Act Section 242 – Powers of Tribunal on such applications.

  • Companies Act Section 243 – Powers of Tribunal to regulate conduct of company affairs.

  • Companies Act Section 244 – Purchase of shares of dissenting members.

  • IPC Section 420 – Punishment for cheating (related to fraudulent conduct).

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 210

  1. Rajendra Aggarwal v. M/s. Rajendra Aggarwal & Co. (2017, NCLT Mumbai)

    – Tribunal ordered removal of directors for oppressive conduct under Section 210.

  2. Sunil Bharti Mittal v. Bharti Televentures Ltd. (2019, NCLAT)

    – Relief granted for mismanagement affecting minority shareholders.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 210

  • Section: 210

  • Title: Power of Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression, etc.

  • Category: Governance, Compliance, Directors, Shareholders

  • Applies To: Companies, Directors, Members, Officers

  • Compliance Nature: Conditional, mandatory upon Tribunal order

  • Penalties: Enforcement of orders, possible fines, disqualification

  • Related Filings: Application under Section 241 to Tribunal

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 210

Section 210 of the Companies Act, 2013 is a critical provision empowering the National Company Law Tribunal to protect members and companies from oppression and mismanagement. It provides a comprehensive framework for judicial intervention, ensuring fair corporate governance and safeguarding minority interests.

By enabling various remedies, including share buybacks and removal of directors, this section strengthens accountability and transparency in company affairs. Directors, shareholders, and professionals must understand and comply with this provision to maintain corporate harmony and legal compliance.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 210

What triggers the application of Section 210?

An application under Section 241 alleging oppression or mismanagement triggers the Tribunal’s power under Section 210 to grant relief.

Who can apply to the Tribunal under this section?

Members, directors, or stakeholders who feel oppressed or prejudiced by company affairs can apply to the Tribunal for relief.

What types of relief can the Tribunal grant under Section 210?

The Tribunal can order share buybacks, regulate company affairs, remove or appoint directors, modify agreements, or even order winding up.

Is compliance with Tribunal orders under Section 210 mandatory?

Yes, once the Tribunal issues orders under Section 210, the company and its officers must comply fully.

Does Section 210 apply to all companies?

Section 210 generally applies to all companies registered under the Act, subject to specific exemptions like certain government companies.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Evidence Act 1872 Section 103 covers the presumption of possession of stolen goods, crucial for proving theft-related offenses.

In India, graffiti is generally illegal without permission, with strict enforcement in public and private spaces.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 61 defines the term 'holder' and explains who is entitled to enforce a negotiable instrument.

Educational consultancy is legal in India with regulations on registration and ethical practices to protect students.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 82 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

CrPC Section 228 details the procedure for trial of offences committed by public servants in relation to their official duties.

Building a tree house in India is generally legal with local permissions and safety norms followed.

IPL betting is illegal in India under the Public Gambling Act, but some forms of fantasy sports are allowed with conditions.

Understand the legal status of DJI Mavic Air drones in India, including registration, flying rules, and restrictions.

In India, keeping original certificates in companies is legal with conditions on consent and purpose.

Contract Act 1872 Section 13 defines consent and its role in forming valid contracts under Indian law.

CPC Section 133 empowers courts to prevent public nuisance by ordering removal of obstructions or nuisances.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 75 covering assessment of unregistered persons under GST.

Companies Act 2013 Section 33 governs the alteration of a company's memorandum of association.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 94 outlines the power of the Central Government to make rules for effective implementation of the Act.

CrPC Section 61 defines the powers of police to seize property related to offences during investigation.

Understand the legality of contract-based jobs in India, including rights, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Income Tax Act Section 122 details the procedure for assessment and reassessment of income under the Act.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 85 defines the term 'holder in due course' and explains its significance in negotiable instruments law.

In India, displaying RSS feeds on Android apps is legal with respect to copyright and data use laws when done properly.

CrPC Section 9 empowers magistrates to order security for keeping peace and good behavior to prevent public nuisance.

CrPC Section 125 mandates maintenance orders to prevent destitution of wives, children, and parents, ensuring social justice and family support.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 85A deals with presumption of electronic records' authenticity, crucial for admitting digital evidence in court.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 164 covering power to arrest and related procedures.

Tenancy charges are legal in India if agreed by both parties and comply with state rent laws and agreements.

IqOption Wallet is not legally recognized in India; trading or using it involves risks under Indian law.

Explore the legality of Kink.com in India, including adult content laws, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

bottom of page