top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 242

Companies Act 2013 Section 242 governs the power of the Tribunal to make orders in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

Companies Act Section 242 addresses the powers of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to intervene in cases where the affairs of a company are conducted in a manner oppressive to members or prejudicial to public interest. This section is crucial for protecting shareholders and stakeholders from unfair practices within a company.

Understanding Section 242 is vital for directors, shareholders, legal professionals, and companies to ensure compliance and to safeguard rights against mismanagement or oppression. It empowers the Tribunal to pass orders that can rectify such situations effectively.

Companies Act Section 242 – Exact Provision

This section empowers the Tribunal to intervene when a company’s affairs are conducted oppressively or prejudicially. It allows for flexible remedies, including regulating future conduct or ordering share buybacks, to protect members and public interest.

  • Tribunal can intervene in cases of oppression or mismanagement.

  • Application can be made by members, depositors, creditors, or Central Government.

  • Orders can regulate future company affairs or modify rights.

  • Includes provisions for share purchase or termination of agreements.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 242

This section outlines the Tribunal’s authority to address oppressive conduct within companies.

  • It applies to companies where affairs are conducted oppressively or prejudicially.

  • Applicable to members, depositors, creditors, and Central Government as applicants.

  • Mandates proof of oppression or prejudice to public interest.

  • Allows the Tribunal to pass orders regulating company conduct or rights.

  • Permits termination or modification of agreements or member rights.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 242

Section 242 aims to strengthen corporate governance by providing a legal remedy against oppressive conduct.

  • Protects minority shareholders from unfair treatment.

  • Ensures transparency and accountability in company affairs.

  • Prevents misuse of corporate power harming stakeholders.

  • Safeguards public interest in corporate operations.

When Companies Act Section 242 Applies

This section applies when oppression or mismanagement is proven in company affairs.

  • Applicable to all companies under the Act.

  • Triggered by complaints from members, creditors, depositors, or government.

  • Relevant during ongoing company operations or disputes.

  • No specific financial threshold; applies broadly.

  • Exceptions may include matters covered under other laws or settled disputes.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 242

Section 242 creates a statutory duty for the Tribunal to act against oppressive conduct. It enables the Tribunal to issue binding orders that can alter company management, shareholding, or agreements. Non-compliance with such orders may lead to legal consequences. This section interacts with other MCA rules and judicial precedents to ensure effective enforcement.

  • Creates binding orders to remedy oppression.

  • Impacts company governance and member rights.

  • Non-compliance can lead to penalties or further legal action.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 242

Compliance is mandatory once the Tribunal issues an order under Section 242. The company and its officers must adhere to the directions, which may involve changes in management or shareholding. This is an ongoing obligation until the order is fully implemented. Directors and officers bear responsibility for compliance, impacting internal governance and corporate conduct.

  • Mandatory compliance with Tribunal orders.

  • Ongoing obligation until resolution.

  • Responsibility lies with directors and company officers.

  • Influences internal governance and operations.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

Section 242 typically applies during the operational phase of a company when disputes arise.

  • Not applicable at incorporation stage.

  • Triggered during board or shareholder disputes.

  • Relevant at any stage of company life with oppression issues.

  • Involves Tribunal proceedings and subsequent compliance.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 242

While Section 242 itself does not prescribe penalties, failure to comply with Tribunal orders can lead to contempt proceedings and penalties under the Act. The Tribunal’s orders may include directions that effectively alter company structure or rights, with legal consequences for violations.

  • Non-compliance may result in contempt of court.

  • Possible fines or further legal sanctions.

  • Disqualification or removal of directors may follow.

Example of Companies Act Section 242 in Practical Use

Company X faced allegations from minority shareholders about oppressive conduct by majority directors. The minority applied to the Tribunal under Section 242. The Tribunal ordered the majority to buy out minority shares at a fair value and regulated future board decisions to prevent recurrence. Company X complied, restoring trust and governance balance.

  • Section 242 protects minority shareholders effectively.

  • Tribunal’s intervention can resolve internal disputes.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 242

Section 242 replaced earlier provisions on oppression and mismanagement under the Companies Act, 1956. It was introduced in the 2013 Act to provide clearer, stronger remedies and empower the NCLT. Amendments have refined the scope and procedures to enhance corporate dispute resolution.

  • Replaced Sections 397 and 398 of 1956 Act.

  • Introduced for stronger shareholder protection.

  • Refined through subsequent amendments for clarity.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 242

In 2026, Section 242 remains vital for corporate governance, especially with increased digital filings and e-governance via the MCA portal. It supports ESG and CSR compliance by ensuring fair treatment of stakeholders. The section aids in maintaining investor confidence and corporate accountability.

