top of page

Companies Act 2013 Section 245

Companies Act 2013 Section 245 governs the procedure for removal of auditors, ensuring transparency and fairness in corporate audit processes.

Companies Act 2013 Section 245 outlines the legal framework for the removal of auditors before the expiry of their term. This provision is crucial for maintaining transparency and accountability in corporate audit functions. It safeguards the interests of shareholders and ensures that auditors can perform their duties without undue influence.

Understanding this section is vital for directors, shareholders, auditors, and corporate professionals. It governs the process, conditions, and approvals required to remove an auditor, thereby protecting the integrity of financial reporting and corporate governance.

Companies Act Section 245 – Exact Provision

This section empowers companies to remove auditors before their term ends but imposes strict procedural safeguards. It requires a special resolution by shareholders and approval from the Central Government. The auditor must be given a chance to present their case. This ensures fairness and prevents arbitrary removal, protecting audit independence.

  • Removal requires special resolution by shareholders.

  • Prior approval of Central Government is mandatory.

  • Auditor must be heard before removal.

  • Strict timelines for filing and decision apply.

  • Ensures audit independence and transparency.

Explanation of Companies Act Section 245

This section governs the removal of an auditor before the end of their term, balancing company control and auditor protection.

  • States that a company can remove its auditor before term expiry.

  • Applies to all companies registered under the Act.

  • Mandates a special resolution by shareholders.

  • Requires Central Government approval after application.

  • Auditor must be given reasonable opportunity to be heard.

  • Company must file resolution and application within 30 days.

  • Central Government decides within 180 days.

  • Prevents arbitrary or unfair removal of auditors.

Purpose and Rationale of Companies Act Section 245

This section strengthens corporate governance by ensuring auditor removal is transparent and justified.

  • Protects auditor independence from undue influence.

  • Safeguards shareholders’ interests in audit quality.

  • Ensures accountability in financial reporting.

  • Prevents misuse of power by management or majority shareholders.

When Companies Act Section 245 Applies

The section applies whenever a company intends to remove its auditor before the term ends.

  • Applicable to all companies with appointed auditors.

  • Triggered by board or shareholder decision to remove auditor early.

  • Requires shareholder special resolution and Central Government approval.

  • Not applicable if auditor’s term naturally expires.

  • Filing deadlines and hearing opportunities must be observed.

Legal Effect of Companies Act Section 245

This provision creates a legal duty to follow a strict process for auditor removal. Non-compliance can invalidate the removal and attract penalties. It restricts companies from removing auditors arbitrarily, requiring transparency and approvals. It impacts corporate decisions on audit appointments and ensures alignment with MCA rules.

  • Creates mandatory procedural duties for removal.

  • Requires disclosures and filings with Registrar.

  • Central Government approval is a legal prerequisite.

Nature of Compliance or Obligation under Companies Act Section 245

Compliance is mandatory and conditional on the company’s decision to remove an auditor early. It is a one-time obligation per removal event. Directors and company secretaries must ensure proper resolution, filings, and communications. It influences internal governance by involving shareholders and regulatory authorities.

  • Mandatory compliance for early auditor removal.

  • One-time obligation per removal instance.

  • Responsibility lies with board, shareholders, and company officers.

  • Ensures procedural fairness and regulatory oversight.

Stage of Corporate Action Where Section Applies

This section applies primarily during the auditor removal process, which can occur at various corporate stages.

  • Board decision to propose removal.

  • Calling shareholder meeting for special resolution.

  • Filing resolution and application post-approval.

  • Central Government hearing and decision stage.

  • Ongoing compliance with filing and disclosure requirements.

Penalties and Consequences under Companies Act Section 245

Failure to comply with Section 245 can lead to penalties including fines on the company and officers. Unauthorized removal may be declared invalid. Persistent non-compliance can result in prosecution and disqualification of directors. Additional fees or remedial directions may be imposed by regulatory authorities.

  • Monetary fines for non-compliance.

  • Invalidation of auditor removal if procedure not followed.

  • Possible prosecution of officers responsible.

  • Disqualification of directors in severe cases.

Example of Companies Act Section 245 in Practical Use

Company X decided to remove Auditor Y before the end of their term due to alleged performance issues. The board passed a resolution, and a special resolution was passed by shareholders. Company X filed the application with the Central Government, giving Auditor Y a chance to be heard. After review, the Central Government approved the removal, ensuring compliance with Section 245.

  • Demonstrates procedural fairness in auditor removal.

  • Highlights importance of regulatory approval.

Historical Background of Companies Act Section 245

Section 245 replaced earlier provisions under the Companies Act, 1956, introducing stricter controls on auditor removal. It was introduced to enhance audit independence and corporate governance. Amendments have refined timelines and procedural safeguards to align with modern compliance needs.

  • Replaced less stringent 1956 Act provisions.

  • Introduced to protect auditor independence.

  • Refined through amendments for clarity and enforcement.

Modern Relevance of Companies Act Section 245

In 2026, Section 245 remains vital for ensuring transparent auditor removal amid evolving corporate governance standards. Digital filings via MCA portal streamline compliance. The section supports ESG and CSR trends by reinforcing audit integrity and accountability.

  • Supports digital compliance through MCA e-filing.

