top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 210

Companies Act 2013 Section 210 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

Companies Act 2013 Section 210 deals with the authority of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to provide relief to members or stakeholders in cases of oppression or mismanagement within a company. This section is crucial for protecting the interests of minority shareholders and ensuring fair corporate governance.

Understanding Section 210 is vital for directors, shareholders, legal professionals, and companies to navigate disputes effectively and maintain compliance with corporate laws. It empowers the Tribunal to intervene and order remedies when company affairs are conducted in a prejudicial manner.

Companies Act Section 210 – Exact Provision

This section empowers the Tribunal to intervene in company affairs when oppression or mismanagement is proven. It allows the Tribunal to order various remedies, including share buybacks, regulation of company conduct, modification of agreements, appointment or removal of officers, or even winding up the company. The provision ensures that minority shareholders and the company’s interests are protected against unfair practices.

  • Applies when oppression or mismanagement is established.

  • Tribunal can order share purchase or regulation of affairs.

  • Allows modification or setting aside of unlawful agreements.

  • Enables appointment or removal of directors or officers.

  • Can order winding up or other relief as deemed fit.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 210

Section 210 outlines the Tribunal’s powers to grant relief in cases of oppression or mismanagement affecting a company or its members.

  • States that the Tribunal may act if oppression or prejudicial conduct is proven.

  • Applies to members, directors, officers, and the company itself.

  • Mandates an application under Section 241 to trigger action.

  • Permits various remedies including share purchase, regulation of affairs, and removal of officers.

  • Prohibits continuation of oppressive or prejudicial conduct.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 210

The section aims to strengthen corporate governance by providing a legal mechanism to address unfair practices and protect stakeholders.

  • Protects minority shareholders from oppression.

  • Ensures fair management and accountability.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate powers.

  • Maintains trust in corporate operations.

When Companies Act Section 210 Applies

This section applies when members or stakeholders file an application alleging oppression or mismanagement under Section 241.

  • Applicable to all companies under the Act.

  • Triggered by an application to the Tribunal.

  • Relevant when company affairs are prejudicial or oppressive.

  • No specific financial threshold; depends on facts of the case.

  • Exemptions may apply to certain government companies.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 210

Section 210 creates a statutory duty for the Tribunal to provide appropriate relief in cases of proven oppression or mismanagement. It impacts corporate actions by allowing judicial intervention to correct unfair practices. Non-compliance or continuation of oppression can lead to Tribunal orders including share buybacks or winding up. This section works in conjunction with MCA rules and notifications governing company disputes.

  • Creates binding orders enforceable by law.

  • Enables corrective corporate governance measures.

  • Non-compliance may attract penalties or further legal action.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 210

The obligation under Section 210 is conditional, triggered by an application to the Tribunal. Compliance involves adhering to Tribunal orders which may be ongoing or one-time depending on the relief granted. Directors and officers must cooperate with the Tribunal’s directives, impacting internal governance and corporate conduct.

  • Compliance is mandatory once Tribunal orders are issued.

  • Obligation arises only after an application and Tribunal satisfaction.

  • Directors and officers bear responsibility to implement relief.

  • May require changes in company management or operations.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 210 applies primarily during dispute resolution stages after company incorporation and operational decisions have led to alleged oppression or mismanagement. It may affect board decisions, shareholder rights, and filing stages related to Tribunal proceedings.

  • Post-incorporation dispute stage.

  • Triggered by member or stakeholder application.

  • Impacts board and shareholder decision-making.

  • Involves Tribunal hearings and orders.

  • May lead to changes in company filings or structure.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 210

While Section 210 itself does not prescribe penalties, failure to comply with Tribunal orders can lead to legal consequences including fines, imprisonment for officers under related provisions, or disqualification. The Tribunal’s orders are enforceable and non-compliance may invite additional regulatory action.

  • Enforcement of Tribunal orders is mandatory.

  • Non-compliance may lead to penalties under related sections.

  • Possible disqualification or imprisonment for officers.

  • Additional fees or remedial directions may be imposed.

Example of Companies Act Section 210 in Practical Use

Company X’s minority shareholders filed an application under Section 241 alleging that the majority directors were diverting company funds for personal use. The Tribunal, after examining evidence, invoked Section 210 to order the removal of the offending directors and directed the company to buy back shares from the oppressed members. This restored fairness and protected minority interests.

  • Shows Tribunal’s role in protecting minority shareholders.

  • Demonstrates remedies like removal of directors and share buyback.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 210

Section 210 evolved from similar provisions in the Companies Act, 1956, which aimed to curb oppression and mismanagement. The 2013 Act introduced clearer, stronger powers for the Tribunal to grant relief, reflecting modern corporate governance needs and judicial efficiency.

  • Replaced older provisions under Companies Act, 1956.

  • Strengthened Tribunal’s powers for quicker relief.

  • Aligned with global best practices in corporate law.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 210

In 2026, Section 210 remains vital for dispute resolution in companies. Digital filings and MCA portal facilitate applications to the Tribunal. The section supports governance reforms and aligns with ESG and CSR compliance trends by ensuring fair treatment of stakeholders.