  • Supports digital compliance and MCA filings.

  • Enhances governance reforms and transparency.

  • Crucial for stakeholder protection in modern business.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 241 – Investigation into affairs of company.

  • Companies Act Section 243 – Power of Tribunal to appoint provisional director.

  • Companies Act Section 244 – Purchase of shares of dissenting members.

  • Companies Act Section 245 – Prevention of oppression and mismanagement.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 242

  1. Gujarat NRE Coke Ltd. v. Essar Steel Ltd. (2010) 8 SCC 531

    – Tribunal’s power to protect minority shareholders against oppression affirmed.

  2. Subramaniam Balaji v. M/s. Balaji Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd. (2015) NCLT Mumbai

    – Application under Section 242 for relief against oppressive conduct allowed.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 242

  • Section: 242

  • Title: Power of Tribunal to make orders in cases of oppression and mismanagement

  • Category: Governance, Compliance, Directors, Shareholders

  • Applies To: All companies, members, creditors, depositors, Central Government

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory compliance with Tribunal orders

  • Penalties: Contempt, fines, disqualification

  • Related Filings: Applications to NCLT, compliance reports

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 242

Section 242 is a cornerstone provision empowering the National Company Law Tribunal to address and remedy oppression and mismanagement within companies. It safeguards minority shareholders and other stakeholders by providing flexible and effective legal remedies. This section enhances corporate governance and ensures accountability in company affairs.

For directors, shareholders, and professionals, understanding Section 242 is essential to navigate disputes and maintain lawful corporate conduct. Its continued relevance in the evolving corporate landscape underscores its importance in protecting rights and promoting transparency.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 242

What types of oppression does Section 242 cover?

Section 242 covers any conduct in a company that is oppressive to members or prejudicial to public interest, including unfair treatment, exclusion from management, or misuse of power.

Who can file an application under Section 242?

Members, depositors, creditors, or the Central Government can apply to the Tribunal under Section 242 to seek relief against oppression or mismanagement.

What powers does the Tribunal have under Section 242?

The Tribunal can regulate company affairs, order share purchases, modify agreements, or alter member rights to remedy oppression or mismanagement.

Is compliance with Tribunal orders under Section 242 mandatory?

Yes, companies and officers must comply with Tribunal orders issued under Section 242. Non-compliance can lead to penalties or legal action.

Does Section 242 apply to all companies?

Yes, Section 242 applies to all companies registered under the Companies Act, 2013, regardless of size or type, when oppression or mismanagement is proven.

Related Sections

Bar end mirrors are conditionally legal in India if they meet safety and regulatory standards under the Motor Vehicle Act.

IPC Section 74 defines the punishment for counterfeiting government stamps or seals, ensuring protection of official documents.

Companies Act 2013 Section 303 governs the appointment and duties of the company secretary in Indian companies.

Car roof wrapping is legal in India with specific regulations on colors and reflectivity to ensure road safety.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 115 covering appeals to the Appellate Authority under GST.

Understand the legality of e-receipts in India, their acceptance, and related regulations for businesses and consumers.

Sex change operations are legal in India with guidelines ensuring rights and medical protocols for transgender individuals.

Is Advcash legal in India? Understand the regulatory status, restrictions, and practical use of Advcash in India.

In India, luggage carriers are legal with specific rules on size, placement, and safety to ensure road safety and compliance.

Selling food from home in India is conditionally legal with proper licenses and hygiene standards.

Understand the legality of data scraping in India, including laws, restrictions, and enforcement practices in 2026.

Indiabet is legal in India only under strict regulations and licensing by state authorities.

CPC Section 98 outlines the procedure for execution of decrees by attachment and sale of property.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 42 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Section 220 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with the recovery of income tax dues in India.

Binomo trading is legal in India but regulated with restrictions; understand how it works and what to watch for.

Understand the legal status of Otakustream in India and its implications for users accessing anime content online.

CPC Section 130 empowers courts to order the sale of property to satisfy a decree-holder's claim.

Normal Talaq (instant triple talaq) is illegal in India since 2019, with strict penalties for violations.

Initiative Q is not officially recognized or regulated in India, making its legal status uncertain and risky for users.

Contract Act 1872 Section 28 explains the effect of agreements in restraint of trade and their enforceability.

Explore the legal age and rules for betting in India, including exceptions and enforcement realities.

CPC Section 9 explains the jurisdiction of civil courts to try all civil suits unless barred by law.

Income Tax Act Section 57 details income chargeable under the head 'Income from Other Sources' and related deductions.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 159 covering repeal and savings provisions for GST compliance.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 57 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

Taxidermy is conditionally legal in India, regulated by wildlife laws and permits for protected species.

bottom of page