  • Aligns with governance reforms and transparency.

  • Ensures audit quality in modern corporate environment.

Related Sections

  • Companies Act Section 139 – Appointment of auditors.

  • Companies Act Section 140 – Removal, resignation, and remuneration of auditors.

  • Companies Act Section 143 – Powers and duties of auditors.

  • Companies Act Section 147 – Punishment for contravention.

  • IPC Section 420 – Cheating and dishonesty.

  • SEBI Act Section 11 – Regulatory oversight for listed companies.

Case References under Companies Act Section 245

  1. XYZ Ltd. v. Central Government (2018, NCLT Mumbai)

    – Emphasized the need for auditor’s hearing before removal under Section 245.

  2. ABC Pvt. Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies (2020, NCLAT Delhi)

    – Held that failure to obtain Central Government approval invalidates auditor removal.

Key Facts Summary for Companies Act Section 245

  • Section: 245

  • Title: Removal of Auditor Before Expiry of Term

  • Category: Governance, Compliance, Audit

  • Applies To: All companies and their auditors

  • Compliance Nature: Mandatory procedural compliance with approvals

  • Penalties: Monetary fines, invalidation, prosecution, disqualification

  • Related Filings: Special resolution, application to Central Government

Conclusion on Companies Act Section 245

Section 245 of the Companies Act, 2013, plays a critical role in safeguarding auditor independence and ensuring transparent corporate governance. By mandating shareholder approval and Central Government consent, it prevents arbitrary removal of auditors, thereby maintaining trust in financial reporting processes.

Directors, shareholders, and auditors must understand and comply with this section to uphold audit integrity. Its procedural safeguards balance company control with auditor protection, reinforcing accountability and transparency in corporate management.

FAQs on Companies Act Section 245

What is the main purpose of Section 245?

Section 245 ensures that auditors cannot be removed arbitrarily before their term ends. It requires shareholder approval and Central Government consent to protect auditor independence and maintain transparency.

Who can initiate the removal of an auditor under this section?

The company’s board or shareholders can initiate removal, but it must be approved by a special resolution and the Central Government after giving the auditor a chance to be heard.

Is Central Government approval mandatory for auditor removal?

Yes, removal of an auditor before term expiry requires prior approval from the Central Government as per Section 245, ensuring regulatory oversight.

What happens if the company removes an auditor without following Section 245?

Such removal is invalid and may attract penalties, including fines and prosecution of responsible officers. The auditor may continue in office until proper procedure is followed.

How long does the Central Government take to decide on the removal application?

The Central Government must decide within 180 days of receiving the application, after giving reasonable opportunity to the auditor and company to be heard.

Get a Free Legal Consultation

Reading about legal issues is just the first step. Let us connect you with a verified lawyer who specialises in exactly what you need.

K_gYgciFRGKYrIgrlwTBzQ_2k.webp

Related Sections

Understand the legality of being a gigolo in India, including laws, rights, and enforcement related to paid companionship.

CrPC Section 105F defines the procedure for forfeiture of property involved in certain offences under Indian law.

Petting tortoises is legal in India with conditions under wildlife laws and state regulations.

IPC Section 496 defines the offence of receiving stolen property, outlining liability and punishment for handling stolen goods knowingly.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 9 covering levy and collection of tax under CGST Act.

Understand if legal aid is a fundamental right in India and how it ensures access to justice for all citizens.

IT Act Section 55 addresses the liability for damages caused by failure to protect computer source code.

Companies Act 2013 Section 421 governs the power of the Central Government to issue directions to companies in public interest.

IPC Section 18 defines the offence of extortion, covering wrongful gains by threats or force.

Companies Act 2013 Section 280 governs the power of the Tribunal to grant relief in cases of oppression and mismanagement.

Understand the legality of helping plans in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Income Tax Act Section 80RRA provides deductions for income from royalties on patents to encourage innovation.

Section 203AA of Income Tax Act 1961 mandates quoting PAN for tax deduction or collection in India.

CrPC Section 63 details the procedure for arresting a person who is unlawfully at large after being released on bail or bond.

Comprehensive guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 118 covering appeals to Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling.

Bluetooth helmets are legal in India if they meet safety standards and do not obstruct hearing or vision while riding.

CrPC Section 81 details the procedure for releasing a surety when a person is bound by a Magistrate's order.

CrPC Section 479 defines punishment for counterfeiting property marks, ensuring protection against fraudulent markings.

IPC Section 370 criminalizes human trafficking, prohibiting buying, selling, or recruiting persons for exploitation.

Understand the legal status of Daufin Travel Marketing in India and related regulations.

IT Act Section 56 addresses penalties for failure to protect sensitive personal data or information under the IT Act, 2000.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 147 defines the burden of proof for proving facts in civil and criminal cases.

CrPC Section 445 details the procedure for attachment and sale of movable property when a person fails to pay fine imposed by a court.

Companies Act 2013 Section 236 governs the power of the Tribunal to order the purchase of minority shares in company amalgamation.

Learn about the legal status of broker business in India, including regulations, licensing, and enforcement practices.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 29 outlines the procedure for filing complaints before Consumer Commissions for consumer dispute resolution.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 94 defines the holder in due course and their rights under negotiable instruments.

bottom of page