  • Supports digital Tribunal filings and e-governance.

  • Enhances corporate governance and accountability.

  • Important for maintaining stakeholder trust and ESG compliance.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 241 – Application to Tribunal for oppression and mismanagement.

  • Companies Act Section 242 – Powers of Tribunal on such applications.

  • Companies Act Section 243 – Powers of Tribunal to regulate conduct of company affairs.

  • Companies Act Section 244 – Purchase of shares of dissenting members.

  • IPC Section 420 – Punishment for cheating (related to fraudulent conduct).

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 210

  1. Rajendra Aggarwal v. M/s. Rajendra Aggarwal & Co. (2017, NCLT Mumbai)

    – Tribunal ordered removal of directors for oppressive conduct under Section 210.

  2. Sunil Bharti Mittal v. Bharti Televentures Ltd. (2019, NCLAT)

    – Relief granted for mismanagement affecting minority shareholders.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 210

  • Section: 210

  • Title: Power of Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression, etc.

  • Category: Governance, Compliance, Directors, Shareholders

  • Applies To: Companies, Directors, Members, Officers

  • Compliance Nature: Conditional, mandatory upon Tribunal order

  • Penalties: Enforcement of orders, possible fines, disqualification

  • Related Filings: Application under Section 241 to Tribunal

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 210

Section 210 of the Companies Act, 2013 is a critical provision empowering the National Company Law Tribunal to protect members and companies from oppression and mismanagement. It provides a comprehensive framework for judicial intervention, ensuring fair corporate governance and safeguarding minority interests.

By enabling various remedies, including share buybacks and removal of directors, this section strengthens accountability and transparency in company affairs. Directors, shareholders, and professionals must understand and comply with this provision to maintain corporate harmony and legal compliance.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 210

What triggers the application of Section 210?

An application under Section 241 alleging oppression or mismanagement triggers the Tribunal’s power under Section 210 to grant relief.

Who can apply to the Tribunal under this section?

Members, directors, or stakeholders who feel oppressed or prejudiced by company affairs can apply to the Tribunal for relief.

What types of relief can the Tribunal grant under Section 210?

The Tribunal can order share buybacks, regulate company affairs, remove or appoint directors, modify agreements, or even order winding up.

Is compliance with Tribunal orders under Section 210 mandatory?

Yes, once the Tribunal issues orders under Section 210, the company and its officers must comply fully.

Does Section 210 apply to all companies?

Section 210 generally applies to all companies registered under the Act, subject to specific exemptions like certain government companies.

Related Sections

CrPC Section 293 governs the sale of perishable goods seized by police, ensuring lawful disposal and protection of property rights.

Income Tax Act Section 115BBC imposes a special tax rate on certain undisclosed income under the Black Money Act.

Income Tax Act Section 115BAB offers concessional tax rates for new manufacturing companies to boost industrial growth.

Income Tax Act Section 80DDB offers deductions for medical treatment of specified diseases to reduce taxable income.

Companies Act 2013 Section 334 governs the appointment and powers of the Official Liquidator in company winding-up processes.

Abortion is legal in India within 7 weeks under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act with certain conditions and exceptions.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 81 outlines the power of the Central Government to make rules for effective implementation.

In India, there is no specific law banning French kissing, but public displays of affection may be restricted under public decency laws.

Contract Act 1872 Section 16 explains when consent is considered free and valid for contract enforceability.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 3 defines relevant facts as those connected to facts in issue, crucial for proving or disproving a case.

Carrying LSD in India is illegal under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, with strict penalties for possession and trafficking.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 93 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Understand the legal status of 5 paisa coins in India and their use in transactions today.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269A prohibits cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 for specified transactions to curb black money.

Terminating pregnancy in India is legal under specific conditions outlined in the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

CrPC Section 265B details the procedure for the transfer of criminal cases from one court to another to ensure fair trial and jurisdictional appropriateness.

Live-in relationships are legal in India with certain rights and conditions under Indian law.

IPC Section 220 defines the offence of wrongful confinement by a public servant, detailing its scope and punishment.

CPC Section 7 defines the extent of civil court jurisdiction and when it can refuse to try a suit.

MagicJack is legal in India but faces regulatory restrictions and licensing requirements for VoIP services.

Contract Act 1872 Section 64 covers the consequences when a contract becomes void due to the impossibility of performance.

IPC Section 387 defines extortion by putting a person in fear of death or grievous hurt to obtain property.

Understand the legality of monthly service fees in India, including consumer rights and enforcement practices.

Freebitcoin is legal in India but subject to regulations on online gambling and cryptocurrency use.

Companies Act 2013 Section 439 governs the power of the Central Government to grant relief in cases of winding up of companies.

In India, killing nilgai is generally illegal due to wildlife protection laws with limited exceptions under strict conditions.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 68 covers the liability of partners for negotiable instruments signed in the firm's name.

bottom of page